Even after looking that word up, I'm not too sure if I should get offended or flattered by that description. I do feel a little sad to have been misunderstood, but what can you do; can't please everyone.
Anyway. Again I'd suggest taking a look at the discussion on meta.SO as this is really more a question about how the network thinks about tag wikis and how to use Wikipedia content in them.
Unfortunately, they don't; as we've discussed -- and as discussed in the linked question on meta.SO about whether it's okay to copy-paste from Wikipedia -- that content is licensed in certain ways which means that you have to at least provide a link back.
Or at least that's generally thought to be enough. But either way it's much better to grow that kind of internal content organically (just like with anywhere else on the site) than copy-paste from elsewhere.