Contact

no other contacts, so - clue's dead. (What was that?)

:| wait nvm sorry I should really stop doing clues I'm not 100% sure about

Sp3000

2:40 AM

(If you mean Eclipse it's a mint brand, here at least)

nah I meant ASCII's word

turns out it's actually a type of pastry >_>

...oh.

hah

oh man

2:41 AM

eclair?

I was about to clue that word

well now I know what it is :P

eclaire

1 ✔ (sorry)

hehe no wonder

2:42 AM

Well if you'd clued it correctly Rubio would get it

So not much lost

9. People pop this at parties

7 has been updated

gah, it's not showing up right

hey it looks like a [REDACTED] now

@ASCII-only no.

9: It's not ECSTASY, perhaps - in which case remind me not to try your kind of party hehe

2:43 AM

9 ✔

although that would definitely not be my kind of party

well, I can't get 7 to display right

the characters on the ends are Unicode THREE LINES CONVERGING RIGHT and ...LEFT respectively

it displays correctly for me

that is, I think, what I see

Is this better? ⪫⪪

what browser are you using?

2:45 AM

really? huh.

It's displaying right to me

@ASCII-only that's weird, I can see those

@Deusovi They're different haha (from here)

^ the first thing I thought of when I saw those

anyway, someone contact one of my two clues and put me out of my misery :P

2:47 AM

I'd love to just guess either of them but I'm at a loss :)

btw shouldn't wheat wizard's post be not pinged

7 has been updated again

huh

ok then

-1 mod abuse eleven

Deusovi, has your word appeared in this chat in the last 15 minutes?

2:48 AM

also these "words" don't have to necessarily be real words, right?

@Rubio I think you know the answer to that question.

@notjagan No, but it has to be possible for other people to guess

well in that case

then PASS on 7

6. JonTron

2:49 AM

Unless you're the defender in which case it has to be a real word

but I don't know if anyone will know this, hopefully someone does

contact 6

heh. I vaguely know JonTron is a youtuber.

ayy cool

PASS 6

2:50 AM

(I used to watch him before the extreme racism incident)

Did anyone contact 7?

No, nobody did.

And Rubio was fully aware of that.

I'm guessing eclipse then

that's correct

(it's bad Unicode art. I tried.)

And that is of course my word.

2:50 AM

Obviously.

Deus, I take it you knew 6?

I suspected, but not enough to guess at it, until your last version

As soon as I thought of it, I knew that was it

@Deusovi :| looked like Q*bert

It looked more like something out of Hello Kitty hehe

2:51 AM

@notjagan ECH? He says that a lot, AFAICR.

6 ✔

@Rubio Sh. It's hard to make Unicode art, especially if you're trying to not make it too obvious.

I suspected it but the ⚞⚟ made it look too much like candy

I thought it was a cat

14 was ECCLESIASTES (there are 2 books of the Bible with that name, between Proverbs and Song of Songs)

2:52 AM

huh. Depends on what Bible you're using.

Why 14?

Because my previous clue numbers were 12 and 13. No particular reason other than that.

Rubio knows a lot of my clue numbering conventions, so I have to not use them sometimes :P

hehe

Deusovi uses clue numbers to mean something so often it's weird when they don't

Let's face it - we both play waaayy too much of this game :)

2:54 AM

true

... by which I mean, not nearly enough

and you're up. (for those keeping score at home)

Sid

Anyone planning to write that previous C4 into the meta post?

Fermat's Last Cryptic?

@Deusovi btw, get out of my head. hehe