@Zanna yes, I agree, not only it ignores the most interesting part of the question, that answer is basically the first thing that jumps up on at least 6 different links when the title of the question is copied to Google
I have heard that about D2 too, but currently that is what I am using and so I would rally like to see a nice comprehensive answer about it :)
I try to yes and I'm sure many others do. But there's not always an alternative and maybe you need it to save your life or whatever. People have different ideas about this. There's also animal testing of medicines, which is also a concern for vegans.
@Fawad Electing the mod is in the hands of SE staff till the site gets graduated. They not only consider but also consider profiles in other SE, activity, comments from community. Finally you get a mail from one of the CM's. This is the procedure for beta sites.
One drawback for @Niitaku is that he has no experience in Mod tools. For becoming a moderator, it is not compulsory to be an expert in the topic(It's a bonus). But experience in reviewing and moderation, deciding when to intervene in reviewing/deleting a post is important.
for me being passionate about the site, showing general intelligence and looking as a decent person all seem like much better reasons to be elected than "knowing the tools"
you can learn the tools, the others things are much harder to come by
@Fawad well, that was some goood strategy there...
haha if you also downvoted Erica, I would be grateful if you would undo that downvote (the post has been edited since you downvoted it, so you can change it) @Fawad
they are your votes and you can do what you like with them, but strategic downvoting makes no sense imho
Difficult happens. Two years of moderating Parenting .... it's been educational. Oh, and I got a dedicated occasional-troll who writes creepy poetry about me XD
lol... he used to troll with massively inappropriate Q&A (e.g. "should I beat my child to death for sneezing on my shirt" was the nicest), and got furious when I figured out his real SE account
@Riker no... the person who posted the dangerously incorrect answer to the vitamin A question, rolled back my edit with some BS, downvoted my nomination, and left some comments there saying why
but I didn't know how to let them climb down there, I was emotional about it and just said exactly what I thought. I should have been more casual about it, and it might have got fixed. Should have realised this person's ego was making it hard for them to actually read
So far I've reviewed about 15 edit suggestions, 3 of these I rejected. All for the same reason. Deviating from the OP's intent.
This one:
This would be a fine edit from the OP, but not from another user. THe comment part is okay (the OP replied in comments with "a simple reason will suffice, ...
I'm more disappointed by downvoting-without-explanation, because it gives me no feedback on how to do better (even if it's something like "you're not veg*n enough" which could be quite legit criticism for this site!)
ultimately, a healthy meta depends on being able to have discussion with moderators (or even moderator candidates, or high-rep users who have lightweight moderation powers) -- it's difficult if there's a perception that mods never listen or mods do whatever they want
@Riker uh, in a sentence -- reading rows from a database, comparing them to rows in an online database, and uploading ones that exist in the database but not in the online version (while maintaining geospatial data)... for some reason it is just uploading EVERYTHING ALWAYS
I have literally flagged one thing so far... if we had 4 mods they would have nothing to do (although I guess the floodgates will open and a s***ton of badness will land on us when it goes public...)
Notes
This user contributes high-quality answers and questions and has a great objective style, one that I'd personally like to see everywhere on the site. Attilio is aware of what's going on on the site, and takes interest in it.