« first day (15 days earlier)      last day (2918 days later) » 

03:26
@AlexanderRossa I have seen a notice that we will be in private beta for atleast 4 days. It usually takes more than that. Yes they are connected.
 
3 hours later…
06:47
damn people keep missing the point of this vegetarianism.stackexchange.com/questions/530/…
I am tempted to flag
nice to see a bounty @AlexanderRossa I will see if I can find anything. I've heard from many people that D2 is no good
 
2 hours later…
08:22
Hello! o/ :)
09:11
morning everyone :)
@Zanna yes, I agree, not only it ignores the most interesting part of the question, that answer is basically the first thing that jumps up on at least 6 different links when the title of the question is copied to Google
I have heard that about D2 too, but currently that is what I am using and so I would rally like to see a nice comprehensive answer about it :)
09:32
I think it's not a question of bioavailability but effective conversion...
Haven't found anything definite yet
I might well flag that as NAA
I don't even believe it generally - I think it's one bad study widely spread by meat-eater gloating
Which answer are you talking about?
@Zanna How are you today? :)
10:02
@Niitaku the one I linked to earlier, the one about number of vegetarians quitting
I think if an answer misses the point, it's not an answer
@Niitaku a bit sleepy - Linux meetup last night so stayed up late, and working early
@Zanna Oh, yes, that one. The answer seems effectively not answer the 'raised' part of the question.
@Zanna Oh :s Good luck, then. :)
 
3 hours later…
13:29
Do vegans care while taking medicines?
do you mean, do we feel uncomfortable about taking gelatin capsules and lactose tablets and hormones derived from horses?
Somewhat,do vegans check if there is something animals stuff inside medicine?
I try to yes and I'm sure many others do. But there's not always an alternative and maybe you need it to save your life or whatever. People have different ideas about this. There's also animal testing of medicines, which is also a concern for vegans.
 
2 hours later…
15:24
@Zanna You took back the lead, congrats! :)
oh! I'm glad if people are not downvoting, mades me wonder who I upset and how
Yeah, me too. :/ You should have never left this position imho
@Zanna sorry but 1 down vote was from me,because I used my vote strategically to give some lead to niitaku , everything is fair in (…)
I mostly use sentence … everything is fair in war and gamimg…but I didn't find any suitable sentence here :P
15:40
Hello @Fawad !
I'll answer your comment on my post once I get back home, at calm. ^^
15:51
@Fawad how do you mean strategically?
@Zanna each vote counts,so I down voted you and then up voted to niitaku …
o.O I don't get why you would do that. There will be 3 mods...
the votes don't actually count really really, it's not a real election
the votes just indicate, like, approval from the community
So what do think @Zanna ? Will niitaku can atleast become 3rd mod?
there's no way of knowing
the SE staff will appoint the moderators
it will not automatically be the top 3 voted people
I see
 
2 hours later…
18:27
@Fawad How about war and election?
@Fawad Electing the mod is in the hands of SE staff till the site gets graduated. They not only consider but also consider profiles in other SE, activity, comments from community. Finally you get a mail from one of the CM's. This is the procedure for beta sites.
18:45
and it happens after public beta is announced
public beta for literature was announced on feb 6th, but the mod nomination post went up on the 30th of jan
and it's the 16th now
One drawback for @Niitaku is that he has no experience in Mod tools. For becoming a moderator, it is not compulsory to be an expert in the topic(It's a bonus). But experience in reviewing and moderation, deciding when to intervene in reviewing/deleting a post is important.
19:05
honestly, that's pretty true
though I do think he would be a good mod, that's something to consider
 
1 hour later…
20:18
for me being passionate about the site, showing general intelligence and looking as a decent person all seem like much better reasons to be elected than "knowing the tools"
you can learn the tools, the others things are much harder to come by
@Fawad well, that was some goood strategy there...
20:36
haha if you also downvoted Erica, I would be grateful if you would undo that downvote (the post has been edited since you downvoted it, so you can change it) @Fawad
they are your votes and you can do what you like with them, but strategic downvoting makes no sense imho
20:56
@Zanna congrats to 2k :)
ay caramba!
@AlexanderRossa thanks very much!!
21:08
@Zanna yes, it's the kind of thing we need to protect later
yes indeed
@Zanna welcome to one of the first lessons of moderation: sometimes there will be inexplicable opposition :D
(also, hi room!)
haha if you look at the comments on that post and the revision history... let's just say I think that person is... a bit difficult
thanks for coming to the room :D
Difficult happens. Two years of moderating Parenting .... it's been educational. Oh, and I got a dedicated occasional-troll who writes creepy poetry about me XD
@Zanna the poster of the Q?
@Erica ... wot?
21:14
lol... he used to troll with massively inappropriate Q&A (e.g. "should I beat my child to death for sneezing on my shirt" was the nicest), and got furious when I figured out his real SE account
@Riker no... the person who posted the dangerously incorrect answer to the vitamin A question, rolled back my edit with some BS, downvoted my nomination, and left some comments there saying why
yeah :(
edit ban plz /s
so now dude shows up every couple months and posts seriously crazy stuff about our "relationship"
it always gets cleaned up quickly, and by now I'm just bemused by the amount of time he's still wasting on a pretty sad vendetta
but I didn't know how to let them climb down there, I was emotional about it and just said exactly what I thought. I should have been more casual about it, and it might have got fixed. Should have realised this person's ego was making it hard for them to actually read
but yeah -- difficult happens!
21:17
@Erica the relationship with you?
@Zanna yeah, I think it's actually my fault
hahaha I'm sure male mods don't get this crap
I was the one who made the meta post pretty much naming & shaming him for bad edits
um no it's not your fault
not intentionally, it was intended in good faith, but he got pissed methinks
yeah definitely he did
21:17
3
Q: Please don't make unwarranted edits with drastic changes to the post

RikerSo far I've reviewed about 15 edit suggestions, 3 of these I rejected. All for the same reason. Deviating from the OP's intent. This one: This would be a fine edit from the OP, but not from another user. THe comment part is okay (the OP replied in comments with "a simple reason will suffice, ...

I remember
@Riker yup. It's weird.
In future, hide the user
but still, not your fault
@Zanna yeah, I thought about it, decided not to because I linked the reviews (which I feel was useful) and they show the name
but I have now <shrug>
also @Zanna are you serious that you think he created a new account just to downvote?
that's a pretty big crime, he can get suspended for a long time for that
someone definitely did that, but I don't know how it was
a mod will know though
I say definitely, but I mean almost definitely
21:22
mods won't, but the only "mod" we have now will if he checks
mods can't see downvotes, but they can see IPs
(robert)
go to users, click on creation date, see the account created on the day it started
@Erica yeah I know
@Erica yeah, but robert is an employee and he can see votes and IPs
@Riker yes, correct, he has CM power :)
21:22
majik CM-ness FTW
that account, on the day, had 2 downvotes and 1 upvote in their profile, on meta
right after the downvotes very suddenly appeared
but I looked at sv and he had not been seen for days
@Zanna which one?
I don't see any
hm I don't know
that user also has contributions dating to the 6th of feb (a week before the nom post went up) on math.se
aah yes true but I think they created the account on this site only to do those votes
21:26
<shrug> it's possible it's a friend yeah
but I think it's honestly more likely it's a different user, given his activity on math.se
@Zanna not going to name & shame this time, but go check out whose posts he edited on math.se
Maybe it's more important to focus on the fact that even 4 downvotes didn't harm your position on the nomination poll
@Turion Ultimately this is what matters, particularly since this isn't traditional "voting"
ye
I'm more disappointed by downvoting-without-explanation, because it gives me no feedback on how to do better (even if it's something like "you're not veg*n enough" which could be quite legit criticism for this site!)
@Riker I never said it was him, I just said it seemed to be an account created just to vote on the nominations
21:29
yeah
@Turion sure, but I didn't bring up the topic, just sharing what I saw :)
@Erica exactly
I also find it somewhat frustrating that nobody really votes on the lower answers
zanna has about 17 total votes either direction, niitaku 9, erica 12, and I only have 6
ultimately, a healthy meta depends on being able to have discussion with moderators (or even moderator candidates, or high-rep users who have lightweight moderation powers) -- it's difficult if there's a perception that mods never listen or mods do whatever they want
regardless of the net score, I think my self-nom just isn't getting seen <shrug>
@Erica yeah, definitely
</philosophizing>
lol
21:32
there was a bit of a struggle regarding that in the literature.se recent mod election (same as htis one, priv -> pub beta)
rand al'thor was the subject of a huge controversy when he was elected on SFF
@Erica very much so
and when he ran on literature, people started dredging it up again
wow, there are no candidates without downvotes, that's sort of surprising
yeah
seems pretty weird to me too
21:33
Sounds a lot like someone is on a rant about the site because of frustration
yeah
I think the same (2) people downvoted all 4 candidates
Sure possible
strange message -- "I prefer anarchy!" hahahaha
@Turion hmm? who where?
@Erica o_O where?
21:34
that's what I infer from DOWNVOTE ALL THE THINGS
sorry :D
@Zanna who is prolly unknown (though we all can have our suspicions) but where is this meta :P
@Erica lol
I sometimes don't bother typing all the other things in my head, which can be misleading XD
@Erica haha yeah "we don't want mods!"
this took a very small amount of effort I deserve stars
thank you anonymous starrer
How exactly is a consensus reached on the nominations?
21:37
majik
literally
CMs pick the mods, there is no "consensus"
they certainly factor in the votes, but beyond that it's really up to them
@Zanna what who where? ;)
on another note: I'm saddened by the fact that only 5 people were nominated
we don't have a very active meta community :(
I'm sort of tempted nominating people, but I don't want to make someone feel obligated
@Turion nominate, nominate! they can always turn it down!!!
If I think what to write, I might nominate Robert Longson as he has rep on MSE and seems to know stuff
21:39
<shrug> he hasn't been active on meta that I've seen though
(omg why is my Python script constantly failing to do what I tell it!!!)
not many people have been active on meta
@Erica indenting?
@Erica lol what's it supposed to do?
and just be glad it's not JS
JS seems to always know exactly what you want to do and intentionally do the opposite
@Zanna yeah :(
@Riker uh, in a sentence -- reading rows from a database, comparing them to rows in an online database, and uploading ones that exist in the database but not in the online version (while maintaining geospatial data)... for some reason it is just uploading EVERYTHING ALWAYS
despite me saying "stop that"
lol
21:40
silly snakey
did you try asking it politely? like:
"please stop that"
> Python, you're hurting my feelings. Would you kindly stop doing that? Thanks, I really appreciate it.
"no, really, this isn't what I wanted"
"stop giving me so much YOU ARE SUFFOCATING ME"
> go sit in a corner and think about yourl ife
21:41
XD
@Erica well no dur why'd you use a python then
:P
> Breaking news: python suffocates hawaiian shirt girl
hahahahaha
that would simplify the moderator decision, I guess ^.^
yep
all 3 candidates would become mod
if I turn up dead I know who the top suspects are
honestly at this point I think they should either just pick you, zanna, and niitaku and get it over with and/or do 4 mods and include me
21:44
I don't remember how long the process takes
even Arts & Crafts was nearly a year ago now
it ends about 4 wks after public beta generally
well I'm outta here, see you guys/gals
bye!
I have literally flagged one thing so far... if we had 4 mods they would have nothing to do (although I guess the floodgates will open and a s***ton of badness will land on us when it goes public...)
ciao @Riker :)
ciao
@Zanna lol true
I feel I'm completely incompetent at nominating people. Hopefully someone reads the nomination and expands it.
21:59
I'm hopeless at nominating too, I just can't do the kind of language needed somehow
0
A: Accepting Nominations — Who should moderate this site?

Turion Notes This user contributes high-quality answers and questions and has a great objective style, one that I'd personally like to see everywhere on the site. Attilio is aware of what's going on on the site, and takes interest in it.


« first day (15 days earlier)      last day (2918 days later) »