Almost equivalent. I've really only heard the third but to my mind, "sledgehammer approach" implies hitting a smallish target with overwhelming force, "steamroller tactics" implies squashing a lot of things, and "brute-force method" implies simply that you're just powering through the problem with no finesse (sheer brute force alone).
I thought that too but then I looked at the CG&CC Gaming room where steamrolled was used and realized that sledgehammers and steamrollers are used, just not in that specific phrasing.
@DJMcMayhem I'm not sure I heard these exact expressions but as you said, maybe similar ones like "steamrolled" or so. These were just thee exact results from translating "Holzhammermethode" (wood-hammer-method / mallet-method), which generally refers to using an overkill method.
Or also maybe something that "solves" a problem but at the same time does maybe more damage than good.
In a math class a friend was always trying to use e.g. Fermat's great theorem or so to prove the simplest exercises, and you would use "holzhammermethode" here as well:)
not sure if we can apply some compressed sensing methods :P
would be interesting to have a wikipedia in ASL:)
There is a wikipedia for some german dialects (which do not have an "standard" version, and no official grammar rules), and I really don't know how they managed to get so many articles:)
Some googling leads me to ~0.5 million people that know ASL and probably not much more than ~1 million people with math degrees (as a proxy for people who would care about Euler, Fermat, etc). The population of the USA is well over 300 million. That means < 0.16% know ASL and < 0.3% care about famous mathematicians. Assuming independence, that's no more than 2000 people who speak ASL and care enough about famous mathematicians to have name signs for them.
In reality, people who speak ASL will mostly be either 1) people-oriented (interpreters) or 2) be deaf, and deafness is comorbid with many other diseases/illnesses that can affect intelligence, on top of education being lower quality for deaf people in general. The probabilities are not independent, so there's probably only like a few hundred people that fit my criteria.
And that's being generous. So, a few hundred people, scattered across a country the size of the United States... Plus a language that doesn't lend itself to a written form, so communication over the internet generally involves videos...
@El'endiaStarman Many places have some particular language, and that language is not really spread much (probably nowadays more and more) beyond its borders - where as ASL is "sparsely" spread throughout a country, that for the most parts speaks other languages.
@DJMcMayhem Spelling a name is always an option, but most Deaf people (and those who interact with them often, or famous figures like presidents) have name signs.
@flawr That's what I figured. Yeah, I'd guess that's due to the sparseness of the population itself.
@El'endiaStarman Oh man, that opens up so many more questions I have. Do name signs frequently match the legal/verbal names? Are name signs picked by the individual? Do you have a name sign? Does ElizB?
Is there some characteristic of name signs that make them more obviously representing a name?
@DJMcMayhem Name signs are typically not part of the regular vocabulary (though they may often allude to specific signs/meanings) and they're used like pronouns, which are fairly easy to pick out like in English.
@DJMcMayhem Far from it. If two people are in the same circles (socially speaking) and they have the same name sign, it's typical for one of them to get a new name sign (most often the younger one).
Name signs are also usually based on something particular about the individual rather than their English name.
E.g. mine is an "L" with the thumb next to my eyes because I have heterochromia. ElizB's is an "E" in the same place/motion as "cute", though my mom likes using the "I love you" sign and moving it like a "Z".
@flawr Pretty much yeah. Babies have very few individually-distinguishing features anyway, so those name signs are usually fairly generic, so to speak.
@El'endiaStarman so does in this case the younger one adopt the new name in other places, or will they maybe have different names depending on the people their currently with?
@flawr Either of those. Interesting thing though is that you almost never see your own name sign. If the person you're referring to is in the room, you just point at them.
Puns do exist but they're less commonplace because there's few signs with multiple meanings that are significantly different. Unlike English...
Well, in the language proper. Something like puns for names are not uncommon, yes.
A guy I knew during Summer Academy in Seattle was tall and had a name that started with "R", so his name sign was the sign for "tall" with the hand shape of "R". That's the same as the sign for "rocket"...
@El'endiaStarman Something my family did a long time ago was to teach very very basic ASL to my brothers when they were really young. (No one in my family knows ASL, just they heard about the trend of "baby sign language" because at a certain age signing is a little bit easier than speaking). Just phrases like "mom/dad" "please/thank you" "hungry/all done". Actually, I think it was exactly those 6 phrases
But I have a very vivid memory of my youngest brother signing "dad" wrong and making the "loser" sign XD
@DJMcMayhem Teaching sign language to babies/toddlers is definitely a good thing for multiple reasons, only one of which is that they can communicate earlier in sign than in speech. This is the part where ElizB would go on a tirade about how this is widely encouraged for hearing babies but not for deaf babies (because it would "make it harder to learn English later" >_<).
No no, see, the thing you're supposed to do is a couple invasive surgeries to put in cochlear implants and then stick with spoken English exclusively afterward. (I'm being very facetious here.)
@El'endiaStarman When you got your implants, was there an adjustment period where you could hear, but it was difficult to understand or muffled and then it got better over time?
How long did it take to adjust? And was it more like the sound was muffled or you could hear but had a hard time interpreting what you were hearing?
I remember reading in some neuroscience books (I think it was "Conversations with Neil's brain") where they were talking about how your hardware can be perfectly functioning, but your brain has to learn how to actually interpret the inputs you're receiving
I remember an experiment from that book that was really fascinating. They gave blind people various shapes (star, sphere, cube, etc.) And had them identity the shapes by touch. After having their sight restored, they couldn't identify those objects by sight unless they could touch them
Actually, I don't remember if I learned that in a psych class or that book. But it's still fascinating
Molyneux's problem is a thought experiment in philosophy concerning immediate recovery from blindness. It was first formulated by William Molyneux, and notably referred to in John Locke's An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689). The problem can be stated in brief, "if a man born blind can feel the differences between shapes such as spheres and cubes, could he, if given the ability to see, distinguish those objects by sight alone, in reference to the tactile schemata he already possessed?"
== Original correspondence ==
The question was originally posed to Locke by philosopher William Molyneux...
Well not directly but I have the impression that it is ismilar when you e.g. learn riding a bike, or juggling or something you didn't do before, you first need to get used to what you perceive and what that means.
Or also reading braille with your fingers, I've tried and it takes me great effort to figure out which of dots there are in a single character, but I guess with more practice you get better.
Hehehe. You do have a point in that the experience is somewhat similar to learning entirely new skills or how to read Braille, but...hmm. How do I put it. I'm still hearing new things in songs I've listened to many times.
Relatedly, my wife showed me last week this version of Let It Go from Frozen that doesn't have an orchestra. I was barely able to hear Elsa's crown bouncing on the floor because I was expecting it but my wife didn't hear it.
Most frequently it'll be some interesting sound or instrument that I pick up on that I didn't notice before. Some other times but not as frequently it'll be an interesting thing about the production (cause I like to think about music production) so like an interesting pan or weird rhythmical variation
I just said the word interesting 3 times in a row
Sometimes I'll notice an individual note from one instrument, but I'm not sure when I first notice that, it'll just be something that sticks out to me when I listen.
I wonder if Molyneux's problem would be different if you gave the subjects time to adjust. Like say you gave a blind subject a star and a cone, then restored their sight, and the could not identify them from sight. But then over several months, they live life as normal and touch objects while seeing them, but are never allowed to touch a star or cone without a blindfold on. Would they eventually be able to identify those objects visually from memory without having ever touched/looked at them?
"Recently [experiment conducted in 2012, article written in 2015], by combining the highly sensitive receiving capabilities of the National Science Foundation’s (NSF) Green Bank Telescope (GBT) and the powerful radar transmitter at the NSF’s Arecibo Observatory, astronomers were able to make remarkably detailed images of the surface of this planet without ever leaving Earth."