« first day (981 days earlier)      last day (243 days later) » 

04:19
I am mildly panicking right now because I just realized that I'm not sure I remember my LastPass master password.
Would be nice if there was a way for me to try and see if I can remember without signing out.
 
5 hours later…
09:39
@El'endiaStarman can't you try to log in from another device?
or is there some way to export all the data?
 
4 hours later…
14:37
@flawr Hmm, good suggestion, I might try that.
@flawr "all the data" in this case is two passwords. :P I can just stick 'em in a text file if I need to.
15:28
@Feeds The lack of trigger discipline in that thumbnail really irks me. Dude's got a lotta experience with guns and should not be demonstrating such unsafe behavior. (It's probably intended to get more clicks, methinks.)
That's a really good point. I didn't even notice until you pointed it out
Last time I went to a gun range (out of maybe like 3 times in my life), I wrapped my thumb around the back of the slide. Turned my nail purple o_o
Lol, there's this comment under the video:
> Your 'lack' of trigger discipline in the thumbnail is great clickbait for those of us who understand gun safety. Smooth. 🤣
He actually has great trigger discipline throughout most of the video.
15:43
People online really love to point out trigger discipline or lack there of, it does make for a pretty enticing thumbnail.
@DJMcMayhem I've never been to a gun range, though I'd like to at some point. (I have fired guns way out in the country three times though.)
@SriotchilismO'Zaic Of all the things to harp on repeatedly, trigger discipline is a pretty good one. Guns Are Cool™ but also Guns Are Dangerous™ and reminding people to be as safe as possible with them is always a good thing.
I'm not criticizing it. I don't know anything about guns really so I wouldn't know. I am just agreeing that it is a pretty good way to garner clicks.
@SriotchilismO'Zaic Out of pure curiosity, what would you say are the most important rules of gun safety? There's typically four and I'm really curious as to whether you've been exposed to them enough - despite not knowing much about guns - to remember them.
1) Do not point a gun at something you do not want to shoot.
2) Do not put your finger on the trigger if you do not want to shoot.
3) Keep your gun locked and secured when you are not using it.
4) Idk wear ear and eye protection?
That would be my guess
In the order I thought of them.
15:59
You definitely got the first two right. Third is also vital and fourth is good, but not strictly necessary. (Well, ear protection is pretty good to have for most people.)
I was actually trying to remember them myself, and one of them is: don't hand a loaded gun to someone else. (Always let them load the gun themselves.)
Corollary to #1 and #2 is that the safety doesn't necessarily work. I remember a demonstration where someone had a gun (without ammo!) that had a worn down safety (due to lots of use) and they showed that it was still possible to pull the trigger despite the safety being on.
is safety supposed to stop the trigger from depressing?
Indeed. It's a physical mechanism too.
16:30
So maybe it shouldn't be called a "safety" but an "arm-y".
16:45
@flawr Hahaha, you do flip it from "safe" to "armed"...
since we're already talking about arms
A vespa:)
 
3 hours later…
19:39
@NathanMerrill maybe we should really think about it, considering this
 
2 hours later…
21:12
@flawr Re-reading the following messages makes me really sad. "some encouraging signs", huh? That's...kinda been nullified. :(
21:58
Is it possible to arbitrarily overfit a sine wave? You're given N points (x_i, y_i) and you want to fit them with a function y = a*sin(bx+c) so that all residuals |f(x_i) - y_i| are at most epsilon for some fixed epsilon. I wonder if this is possible using some extremely large frequency b, assuming the inputs x_i are linearly independent over the rationals.
This is for this challenge: codegolf.stackexchange.com/q/193728/20260
22:18
I think the answer is yes.
Yeah, just as a gut feeling, I don't see why you couldn't do that.
Yeah.
For each point, there is a periodic subset of b's that fit the bill, holding everything else fixed.
And if the periods (given by the x_i's) are all independent, there will be some number that is in the intersection of all of them.
 
2 hours later…
23:55
@xnor I don't think you even need the x_is to be independent.

« first day (981 days earlier)      last day (243 days later) »