This is the Realm of Simply Beautiful Art

But it is far too vague to be answered as stated. That user hasn't annoyed me. Another self-proclaimed "linguist" duplicating twice after their initial post, posted to meta, and

But, all is good.

user21820

2:52 AM

@amWhy Well yea that asker should learn to prove things first.

4 hours later…

user21820

7:17 AM

@amWhy: I saw your comment about races in the other room. You know, I've always wondered whether it would be a good idea to put down my official race as "human".

5 hours later…

user21820

12:28 PM

@amWhy: Okay I'll wait for you to get back. =)

3 hours later…

Simply Beautiful Art

2:58 PM

@amWhy A FEW MORE DAYS!!!

Also, I got a score of 66/90 on a mock AP MacroEcon test just now, and 70/90 would put me at a 5, which is really good.

@amWhy Um... open for deletion?

user21820

3:20 PM

@SimplyBeautifulArt I don't object to deletion, but anyway I added a comment.

Anyway, hello!

user21820

4:08 PM

@amWhy: Oh well I got to go off already. See you next time!

amWhy

@user21820 Sorry... I'm giving my last exam today, so I've been a bit distracted! C'ya!

user21820

@amWhy No problem. Chat again another day. =)

amWhy

@SimplyBeautifulArt Thanks! Now, we wait for the final delete vote :)

@SimplyBeautifulArt Cool!

user21820

@amWhy Hmm will the asker see my comment if the question is deleted? He/she hasn't been on Math SE since many hours ago.

amWhy

@user21820 Good point. I think a user can see any post of theirs that has been deleted (show deleted), so long as they authored the deleted question(/answer).

user21820

4:21 PM

But it may not be easily findable for them (according to what I vaguely recall Martin Sleziak saying).

And actually there is a sort of motivation in his comment (which should have been in the question):

Thank you for your kind comments. The reason why I came up with the question is the proof of the famous Fermat's theorem by mr. Wiles. Also Fermat himself said that he had a proof (although he said the margin was to small to write it down). I was wondering, what if you could prove that the way Andrew Wiles proved Fermats theorem is the only way to prove this theorem, you could cancel out that Fermat had a proof himself (which would be quite hard I admit). (indeed, one needs to define what is a single proof as @Bram28 says) — Bernold Nieuwesteeg 23 hours ago

I wonder if it would be an acceptable question if that were included in the body of the question.

@amWhy: So what do you think?

1 hour later…

amWhy

5:44 PM

@user21820 If I could retract a delete vote (my delete vote), I would. It seems a vote to delete cannot be retracted like a vote to close.

user21820

@amWhy If you are agreeable, I can upvote the question after editing to put in that comment for the asker. That will temporarily stall the deletion.

amWhy

@user21820 Indeed, that would be great, if you're up to it!

@user21820 I also just took away my downvote, so is at -2.

user21820

@amWhy Okay done, thanks!

And see you next time! =)

amWhy

@user21820 If you'd like to answer the question, I'm willing to vote for reopening.

user21820

@amWhy Okay, but I really don't have time now. Tomorrow I will check if it is reopened and if so then answer if I have time. Thanks!

amWhy

5:53 PM

@user21820 No problem! C'ya!

2 hours later…

fejfo

7:52 PM

@SimplyBeautifulArt I am back (if you still remember me), What did I miss? And since you mentioned antimatter dimentsions (that's about the point from which I started reading again), [swarmsim](https://swarmsim.github.io) is an other fun incremental game.

On the other hand I had an idea about large numbers recently (about a week ago): could the derivative be used to create faster growing functions? is it possible for $f'(x) > f(f(x))$

fejfo

8:03 PM

@SimplyBeautifulArt could I submit that program I never finished for the TREE(3) challange to the codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/148897/… if I finish it?

« first day (346 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (1152 days later) »

all rooms