> Informally, we can say that for any positive error margin ε, there is a positive window of size δ around c such that if x is in that window then f(x) is close to f(c) within the error margin.
Context:
My friend (The same one who gave me this ODE) originally challenged me to obtain the general solution to this ODE:
$$\frac{d^3 y}{dx^3}+\alpha x\frac{dy}{dx}+\beta y=0 \tag{1}$$
Where $\alpha,\beta \in \mathbb{R}$.
I could not figure out any substitution without the use of power seri...
> for any positive error margin ε ( there is a positive window of size δ around c such that ( if x is in that window then f(x) is close to f(c) within the error margin ) ).
forall real ε>0 ( exists δ>0 ( ... ) ). Fill in the blank.
> for any positive error margin ε ( there is a positive window of size δ around c such that ( if x is in that window then f(x) is close to f(c) within the error margin ) ).
For all real ε>0, we want to show there exists some real δ>0 such that the when the distance from x to c is within an error margin δ, then the distance between f(x) and f(c) is within an error margin ε
Write for me "distance from x to c is within an error margin δ"
Then: "distance between f(x) and f(c) is within an error margin ε"
we want to show there exists some real δ>0 such that the when the distance from x to c is within an error margin δ, then the distance between f(x) and f(c) is within an error margin ε
But I feel like I could improve on communicating without looking things up
Yeah
For all real ε>0, we want to show there exists some real δ>0 such that the when the distance from x to c is within an error margin δ, then the distance between f(x) and f(c) is within an error margin ε.The distance between f(x) and f(c) must be smaller than ε, and it must be smaller than ε for every ε>0
@Simply when I get a theorm definition etc I write it down break it down and glue it back together. For me understanding is if it can be stated in simple terms
And for all people, there exists a small tweak in their mind such that the tweak is not found in another mind, which implies that two people will not be able to fully understand each other.
In the book "The theory of Ordinary Differential Equations" I'm having trouble understanding $Lemma(1.6)$ which assets Lipchitz Continuity defined below, specifically the gap in my understanding is within the operation taken within $(2.)$,specifically speaking the specifics of my question can be ...
In the book "The theory of Ordinary Differential Equations" I'm having trouble understanding $Lemma(1.6)$ which assets Lipchitz Continuity defined below, specifically the gap in my understanding is within the operation taken within $(2.)$,specifically speaking the specifics of my question can be ...
@TheGreatDuck Hi, just wondering exactly what you mean by "Could we somehow use algebra to reduce the order?" I tried reducing the order and didn't succeed.