« first day (49 days earlier)      last day (1449 days later) » 

12:03 AM
@SimplyBeautifulArt wolfram can solve it
 
Of course, can you?
 
@SimplyBeautifulArt sure
 
What does Wolfram give tho
 
but i am not sure how wolfram solves it
it gives the closed form
 
of course, but what does it give? I want to check my answer
 
12:04 AM
(-gamma - 2log(2) + 2) * sqrt(pi) / 8
 
Hm... that is not what I got, so I will check myself...
close to my answer though
 
what is your answer
 
Well, later tho
$$\frac{-\sqrt\pi (\gamma+2\ln(2))}2$$
At least I'm on the right track
 
yeah, right idea but one or two flaws, i think
the answer is gamma'(3/2) / 4, in a simpler form
that's what you get when you unpack the gamma'(3/2)
 
12:38 AM
@Starfall Oh right!
I made a small mistake... :P
Yeah, I got it :D
 
12:49 AM
@BrevanEllefsen Good morning?
 
1:06 AM
@SimplyBeautifulArt good morning to you too
Though it's now afternoon
 
1:26 AM
@BrevanEllefsen ah, right
 
2:02 AM
@YouKnowMe I know you
 
@SimplyBeautifulArt Are you sleeping soon?
 
@S.C.B. Yes sadly
 
Yes, I managed to figure out $$\int_{0}^{1}x^x \mathrm{d}x=\int_{0}^{1} \int_{0}^{1} x^{xy}y^{xy} dxdy$$
 
Ah, cool!
 
The teacher had given it as an problem
"we couldn't solve".
Ha!
Guess I proved him wrong.
 
2:11 AM
Lol
 
Well, may you have a good night.
 
May you have a good day
 
Goodbye.
 
Good seeing you
 
Xam
3:07 AM
Hello, is someone here? xd
 
 
9 hours later…
12:15 PM
@amWhy @S.C.B.: And for Galois theory I highly recommend James Lingard's notes as a starting point; it explained clearly what I could not grasp during the Galois theory course I took, and at 38 pages it can be read through relatively easily. For a more comprehensive text on abstract algebra in general I recommend Paul Garrett's notes.
 
Hello @user21820
What is Galois theory?
Isn't Galois that man who got shot during a duel?
 
yes
 
OK.
 
@S.C.B.: Yea he's the in my opinion foolish guy who was not brave enough to back down from a fight.
And therefore died in his twenties.
 
At the ripe age of 20 or something, he died.
Kind of like Abel.
 
12:22 PM
or eisenstein
 
Though Abel didn't die from a duel.
 
He even knew his foolishness because he quickly tried to write up as much as possible before his duel date.
 
I remember something on how his handwriting is very difficult to read on his last few notes....
 
Haha I have no idea about that.
But wait are you looking for introductory material to groups and rings first?
You need some of that before field theory (including Galois theory) would make sense.
 
Yes.
I think I do.
I don't know anything about abstract algebra. Zero. Zilch.
 
12:24 PM
galois died without ever knowing about dedekind's and kummer's results
it's sad
 
People on Quora keep asking people to "solve" numbers.
 
lol, I have a lot of reading to do...
Do you know these notes?
And how on earth do you solve numbers?
 
The reason I know all these sources was that I struggled through the Galois theory course I took, so I hunted all over the internet for good free resources to help me.
 
Yeah, books are too expensive...
 
12:27 PM
@S.C.B. I have seen Keith Conrad's writings on field theory before, but I didn't save them on my hard drive so I guess it was because they didn't help me much.
I can no longer recall if that's the true reason because it was too long ago.
My Galois theory teacher didn't give us any notes, and we had to try to copy from the board and listen at the same time, and he was rather fast... so much so that a crucial error went unnoticed until I discovered it just before the exam.
By the way, do you see any error in the three non-accepted answers to this question? We all got downvoted within 30 seconds, but I can't see why.
 
Is it bad that I answer questions too easy for me?
Like
3
A: Finding the partial sum of $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{n-\sqrt{n^2-1}}{\sqrt{n\left(n+1\right)}}$

S.C.B.First, algebraically manipulate the function we are summing$$\frac{n-\sqrt{n^2-1}}{\sqrt{n\left(n+1\right)}}= \frac{n}{\sqrt{n\left(n+1\right)}}-\frac{\sqrt{n^2-1}}{\sqrt{n\left(n+1\right)}}=\sqrt{\frac{n}{n+1}}-\sqrt\frac{n-1}{n}$$ Note that $$\sum _{n=1}^{m}\frac{n-\sqrt{n^2-1}}{\sqrt{n\left(n...

 
@S.C.B. According to the SE reputation model, it rewards such behaviour.
Of course, I personally don't like the model, so I don't do it. But everyone is free to do whatever they please so long as it doesn't harm others.
 
Well.
Interesting questions are answered far too easily by other taleneted users.
 
But I don't think it's good for you to answer questions that show no effort whatsoever.
Like the one you linked.
 
@S.C.B. >.>
 
12:37 PM
Oh good point.
But This was a new user.
I should probably notify him in the comments first.
Hello @SimplyBeautifulArt.
 
2
A: What is the purpose of this site?

user21820A year late, but I would like to add my viewpoint (which may not be shared by others) to the list. I will present it in pairs to distinguish what I feel Math SE should be from what it should not be. As a repository It should contain a collection of useful mathematical techniques and insights....

 
0
Q: Integrate $\int\frac{\cos nx}{5-4\cos x}=$

user35508I stumbled across the following integral:- $$\int\frac{\cos nx}{5-4\cos x}=$$ Given that $n$ is an positive integer. I have no idea how to proceed....I tried integration by parts and even writing $\cos(x)=\frac{e^{ix}+e^{-ix}}{2}$ I couldn't make much headway..... Any help to solve this integr...

^ I wanna do that question
 
The above is my current viewpoint about what Math SE should be, which is related to my discontentment with the SE reputation system.
 
Interestingly, $$\int_{0}^{\pi} \frac{\cos nx}{5-4\cos x}=\frac{\pi}{3 \times 2^{n}}$$
 
12:39 PM
@S.C.B. New users do not have an excuse because a huge pop-up comes up telling them how to ask a good question.
 
@SimplyBeautifulArt
 
@S.C.B. Definite integrals are easy
 
Given $n$ is a positive integer.
 
Most of them just want their homework done for them, which I severely dislike.
 
Possibly.
But I asked poor questions here a long time ago.
When I was new here.
Like
-1
Q: Connection between 7 and 13

S.C.B.While there have been many numbers that have been deemed 'lucky' or 'unlucky', 7 and 13 are two of the most prominently known. So, this had led me to wonder if there were any connections between 7 and 13, and found the following. $1$. $(7,13)$ is the largest integer pair $(n,m)$ for which ($n...

 
12:41 PM
Did you read the FAQ before asking?
 
What is the FAQ?
 
Lol, no, we didn't @user21820
 
New users will see a pop-up telling them How-to-ask. But your supposedly poor question is far from a homework question.
And the part "[...] this has led me to wonder" automatically gives it a free pass in my eyes.
 
Perhaps.
 
Also, it got closed for being too broad, but that's because you didn't realize the law of small numbers.
 
12:45 PM
Have to leave now.
Doing Korean Poetry.
 
Sure, see you!
 
@S.C.B. See you!
 
 
2 hours later…
2:25 PM
1
A: Evaluate $\int \log(1+2m \cos x+m^2) dx$

Simply Beautiful ArtI'm not so sure of indefinite integration, but if we add bounds, it comes out beautifully, as shown here. Take the derivative with respect to $m$ to get $$\begin{align}-I'(-m)&=\int_0^\pi\frac{2m-2\cos(x)}{1-2m\cos(x)+m^2}\ dx\\&=\frac1m\int_0^\pi1-\frac{1-m^2}{1-2m\cos(x)+m^2}\ dx\\&=\frac\pi ...

 
2:43 PM
@SimplyBeautifulArt Back.
Did you solve the integral you wanted to evaluate?
 
@S.C.B. I don't know, but I solved that integral ^^^
 
You have a lot of carrots.
 
Yes
They point up to things
 
Hah!
You got the pun.
I was looking it up for the spelling.
The caret /ˈkærᵻt/ is an inverted V-shaped grapheme. It is the spacing character ^ in ASCII (at code point 5Ehex) and other character sets that may also be called a hat, control, uparrow, or less frequently chevron, xor sign, 'to the power of' (exponent), pointer (in Pascal), or wedge. Officially, this character is referred to as circumflex accent in both ASCII and Unicode terminology (because of its historical use in overstrike), whereas caret refers to a similar but lowered Unicode character: U+2038 ‸ CARET. Additionally, there is a lowered variant with a stroke: U+2041 ⁁ CARET INSERTION POINT...
So it's spelled caret...
For some reason I thought it was karet.
 
Lol, yeah...
 
3:00 PM
@SimplyBeautifulArt So, what have you been up to today?
 
1
A: Evaluate $\int \log(1+2m \cos x+m^2) dx$

Simply Beautiful ArtI'm not so sure of indefinite integration, but if we add bounds, it comes out beautifully, as shown here. Take the derivative with respect to $m$ to get $$\begin{align}-I'(-m)&=\int_0^\pi\frac{2m-2\cos(x)}{1-2m\cos(x)+m^2}\ dx\\&=\frac1m\int_0^\pi1-\frac{1-m^2}{1-2m\cos(x)+m^2}\ dx\\&=\frac\pi ...

I did that
and not much else
 
5
A: Solve $\lim_{x \rightarrow 2} \frac{xe^{x-1}-2e}{x-2}$ without using L'Hopital's rule

Simply Beautiful ArtAlgebra solution: Let $x=u+2$. $$\begin{align}\frac{xe^{x-1}-2e}{x-2}&=\frac{xe^{x-1}-2e^{x-1}+2e^{x-1}-2e}{x-2}\\&=\frac{(x-2)e^{x-1}+2e(e^{x-2}-1)}{x-2}\\&=e^{x-1}+2e\frac{e^u-1}u\end{align}$$ We know that $\frac{e^u-1}u\to1$, thus, $$\lim_{x\to2}\frac{xe^{x-1}-2e^{2-1}}{x-2}=e+2e=3e$$ T...

Was today.
Top user this month.
 
That was last night for me
Nice man
 
Do you think that
 
3:03 PM
$$\int_{0}^{1} x^x dx=\int_{0}^{1} \int_{0}^{1} \int_{0}^{1} (xyz)^{xyz} dxdydz$$
 
Well...
Yes?
 
Ha!
No.
 
Can you convert the second one into a series?
 
@S.C.B. I couldn't actually read your stuff yesterday because I was on my phone
 
3:06 PM
OK>
Are you on phone now?
 
No, I'm looking for your stuff
Oh
Beautiful :D
 
I thought you actually didn't know this for a while there.
 
lol
No, it was just too much LaTeX to read through yesterday
 
4:02 PM
@BrevanEllefsen That just looks like a mess
 
Xam
4:15 PM
Hi :)
 
Xam
@SimplyBeautifulArt out of curiosity, have you studied abstract algebra?
 
Xam
Oh, I see :(
 
4:18 PM
Why all the sad faces?
 
@user21820 :(
 
Have you tried my smiley graphs to cheer you up? =)
 
Xam
:'(
 
Cuz sad faces are awesome. I'm about 1/4 the way through an abstract algebra textbook atm :/ I'm pausing that to dive into my complez analysis text though.
Also, @SimplyBeautifulArt what is a mess?
 
Xam
4:20 PM
@BrevanEllefsen what topic are you studying?
 
@BrevanEllefsen Something I look at and cry a little
 
@SimplyBeautifulArt you just made my day XD were you referring to the ArXiv paper I linked, or what?
 
@Xam before I stopped? Just started Groups of Permutations
@Xam but again, I'm only a quarter way through it... Given, that was over two days of light reading so I should be able to finish it and most of the examples within March I hope
 
Xam
@BrevanEllefsen oh, and did you like it?
the topics i mean
 
4:24 PM
@Xam yeah, I love it so far! I just happen to love Complex Analysis more ;)
 
Xam
@BrevanEllefsen haha I see xd
 
Xam
But trust me, when you study rings and modules, you'll love abstract algebra more than anything else :)
 
That's interesting; I studied them but never really liked them.
I always preferred geometry and graph theory and combinatorics hahaha..
 
Xam
xD
 
 
2 hours later…
6:10 PM
@Xam I'm generally knowledgeable about rings though I admit my knowledge of modules is nonexistent. Understanding rings has helped with the complex analysis actually XD
 
7:07 PM
@user21820 I have analyzed your program.
It is quite clever; your p(n) has a growth rate similar to f_{zeta_0 * omega}(n) in the fast-growing herarchy.
This is nowhere near the Buchholz hydra though; even the 0-1 Buchholz hydra has a growth rate similar to F_BHO(n), where BHO is the Bachmann-Howard ordinal.
The way it works is: just like the Kirby-Paris hydra, a node labelled with 0 with children corresponding to ordinals alpha_1,...,alpha_n will correspond to the ordinal omega^(alpha_1 + ... + alpha_n)
So a root node labelled with [0] will correspond to epsilon_0
then, a root node labelled with 0 with n children that are childless nodes labelled with [0] will correspond to epsilon_0 * n
then a root node with a single child being the previous tree will correspond to omega^{epsilon_0 * n}
then omega^omega^{epsilon_0 * n}, and so on
so a root node labelled with [[0],0] will correspond to epsilon_1
in general, a node labelled with a tree corresponding to the ordinal alpha will correspond to the ordinal epsilon_alpha
so a root node with label a root node with label [0] will correspond to epsilon_epsilon_0
a root node with label the previous tree will correspond to epsilon_epsilon_epsilon_0
and the limit of S-trees is zeta_0
This is 0-reduction; 1-reduction will also correspond to an ordinal hierarchy of length zeta_0, except the base function is about f_{zeta_0}(n). So the limit of 1-reduction is f_{zeta_0 * 2}(n).
p(n) will then be about f_{zeta_0 * n}(n).
Unfortunately, the proof of well-ordering at the bottom of your program, cannot work, because the ordering you define is not well-ordered.
For example, if we let A-B-C-D be a tree with root node labelled with A, with a child with label B, with a child with label C, etc.
Then [0], 0-[0], 0-0-[0], 0-0-0-[0], ... will be an infinite sequence that is decreasing according to your ordering.
 
Xam
8:17 PM
@BrevanEllefsen I suppose that is because there are some kind of rings that appear naturally in complex analysis.
 
Xam
9:09 PM
30
Q: What is the purpose of math.se; to learn to provide nice answers or just to get them?

milcakHello to all, I am a relatively new math.se member, and I have a question about the site. First of all I must say, that I have found this website to be completely amazing. No other related site that I have ever seen can even compete with it. I am astounded by the quality of answers provided he...

Interesting question which also has interesting answers.
 
 
2 hours later…
10:51 PM
@FirasAliAbdelGhani Hello and welcome to my realm!
 
11:17 PM
@amWhy How many chat rooms are you usually in? XD
 
11:33 PM
$$\int_{-\pi/4}^{+\pi/2}\frac{\sin^2(x)}{\sqrt{1+\tan(x)}}\ dx = \pi\sqrt[4]2 \left(\frac14\sin\left(\frac\pi8\right) + \frac18\cos\left({\pi\over8}\right)\right)$$
 

« first day (49 days earlier)      last day (1449 days later) »