« first day (1343 days earlier)      last day (3373 days later) » 

ssb
12:26 AM
@DariusJahandarie ならもっと勉強せなんといかんばい~
I've fallen a bit behind in my 漢検 studying again..
 
 
3 hours later…
3:49 AM
@ssb ですよね。今の私には一番効果的な方法は本を読むこと、だと思うけど、なかなか面白い本が見つからない。
まあ、本自体が面白いだろうと思うんだが、私には読むのは時間がかかりすぎるから面白くない。
 
ssb
4:22 AM
時間かかるって
知らない単語多すぎて全部調べて時間かかるってこと?
もしそれなら単語の勉強に集中したほうがいいんじゃない?
 
4:37 AM
単語ではなく漢字の問題。
もちろん漢字の勉強にも集中できるんだけど、あれはうまくいくかどうかは分からない。
 
ssb
単語の勉強は漢字の勉強になる
 
 
11 hours later…
Anonymous
4:10 PM
Some discussion here:
 
Anonymous
Please add an "s" to the romaji of 集まる and 集まる; I tried editing but could not cross the impossible 6 character limit. — varun yesterday
 
6:05 PM
I wonder who'll be noticed if I post a comment?
the poster and the one right above me?
 
Anonymous
6:20 PM
@broccoliforest The author of the post you're commenting on is always notified
 
Anonymous
If you'd like to notify someone else, you can add their name with @
 
Anonymous
It's a little confusing, though―sometimes the system automatically removes the @ notification from the post
 
Anonymous
And sometimes it seems to notify the previous commenter
 
Anonymous
I honestly don't know what they were thinking when they designed it
 
Anonymous
But in general you can choose to notify two people (the owner of the post, and one other person)
 
Anonymous
6:21 PM
(You can't put multiple @ notifications in a single comment)
 
thank you, once I got refused when I tried to insert multiple @ :)
 
Anonymous
You can insert multiple at-signs in a comment if it contains a single ` character
 
Anonymous
But then I'm not sure if they work as notifications
 
Anonymous
In chat, you can notify multiple people at once :-D
 
oh, smells like a nasty bug...
 
7:03 PM
@broccoliforest I have to wonder why you didn't continue this comment thread in Japanese... :-) japanese.stackexchange.com/questions/21570/…
 
Anonymous
We tend to use "formal noun" for 形式名詞 on this site, although as everywhere there are lots of terms in use for everything
 
Anonymous
"Abstract noun" is the opposite of "concrete noun" in English
 
Anonymous
The distinction in English is related to countability
 
Anonymous
I know people talk about abstract nouns in Japanese but I don't know what significance it has in that context…
 
Anonymous
Martin writes of Japanese: "Abstract nouns (正義 'justice', 美 'beauty', 善 'goodness') can be quantified, as in 少しの正義, but not counted or measured. By Isami's criteria they differ from action nouns only in not taking …をする: they are not actions that can be engaged in." (Martin 1975 p.178)
 
Anonymous
7:12 PM
He seems to be reporting the distinctions made by 勇康男 in「日本語の構造」(1965)
 
Anonymous
I'm not really familiar with the term in a Japanese context…
 
Anonymous
7:58 PM
Good ol'
 
Anonymous
A nice, specific tag
 
8:11 PM
Hmm, 存じております seems too formal to me for a job interview.
But well, I am practically the opposite of an authority of that. :)
 
 
1 hour later…
Anonymous
9:14 PM
How often do you think people pronounce 場合 as ばわい rather than ばあい?
 
I'm not sure I understand the question, because I think it's always ばあい.
 
Anonymous
9:30 PM
Oh, people say ばわい fairly often
 
Anonymous
But I think it's looked down upon as an error
 
9:47 PM
Weird, I can't recall hearing it pronounced like that.
 
Anonymous
10:04 PM
Hey, 明鏡 mentions it in their definition: ♦ 「ばわい」「ばやい」は「ぐわい(具合)」「しやい(試合)」などと同様、変化した形。
 
ぐあい⇒ぐわい makes sense to me, because you can round your lips for /u/ in ぐ without drastically changing the sound, making the following あ turn into a わ. But rounding your lips for the /a/ in ば sounds incredibly weird to me, so I don't understand why the following あ would turn into わ.
 
Anonymous
5
A: 味わわせる vs. 味あわせる

Dono Why is 味わわせる often pronounced as 味あわせる? I can only speculate that this is a kind of onbin to ease pronunciation. The two medial approximates /w/ are only separated by a vowel. Approximates, also known as semi-vowels, share some similarities with vowels. The reduction of one in rapid speech i...

 
Anonymous
> [...] baai <> bawai, which tries to avoid repeating the same vowel twice.
 

« first day (1343 days earlier)      last day (3373 days later) »