« first day (5 days earlier)      last day (43 days later) » 

12:00 AM
Nobody understands hats anymore.
 
Do I get the _Z̠̻̣̣̦͚ͅA̯̠̖͕ͅL̫͈͎̪̬͕͝G̶͔͚͙̭͚O͈͈̭̗_ hat for parsing HTML with Regex?
̴̝̳
 
"Search You Must" should be inbound.
Have 25 hats, I do.
 
yep, confirmed.
 
A while to update hats, chat does take.
 
@AlexanderO'Mara you sure are on a roll!
 
12:09 AM
I am the Sun
 
@ATaco You are a taco.
 
A Taco Without the Taco Hat
 
But you are still a taco.
 
Soon, I will have The Hat
 
or not. it seems to be randomly assigned.
 
12:13 AM
You misunderstand me.
I am not going to sit by and let myself not get the hat.
I will have that hat.
Also, Hat Lag sucks
 
Now for the grueling task of a third rep-cap.
 
@AlexanderO'Mara I've managed 1/3 so far...
 
lol
 
12:30 AM
Anyone wants a "this is fine" hat? I can award this bounty stackoverflow.com/q/39431230/584192
 
Hold up, I am getting in on that.
 
I do, hold on
 
(Is there a way to get in on this without it looking like I'm just hat hunting..?)
 
(dunno)
 
(I'll do a semi-burn, then probably just delete it after...)
 
12:36 AM
(lol)
 
(I feel like a horrible person, I am a hat whore)
 
anything else to add?
@Saiid
 
(now I need to find something to add that isn't a copy of the others)
I think I might have something
Ah, yes, I know what I can do
 
@MonicaCellio have you reached 150 on each of the three, or 150 in total?
 
I haven't been able to get any hats :(
My snowflake is missing on mobile
 
12:43 AM
@alecxe each. Sorry if my wording wasn't clear enough.
(Plus there was some stuff from the previous day, i.e. first day of Winterbash.)
 
@MonicaCellio gotcha, sounds like you qualify
 
(I'm only active on three sites...)
 
@AndrewLi yeah, mobile doesn't support hats; you need to switch to the full-site view to get them.
 
@alecxe care to join in for the this is fine hat? stackoverflow.com/q/39431230/584192
 
I posted my answer, if someone would upvote? :D
 
12:46 AM
@MonicaCellio I did
It stopped showing up
@ATaco @Saiid honestly if you don't have anything to add, please don't add an answer
 
@SamuelLiew would be great, thanks, can you give me time till tomorrow?
 
even if it's for a hat
 
@alecxe No, just post something short now
 
make it answer worthy
 
okay, got it, let me see
 
12:48 AM
@SamuelLiew @SamuelLiew IMO either let them write a legit answer or then don't do it
 
I've tweeted links to questions on three sites but no social-media hats yet. I wonder if Twitter's link-shortener messed that up. Real links: worldbuilding.stackexchange.com/q/64705/28 judaism.stackexchange.com/q/78283/472 writers.stackexchange.com/q/25587/1993
And if anybody can offer any answers to the last one, which is about Doxygen, I'd be happy.
 
@AndrewLi Ok cool. Do you mind if I award the bounty to the newer better-written answer instead?
 
@SamuelLiew I don't, but I won't get the hat :P
 
You're right, I don't want to sell my soul for hats, the post has been deleted.
 
@AndrewLi wow, that's weird. I thought the desktop site gave you all the features of the desktop site, even if you're viewing it on a phone. I wonder if the snowflake is using something that your phone's browser doesn't support. (Dunno what that would be, but...) . Have you tried multiple browsers?
 
12:50 AM
@MonicaCellio Hmm. It may have been some weird bug. It's back now
 
@AndrewLi I noticed a few hours ago that the snowflake was slow to show up on page loads -- assumed it was us pounding the snot out of the server or something. So maybe it was that?
 
Maybe
 
Yeah, you are right, I don't have anything that will bring something new to the topic at this moment.
thanks though!
 
Never let me stoop that low for a hat again
 
I'm going to open up more bounties now, suggest a question that you can answer well? @ATaco @alecxe
 
12:56 AM
Suggest some, but I won't answer anything non-constructive.
 
Rob
@SamuelLiew Oups - didn't know you were awarding the bounty now - had one coming :P
 
@Rob aww, I'm going to open up more bounties, what else can you answer?
 
Give me Lua, I speak Lua better than I speak English
 
Rob
Anything C# :D
 
12:59 AM
@AndrewLi I was planning to answer it anyway
 
Darn, I cannot Answer that one
 
Rob
@SamuelLiew Most of it's covered I feel. I'll have a think about it if you decide on that one. Though pick a question/answer you want to bounty - don't mind us just for the hats :)
I'm also curious - do you get the hat if you award a bounty to a competing answer?
I've already got a bounty going on a question I answered
 
I don't think it works if you award the bounty
 
@Rob Yes, tested on a competing answer manually
 
Rob
Yes - you do get it, or Yes to Saiid?
 
1:03 AM
@Saiid Yes, manually awarded bounties are also tested
 
Rob
Ah, nevermind though - answer was posted long ago
 
@SamuelLiew I meant I don't think it works for you if you are the one awarding the bounty
 
Rob
It's only for answers posted during WB right?
 
@Rob I believe so
Has anyone gotten the This Is Fine hat from @SamuelLiew's bounty-giving?
 
@Rob Yes, has to be during WB, proven here stackoverflow.com/q/40581507/584192 (10k), user Emile didn't receive hat while I did, on a bounty self-awarded to a competing answer
 
Rob
1:05 AM
Alright, thanks
 
@Saiid It does, see above comment
 
Yeah
 
@SamuelLiew maybe just has to be in December
there was a Dec. 13th counterexample
 
Just got This Is Fine
 
Nice
but your answer is a bit subpar imo
 
1:09 AM
Ehh
It works
 
Sure @Saiid but it's not what they're looking for...
 
@Saiid Don't forget to delete your answer, or improve it.
 
@SamuelLiew I was about to head there in a second
@AndrewLi You have a point. Mine takes a bit less code than yours, though :P
 
@Saiid Less code doesn't mean better by any means
Especially if they do different things
 
1:12 AM
Please explain how they do different things
 
@Saiid In your example, c() is not a property of the string. It's a function call
 
Rephrase: they do the same thing, but the OP explicity requesting a property, not a function
 
Yeah, it's a valid suggestion, although not a great one.
 
Not valid imo
 
*shrugs*
 
1:14 AM
Either improve or remove
 
Am I wrong that I should have received another badge/hat?
I edited the question, then answered it
or does my answer then have to be accepted?
hmm
 
I'm not sure
I thought there was one like that though
Explainer
nvm, has to be less than 12 hours
oh well
 
Anyone want to close a random question, pile on edits, and then reopen it 4 teh hatz?
Preferably one of my questions so that I can get Abominable and No Longer Grinchy
I don't have 3K anywhere :(
 
Please don't do that to random questions posted by unsuspecting users. Try to find a question that deserves the close/edit.
 
1:26 AM
Do not sell your soul for hats
7
 
I think you made a typo
 
Hi!
 
ello
 
Wow, the Docs has a new formatting again :P
 
@ATaco You clearly wrote 'not'. I believe this was a typo for ''.
 
1:29 AM
Any new discoveries for the hat 6?
 
Do not sell your soul for hats
 
Another typo
:/
Please fix your typo
 
Do NOT sell your soul for hats
 
So many typos
 
@Saiid seriously though, no soul selling
 
1:35 AM
:'/
 
@ATaco Too late
 
@KritixiLithos wat how you get bert
 
@MonicaCellio I was going to suggest one of my own questions :P
 
@StephenLeppik ah. Ok, that's less bad. In general, let's try to remember that the things we do in search of hats can create work for other people (e.g. reviewers) or interrupt other activities (e.g. an in-progress answer to a question being closed/edited). I'm not saying don't do stuff; SE should be designing hats to stimulate positive activity. I'm just saying: let's try to be careful. General comment, not aimed at anyone in particular.
4
 
As previously stated, Do not sell your soul for hats
 
1:52 AM
:/
 
:/
 
\:
 
\:
 
:D
 
'_'/
 
1:54 AM
'_'/
@AndrewLi :D
 
no.
 
Yes.
 
\:/
 
\:/
 
:┑
 
1:55 AM
 
Time to go hat hunting
 
 
 
anybody got a secret hat
 
∫αωαδ
 
1:56 AM
i meant a secret secret hat
that somebody hasnt really figured out yet
 
Rob
@StephenLeppik If you want abominable, VTC this question duplicate before I hammer it
 
No :(
 
UH
@Rob i dont even have close votes!
:(
 
Rob
@MasterBob Flag it
Then go 'should be closed' -> 'duplicate'
 
@Rob flagged
 
Rob
2:00 AM
@StephenLeppik You around?
@MasterBob Hammered - lemme know if you get it, haven't tested it with flags, only votes
 
I have a feeling the secret hats have all been found.
 
@AndrewLi theyve been all found, but some people just dont know how they got it lol
 
@MasterBob is it confirmed?
 
@AndrewLi what is confirmed?
 
@MasterBob that there are no more secret hats?
 
2:02 AM
The Taco Hat Will be MINE
 
No soul selling :P
 
I'm not selling my soul.
 
@AndrewLi nothing can ever be confirmed with 100%, but its not likely theres more
 
I'm just editing a lot more than I otherwise would.
For the Tacos
 
I'm editing for a gold badge
and 24
 
2:04 AM
@Rob did not get the hat, but its registered because i got the first flag badge
@AndrewLi really? i'm going for electorate (have to vote so much)
 
Rob
Hats are processed separately @masterbob
 
@MasterBob Got that long time ago
Going for copy editor
 
Rob
Usually 10-15min delay
 
@AndrewLi oh well
@Rob but its already registered (at least, the badge is)
 
469/500 edits!
 
2:05 AM
amazing
im like, 2 or 3, maybe even 1
oh its 3
 
What's up with the highlighting
on the doc
Don't bold things that shouldn't be
 
@Rob i got the hat, confirmed with flags
 
Rob
@MasterBob \o/
 
@Rob yeah YAY!!!
thx
 
Which one?
 
Rob
2:09 AM
No worries
 
@MasterBob I must say, the "what's up doc" hat fits you very well
 
@AndrewLi you meant, it fits my cat very well
 
2
Q: Where's a lifesaver when I need one?

Robbie WxyzI've set myself to go earn the Lifesaver hat: So, I went and posted an answer which was accepted. And, here we see that that question did result in a tumbleweed badge for the OP. Am I misunderstanding the requirement or is there something else wrong? Any ideas?

 
@Rob Sorry, bit of a break. I can't VtC yet
 
Rob
2:14 AM
No worries - I'll let you know when I find another, flagging works too
 
@Rob which hat?
 
@AndrewLi abominable, proven by me!
 
For Where In The World, what counts as interacting with a site?
 
Upvotes
 
Yeah. Flagging works
@JamesENL voting, posting, commenting, flagging,cving, etc
 
2:16 AM
Ty
 
@AndrewLi although im not really sure how to do a reopen flag
 
@MasterBob must be 3k+
 
@AndrewLi i know, i checked the priviledges page
 
@Rob how did you get the taco hat
 
Rob
2:21 AM
No idea
Was editing out 'thanks' from old posts
 
Taco hat seems to do with edits
Usually awarded with elementary
 
@Panda yes, not leaving an edit summary is one theory
 
^Yea
 
@Panda however, it has to be multiple, bc i did it 1 time and i didnt get it
 
I think I got it while aiming for some other hat
 
2:23 AM
Who changed criteria for this is fine???
 
@Rob showed up too late :(
 
Me
jk
 
@AndrewLi eh, has good reason
 
@MasterBob no it doesn't
 
@AndrewLi and why does it not?
 
2:25 AM
answer is correct, not question
 
ok
editing
done
 
Are there any theories for the hat 6?
 
Yeah, I got it from a question posted way before WB
 
I've tried it for 3 days in a row
 
@Panda 6 secret hats? XD
 
2:26 AM
Definitely not ;)
 
6?
I got it from doing nothing
 
@SamuelLiew encouraging users to post answers that are immediately deleted after getting an upvote and you award the bounty is highly disappointing. I get you want to help people get hats but it's encouraging bad behavior and I'd recommend stopping it
3
 
@bluefeet may I ask a question regarding secret hats?
 
Hats are fun but let's not litter the sites in the process of trying to get them.
3
 
^^^
 
2:29 AM
@AndrewLi you may ask but I'm most likely not going to answer
 
Have all the secrets hats been found?
Worth a try
 
Do not sell your soul for hats
 
It's day 2. You've got lots of days left to find hats. Why try to get them all in two days?
 
OK flagged
 
Compared to last year's number of secret hats, there seem to be much more
 
2:31 AM
@bluefeet I wanted confirmation that our search hadn't come to a disappointing end ;)
 
You'll have to wait and see
 
Ok
 
Have we figured what Blue In The Face is for yet?
 
Nope
I got that one from doing nothing
 
@AndrewLi upvoting comments?
 
Rob
2:33 AM
I'm almost positive it's just having a bunch of comments upvoted quickly
All our tests only yielded about 5 comment votes, while @AndrewLi ended up with 10+ over two comments
 
that almost is key
 
Huh, interesting.
 
Shall we mass-upvote some comments, then? It's not particularly harmful to the site
 
@Saiid seems tempting
anybody got an idea where
 
So we just have to upvote like 10 or so distinct comments?
 
2:36 AM
not 10 distinct comments i think
 
Rob
From what I saw: there were two comments. The first one was 'possible duplicate of...' which had 5 upvotes. Then immediately after was another normal comment, with (i think) 7 upvotes
 
Blue in the face?
I've one comment with 6 upvotes
 
Rob
The question didn't get closed, even though it had 5 upvotes
 
@Panda was the comment posted before winter bash or did you get the hat
 
Ah, ok, I see what you mean now.
 
2:37 AM
Posted yesterday
Let me see if I can find the link
 
@Panda I think we had 8-10 last year, somewhere in that range
 
Wait, it's 5 upvotes
You'll need to post your code. — Panda 19 hours ago
Pretty sure it was 6 yesterday
 
Rob
Yeah, it's not pure upvotes
 
hah, that's easy enough
 
Rob
We tested that
 
2:38 AM
aw
 
Anyone willing to try on my comment ;)
 
try what?
 
What's this about upvoting 10 comments?
 
8 to 10 up votes?
 
I did my part
 
2:39 AM
What does it do?
 
Blue in the face
 
It gives you a badge, and potentially a hat
 
Just to clarify, it's hypothetically about getting bunch of comments by a specific user heavily-voted each?
 
Which badge?
 
Well, if multiple times
 
2:40 AM
hmm... the number of blue feet is 2... maybe 2 comments?
 
@MasterBob Let's test
 
Well, test on what?
 
Rob
It might be worthwhile using the sandbox question for this
 
need a guineapig to conduct an experiment yo
@Rob Ah!
 
Rob
2:45 AM
One person can post a bunch of comments (with links, etc, 'possible duplicate') etc, and then we all upvote them
Since this is really unorganized, can we just have one person making the comments until it's verified?
 
Sure
 
Rob
otherwise we'll end up with 500 comments and none of them getting enough upvotes
 
I've actually got two comments ready, though, if anyone wants to upvote them
no links, but
idk
maybe we should upvote with the [ask] and [tour]?
@Rob What sandbox question is this?
 
Rob
Hold on
 
Rep-capping is tough when nobody is asking good questions...
 
2:47 AM
lol
 
Rob
Ah, it's a protected question
Annoying
 
lol
 
@AlexanderO'Mara yeah it is
That's why you go for bounties
@Rob My comments got 10+ upvotes?!
 
Well, one comment, two comments
 
how about this? is doing stuff on meta sites fine?
 
Rob
2:49 AM
@AndrewLi You had one with 5ish and another with 7ish right next to each other
 
huh
 
Rob
@BalarkaSen It's closed
 
so what? we can still comment as much as we want on any draft
 
The doc is a bit cluttered guys
 
Rob
Ah, right
Well, we can comment on this question: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3122/…
 
2:50 AM
And the random question marks are not organized
 
Rob
It explicitly says we can 'post comments to this question or its answers'
 
yeah, fair enough
 
Does my name show up as Andrew Li when editing?
 
Rob
So.. can one person post two comments there - one with a link, one without - and we all upvote both those comments
@AndrewLi Yes - if you mean the google doc
 
oki
 
2:53 AM
yeah
The comments won't load for me
 
M̵̳̙͔̟̱͕̓̀̄̉̅ͧ̋͊͌͑́͌ͪ̒̿̀̚a͔̟̝͔ͥ̈́̏ͮͯ̇͆̊̒ͦͦ͘͢͜y̵̴̢͕̝̩̱͈͕̼̣͕̟̌͗̾ͤ̎͌̄ͣͨ͊ͬb̡̯̰̪̜͙̟̝̠‌​͚̜̥̙̤̃ͨ̋̒̒̊ͧͤ͐̓͋̌̾̇̔̈́̀́͡͠e̵ͯͪ̿̿̂̄ͫ̃҉͏͎̣̹̱̜͉̦̞̪̘̠̝̝͍̼̜̖̥̭͟ ̣̞͙͚̝̰̞̹̗̲̣͙͍͍̀̓͊̂̋ͣ̏̑̍̊͌ͩ͐̎̀ͣͣ̚͟ͅh̛͋̏̍̆ͤ͛͐ͨ̌̋ͤ̎̂ͨ̂̓̑̚̕͟͏̻̣͖̖͚͚͓̲̼̪ȁ̔̅̿͐̑͡͏̝͓̮͚̘‌​̦̰͚͎͔͉͚̮̠̕͜ͅṱ̱̼̖̓̂ͭ̏̅͂ͥ͌ͯ͌͠sͪ̓ͪ̄̌̓ͧ͋͐ͬ̅̑҉̨̪̬͎͍̥̬?̡̮̳͙͓͔̹̘̹͓̘̻̦̣͎̫̐ͤ̐͛́͝ ̧̦̼̘͕̪̠̙͖̦̯̦̘͉͈͕͔̘̻̲͑ͨ̊̈́̐ͫ͐̌ͯ̀͘͝Ḩ̷̸̸̹͉̩̜̹̞ͯ̃̃ͧͬͨ̌̀̾̐̈̇ͧ͛̃͐̀ͦ͞A̴̦̗̬̠͙̭͉̟̺͇̭̰͔͕̯̅‌​̃͋ͪ̈́̉̓̌ͯ̈́͆̋̀ͤ̇̂̿̈́̂͡͡Ṱ̲͎͉̣̳̺̱̜̦̬͕̣͉͇͊̌ͥ͐͒̈́̓́ͥ́́̋͂̅ͬ̆͗ͥ̕͢͡S̍ͧ͗̒͗̂̈ͬ͊̚̚͢͏̗̣̳ͅ!̶̨‌​̡͇͚̙͚̭̱̣̲̳̤̞̫̗̣̦̮̖̞͒͆̿̄͑̃̎͡
lol
that's horrible
 
ugh
 
All hail Zalgo!
 
emoji arts
 
Bobince's answer is amazing
 
2:55 AM
yeah'
 
uh, i dont have enough rep on the meta site, only SO
 
The pony he comes
 
Sorry for spam, but
H̶̛̏̉̒͗̌̈́̉͒̈͛͒́̑́̐̀́̽̀̾̈̍̆̽̓̓̆̀̓̂̉̒͒̍̒͆̊͗̓̈́̓͛̃̀́͆̉̉̇̾͊̍̈̓̾͗́͊̈́͂͌̎̍̄͘͘͘̚͘͠͠͝͝͝͝͝͠‌​̢̨̧̨̛̗̝̩̩̺̣̖̟̭̞͎̝͖̥̳͙͖̰̫̺̹͍̙̖͕̣̻͓̩͚̻̤̞͔̰̲͖̣̩̼̮̰̲̰͈͙̹̗͓͔͉̞͔͇̯̈́̌̀̎͒̈́̊̒̈́̈̈́̈́̇̄̂̾̒̚͘͝͝‌​̢̧̧̡̢̰̠͎͕̫̼̺͔͈̝̩̦͖͈͖͎̤̩̫̖̰͈̳̜̦̲͎̻̭̬̭̥̲̤̙ͅa̵͋͐̿̔̿͂̓́̀̇̇͐̏̋͐̍͗̊̈́͒̂́̊̈́̽͛̉̊̔̋͊̕̕͘̚͠͝͠‌​̡̢̛͚̠̜̞̦̣͖̠̼̰̰͎̙̭̜̣̫͋̀̐̄̌̆͐̓̽̈́̀̓̓̾̉͑̽͊́̂̑̍̏̅͊̽̄̌̇̑͒̆̆̄́̽̾̉̒́̋̇̓̾̓̽͗̋̊̓̾̆̀͂͌̇͒̚̚̕͝‌​̡̨̧̡̧̡̡͎͉̘̟̞͖̭̠̘͈̩̞̠̮͈̬͇̥̥͉̫͈̼͚̳̲̟̥̤̖͚̙̫͇̬̘̲̠̲͔̪̟̹̖͍̰̥̜̗͚̤̘̥̱͖̥͙͔̳̼̞̫̫̘̭̝̝̦͜͜͜͜ͅͅ‌​t̶̛̊̈́́̀̄̓͛̓͒͑́̈́͒͂̈́͌̄̈́̔͂̉̄͒̀͌̍͗͗̓̽̒̃̌̉͂̎̈́̄͛̍͌̈́͛̑̋̈́́́́̿̓́̈́̂̐̌̾̅́̓̌͂̑͛̽͘̚̕͝͝͝͝͝͠͝
ah, dammit
didn't work
oh well
 
glares
 
2:57 AM
Why is stuff Open Sans and Arial?!
 
Rob
So - is anyone going to make a few comments we can upvote?
 
One font please!!!
 
@Rob right
 
@Rob Where?
 
Rob
2:58 AM
 
@AndrewLi done
@Rob I don't have enough rep to comment/vote on the meta site
 
Woo! I got They Live!
From editing
and reviewing suggested edits
 
editing wut?
ah
 
Nice @JamesENL
I got it like that too
 
@Rob I just did
 
2:59 AM
I want to say Necro'ing
 

« first day (5 days earlier)      last day (43 days later) »