« first day (16 days earlier)      last day (2945 days later) » 

04:04
All right, @Aurora, you got me...
0
A: Accepting Nominations — Who should moderate this site?

anonymous2 Notes: Just throwing my hat in the ring at the recommendation of a user whom I deeply respect. :) My nomination as far as my IoT reputation and badges are concerned isn't impressive, mostly because my actual knowledge of IoT is somewhat limited. However, avid users will bear me witness ...

 
6 hours later…
09:43
@anonymous2 probably useful to mention your timezone
That could be an advantage to you - currently the other nominees (including me) are all in GMT (or within 2 hours of it)
So there would be no mod coverage around US afternoon/evening
 
1 hour later…
10:50
@BenceKaulics you'll be happy to know my question-answer ratio is now 21-11
Hi @BenceKaulics
Aurora0001 has stopped a feed from being posted into this room
Hi, impressive ratio.
Still beaten by @Helmar though
You have 5 aurorahats too now @BenceKaulics, which is good
Helmar has 6
I have 7
Ghanima has 4
I have to catch up with the stars
11:21
Yeah, you're quite far behind with them
I will check your answer later on and also make some pun for atarts.
Guaranteed star for anyone who posts a tag review with a pun in its name
Like I did with
Also, that question was quite interesting to research @BenceKaulics - I never realised quite how cheap cloud servers could be
 
1 hour later…
12:46
@Aurora0001 Done.
@Aurora0001 Which is when I am the most on.
13:38
Also @anonymous2 congratulations for having the most stars so far
@Aurora0001 Lol. Not my initiative.
Say, I found some evidence on a case we had a bit back.
Look carefully. Very carefully.
Not logged in?
Yeah, I somehow got around it once, but can't reproduce
What browser are you using?
I am able to reproduce, but I've got a very particular setup.
Chrome 55
Just tried it in Incognito, and it didn't work
Try logging out of SE instead.
13:42
Got it to work!
Just make sure you remember what your password is to log back in.
@Aurora0001 How?
Let me see if I can reproduce first
Yep, follow these steps exactly:
Go to area 51
Logged in or not?
16
Internet of Thingsiot.stackexchange.com

Beta Q&A site for everyday objects embedded with electronics to be sensed, monitored, and controlled remotely.

Currently in private beta.

Not logged in
Click "Visit!"
Click "Users" in the navbar
Pick a random user
Click on a question or answer of theirs
You then have full site access to do anything
You're right!
Unbelievable that you managed to crack it that fast, but that's right on. :)
13:45
Doubt it's a serious bug though
I wonder if it's a cookie or something that gets set
@Aurora0001 I still have a hard time believing that we have as many people who did that as who joined the site.
I wonder what you two are up to
@Ghanima We were going through the puzzle about people reached.
Here are the clues:
1. Helmar has reached 1k people.
2. We are in private beta.
OK, the cookie that matters is the rawr cookie
3. We only have 548 users total.
13:47
Well my answers are so spectacular, that they just assume for every IP address, there are two people looking over the shoulder to read it too.
2
I am fine with anything but "we're trying to circumvent private beta to get our sockpuppet voting ring in place"
2
@Tag wiki reviewers: Your turn :)
@Helmar that's probably it!
@Ghanima to be fair, it's just a way to get around the private beta's "you must be logged in to see this"
@Helmar :( wish I could make answers that good...
13:48
Doesn't give you any privileges other than seeing the site :P
@Aurora0001 ...and @Helmar's spectacular answers...
Which is a privilege kept for the elite 548 true users, but our secret has been hacked!
@Helmar done
argh, I can't reproduce my 'bug' now
Got it again
@Aurora0001 someone leaked our secret to the SE staff... Stick 'em up!
I blame @Ghanima, he's always spoiling our voting rings innocent activities
@anonymous2 I wouldn't be of much use on that site
13:54
@Helmar You can always ask
I am almost certain that Aurora has voted on appoximately 101% of posts anyways :D
3
Are there even 222 posts?;)
@Helmar it's madnificent!
111 questions, 1.7 answer ratio. 111 X 2.7 = 300.
@Ghanima It certainly is :)
Theoretically, a user who has posted absolutely nothing could get the Civic Duty Badge.
13:57
@anonymous2 you're outstarring his Most Madnificent
2
@Ghanima I'm only one ahead.
Is the feed that live?
@Helmar No, it's definitely a few minutes behind.
I count already four more for you on my screen right now
So, congrats on the black hole :)
I think some of those are in my score.
14:00
@anonymous2 6 to 8 weeks behind
BEWARE ALL! WHEN YOU GET THE BLACK HOLE BADGE, YOUR ACCOUNT DISAPPEARS!!
If you ever wonder why Alexa and Co. sound strange sometimes: Dearest creature in creation, Study English pronunciation.
The top 5 users by rep own 40% of the posts on the site so far
@Aurora0001 Dang
The top 2 own 22% of the posts
Top 10 users own 54% of posts
14:06
@Aurora0001 Top 2 = You and Helmar ?
Arghhhhhh.... I feel myself being deleted...
STOP MAKING ME ADD NEW STAR HATS
ARGGGHH
wow, this has 30 upvotes now
30
Q: Securing small home automation setup

AndyI have a small home automation lab (that I keep saying I'll expand, but haven't). In this set up, I have a control system to control lights (utilizing the x10 protocol), blinds, a Nest thermostat and two web cams. With the recent record setting DDoS attacks utilizing unsecured IoT devices, I'd l...

@anonymous2, looks like you went bang :P
Somehow a pattern on SE, highest voted posts by least involved people :D
14:21
It just has the advantage of being posted early
And being applicable to a lot of people
And being on top of the highest voted list from day one
that guy deserves a hat!
Certainly
Problem with the highest voted answer is, it's really not that good, not as off-topic as it originally was, but still. Cookies are virtually non-existant in IoT devices.
It's just reasonable general IT security tips that totally shoot past the question
But lists and first impression reason will always beat a fitting answer with paragraphs like Gilles'
Might be worth putting a bounty on once we reach public beta
To try and get a proper canonical answer
@Aurora0001 BLACK HOLE
14:35
Party!
Oh, no!
I guess I'm "bang" for the next thirty days.
That's what I get for falling in a black hole. :)
What's that, a smug grin? ;)
Had to tack a line onto the end of my nomination so people know who I am. :)
14:56
Seems like an annoying 'feature'
But, like everything, it's rate limited
Breathing? Rate limited to 1 per second
Stars? Rate limited per day
and rate limited for how many you can star per second/minute
15:08
@Aurora0001Thank
s
For the great answer, I wanted to see such points that you have listed.
No problem
Is there anything else you'd like to see @BenceKaulics?
You know I wait before accept, but you have answered my question.
Yeah, just checking to make sure you're happy with my answer ;)
Could you check the tag wiki queue as well @BenceKaulics and @Helmar?
I am.
I will, i am on phone now and queues dont show unless i switch to desktop view.
Oh, fair enough
No hurry
Also, I do wonder why I sometimes get mystery downvotes
If only people commented :P
15:18
Site user number increases and view per day decreases 😕
Yep.
@BenceKaulics well, this is to be expected around Christmas though
People are off work, hence not able to slack off on IoT
😃
1 review done was not more.
I'm surprised the emojis work @BenceKaulics
Still, if they're Unicode emojis they're quite well supported now
Me too. 😉
But quite cool.
😱
Also, 1 rep off protecting questions!
15:22
This one is funny.
But you barely take the lead before @Helmar.
Let him do the protecting. 😃
Might be worth protecting this: iot.stackexchange.com/questions/398/…
Until its fate is decided on meta
Yes I approve this idea.
It won't stop anyone with rep posting, but it stops new users who don't know about the meta thread from answering on it
Plus I do love testing new powers :P
I should get the Black Hole hat now, thanks!
15:27
You are welcome.
I am plannig to hook up mqtt at home. I hope it wont go well and I must ask some question.
2
@BenceKaulics you can ask&answer questions even if it goes "well". for sure you'll learn something along the way that is worth putting it up here.
2
15:54
hmm, is there a way to have an objective answer to this?
16:32
@Aurora0001 What's next - 100 stars? :)
And after that, it's 1k, right?
@anonymous2 50 probably
then 100
@Aurora0001 Does the Aurorhat contest end the same time as WinterBash?
hopefully
@Ghanima don't know, but I think it's an interesting question
@anonymous2 it will end at a random point between January 3rd and 10th
@Ghanima What did you mean by your comment on meta?
16:41
nothing that should trouble your mind
but I guess that waiting it out should solve the problem
@Ghanima Sure. :)
I'm not impatient to get the badge, I was just curious when I noticed I hadn't gotten it.
@anonymous2 you can hit the vote cap without voting on 40 posts I think
@Aurora0001 I am unable to vote on questions and on answers...
I know, but your cap for today might be 38
@Aurora0001 Okay, looks like you may have it nailed.
16:47
Posting an answer now to clarify
@Aurora0001 Great!
@anonymous2 see my answer
As usual, SE is overly convoluted for very little benefit!
Also, can't protect iot.stackexchange.com/questions/398/… because the association bonus means that new user didn't count as 'new'
17:05
1
Q: Vox Populi Badge not given

bangI was fairly intensely running through a bunch of older posts this morning and used up all 40 of my votes. When I try to upvote a question, I see: Totally normal. What isn't normal is that the Vox Populi Progress remains at 38/40, and has done for the past hour or so. Usually, it takes a fe...

When protecting, must there be an answer by a user with <10 rep at the time of protection?
I thought it would just be any answer where the user was new at the time
If so, it's entirely useless now
don't understand where you're going
What I'm saying is I can't protect anything, but I thought I would be able to
hm, then: dunno
I think I just misunderstood the criteria, so don't worry
17:12
if the vox populi thing is like you describe
and there is nothing to fix it
then that's a terrible badge
Yeah, the whole vote algorithm seems stupid to me
just give me 40 votes to use how I like!
Can someone who is good at the internet please help my family is dying @internetofshit https://t.co/kbEhXIo3TW
guess we will see things like that more and more in future
Welcome to the future!
17:50
@Ghanima is there an English version of that quote?
in your question?
@Aurora0001 I considered a verbatim translation
but actually that wouldn't help much
well I'll include it nonetheless
Otherwise I'd just Google Translate and get a worse translation than what you could do
After saying I thought that question was interesting, I'm not sure how answerable it actually is now
The AI question I mean
it's google translate
didn't do that bad a job
@Aurora0001 yepp
Yeah, looks like a good translation
@Ghanima looks like you got the Sir Ask-A-Lot hat!
18:06
@Aurora0001 yeah me
that was easy
Now ask 10 questions!
Then 20
Then 50
Then 100!
Oh dear... 3.9 questions/day now
18:27
@Aurora0001 Hmm, let's see if I can do something...
My chat name hasn't caught up yet.
I think that will stay as anonymous2
Actually, I wonder if actually ever will. My name on the rest of SE is still anonymous2.
@Aurora0001 That's what I'm thinking.
It's based on your account at Motor Vehicle Maintenance & Repair
See your "parent user" here: chat.stackexchange.com/users/202730
@Aurora0001 Right, makes sense.
If you change the parent user, I think your username will change
18:29
@Aurora0001 Shall I try?
Worked
I still see anonymous2.
Oh, no I don't.
:)
Shows as "bang" for me
Are you able to change back again?
I guess I am!
Archived messages retain their old names.
I hate to say it, but it looks like we're on the same track as this proposal:
Deep Webdeepweb.stackexchange.com

Q&A site for parts of the internet that cannot be indexed by traditional search engines

Closed after 21 days in beta.

18:31
I do remember that happening on MVR&M. I was reading through very old chats (5 years or so) and only as I caught up did I discover that "Larry" was actually "Move More Comments Link To Top".
@anonymous2 hahaha
Stats are a bit better...
We already have more users and significantly more avid users.
Yeah, views are headed that way though
Admittedly, obviously Deep Web never made it out of Private Beta.
@Aurora0001 I'm wondering if I should actually have put my meta post on Meta.SE with a link to IoT.
Sure, it would have been closed as a dupe; but it may possibly have brought more attention to the site...
In any case, the majority of my questions get closed as dupes. :)
Everything has been asked before on MSE :P
I've been digging through the data dump as to why Dark Web.SE closed
It's honestly quite concerning
"Sometimes a technology buzzword can be a somewhat uncertain premise on which to build a site. Pop culture sees it as one thing; the actual participants use it for something else... and a fledgling community tries valiantly to tie it all together into something on which to build a site."
"It was a really good try, but this time it just did not work."
Is it just me, or does that sound a lot like a certain site's current title?
On the other hand, the closed site didn't have a nominations thread for Pro Tem Moderators
Yeah, not one of the closed proposals had a moderator nomination thread, so I think that's a good sign
18:39
@Aurora0001 Hilarious, that's exactly what I was busy doing. :)
If only there was a proper data dump viewer
@Aurora0001 Exactly what I was going to ask.
I've just been using Ctrl+F with Notepad++ to look through the XML files
@Aurora0001 Yes, but trying to link Q's with A's is tricky.
@Aurora0001 nooooooo
no
18:42
16
Q: StackExchange Data Dump Viewer - A Desktop Tool for Viewing the StackExchange Data Dumps

Nathan OsmanAbout: StackExchange Data Dump Viewer is a small Qt-based application that allows you to view the contents of the data dumps. This includes the Ask Ubuntu data dump. Code: The application is written in C++ using the Qt framework. The project depends on libqtwebkit as well, because some of the ...

@Aurora0001 call it a good sign
maybe SE sees the future of the emerging field of IoT even though the questions in this private beta does not yet reflect it ;)
Perhaps someone should share a link in the SmartThings community while we're in private beta after all
I can do it if no-one else is interested
@Aurora0001 You follow my tracks!
Perhaps it's not a great idea to keep saying "yeah, wait 'til public beta"
Because it might never come :P
Plus, there's another advantage in that the SE team can't kill the site as quickly because they're all away for Christmas ;)
@Aurora0001 Just what is the SmartThings community?
18:50
The SmartThings community community.smartthings.com would be receptive. We had previously looked at doing tagged topics on the normal SE. — Jody Albritton 14 hours ago
@Aur, go for it!
More people on board, the better!
yeah, go for it
in Ask Ubuntu General Room, 9 mins ago, by Videonauth
steam users , you can get GRID motorsports for free on humble bundle site: https://www.humblebundle.com/store/grid-free-game?hmb_campaign=grid_free_2016&hm‌​b_source=bundle_page&hmb_medium=banner_cross (next 23 hours)
19:11
Does this sound alright?
Discourse is so annoying for new users though
"New users can only include two links!"
Even though I love links to save people a click
20:04
0
Q: See number of site views today

anonymous2I'm a beta user on Internet Of Things. I've been watching our site views stats for a while, but one thing that bugs me is that appears to be some kind of average. Would there be a way to see how many views the site had yesterday or December 20th or something like that? Obviously, it would be p...

@anonymous2 glorfindel really lives on meta
@Ghanima One gets the impression.
there's a new user on RPi. An anonymous - any relations?
especially: Your focus as a new community should be on asking good questions and posting good answers, ironing out the scope of the site, etc., not on the vote timing spread and similar minutiae.
;)
boy, that quantcast compilation of data is scary
@Ghanima It doesn't look very impressive, eh?
I mean the additional stuff, like whether the users like NBL or whatnot
as for the numbers
well, it's private

« first day (16 days earlier)      last day (2945 days later) »