@IsaacMoses It also works with sub if that matters

@Kazibácsi That's good for making fine-print footnotes, but for referring to them in the text, it's more expected to use superscript numbers.

@Kazi Is this a poll to find out who pays attention to where their Tanakh text comes from and who doesn't?

@DoubleAA No, I'd really like to know, and I suppose my question would be shot as off-topic. Based on the version with meteg I thought it was hameat, but now I see that there's not meteg in the Keter Aram Tzova (see right column, beginning of line in Iyov). But eventually we turn back to this question of course...

@IsaacMoses Sorry, you're right, I've just skimmed through the question. I often add links or hat tips using sub.

@kazi but it looks like you have all the information already. There shouldn't be a Meteg and it's thus Nach. Lots of modern prints apparently goofed on the Meteg or perpetuated, purposefully or not, someone else's goof. What else are you seeking to gain from a poll like this besides who bothered to check an accurate text for this detail? To find out who thinks which text is most accurate?