« first day (1496 days earlier)      last day (3248 days later) » 

2:13 AM
@yEz this is probably clear already to both you and @MonicaCellio, but just to make it extra explicit: While wrongness, even to the point of delusion, can be frustrating, especially in a forum for Torah information, it's unfortunately not something we can cure by remote-control (or even, in most cases, by near-relationship). Often, frustrating as it might be, the best course is indeed to ignore and move on.
 
@IsaacMoses right. Wrongness, even arrogant wrongness, is frustrating but might not be fixable. If it crosses over into rudeness or disruptiveness, let us know about that, but otherwise, unfortunately, there are annoying people in the world.
 
 
2 hours later…
4:03 AM
3
Q: Liability for stealing one shoe

Isaac MosesSuppose Alice has a pair of shoes, worth $100. Bob steals one of the shoes and destroys it. Setting aside any special penalties, If Bob is caught and found liable, does he have to pay Alice back $50 for the one shoe, $100, because he has deprived her of use of both shoes, or some other amount?

Suppose Asghar has a pair of shoes, and the Mossad comes in the middle of the night and takes one of them...
 
4:20 AM
@Scimonster Then you have to get into tza'ar and boshet, on top of the nezek
 
 
1 hour later…
5:34 AM
@IsaacMoses Was the question inspired by that though?
 
 
8 hours later…
1:11 PM
@Scimonster How are jokes and Mossad operations similar?
 
1:44 PM
@IsaacMoses I guess you missed that. google.com/#q=mossad%20stole%20my%20shoe
 
@Scimonster I mean, they're both things you don't make the perpetrators spell out.
 
Summary: British Islamist Asghar Bukhari couldn't find one of his shoes. He did the obvious thing, and blamed the Mossad for coming in the middle of the night and stealing his shoe, to terrorize him.
He quickly became the butt of many internet jokes.
 
 
3 hours later…
4:50 PM
If I have a meal consisting of rice and meat (mezonot and shekhakol), upon completing my meal. I make a coffee. Do I need to make another shekhakol on the coffee?
 
5:40 PM
Shog9 on June 15, 2015

Long-suffering readers may have noticed that, as we’ve expanded Stack Overflow into strange and exciting territories, we always start by hiring a new community manager. These intrepid souls act as emulsifiers, enabling and promoting communication between the company and the growing community. This role is just as critical for our 140+ English-language sites, where our small team works to ensure that requests and concerns are addressed in a timely fashion (6-8 weeks, give or take). Whenever possible, community managers are hired from within the community itself – after all, who knows its needs better than someone who has been a part of it? …

 
6:32 PM
2
Q: Multiple brochos for one food type?

user2016831It has come to my attention (from a local Rabbi) that one is required to say a brocho on each and every bit of food he/she eats, unless he/she was thinking about that particular food at the time of the brocho. The example he gave was that if I ate (and said a "ha'aitz" brocho on) an orange, if ...

 
6:53 PM
@TheOne Pareve coffee?
 
yEz
@Scimonster gasp
@IsaacMoses @MonicaCellio I know this sounds silly and counter-intuitive, but is there any way to not delete the strongly downvoted posts of delusional users so that it keeps their reputation lower?
 
7:09 PM
@yEz So, you want to make MY worse for the purpose of sticking it to an individual? (excuse crassness)
 
@Scimonster obviously!
 
yEz
@IsaacMoses No - I want to keep the crummy material which is hanging out way down at the end of a thread where it belongs around, so that the party responsible for such crumminess is saddles with the consequences of its crumminess, and thereby improve the site by alerting users to the crumminess of crummy users. (Imagine me waving my thumbs while saying this)
 
@Yishai I believe that the halacha gets trickier when you switch forms (solid -> liquid)
 
@yEz The direct effect - continuing to host crummy content, to the detriment of the reading and googling public, seems stronger to me than the indirect effect - changing people's perception of the same user's other, presumably higher-voted (but presumably undeservedly so) content, by maintaining a depression in the content's author's reputation score
... Right (he confirmed his own idea). If the other content is problematic, fix/downvote/flag/close/comment it, rather than trying to make it look worse through grama degrama
 
Plus @IsaacMoses most of our page views are drive-by googlers who don't care about the author of a post or his/her history or personality. For them it's just best to get rid of it. They won't have been 'alerted to the crumminess' of anyone, and just go about their merry way.
 
7:28 PM
Sometimes a downvoted, wrong answer serves a purpose: "don't do this". If an answer is merely wrong it should be downvoted; if it's not actually an answer (link-only, tangent, "me too", etc), or if it's rude, those are reasons to delete. "Counter to Judaism" is a case I've seen go both ways. (Many such are also offensive, e.g. because they promote Christianity, but not all of them.)
2
 
yEz
7:57 PM
@IsaacMoses what was "...Right" supposed to be referring back to?
 
@yEz Me. I agree with myself.
 
yEz
@IsaacMoses Well at least you are consistent then.
 
@yEz "Talking to oneself is only a sign of insanity if you get answers that surprise you."
4
 
yEz
@IsaacMoses "Of course I talk to myself. Sometimes I need expert advice!"
 
@MonicaCellio Very wrong answers can be deleted by community voting just not by mod fiat.
 
8:15 PM
@DoubleAA that's true, and I should have been more specific.
 

« first day (1496 days earlier)      last day (3248 days later) »