Maybe this question has come up before, but I'd like to know what cars our candidates drive and what they would choose as their daily driver if they where to buy new cars today (the car itself doesn't have to be new).
@DucatiKiller - on a site with a strong community, mod time involvement can be reasonably light. The community does a lot of the heavy lifting, so day to day stuff gets handled (VTC's, activity from high rep folks, gold tag badge people etc), and even when things get more intense, the mod team share the load.
On one of my other sites, one of the 3 mods lives in hurricane central so has times when they cannot be online, sometimes for extended periods. The other two just step up a wee bit until they are back.
@Markus - currently I have a 300bhp Subaru WRX, and my fun crazy car is a 400bhp Litchfield Subaru Forester, but it is a bit old so I'm selling it, which means my only acceleration kicks are going to be from my Yamaha 750 Super Tenere.
If I could buy any car, I'd have another Litchfield - I've raced everything from Caterhams, Atoms, Le Mans cars, Ferraris, Porsches, rally cars etc., and the most fun and most practical car I have ever driven is my Litchfield
Great as a daily driver, brilliant to take the whole family camping, a sensible commute (can get 35mpg), and an awesome track day car
Litchfield? Never heard of before :) Awesome that you've raced! I haven't prioritized my life so that could be possible. I would love to test my Porsche on a track sometime. Or have a go in a rally 911. The sound and looks, hard to beat :)
The 911 GT3 was very disappointing on track - the BMW M4GTP we raced the following season was miles better. I had a good session racing Corvettes and similar one time I visited Vegas - had real trouble with them until I had a proper session with an instructor to go through the differences between rally cars/Japanese cars and American muscle cars :-)
@Markus can't afford much racing these days - my budget goes towards helping my 3 kids (karting, snowboarding, flying etc...) but I'll get back to it eventually
@DucatiKiller shame to hear you're not planning to stand, you'd have a lot to offer
@Markus Nice question - My current daily is a Subaru Forester (we seem to have a lot of Subarus here!), my dream car is an E-type Jaguar, but as a daily I'd go for a 1975 Triumph Dolomite Sprint...
Hey @Nick - good to see you stand. And you too, @BobCross.
@Markus - I think it was the 996. It just didn't handle/accelerate/corner as well as the equivalent cars on the track. Even the Jaguar XKR (heavy beast with 460bhp) was better
In connection with the moderator elections, we are holding a Q&A thread for the candidates. Questions collected from an earlier thread have been compiled into this one, which shall now serve as the space for the candidates to provide their answers. With exactly 8 submissions we've compiled every ...
@Markus I'm intending to get one as a second car soon, through probably not a Sprint, as they are too expensive. I'd not be confident running a 40+ year old car as a daily really....
@anonymous2 I'd say go for it. The worst that can happen is you don't get voted in and you get some useful experience. Or you could end up being a new mod here :-)
@RoryAlsop - I believe I'm an ENTJ ... but I don't remember. I took a different personality test here last year. They had a different bend to it. Instead of just being an introvert/extrovert, there was a middle ground called a "omnivert" (I believe). I fall dead center of the omnivert faction. Blew me away, but made a lot of sense. I've always looked at myself as an E.
For anyone who gets a chance ... if you get offered coaching services ... take it. I went through some training last year where I received professional coaching. I think it was the best professional experience I've ever had.
This is where I can't do things because I'm a mod: I'd love to leave comments on people's election answers but that reads as an endorsement from the incumbent.
Something I think is important, and I've hopefully got over in my answers, is keeping the 'regular' crew involved - i.e. the other high-rep users who aren't mods
@NickC it's not hard. High rep users who want to help are often hanging out in the open chat. All you have to do is throw issues out to the group and there's instant participation. ... Oh crap, now I've given away my strategy for winning the election! Curses!
@BobCross Aye, but it's important that the mods do that - I've known sites outside of SE where the moderation/admin teams are very much a closed block, and what they says goes
@Pᴀᴜʟsᴛᴇʀ2, if you are elected, you will be assigned a space water gun. Not a super soaker. One of the old awful ones from the 70s that just barely dribbled out the end. It might be powerful enough to make a small amount of orbital mist. Use it with joy. :-p
@Pᴀᴜʟsᴛᴇʀ2 Thanks! I'm just taking time to read through the other nominees, and I'm seeing a lot of great stuff. We have a lot of great candidates! I am thrilled.
@anonymous2 - I'm thrilled as well. Like I said, you'd make a great Mod. I think a lot of our core group would make great Mods as well. I don't think we'll have any issues and I'll be happy with the outcome no matter what the results are.
@anonymous2 thanks. See my previous: I wish I could be saying a bunch of things about specifics for everyone's answers but I feel weird as the mod. Assume that I'm giving everyone a thumbs up for volunteering their time.
@Pᴀᴜʟsᴛᴇʀ2 Right, I was thinking that he types in www.mechanics.stackexchange.com, and he's thinking, "WHAM, WHAM, WHAM; Dent Old Tools (dot); mechanics; Destroy Others' Thinking (dot); stackexchange, etc.
Sorry, a bit hard to follow.
JK, BTW, @BobCross. From what I've seen, you've done excellent moderation.
@anonymous2 I think you've identified a mod symptom. Who am I flagging things to? Myself? Dear self, you need to consider the ramifications of this issue that you're currently looking at. Love, yourself
@NickC Rory has indicated that the time commitment isn't as much as I perceived from the outside. Maybe I'll throw in. This is the first time I've even considered it. Thanks for the kind words.
@RoryAlsop How much time per site do you spend a week on being a mod? It just seems overwhelming to me at your level of participation.
@anonymous2 Thanks for that. I'm going to chat with @RoryAlsop when he comes around and ask him about what it's like being a mod on a site that's experienced explosive growth just to understand more.
True enough. I still stand in doubt as to whether he would be an ideal candidate for mechanics specifically, but there's time enough for the final decision.
@DucatiKiller depends on the day. There have been days when there are mod things that bug me for hours (I'm either doing something or I'm trying to figure out what to do). Some days there's nothing at all. I check in at least once a day unless I'm in a strange location (like now).
@anonymous2 I tend to be well structured in my approach to the day, but I also got used to working up to 100 hour weeks in a previous job. Now I work less than 45 hour weeks. That gives me a hell of a lot of free time
@BobCross When you are thinking about 'that thing', what kind of things would create that type of situation? What are 'that thing' s that give you hours of trouble mentally?
@anonymous2 2 of my sites are hard work - not the biggest ones. 2 are quite light as the traffic is still small. And the other three are actually relatively straighforward because of the committed core community.
This is what I was saying about Mechanics.SE - the core is very passionate about doing things right. Guiding new folks, voting to close when needed, and (as far as I can tell) flagging when necesary
There have been situations where someone really wants to start a fight with me about an answer. It was hard work to keep out of a furball. They were super upset and tried to get all "you e abused your mod powers!" That's why I try to keep most of that stuff in the open chat. I want everything to be on the record.
@RoryAlsop What are some of the mod challenges for a site that has moderate traffic and then suddenly blows up? Have you been in that situation? How did you solve it among the mod team so that people didn't get crushed?
My expectation is that generally speaking, this would add around 10-15 minutes to my time here each day. I tend to hang out a bit anyway (I tend to auto-open 25 chat rooms as favourites in order to be connected)
@DucatiKiller Security.SE did exactly that. Mostly it went well, however there were a couple of phases of mass influx of bad new posts during that growth that outstripped privileged user growth, and mod time went up a fair bit. But the mod group communicated constantly
Now Sec.SE has reached a pretty mature level, there are plenty of folks with mod-equivalent privileges, including gold badge holders who can do things like close as dupe in their specialisation
So it has become more relaxed - we still track spammers etc., but often they are flagged to destruction in seconds
@BobCross Sometimes I have to do it on mobile...that does suck. Unfortunately there is not really a business case for providing me with a better multi-mod interface, along with a couple of other multi-mods
@DucatiKiller no - it's really about community direction and cohesion. You can track growth through various upticks in the graphs of new users, posts per day, and visits per day (I have 7 graphs open as we speak, comparing...) but the key at each 'knee' is around community involvement
@DucatiKiller mods have a key role in supporting the good behaviours, publicising what is going on etc, but the community as a whole is what guides new folks, helps them understand what is expected etc., and changes the site policies as needed
@RoryAlsop Based upon how google SEO works I have a firm belief that editing questions and cleaning up verbiage to align with the rules of language can have a profound effect on site traffic. How do you see editing as a tool to get better SEO?
We've debated this issue before and I have forgotten where you landed on it.
@DucatiKiller yes -a couple of times, and with success both times (albeit on different levels)...for one I did a lot of marketing work round various industry bodies, and I also went to various conferences on behalf of the site, giving out swag as prizes, and to speakers etc
That was incredibly successful - and the immediate uptick was measurable
The other one was more of an online marketing piece - using twitter etc to ping out links to questions that tied in with current affairs etc
@DucatiKiller Yep - I'm all for it. One of the things to be careful of is too much clean up all at once, as it swamps the front page
It does increase SEO, but then impacts the community, so doing it piecemeal over time is better!
(we did do that en masse for one site that needed a lot of work, but that was with SE staff who batched things up in a way that didn't impact the front page)
@RoryAlsop We went through a phase of that and I edit like a madman during the lowest traffic times to decrease the contamination effect on the 'active' page. From what I understand SE conforms to the new Google SEO rules and even an upvote is considered change and activity on a page making have a 'higher' value in their mathamagic. What are some things that the community can do with the tools SE gives to increase site traffic?
@DucatiKiller Sharing a post in a relevant online group really helps, which is why you get badges for it! I share Music ones with my musical friends, Security ones with my security friends, and even some of the better Productivity ones with my group of productivity specialists.
@DucatiKiller A strong voting ethic really helps encourage new folks, which leads to greater 'stiction', which leads to growth, so definitely, yes. Page change is also instantly picked up by Google, but I don't know SEO enough to know exactly how that transfers across
@DucatiKiller Heh - I met Damon Hill the other week. Not seen David C for years (he was at an event I was at but I didn't get to speak to him - if I remember I was trying to get Colin McRae's autograph)
@DucatiKiller, Yea, I understand that. I don't have any idea how much time it actually takes. I see you on here enough that I don't think it would be a problem for you.
Of course, I'm not around much anymore, so maybe you aren't either...
and for review, but it's a bit more limited for mods, as decisions are binding - so I look for posts with 3 or 4 votes, and if I agree I add the closer