last day (15 days later) » 

21:04
Okay, I'm ready
So we have $x(t) = A \cos(\omega t) + B \sin(\omega t)$ where $\omega \equiv \sqrt{k/m}$.
Yes?
Ok, this is the standard solution to the harmonic oscillator problem and it's one of the most important things in physics.
It comes up all the time, and for a good reason which you'll learn.
Now let's go back to the original differential equation this came from.
We had $\ddot{x}(t) = - (k/m) x(t)$.
Yes, and that had come from $ma = -kx$ right?
And this all comes from a fucking box attached to a spring lol
Yes.
Actually, let's writ it $x(t) = A \cos(\omega_0 t) + B \sin(\omega_0 t)$.
$\omega \rightarrow \omega_0$.
21:08
Who are $A$ and $B$ again?
Aha! We don't know yet. They're free parameters. A second order differential equation has two free parameters.
Whats $\omega \rightarrow \omega_0$ ?
These would be determined by the initial conditions of the problem.
@DanielSank So now we guess?
@BernardMeurer Just changing notation, nothing more.
21:09
@DanielSank Got it
@BernardMeurer Guess what?
@DanielSank A and B?
@BernardMeurer No no, they're indetermined.
Ah, alright
They depend on the initial conditions of the problem.
Now please rewrite the original differential equation in terms of $\omega_0$. This is a simple plug-in task.
21:11
$$\ddot{x}(t) = - (k/m) x(t)$$ this one?
Lemme get a paper
$$\omega_0 = - \frac{\ddot{x}(t)}{x(t)}$$
I feel like I can simplify it further, but I'm not 100% on how
I just wanted you to write $\ddot{x} = - \omega_0^2 x(t)$.
You missed the $^2$.
21:20
Oh, right, there was a square root!
You can't simplify it any more.
I just want you to burn this into your mind:
$\ddot{x}(t) = -\omega_0^2 x(t)$
That is the equation of motion of a simple harmonic oscillator.
Dully noted
In the box/spring problem that $\omega_0$ came from the spring constant and the mass.
However! Suppose we have an $LC$ oscillator circuit.
Then if you solve for the time dependent voltage you get the same equation but with $\omega_0 = \sqrt{1/LC}$.
$L$ is inductance and $C$ is capacitance.
21:23
AH
An LC circuit, also called a resonant circuit, tank circuit, or tuned circuit, is an electric circuit consisting of an inductor, represented by the letter L, and a capacitor, represented by the letter C, connected together. The circuit can act as an electrical resonator, an electrical analogue of a tuning fork, storing energy oscillating at the circuit's resonant frequency. LC circuits are used either for generating signals at a particular frequency, or picking out a signal at a particular frequency from a more complex signal. They are key components in many electronic devices, particularly radio...
Makes sense, makes sense
@ACuriousMind Howdy
Ok Bernardo, back to the main point.
You solved the equation with Wolfram.
Now please check that it's correct. Plug the solution into equation of motion and see if it all checks out, ok?
21:25
I feel like a plot twist is coming
Not quite yet.
So far I just would like you to get some mechanical familiarity with this business.
Wait, what do you want me to check?
Check that our solution for $x(t)$ satisfies the differential equation.
How do I check that of Wolfram?
Don't use Wolfram.
Use your pencil.
21:27
Ah
The solution is $\ddot{x}(t) = -\omega_0^2 x(t)$
Where do you want me to plug it?
Or not the solution, that's the equation of motion of a simple harmonic oscillator, duh
You have an equation of motion and something Wolfram told you is the solution.
Your job is to make sure Wolfram is right.
$$x(t) = c_2 \sin(t \sqrt{k/m})+c_1 \cos(t \sqrt{k/m})$$
Which was this, right?
Yes but let's clean it up and use this:
$x(t) = A \cos(\omega_0 t) + B \sin(\omega_0 t)$
$\ddot{x}(t) = - \omega_0^2 x(t)$
Your job is to make sure those equations are consistent.
Thinking
Yeah I dunno how to do this, I'm sorry
That's ok.
Hint: compute $\ddot{x}$.
Do you know $(d/dt) \cos(\omega_0 t)$?
21:33
I just don't remember how to do that
oh
Hmmm.
ok
I told you I was weak :/
Do you know $\cos(x) = \sum_{n=0,2,4\dots} (-1)^n \frac{x^n}{n!}$
That looks vaguely familiar
taking notes
I see. If you aren't comfortable with calculus we could go about this all a different way.
In fact, we could make this a lot simpler.
21:35
I barely know calculus, I just know what I learned by myself for the SAT
Side note: Focus carefully on calculus and linear algebra in university, and do well. Those courses are your basic wings for the rest of your life in CS and physics.
I can invent a different problem to show you the power of linear algebra, or we can keep going with the calculus example, and just make sure to spend time developing comfort with the necessary calculus.
Up to you.
Well, my grandfather just had a heart attack, so I'm going to go see him in about 20 minutes, but in general I feel like we should go with the calculus approach. I gotta get over this
@BernardMeurer Oh I'm very sorry to heat that.
Go see your grandpa.
Alright, I'll be heading out then, I'll read on calculus tonight :)
ok see you
22:37
lol

last day (15 days later) »