« first day (3997 days earlier)      last day (940 days later) » 

9:08 AM
quack
 
9:26 AM
@PauloCereda Where is @DavidCarlisle? He misses breakfast.
 
@samcarter oh no
 
@PauloCereda <3
 
user image
3
@yo' ^^ :)
@samcarter <3
 
@samcarter brunch
 
@DavidCarlisle oh no
 
 
2 hours later…
yo'
11:30 AM
@PauloCereda E and F flat are two fundamentally different things!
 
 
1 hour later…
12:56 PM
How can I get the charcode from the char? Like the reverse of char_generate.
That one doesn't work with a char stored in a variable for example.
 
1:15 PM
Although there are function to compare a char with a char code
 
@user202729 use the backtick `a is the character code of a
 
> That one doesn't work with a char stored in a variable for example.
I tried.
\def\x #1{`#1}

\x a
It just result in ​`a​
Actually it's just for debugging, so printing to a file is an option
But still, how to do it?
 
@user202729 you need it o in the context of a <number> so \number`#1 for example.
@u
 
Okay
I see
I didn't know how it works initially, so I find it a little weird that it doesn't have a special character code
 
if the character might be active safer to do \number\expandafter`\string#1
@user202729 what doesn't have a special character code?
 
1:21 PM
I mean, originally I thought if ​`a​ is handled specially by the TeX engine to expand to the number 97 or something similar, it should have a category code for the left quote
In reality, it's handled by \number and the left quote is just a normal category 12 character
 
@user202729 well it's same as all literal number syntax, digits have to be catcode 11 or 12 (including A-F for hex digits) hex needs a catcode 12 " at the start, octal needs a catcode ' at the start and numbers given by characters need a catcode 12 `
compare "10 which just prints "10 and \number"10 which prints 16
 
@user202729 just in time, sensible hex answer...
 
2:00 PM
@yo' indeed!
 
 
2 hours later…
3:50 PM
I am wondering can anyone please help with this question: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/618382/…
 
4:15 PM
why use the algorithm environment hacked like `\renewcommand{\thealgorithm}{1}
\addtocounter{algorithm}{-1}
\floatname{algorithm}{Code}` ? just use the float package and define yourself a new float type \newfoloat{code} or whatever you want to call it
 
4:51 PM
Do you have an example?
 
@Node.JS no time just now but see eg tex.stackexchange.com/questions/11036/…
 
5:27 PM
@DavidCarlisle thank you. I have a follow-up question: tex.stackexchange.com/questions/618469/…
 
Finally got around to writing some Matrix onboarding docs: tex.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/8858/enter-the-matrix
4
@UlrikeFischer @JosephWright @DavidCarlisle ^^^
 
6:19 PM
^^^ An image of this chat should have been shown in this exhibition
 
 
1 hour later…
yo'
7:38 PM
@HenriMenke I wonder what number of channels are people expected to follow... :-/
 
 
2 hours later…
9:55 PM
@egreg Hi prof. and good work. I have a recent question on MSE: math.stackexchange.com/questions/4272714/… It is just for me. Every your answer is veryyyy welcome. Bye.
 
10:50 PM
@Sebastiano The answer is no. There is a “formal” similarity for the case of two subspaces, but it breaks down as soon as you want to compare inclusion-exclusion on finite sets with the dimension formula for the sum of three subspaces.
 
11:11 PM
@egreg excuse very much buy i have not understood also to compare italian language with the Italian. It Is very appreciated an answer by you.best regards
 

« first day (3997 days earlier)      last day (940 days later) »