« first day (1874 days earlier)      last day (3052 days later) » 

cfr
12:00 AM
@AlanMunn I agree that we should not. I agree it is not appropriate. I just think it is an understandable reaction. At least, it would be if it weren't for the fact that the question was perfectly fine by the time somebody voted to close it.
 
@cfr And in fact at no point did it ever meet the 'too broad' criteria.
 
Quack!
 
cfr
@AlanMunn I know. My comment was not intended seriously. How could anybody reading that question and my comment think I was serious? Even if you took my comment literally, it would at most mean that one part of the question was too broad (or whatever). It wouldn't mean anything at all about the rest of the question.
 
@AlanMunn Upvoted your meta post. Well said.
 
cfr
@PauloCereda Cwac!
 
12:08 AM
@cfr Right. Can you add your reopen vote too.
 
@cfr Hi! Miss you! :)
 
cfr
@AlanMunn No. It won't let me vote to reopen twice.
@PauloCereda I hate end-of-semester nest-building.
 
@cfr oh
 
@cfr Oh, sorry, I hadn't reloaded the page, so I though I was the only close vote. It's now open again. Thanks.
 
cfr
@AlanMunn Good.
@AlanMunn I hope you don't mean that.
 
12:11 AM
Why does the OP have to censor foiling? :)
 
@cfr Mean what?
@cfr Doh. Yes, only reopen vote...
 
cfr
@AlanMunn I was about to answer your question ;).
 
@Alan: I like your dog. :)
 
@PauloCereda Thanks :) I think the 'hats' that go in the middle of the avatar are much better than ones that perch on top.
 
@AlanMunn :)
@Alan: speaking of hats, did you see Mico's?
 
cfr
12:19 AM
Why do I have to convert my electronic student records into triplicate paper copies plus summaries plus..., some of which go to some poor sod who has to enter my marks and other details into a database so they've got them in electronic format? And then somebody else has to enter everything a second time if the students fall into certain categories? The number of bits of paper per student is completely insane.
 
@cfr Oh no!
 
@PauloCereda Shaken, not stirred.
 
cfr
@PauloCereda Na chwac.
 
12 hours ago, by Paulo Cereda
user image
12 hours ago, by Paulo Cereda
It doesn't look like Thor at all, it is more like one of those fat ladies singing operas. :)
 
@cfr Crazy. Is this marks for a course? Ours are all electronic, and in fact I can upload a CSV file to the system to enter final marks.
 
12:22 AM
@cfr A lot of trees will suffer. :(
 
cfr
12:43 AM
@AlanMunn Yes. One module is 'electronic' but that only means for the moderator. The university still wants everything in multiple copies on paper. The other one is all paper. Copies of work, feedback, course materials, triplicate module feedback and assignment feedback, assessment record & my module evaluation (only duplicate), register (duplicate but wants an additional photocopy). Etc. Worse still, I've created an electroonic workflow so I ditch most of the paper I'm sent and print it all...
 
@cfr Wow. I think I would go mad with such a system.
 
cfr
I got fed up entering student details on different forms in different formats. Now I enter their details once into a spreadsheet and print everything off. It is completely and utterly insane. And, naturally, there is enormous room for human error at every point.
@PauloCereda Yes. Not just the trees, either.
I have one form I haven't managed to turn into part of my spreadsheet or a LaTeX template (to merge data exported from the spreadsheet). I'm told that is only available in PDF format. They claim not to have a Word version.
@AlanMunn I do. You know those printers which took paper with holes on each side? Our forms are printed in triplicate carbon on one of those. We are supposed to fill them all out by hand. And then they take it all back and enter half of it electronically. Except that I staple yet more bits of paper to the forms and scrawl 'Attached' on the original and just sign it. Or I shred the forms I can get away with shredding and just print. But they still keep sending them to me.
 
@cfr Simply amazing.
 
cfr
It is completely bonkers. It literally feels like building a nest. If other people are doing the same thing at the same time we have everything spread out on tables and everyone is just surrounded by the stuff. I've never worked anywhere with this much paper.
@AlanMunn Uploading a .csv... that sounds like the way things used to be before I worked here!
 
1:40 AM
@FaheemMitha 'at best' vs. 'at worst' is an interesting contrast, but it does in fact need to be 'at best'. :)
 
 
4 hours later…
5:23 AM
Has anyone tried the version of algorithm2e that came out this year (v5.1).
I just spent several hours debugging strange error messages, only to have to roll back to version 5.0 which came out several years ago.
 
 
2 hours later…
7:46 AM
Read the comments :) It's sad and hilarious at the same time
304
Q: The MIT License – Clarity on Using Code on Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange

samthebrand Update (Dec. 17): We're going to push the transition date to Feb. 1, 2016 to allow for more time to collect community feedback on the proposed terms, which you can read all about below. CC-BY-SA is an ideal license for a crowdsourced knowledge base. We’ve benefited immensely from it, our com...

Ok mostly sad but a few of them are still human :)
 
@percusse Oh dear. Unilateral license switching. Not a great idea.
 
@FaheemMitha Come on really?
You too?
 
@percusse It's customary to open this sort of thing for discussion, to start with. If they did, I didn't hear about it.
 
It's an online website that you voluntarily answer questions and then make a fuss about a switch from creative commons to MIT license.
Somethings don't require discussion due to being obvious
 
@percusse Sorry, I don't know what you mean.
 
7:59 AM
@FaheemMitha I also don't know what you mean.
 
The answers I've seen to that question mostly voice legitimate concerns, in my opinion, and as far as can tell.
 
@FaheemMitha they gave two weeks over christmas for discussion but have pushed it back to feb, to give a month and a bit. But given that the existing licence was sufficiently unsuitable we have a standing question on meta urging people to give differemt licences for their code, it's hard to argue too much against the idea of changing it.
 
@DavidCarlisle I see. I didn't hear anything about it, but I guess maybe I wasn't paying attention.
@DavidCarlisle Yes, I think I've seen that meta question. Where people list what their licensing is,is that the one?
 
@FaheemMitha look at the date on the question you linked too it was only announced a day or so ago
 
Have you seen the replies? Most people don't seem happy about it.
 
8:03 AM
@FaheemMitha yes, that's only there because the CC-SA licence is not suitable
 
We want the Internet to take the knowledge and advice that they learn from answers to improve their code and their skills. We do not expect them to just take the code as a product.
Amazing.
 
@FaheemMitha people are never happy about licences. it took 1600 email messages (literally) before debian accepted LPPL as an open source licence for example...
 
@egreg: I am already in São Paulo! I was gonna mention the new shaking bus was advertising free wi-fi, but they lied to me. :)
 
8:19 AM
@DavidCarlisle It may be the case that CC-SA is unsuitable. My point was simply that as far as I know the discussion wasn't made public. An obvious place to put a pointer would have been the front page of SO and other code related sites. I'm not on SO so much these days, but I didn't notice anything on U&L either, which I'm on more.
@DavidCarlisle Yes, I've heard about that legendary thread. Here and elsewhere.
I also didn't notice any mention in chat rooms. Which, granted, far fewer people frequent.
 
@DavidCarlisle: this Hacker's keyboard is great, but I will need a bigger screen...
 
8:40 AM
May the force be with you ;-)
 
I've now posted that notice in the U&L room. I'm wondering if I should pin it.
 
8:59 AM
@FaheemMitha you saw the announcement with a couple of days of it being made so I don't think the places it was announced were so bad (and Joseph starred it here and it appears in the featured links on tex.sx. Just giving two weeks over christmas wasn't good, as they have acknowledged.
@PauloCereda 24in and a solid keyboard with real keys?
 
yo'
Facebook offers you to "see less of Person XY" but no "see less of topic XY". This sucks.
 
@PauloCereda +30 for Grandma this morning:-)
 
@DavidCarlisle I suggest one of the room owners pin it. I've starred percusse's post. I don't see anything else here. I've now pinned it in the U&L chat room, since I'm a room owner there.
 
@FaheemMitha see Joseph's starred comment on the right that links to same.
 
@DavidCarlisle Oh, I see. It was a bit down there. I suggest someone pin Joseph's post. Then it will stay at the top for awhile.
 
9:11 AM
@FaheemMitha and it's in a big yellow "featured on meta" box on the main questions page
 
@DavidCarlisle Ok. Yes, I see it.
 
@FaheemMitha and it's deadly boring stuff that almost no one wants to read:-)
 
@DavidCarlisle Apart from lawyers and judges ;-)
 
@DavidCarlisle I think you underestimate the programming community.
 
yo'
@DavidCarlisle The problem is that now it's going to be pretty unclear how is my code licensed. Currently, it's LPPL, which is really suitable. What's going to be it from now on? If I post an answer with a full package code and give it a name in the answer, can anybody just say they will use the same name for a different version because I posted it here? This is the strength of LPPL -- it is well suitable for a project like a LaTeX package. The MIT license is, from what I see, not so quite.
 
9:13 AM
@FaheemMitha a small proportion of people will want to make a lot of comments.
 
I actually find licenses mildly interesting in small doses. I'm not saying I'd like to deal with them regularly.
@DavidCarlisle Yes, I get that.
 
@yo' no now it's dual LPPL CC-SA licenced as you could not revoke the licence given by the site, only add more, now it will be dual LPPL MIT
@yo' they could do that anyway under LPPL
 
yo'
@DavidCarlisle ah ok
@DavidCarlisle yes, forking by the same name
 
@yo' no you can edit in place that was the major change in 1.3 forced by Debian who would not accept it as open source licence unless you can edit in place (to fix security or other issues)
 
yo'
@DavidCarlisle ok. Should I use 1.2 then?!
 
9:16 AM
@yo' earlier ones said you had to rename, 1.3 says please be nice.
 
yo'
@DavidCarlisle ok, seems that I only "went through it"
 
@DavidCarlisle I'd don't mean to reopen painful memories, but why did/does the LaTeX project care about Debian?
Nobody here seems to use the TeX Live Debian packages, for example. Except freaks like me.
 
@FaheemMitha well at the time I had a debian box on my desk so debian removing latex would have been a bit inconvenient:-)
 
yo'
@FaheemMitha Because you want TL in Debain and Ubuntu
 
@yo' Really? Why? Like I said, nobody seems to use the Debian packages anyway.
@DavidCarlisle You were using the Debian packages at the time?
 
yo'
9:19 AM
@FaheemMitha because people want to use it and install it as any other program: sudo <packagemanager> install texlive
 
@FaheemMitha Haven't used Debian for years -- what's wrong with vanilla TeXLive?
 
@FaheemMitha probably the vast majority of tex users on linux use the system supplied tex. It is only the minority of insiders who come to sites like this and know how to get a vanilla texlive from tug.org. If you install a system, and "latex" works, you just use the system supplied command.
 
@yo' Even now? These days everyone seems to use the TeX Live installer. If I even mention the Debian packages, that's practically the first thing anyone says.
@DavidCarlisle Oh. I see.
 
yo'
@ChristianHupfer nothing is wrong will vanilla TL, but the fact that it can't be installed from the package manager. One thing I like about linux is a central place where programs are installed -- it's painful to have to google the install binary for every single tool I want to use on Windows
@FaheemMitha But that's here, and it's not so quite so for general users.
 
@FaheemMitha and they were not just going to stop distributing latex they were planning to actively commission someone to re-implement it under a different licence so there would be two incompatible "latex" languages in the wild.
 
9:22 AM
@ChristianHupfer Possibly nothing. I've never used it. But I like Debian packages. More generally I like centralized Linux packaging systems.
If I was using a Red Hat derived systems, I'd been using TeX rpms.
 
@yo' I often use OpenSuSE and the packages branded as TeXLive are most times the frozen state and hard to update so I rather use tlmgr (daily ;-))
 
@DavidCarlisle That would have been deranged. And impossible. Who is "they"?
 
yo'
@ChristianHupfer that's the right thing to do, unless you're a heavy package developer who wants the code to run on various TLs
 
@ChristianHupfer Fortunately Norbert's packages are generally easily backportable, though I had trouble with TL 2013.
 
yo'
@Chr @Dav I think the plan should be to try to push tlmgr into Debain, not texlive ;-)
 
9:24 AM
We have questions that are in fact FAQ, looked up by many many new users, they grab the relevant code and use it. They don't even know that it is licensed and they have to give attribution. More serious matter, often goes into a package, with a suitable license. For TeX.SX, i really don't see the point in caring too much.
 
@FaheemMitha can't remember names, but it was an official debian statement stating that intention that started the long thread on debian-legal
 
@DavidCarlisle That sounds totally nuts.
 
yo'
@FaheemMitha Debain core devs (managers)
 
@yo' They don't have that kind of manpower. I'm not sure anyone does. Maybe Google could do something like that these days - if they went insane that is.
 
@FaheemMitha that was basically our response, but starting from that we had to come to a situation where latex could get distributed (not just debian, many other systems refer to the debian open source licence guidelines to classify software as open or not)
 
9:26 AM
@DavidCarlisle Sounds like a bit of an attempt at blackmail/coercion to me. Though, as they say, blackmail is an ugly word. :-)
@DavidCarlisle Yes, I take your point about people referencing Debian.
 
@FaheemMitha kind of manpower to do what? (latex2e was written by half a dozen people upaid in their spare time, you saying they couldn't find some volunteers to do something vaguely similar but incompatible if they really wanted to?)
 
@yo' I am not a heavy package developer of course, but I relied on the latest changes of expl3 regarding xassoccnt package I uploaded some weeks ago. I don't have some TL trees parallel, I recently killed TL 2014 (on purpose,not by error ;-))
 
@DavidCarlisle In their spare time over a very long time period. And they were all experts. And so you'd have to find a group of experts to reimplement something that already existed, over a long time period.
So yes, I think it would have been difficult. And of course a really bad idea, but that's a separate issue.
 
@FaheemMitha from Leslie's 2.09 (no real explicit licence) to the first LPPL 2e release was probably about a year.
 
@DavidCarlisle The answer to the question i just wanted to ask.
 
9:30 AM
Granted, Gnome did something similar back in the day, but that was at a time when KDE was clearly based on a non-free toolkit (Trolltech's QT).
@DavidCarlisle You surprise me. But LaTeX 3 has been in development for many years.
And KDE weren't aiming for a clone, anyway.
@DavidCarlisle Historical question - how long did Leslie Lamport stay involved in LaTeX development?
 
yo'
@ChristianHupfer I've got all vanilla TLs since 2010, without tlmgr ever run ;-)
 
@yo' Do you use the tlmgr thing too?
 
@FaheemMitha oh it can not work (and can not be compatible) because as a macro language the full implementation is available at runtime, you can't change a definition of any command in any way without it showing, bu work calls...
@FaheemMitha latex3 started before we started 2e
 
yo'
@FaheemMitha No, for above stated reasons: I want to know what TL most people have, so I have all versions of vanilla TL since 2010. Most "standard" TLs are identical to one of them.
 
@FaheemMitha started I guess around 82 and had stopped by 89 or so when he handed over to Frank
 
9:40 AM
@FaheemMitha: The history of LaTeX is described (to some extent) in the LaTeX companion (At least in the German edition)
 
@yo' vanilla? As in the packaged version?
@DavidCarlisle ok.
@ChristianHupfer Anything available on the net?
I only recently discovered that Lamport is a high-powered Computer Science person.
 
@FaheemMitha yes works for a well known computer software company:-)
 
But was a CS professor for many years before that.
 
@DavidCarlisle Vim Development Ltd? ;-)
 
@DavidCarlisle Digital ;-)
@percusse I do wonder what some people thought they were signing up to. It's pretty obvious that SO is not about trying to force open source on people, and that 'a place for knowledge' has to accommodate 'people do work for hire' if it's going to succeed.
 
9:51 AM
@FaheemMitha he's worked for microsoft since before I joined the latex team
 
On the license discussion, the strange thing is that Creative Commons say not to use CC-BY-SA (or anything other of theirs bar CC0) for code, so it's not like the idea 'we might need to look at this' is problematic. It's also strange to me that some people think StackOverflow is 'meant' to be promoting open-source code (by using a strong copyleft license), when it's contrary to the business model and to the 'mission'.
 
@DavidCarlisle Oh. Hmm, my bad.
@JosephWright Were you involved in those discussions?
 
@FaheemMitha No
@FaheemMitha I've posted one comment on the main thread (asking about dual licensing, basically)
 
@JosephWright Ok.
@DavidCarlisle Yes, I see in fact (per WP) he's never actually worked in a university.
 
@FaheemMitha Outside of SO itself there are limited sites where 'code' is an issue
 
9:53 AM
@JosephWright lots of different box output I need to look at with test suite and 0.87
 
@DavidCarlisle Oh goody
@DavidCarlisle I'll see if Akira's build it yet
 
plus the different output from \showthe\mathcode which makes several diffs on its own
 
@JosephWright Well, U&L, Server Fault, Ask Ubuntu, TeX and Code Review come to mind. There might be others
Also that Apple site, maybe. Ask Different?
 
@FaheemMitha I didn't mean 'there is no code elsewhere' I meant 'there is limited code elsewhere' (bar us, code review and code golf, from the top of my head). For example, on Ask Ubuntu you might get an extract of a man page or a one line sed command, but much less commonly a full function or similar.
 
yo'
@FaheemMitha as the one tl-install provides. Sorry I wasn't here and now I gotta go, I teach in 30 minutes quite far away from here.
 
10:00 AM
@DavidCarlisle Akira has built it, am testing now
 
@JosephWright True.
 
@JosephWright didn't really get time to look at the results yesterday
 
10:14 AM
\documentclass{article}


 \setlength{\textwidth}{15em}
 \hyphenpenalty=0
 \doublehyphendemerits=0
 \hfuzz=1pt

\begin{document}

 This is a supercalifragilisticexpialidocious sentence

\end{document}
@JosephWright the above hyphenates in pdflatex but not in 0.87 (tlb0435 and several others)
@JosephWright checking the format build now, perhaps it messed up the ini paths...
 
@DavidCarlisle I notice I need to adjust ltluatex a bit (will do in the next hour or so)
 
10:34 AM
@JosephWright do you get hyphenation?
$ luatex \\showhyphens{supercalifragilisticexpialidocious}\\end
This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.87.0 (TeX Live 2016/dev)
 restricted system commands enabled.

Underfull \hbox (badness 10000) detected at line 0
[] \tenrm supercalifragilisticexpialidocious
 
@DavidCarlisle Give me five mins
 
@JosephWright sure
 
@DavidCarlisle Same here
 
@JosephWright surely hyphenation isn't completely broken, you might expect that to show up in pre-testing?
 
@DavidCarlisle You'd hope
 
10:41 AM
@JosephWright well it explains the test logs :(
 
@DavidCarlisle Page width is not set properly either
@DavidCarlisle Check you PDF: I get \showthe\pagewidth correct but visually its wrong
 
@JosephWright should I mail list re hyphen or is there a chance we messed up the ini files somewhere (plain log looks good to me though)
 
@DavidCarlisle Shouldn't affect hyphenation
@DavidCarlisle That's why I checked \pagewidth to see if it was the right value (which it is)
@DavidCarlisle Ah, page height might be wrong
 
@JosephWright well it would if the patterns were not loaded, but they seem to have been
 
@DavidCarlisle Yes
@DavidCarlisle Ignore comments on page size: I'd messed up here
 
10:48 AM
@JosephWright I see same if I just use luatex --ini plain.tex and skip all the ini stuff
 
11:09 AM
`! Missing = inserted for \ifnum.` (@JosephWright)
`
 
11:30 AM
@DavidCarlisle Yes, I'm working on it!
 
@JosephWright I guessed you'd notice:-)
 
12:01 PM
Hello all, long time no see. Quick question: any ideas why my document should be missing references to items that are in other physical files that are included with subimport (via two nested levels of directories)? Presumably this should work OK if pdflatex has been run enough times?
 
 
1 hour later…
1:13 PM
@DavidCarlisle Should now be working
 
$ svn update
Updating '.':
U    trunk/base/ltluatex.dtx
Updated to revision 953.
OK will try now ^^ :-)
@FionaSmith sorry no idea, never used (sub)import:-)
@JosephWright running test again but if there's no hyphenation then ...
 
@DavidCarlisle That could be an issue ...
 
@JosephWright oh just thought of something...
sigh...
! You can't use `\hyphenationmin' after \the.
how does one see what value \hyphenationmin has? (@JosephWright)
 
1:29 PM
@DavidCarlisle Erm ..
@DavidCarlisle No obvious Lua access :-(
 
@JosephWright ohh I guess another mail to the luatex list....
 
@DavidCarlisle Yup
 
1:52 PM
Good day to my mentor and friends.
How do I put '(setq TeX-auto-save t)
(setq TeX-parse-self t)' into my init file for document passing in Emacs-AucTeX.
 
@GideonEbelebe you should have a file .emacs in you home directory just add the line
 
@DavidCarlisle you mean I should open notepad and paste this line then save it into .emacs folder?
 
@GideonEbelebe .emacs is a text file, so you can open it in Emacs and paste the line there.
 
2:10 PM
What does second parameter in \fontsize{12}{15} do?
 
Anyone have a good suggestion for syntaxes like $B^{(n)}$ because of the size of the () this often ends up messing with the line spacing in the text. I somethings rewrite using something similar to $B\np{n} which smashes the ()'s. But then people start writing $B^{U(n)}$....
@yasar line spacing
Hmm, come to think about it perhaps just a simple macro bases replace would be enough. Though for this project I'll just add a lot of \smash'es
 
@GideonEbelebe why would you use notepad if you have emacs:-)!!!!!!
@yasar baseline spacing
@JosephWright @barbarabeeton luatex8.7 breaks amsmath
! Invalid math code.
<to be read again>
\relax
l.741 \mathchardef\std@minus\mathcode`\-\relax
 
@daleif -- is there an example file on the main site? if not, please make one, post or send it, and i'll see what can be done. this would make a nice test for the stix font work.
 
2:27 PM
@barbarabeeton not really, it seems to depend on the chosen font. Though it is quite common
 
TL Utility just exited with an error. Everything seems to be fine in the log except at the very end:
2015-12-18 14:22:46 +0000 Notice -[TLMAuthorizedOperation _runUntilChildExit][35744]	kqueue noted that pid 36076 exited (/usr/texbin/tlmgr --repository ftp.math.purdue.edu/mirrors/ctan.org/systems/texlive/tlnet --machine-readable --persistent-downloads update --all)
2015-12-18 14:22:46 +0000 Notice tlu_ipctask[36075]	child process pid = 36076 exited
2015-12-18 14:22:47 +0000 Error tlu_ipctask[36075]	Value of errno is Operation not permitted
2015-12-18 14:22:47 +0000 Error tlu_ipctask[36075]	*** ERROR *** exit status of pid = 36076 was 1
Has anyone seen this before?
 
@daleif -- what i meant about testing with the stix fonts is that there really is a question about the behavior of delimiters, and this is an important question as (some influential individuals at) the ams wants to pursue use of the stix fonts to replace computer modern in their publications. (if you don't want to share an example, i will feel obligated to create one myself.)
 
@barbarabeeton I'll create some examples
 
@JosephWright This is just attention seeking for my understanding
Why would anyone care about the code what happens to the code they put on a public website ? And most of the code in SO is partial code.
 
@DavidCarlisle -- thanks. i've shared the "good news" with the team. do keep us posted.
@daleif -- great! many thanks!
 
2:40 PM
@percusse in my experience the people caring more about that (with some reason) are people using the code not people posting it.
 
@barbarabeeton VVV
\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
%\usepackage{mathptmx}
% from kantlipsum
\newcommand\txt{Let us suppose that the noumena have nothing to do
with necessity, since knowledge of the Categories is a posteriori.}
\newcommand\mth{$x^{(n)}_j$, $B^{(n)}_j$, $B^{U(n)}_j$}
\newcommand\mths{$x^{\smash{(}n\smash{)}}_j$,
$B^{\smash{(}n\smash{)}}_j$, $B^{U\smash{(n)}}_j$}
\begin{document}

\txt{} \mth{} \txt{}
\txt{} \mth{} \txt{}
\txt{} \mths{} \txt{}

\end{document}
It is mostly seen when there is both super- and subscript
 
@JosephWright @barbarabeeton line 741 of amsmath.sty:
\ifx\hyphenationmin\undefined
\mathchardef\std@minus\mathcode`\-\relax
\mathchardef\std@equal\mathcode`\=\relax
\AtBeginDocument{%
  \mathchardef\std@minus\mathcode`\-\relax
  \mathchardef\std@equal\mathcode`\=\relax
}
\else
\Umathcharnumdef\std@minus\Umathcodenum`\-\relax
\Umathcharnumdef\std@equal\Umathcodenum`\=\relax
\AtBeginDocument{%
  \Umathcharnumdef\std@minus\Umathcodenum`\-\relax
  \Umathcharnumdef\std@equal\Umathcodenum`\=\relax
}
\fi
 
Can I manually set horizontal space between letters?
I want my text to spread horizontally a little bit.
 
tex.stackexchange.com/questions/283764/… couln't resist to comment on the \vspace answer :D
 
@yasar Document wide, or for just some words?
 
2:55 PM
@DavidCarlisle -- i see. i hope you don't mind my saying that forcing amsmath to be dependent on anything to do with hyphenation is absurd, if not insane ...
 
@TorbjørnT. words inside a parbox
 
@yasar The microtype package provides \textls which does this, though there might of course be other ways. \usepackage{microtype}, and then \textls{spaced out}.
 
@barbarabeeton oh that's just because I was quickly trying to get it to work, you could write it as \ifx\luatexversion\@defined\else\ifnum\luatexversion>85 ... if you prefer
@JosephWright see @barbarabeeton's complementary review of my coding style ^^^^^
@yasar a\hspace{3cm}b\hspace{3cm}c ?
 
@DavidCarlisle That dont seem very practical :)
 
@DavidCarlisle complimentary?
 
3:02 PM
@DavidCarlisle -- try "(un)complimentary". there wasn't an earlier one to complement. (just being pedantic.)
 
@FaheemMitha my spelling's as good as my code!
3
 
@yasar You can control the amount with an optional argument, i.e. \textls[500]{Loosen up.}. The unit is thousandths of 1em, so with 500 the spacing is 0.5em.
 
@barbarabeeton stop press!! bnb finds typo in my writings
 
3:22 PM
@TorbjørnT., and friends, where exactly is .emacs located?I can't see that in my C:\HOME file
 
@GideonEbelebe Never really used Emacs on Windows, so I don't know. Have you searched?
 
I meant search the internet for that info. Googling location of .emacs in windows leads me to stackoverflow.com/questions/189490/… for example.
 
@GideonEbelebe C-h v user-init-file
 
4:08 PM
@DavidCarlisle do you recall why afterpage redefines \enddocument instead of hooking into \@enddocumenthook?
 
@StrongBad no but probably the fact that when afterpage was written enddocumenthook didn't exist might be a factor
 
Ah, that might explain it
The way it is now if content in \@enddocumenthook causes a page break, the afterpage stuff happens at the wrong time
 
@StrongBad you might have thought that packages included in the core latex2e release were updated to use latex2e features. You might have though that:-)
 
I am trying to add a standard disclaimer at the end of a letter and need afterpage to handle changes to page sizes
 
Question: what's minimum taxi fare in the UK these days? Seeing as we have some actual English people here. If it varies, which it probably does, a local minimum would work.
 
4:11 PM
@StrongBad I refuse to believe that afterpage is ever the correct solution.
@FaheemMitha no idea (but it would depend on the town, taxis are locally regulated)
 
@DavidCarlisle Oh. You don't use taxis either?
 
@DavidCarlisle I am trying to change the header and text height between the 1st and 2nd pages. I can ask on the main board
@FaheemMitha I think it is 2.80 or 3.00 in Nottingham.
 
@StrongBad Oh. Any idea for how long a distance? Are you English?
 
@FaheemMitha No, but I lived in Nottingham up until a few months ago.
 
@StrongBad Ok. Thanks for the information.
 
4:15 PM
Distance wise, without traffic, less than 2 miles. But Nottingham is going to be very different.
 
@StrongBad county of my birth:-)
 
@DavidCarlisle I am back in the US now, but just bought some Stilton for an xmas party.
 
@FaheemMitha not been in a taxi in the UK for maybe 10 years?
@StrongBad do americans know what to expect from that? :-)
 
@DavidCarlisle Oh! Hmm. Poor taxi drivers. How do they make a living?
 
@FaheemMitha by over-charging foreign tourists of course.
 
4:18 PM
@DavidCarlisle I'll bear that in mind.
 
@FaheemMitha coming to the UK?
 
@DavidCarlisle No, Stilton is hard to find over here. It is a work party, so I don't care if they like it.
 
@DavidCarlisle No, just idle curiosity. It occurred to me to compare taxi prices here and there.
It's less here.
Stilton is a acquired taste. I do like blue cheese, but never quite got the taste for Stilton.
 
4:32 PM
hehe, appropriate head gear. Now of to see the actual movie. Have a nice weekend everyone
 
 
2 hours later…
6:25 PM
@DavidCarlisle -- some americans like stilton. one of my aunts was quite fond of it indeed; when she was buried, my sister (her godchild) and i sneaked a jar of it into her coffin.
 
@TorbjørnT., and or any expert friend, I wish you create some time for me to actually use TeamViewer to look at my laptop.
 
6:42 PM
@TorbjørnT., @DavidCarlisle, @JosephWright and all my friends goodnight.
 
7:00 PM
@GideonEbelebe Sorry, no. I'm not an expert on either Windows or Emacs anyway.
 
 
1 hour later…
8:28 PM
@AlanMunn “H-moll Messe” now playing
 
9:19 PM
@egreg Live? :-)
Which is your favorite recording?
 
@FaheemMitha A recording from some days ago. I have the one by Karl Richter which is great, but also Gardiner's.
 
@egreg Which do you prefer, if any?
 
@FaheemMitha They're different, both great.
 
@egreg Ok.
 
@FaheemMitha Different approaches. I'd avoid Karajan. ;-)
 
9:23 PM
@egreg Oh. What's wrong with Karajan?
 
@FaheemMitha What's right with Karajan?
 
Where Bach is concerned, Gardiner seems to be flavor of the Millenium.
@egreg I wouldn't know. He does the Beethoven symphonies. His versions seem to be popular.
 
@FaheemMitha They're not so bad, but too crowded. And his performances of baroque music were pathetic.
 
@egreg Ok. I don't think I've ever listened to any of his Baroque stuff.
 
@FaheemMitha Don't. :)
 
9:25 PM
@egreg Ok.
What's your favorite Bach cantata?
 
@FaheemMitha this is @egreg's taste: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Switched-On_Bach
 
@DavidCarlisle I expected you to point me to PDQ Bach.
 
P. D. Q. Bach is a fictitious composer invented by musical satirist "Professor" Peter Schickele. Schickele developed a five-decade-long career, performing the "discovered" works of the "only forgotten son" of the Bach family. Schickele's music combines parodies of musicological scholarship, the conventions of Baroque and classical music, and some slapstick comedy. The name "P. D. Q." is a parody of the three-part names given to some members of the Bach family that are commonly reduced to initials, such as C. P. E., for Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach. PDQ is an initialism for "pretty damned quick". ...
@FaheemMitha The six for Christmas, also known as “Christmas Oratorio”.
 
@egreg Ah. Ok.
I know that one. Possibly have it on CD. Though I don't play CDs these days.
 
9:44 PM
@egreg wasn't it you who said: »using vspace is the first step in the wrong direction«?
 
@Rico In many instances, yes; for typesetting a title page, no.
@Rico Using \vspace twice in the body of the document is a sign something is going wrong; in the preamble or a title page it's another matter.
 
@egreg ah I see, must have misst the typsetting part :P
 
What's wrong with vspace?
 
@FaheemMitha explicit spacing in a document is usually wrong
 
@DavidCarlisle Suppose you want the text moved down that much? What's wrong with that?
 
9:48 PM
@JosephWright (or anyone with luatex 0.97) got a minute to confirm something else wrong?
 
In fact scrlttrhas adjustable parameters for just that.
 
@Rico I used to teach to young basketball referees that “one double foul call in a referee's career is one too much”. ;-) That's quite exaggerated, of course, but it should give the idea. For \vspace it's similar.
 
@FaheemMitha for special cases, sometimes, but if you are regularly using spaces it's a sign that the settings for the document structures in your class are not suitable. it's the difference between \section{aa} and \vspace{.2cm}\textbf{aa}\vspace{.1cm}
 
@DavidCarlisle Well, scrlttr2 deals in absolutes, so if your to address is longer, for example, you need to move stuff down a little bit. And vice versa.
Granted, constant micro-adjustments are suboptimal.
That's how a word processor would do it.
 
@FaheemMitha that's why I use latex not a word processor:-)
another mail sent to luatex list
 
9:55 PM
Yes, word processors suck.
@DavidCarlisle Presumably not the only reason, though.
 
not sure if this is a dumb question, but how would one write »and/or« ? With or without space after the slash?
 
@FaheemMitha I never had a word processor until relatively recently and I never make any documents in it now, just use it as a reader if sent one. I don't really understand them enough to use them.
 
@DavidCarlisle Delimiters?
 
@Rico without (I'm so tempted to add "and / or with" but that would be silly:-)
 
@DavidCarlisle :D thanks :D
 
9:59 PM
@JosephWright oh you are here, yes, i sent it anyway (tlb0001.lvt:-)
 
@DavidCarlisle Party at my flat tonight, so just popping in
 
@JosephWright oh the MP film one?
@JosephWright You could have a new party game: pass the laptop, when the music stops find another luatex feature.
2
 
@DavidCarlisle Yup
@DavidCarlisle :-)
@DavidCarlisle I think you mean 'feature'
 
@JosephWright with no hyphenation and stretchy delimiters not stretching it's not that surprising that I saw a lot of difference in box output:(
 
10:14 PM
@DavidCarlisle I'm not sure there is that much to understand. From a user's POV, anyway.
 
10:26 PM
@cfr Re:
@FaheemMitha You shouldn't use this at all with KOMA classes. — cfr 42 mins ago
 
@FaheemMitha I usually completely fail on the few times I've tried.
 
Yes, I'm (now) aware of this. I posted a question about that recently. I think a KOMA answer should be added for that question. It's a special case, but an important special case.
@DavidCarlisle Fail at doing what? Don't you just type stuff in? And optionally hit save, I suppose.
I don't really know word processors either.
 
@barbarabeeton looks like Hans is going to make amsmath work
@FaheemMitha start a list then fail to type anything after the list that isn't bulleted, fail to type normal text after a stretch of text that is bold or coloured or ... fail to do anything at all really (I don't think I have ever actually produced a whole document from start to finish in word)
 
@DavidCarlisle Oh, yes, I see. If you want to add formatting that the complexity goes up. When I think of word processors I just think of typing ascii. But then I suppose one would just use an editor instead.
 
10:47 PM
Phew, back home.
 
11:00 PM
@PauloCereda Shaky bus?
 
@ChristianHupfer The very same. :)
 
@PauloCereda Yayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy Shaky bus ;-)
 
@ChristianHupfer :D
 
@PauloCereda And no wifi?
 
@egreg They lied to me! :)
 
11:07 PM
@PauloCereda @PauloCereda: The bus had a long ethernet cable then? ;-)
 
@ChristianHupfer ooh a 220km long one. :)
 
@PauloCereda Piece of cake :D
 
11:45 PM
Lots of people up late today.
 
anyone understand tex kerns?
 
@DavidCarlisle They have their pluses and minuses.
 

« first day (1874 days earlier)      last day (3052 days later) »