Recently, a question was asked about how to get enumeration with non-sequential, random-ish numbers. (I say random-ish because the point of the question was not to generate random numbers, but to take a given list of random looking numbers and enumerate with them. The obvious answer is just to use the optional argument of \item to do it manually. Tobi’s answer suggests exactly this. This is, I think, The Right Answer in this case.
So why did I suggest my own answer which, by my own admission, was an insane way of achieving the same thing? Given that the right answer had been given, why di …