« first day (1100 days earlier)      last day (114 days later) » 

03:18
2
Q: How is Arya still alive?

R JLet's have some flashback about S04E04, When a white walker brings one of Craster's son to Night King. So, the scene goes like this, [WikiPedia] Later, a White Walker retrieves Craster's son. The Walker travels to the White Walkers' fortress in the Lands of Always Winter and lays the child o...

 
2 hours later…
05:18
0
Q: Did David Benioff & D. B. Weiss just retcon the show's canon?

BeylaIn the Inside the Episode of S08E01, the showrunners (David Benioff and D. B. Weiss) said: ... Yet Sam's older brother was not a bad person,... It's clear to anyone that Sam is the older brother. Why did they say this?

 
2 hours later…
07:04
@djsmiley2k Eyrie should be important, Along with the Neck. It was really stupid to make the last stand at Winterfell. There are no natural defenses at Winterfell. Oh wait, they only had to kill one guy to get rid of the "Greatest threat" to mankind, right.
JAD
JAD
@Aegon I don't think the neck is too good. first of all, it's made for the other direction: attackers from the South. Second, the swamp probably doesn't deter wights as much as it does living things. Third, the idea is to rain arrows from the towers. Those didn't appear to be too effective against the wights to be honest. They run out and all that jazz.
07:20
@JAD Sure it ain't Eyrie but it is better than Plains of the North. Of course I don't think they should have won there, we discussed it after 3rd ep.
I felt it would have been better to have them retreat to the South like Rohirrim to Helm's Deep, make their stand at the Neck
Get defeated, fall back
Only to find Cersei's army behind
Deal with Cersei
And then make the last stand in the King's Landing
Keeps the excitement and action up.
@JAD Now speaking of terrain, it's all marshes and swamps. Surely that'd hamper their movements. You're correct though that it ain't much use for stopping an army coming from the north though.
JAD
JAD
07:43
@Aegon it'll hamper their movement for sure. For the first layer of wights. The rest will walk over them :P
but they won't get sick, bitten by snakes, killed by the bogmen as easily
07:56
Heh, the Trench all over again
Heroic dead men, giving up their er, death/life for their fellow dead
08:15
Makes quite some sense, though.
From the current standing probably still one of the better solutions. The White Walkers won't come back to freeze the Iron Throne anyway.
The Bronn thing is obvious bullshit, though.
Think they just added it for giggles and stuff
That and just to get another character out of the way
"Gib BrOn a CaStLe" is a big meme in fandom after all.
This season appears to be full of either killing everyone off or removing them out of the way
A guy in this FB group thinks that Red priestess Kinvara or summat will resurrect Rhaegel and Viserion
That's why Euron looks afraid in the next episode's trailer
Idk what stage of grief that is. Still denial?
08:19
Denial yeah
Or some mix of denial and bargaining?
Kinvara seems to have been added in for no point
"Guys why would they introduce that woman if she is not meant to do something? And why would Euron look afraid? He didn't look afraid of Drogon on the Walls"
:D
People keep complaining about the effin' dragons while simultaneously complaing about the show getting stereotypical.
But...maybe they are subverting the whole drago crap and dragons just...aren't such a big thing, yo.
Dragons had to die sure
But not at Cersei's hands
08:22
Dany and everyone else continously freak out about their dragons. But at the end of the day, they were deceived by the legends as much as every single Reddit complainer.
Rhaegal's death annoys me cos they had the perfect chance to kill him off against Viserion, in fact everyone thought he had died. Yet they kept him alive to die in such a poor way, the writing in that scene was terrible
"Only one Dragon in recorded history has been brought down in the air by a projectile and it was a one in a million shot. A mature Dragon in the air is virtually invincible." - GRRM
So certainly not legends
That's why they should have dealt with Cersei first in the show
Rather than saving her as the final boss
Very much legends, GRRM's legends. ;-)
And let The Night's King kill them dragons to sate their bloodlust
@Aegon Well, of course, noone gives a fuck about the Iron Throne. It's the White Walkers that ought to end the story. But...that train has left.
At least making one of the dragons evil was a nice idea. Although, I'm sure that's 100% against book cannon, too.
08:25
The others can turn animals to their will in the books
But a Dragon, well nobody really knows but it seems inconsistent
If Dragonglass kills the others and breaks their magic
What would dragonfire do?
And if they somehow get one, it'd still be a dragon? Will it still breathe flames?
JAD
JAD
@Aegon "one in a million show" or three in a row, eh
@Aegon the blue flames were... visually satisfying. But it doesn't really make much sense
JAD
JAD
oh yeah
^Courtesy of Carrot
@JAD And they actually said it was still fire.
@JAD Frankly, the colour of the flames is about the most useless thing to complain about (well, apart from Dothraki fighting tactics maybe). ;-) There's about 5 stupid questions wasted on if it's ice, fire, magic, skittles, or whatever crap. Like, dafuq wut, it's a zombie ice dragon.
08:32
@Aegon I shall star "my own" image :P
JAD
JAD
@NapoleonWilson well, you said it. > flames > ice dragon. What is it? Also, I wasn't complaining. Is even said it looked pretty. And it helped tell a bunch of dark dragons on a dark background apart
@JAD It's a magical wight dragon thing breathing magical blue fire. That's what it is.
Why doesn't the fire burn him inside out and drive whatever evil spirit is possessing it, out of it?
The way it does for zombie men, horses and other animals?
@NapoleonWilson White Walker dragon apparently
@Aegon Because it's a magical creature with magical fire?
08:38
@NapoleonWilson Does the magic persist when the creature dies?
Winters grew longer when the last Dragon died
Apparently so.
Whatever their magic is seems to die with them if the last dragon of aegon III is any evidence
Or at least it gets new magic when its revived.
Aeg you need to try and not apply book logic, or any logic, to the show
Afterall, undead already need magic to be different from, well, plain dead.
If the flames were normal fire-coloured and he'd spew it on the rest of the undead army who stay unharmed, then we can start bringing physics into the matter. But if it's a friggin weird creature with its own weird blue flames, it makes absolutely no sense for it to take harm from these flames. But call it "jibberwoggles" if the word "flames" or "fire" is too reality-laden.
JAD
JAD
08:47
@Aegon No, I suppose that was caused by the magic leaving as the last dragon died. Given that magicians over the world noticed their magic strengthening as the dragons were reborn
@JAD They bring/take magic with them. When they were gone, it disturbed the magical balance in the world and as pyromancers and others noted, their spells didn't work as books promised, maesters noticed that winters grew longer. When they came back, the reversal began at least for spells.
0
Q: How did Daenerys manage to turn up at King's Landing

SefeIn Game of Thrones S8E4, Daenerys went to Dragonstone with her court and the Unsullied when... We see Tyrion and Varys have a discussion on Dragonstone. Some unspecified time later they turn up with Daenerys and some Unsullied at the gates of King's Landing. I am aware that Dragonstone is both...

Now whether they have magic inside them, or they just act as some sort of catalyst for magic, we don't really know
09:24
Sansa, Arya and Bran find out that they are the last of the Starks in this episode, because Jon is not actually Eddard Stark's son. He is a Targaryen, and his children would be Targaryens.

Sansa and Arya are women, so would take their husband's names and their children would not be called Stark. Bran doesn't consider himself to be Bran Stark anymore, having become the Three-Eyed Raven, and seems unlikely to have children.

Therefore there will not be another generation of Stark children, and the house will cease to exist. Eddard Stark's remaining children are the last of their name.
Seems like that one might annoy you a bit @Aegon
"Sansa and Arya are women, so would take their husband's names and their children would not be called Stark." This just simply isn't correct, woman in GoT do not always take their husbands name, see Cersei Lannister as one main prominent example. — TheLethalCarrot 53 secs ago
I left a comment for you
Still a nice answer. A little less bland than the accepted one.
Also seems the dude commenting before you said about the same thing.
The main part of the answer is completely wrong
A few people said it but no one added an example
Granted. Still an interesting take, though.
It can be as interesting as it likes, still doesn't change the fact that it simply isn't correct
Sure sure.
09:32
And this is the problem with the HNQ and people voting when they don't know enough
Wrong answers that look correct get lots of votes and then incorrect information gets passed around
@TheLethalCarrot Well, you and the 5 people commenting before and after you are trying to set it straight, though.
Aye, won't change anything now though
The answers got enough votes and is still in the HNQ that it will now stay with high votes
Sure.
Arya probably is as likely to run around as a Stark with little Stark babies as Bran is. But granted, Sansa seems like someone to keep her name.
Arya will undoubtedly not get married and have kids if she survives... at least showverse
Sansa would keep her name and pass it on to her children
And Bran is the 3ER so not a Stark anymore
The title probably has a few meanings, that they are the last remaining Starks but only Sansa is one that would carry the line on
Well, maybe it is singular afterall. ;-)
09:38
Well even the last of the Starks would only really refer to Sansa and Arya since Jon is a Snow/Targ and never a Stark and Bran is 3ER
I mean Arya probably meant it to refer to all 4 of them in universe though
Maybe it's an intentional double entendre based on the lack of plural adjectives in the English language, similar to The Last Jedi.
Potentially but that seems like too much effort for GoT this season
Well, it doesn't matter if D&D say "it's obviously plural, dude! Noone gives a crap about no title!", we're not bound to their reasoning when interpreting the show.
Well sure but in cases like that where they are explaining why they chose a title name then that is the actual answer... you can infer other things from it but it wouldn't be correct as in why did they name it as such
When it comes down to in universe questions things change more
Yes, I forgot it's a SciFi chatroom.
Though, it seems this room would be the first to acknowledge that D&D are just...full of it. ;-)
09:48
SFF chatroom or not if you're asking why it's titled as such the only correct answer is the official answer from whoever titled it. Sure we can make other reasons up that fit but they won't be the correct answer to the question
@NapoleonWilson Yeah when it comes to in universe questions I wouldn't touch their reasoning with a barge pole
I mean Dan calls wights zombies and Dany apparently forgot all about the Iron Fleet!
Your definition of "correct" is quite strict, though. But let's leave it at that, I guess.
Well I was using correct as in official there but on questions like the title episode name the official answer is the correct answer
If the question asks "why did the creators title it as such", yes.
I mean whilst you are correct, "why is the title named X?" is essentially "why did the creators name the title X?" without saying as such
But meh we won't agree on this haha
@TheLethalCarrot I guess that's where we differ.
09:54
Well I knew we differed on that point when we started this conversation haha
Don't get me wrong I do like coming up with other reasoning for these sorts of questions as I did above
Then at least let's just be glad the accept button isn't the undelete button. ;-)
@TheLethalCarrot Meh left a link for hm if he wants to correct where he went wrong with examples.
See, I knew your comment wouldn't be the last one now. ;-)
Well why does it have to be the last
11,999 people have already seen it
10:00
Oh, it doesn't. The question isn't titled "The Last of the Comments" afterall.
And at least the link adds something new and fruitful.
Don't want the next 11,999 to run around with the vague ideas about matrilineal marriages/One tiny comment about Bael the Bard which doesn't present full picture imo
That's how "Right of conquest", "Law is the sword" bs started
But it's not like it was unexpected for the ASoIaF room to pile on with reiterations of that comment. ;-)
0
Q: Before S08E05 what side are the major houses on?

starseeker29Which of the 7 major houses or even minor ones are on each side of the upcoming conflict? From my understanding until now it should be: Starks + Arryns with Daenerys and I guess sort of Baratheon since in the last episode But I guess it doesn't really count since he doesn't have any actual h...

10:59
Hmmmm
I see things happening. Dany will take the throne, Jon will have to kill her ala Jamie and the Mad King.
Jon will refuse the throne, Sanza takes it, with Arya as her hound.
War - It never changes.
@djsmiley2k better: gendry sit on the thrones
come back to baratheon on throne: war never changes
See you were doing good til Jon murdering Dany
Then you took it too far with Sansa
But hey, maybe you were trying to think like D&D
sansa have ZERO claim for the iron throne
at least cersei was regent/mother queen
Heh that's still more than Cersei's claim to Iron throne and Jon's to Winter Crown
Didn't stop them
but as aegon says, could be plausible with D&D
11:14
@Kepotx or that, yah
@Kepotx Does any king, really have a claim to the throne? :)
@Aegon oh yah I think the books will go entirely different way.
Still may all end up with a final line 'War, it never changes'.
cc. Fallout 2013
;D
@djsmiley2k of course, the first kings conquer the lands. but each king of seperate kingdoms had thousands year of lineage that give them a good claim
even for the iron throne, it has been centuries know, and even robert had a claim
not the best, as all descendents of Aerys were before him, but he was on line of succession
of couse, becoming a king by inheritence is questionable, but if you accept it, then all families in the begining of GoT/aSoIaF have good claims
 
1 hour later…
12:29
0
Q: Has there been evidence of any other gods?

CharlesIIRC, the only god we've seen real evidence of is the Lord of Light. We see it when Beric comes back to life, and well as a couple times with Melisandre (birthing the shadow and bringing Jon Snow back). But, has there been any evidence of other gods throughout the series, or, is the Lord of Lig...

13:28
0
Q: Is there a known justification for why D. B. Weiss was hired as showrunner for Game of Thrones?

menaci342Reading the Wikipedia entry for one of the showrunners of Game of Thrones, namely D. B. Weiss, one gets the impression of a struggling and weak writer whose projects got turned down one after another. From the Wikipedia article: Weiss worked as personal assistant on films such as The Viking S...

 
5 hours later…
18:42
-1
Q: How did Varys know about Jon Snow's parentage?

83457In 8X04, Tyrion makes a remark regarding Lyanna Stark leaving Robert Baratheon that only somebody who knew about Jon Snow's true parentage in the first place, could have made a connection between the two. And Varys does, as evidenced when he immediately asks Tyrion "how many people know". So how...

 
1 hour later…
20:01
0
Q: Has everyone forgotten about wildfire?

IvanaWhy haven't the defenders of Winterfell, in S8 of GOT, at least contemplated using wildfire to defend the castle (and humanity)? I just watched 8.2. The defenders of Winterfell have been armed with Dragonglass and Valyrian steel as much as possible. But no-one has brought up wildfire. Why? We k...

 
1 hour later…
21:20
0
Q: Scorpions and crossbows

AlexanderGame of Thrones Season 8 Episode 4 spoilers ahead. Those of you who have seen Episode 4 already must be very impressed at the capabilities of medieval projectile weapons like crossbow and scorpion. However, I can't stop wondering if these depictions are anywhere close to reality. The crossbow ...

 
2 hours later…
22:58
0
Q: Why is the Night's Watch so depleted at the start of ASOIAF?

IngolifsAt the start of AGOT, the total number of the Night's Watch is said to be less than a thousand. During Aegon's conquest, the watch numbered ten thousand. (I don't have a copy of the books with me so I can't give a quote). Out of the nineteen castles on the wall, only three are manned. Castle blac...


« first day (1100 days earlier)      last day (114 days later) »