So, Nick Stauner's question has popped up for review again. I think it is actually an interesting question, but still wonder if it is well suited to this site - even as is. It strikes me as a great question at a dinner party hosted by a couple of conversationalists that relish in a good discussion that may not really have an answer though - especially when viewing the original.

Definitely more inline now than it was. I'm actually a little torn about voting to close, so I think I'll wait and see. I do like that Nickopened another chat room for it.

User 6692 Pamela - looks like spammer to me - just alerting you @Beofett :-)

@keen I wasn't sure my ping earlier worked because I think I used a lower case K and never saw the little flag pop up.

I think that question you were asking about on SciFi that asks about THHGTTG and reading levels might work here with only a slight change to make it a bit more general - especially now that it is clear that he really was trying to figure out if his kid would be able to understand it. Based on convo earlier with @Beofett, I don't think he disagrees either. Anyway, I'm much more for migration now after a few edits to the question were happily taken.

He seems unhappy with some of what we said about the question in chat, and unlikely to re-post at this point but I think it might actually be a GOOD fit for the site now that it really is about how to figure out if his kid can read it with understanding.

@balancedmama Definitely a spammer. We get a fair number of these "trustworthy spell caster" posts. You should destroy the user, instead of just deleting the posts.

There was a moderator newsletter recently that described the new anti-spammer tools, and it explains when to destroy vs. when to delete.

@Beofett Thanks. Good to know.

Sure you don't want the joy of the destruction?

hmm. Did you already blast it? Here is a toast! Clink Clink

Just destroyed something similar - my first elimination :-)