« first day (2908 days earlier)      last day (1718 days later) » 

 
1 hour later…
 
1 hour later…
02:28
no longer needed, wrong canned comment
 
1 hour later…
[ Natty | Sentinel ] Link to Post Contains Blacklisted Word - I am facing the same problem; Low Length; IntelliBL - 0.3; Low Rep; 2.5;
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
@Natty fp It includes a question, but it also gives the solution.
@Natty tp
@Natty tp It's intended as a comment on the other answer.
@Natty tp
OT no-repro, Solved! On June the 9th I made software upgrade and the problem disappeared.
@Natty tp
04:25
OT Debian
05:12
Is this question a dupe of something? The answer seems to have some potentially useful information and it has 2 positive and 2 negative anonymous/low-rep feedback (the question has none), but it didn't help the OP (and doesn't explain how to completely remove fglrx)
similar question, also "unanswered" - answer has 1 up and 1 down anon/low-rep feedback
05:59
Though Jorge approved this edit but I found nothing to support the claims in the edit, at least in case of GNOME Terminal.
06:51
Ask Ubuntu is scheduled to migrate to CommonMark today.
07:34
@Kulfy at 12pm UTC?
I'm not sure about the timestamp. But before AU, Super User and Mathematics will be affected.
let's go down together, yay
(unrelated) It is still quite rude to point it out in that way.
I'm not sure what went wrong in the comments of nomination I mentioned earlier.
I am just going to purge all the comments there which are no way related to the nomination
07:59
Thanks :)
08:20
OT no-repro, After one more clean reinstall of Ubuntu (formatting the partition), things are working again.
08:55
this question seems too broad to me, but is it just because I'm clueless about what they want to do?
it's a new arrival in the tag
I can remove the tag, which seems not at all needed, but the question seems borderline on topic at best and lacking focus
09:58
@Natty tp
 
3 hours later…
13:27
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
13:55
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Username similar to website in answer (62): Ubuntu 19.10 upgrade to 20.04 (out of date) by cyberflix apk on askubuntu.com
@Natty tp
14:14
I have written a query if anyone is interested in auditing their older comments based on keywords, for example, "Possible duplicate", "Does this answer your question", "This doesn't provide an answer".
oooh interesting
thanks!
@Natty tp
Well OP posted the answer in question and deleted account. It needs a CW answer.
14:57
@Natty tp considering link only answer
Another example of careless reviewing :|
15:09
@jokerdino Done. 13 mins ago.
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Manually reported answer (94): Installing ubuntu on a new empty internal hard drive by MR.suuji on askubuntu.com
hey @JacobVlijm haven't seen you around here for a while!
you wrote a comment about one of my comments... your comment is deleted now, but, I wasn't sure whether you wanted a reply to that comment
I wrote a reply eventually, but I deleted it as I decided it wasn't helpful
but anyway, since then I have been worrying a bit about it
Worrying that you would have felt I was ignoring you
Hey @Zanna Yeah, was just scrolling through chats to see what is going on here and there. Nono, didn't feel it as ignoring. In the whole story about the post, I must say a longer term frustration about what is going on on AU came out.
You have mentioned that you have finished with that subject so I am not expecting you to talk about it
but, if you do want to talk about it, or about any other stuff at all, I am always here
I mean the number 1 reason I always go to AUGR is to be pingable, because it's important to me to be accountable for whatever I'm doing
@JacobVlijm oh yes?
I need to take care of some housework stuff, may be back intermittently :S
15:30
Nah, this specific one is finished. At the same time, what I told someone else somewhere else. The humble ambition to create good and correct content seems to make place for self esteem and worry about not being "respected". New users seem to stumble over each other to claim their "status". This post was an archetype, if that even is a word in English. Together with the "If you push me, I'll get my big brother to teach you"
...made me kind of explode. Hate that kind of argumentation, trying to get or suggest "they say I am right" - arguments. History is full of it.
@Zanna
@Zanna lol I said "I'm always here" and then left... I should have said, more accurately, "I'm here frequently and I'll always reply to stuff eventually if I can"
archetype is a word in English :)
Felt for Braiam, no intention to be politically correct but technically, he simply is always right. A quality guy we can't miss. Felt like the tiny person saying to the giant he is too small. "I got 2300 points". Sorry, just venting.
that's OK
it's funny how impressions can be so distorted, like in the context of Stack Exchange you have a few statistics about another user, most prominently their reputation, so automatically your mind starts portioning respect to people based on these silly numbers
when you don't know anything else about them
I find it really hard to keep reminding myself that I'm getting the tiniest snapshot of this person via their AU stuff (and the less they have interacted, the less I know)
Sorry to interrupt, but does anyone have any idea why this answer was deleted?
Braiam used to be a highly active person on AU. Sharp as a blade. Got into quarrels a few times. I mostly disagreed with him, but loved him for his unable-to-compromise opinions. He kind of left. I guess in his edit war, old frustration came to the surface.
@Kulfy looks ok to me.
15:47
@Kulfy no problem at all! (can't imagine, maybe a mod will be able to say why it was flagged or whatever)
How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't have been? :P
I have seen Braiam here and there doing stuff over the years
@Kulfy ask Thomas, if he's sufficiently caffeinated
Yeah I was about to ping him in general room.
16:05
@JacobVlijm I can't say I have personally noticed the change you mention... I mean, I feel that the kind of attitude you mention has been visible quite regularly throughout my time on AU. But, if you have noticed a change, do you have an opinion on the cause of it?
16:16
Not sure, can only give how I feel, which is hardly objective. Might be a natural aging thing. In the early days of AU, there was a generation of "builders". People who had sharp what the goals were and felt highly responsible (I imagine). Some of them still are moderators.
After years, another generation comes along, more like "consumers". Since my presence here (ten years or so) I feel the sharp vision got more and more blurred. The lines of the drawing become more vague. Like I said, the humble ambition to create good quality content was replaced by something else.
Might be a natural thing. Maybe it's me. Fact is that what happens around here and especially on Meta, I don't follow anymore. Community seems not care. If you do, got the hammered on the head.
@Zanna
Last page of revisions if anyone bothers.. 568 pages of edits. Yeah, I am having none of that.
16:37
Then it must be me.
Sorry, I don't know what's going on.
Oh wait, you weren't talking to me?
I was looking through the Community bot's pages of revisions. Last page of Commonmark migration is 568 if anyone wants to see all the revisions. I personally won't be doing that work.
Ah, sorry, sorry
@jokerdino 11346 posts were affected
16:42
I don't think it's worthwhile to look through that many posts, at least not as a first step to seeing if there's anything that has to be manually fixed.
Once SEDE is updated, can we query for just the revisions that make changes other than adding a space after a leading #, ##, or ###?
My guess is that this is the most common change.
It is the only kind of change in most, but not all, of the posts that I've looked at.
Some changes involve adding blank line in front of the links we place at the bottom
maybe we can ask for their script to find out what changed!
That would be good, though we still wouldn't know without looking if those changes ended up breaking anything.
no longer needed, wrong canned comment (it's the OP's self answer)
[ Natty | Sentinel ] Link to Post Low Length; No Code Block; One Line only; Low Rep; 2.5;
16:58
@EliahKagan yes, but it would help us to write queries, I mean
Yes.
This post is an actual case of a lower-quality duplicate of an existing answer that adds nothing of value.
[ Natty | Sentinel ] Link to Post Contains ?; Low Length; No Code Block; Contains Whitelisted Word - Workaround; Low Rep; 1.0;
@EliahKagan Post already registered as True Positive
The CommonMark migration appears to have placed a large number of posts in the LQP queue.
Although maybe not, because the queue isn't giving me anymore items right now, even though I'm nowhere near having reviewed 20 posts today.
Actually, I'm somewhat near. I've done fifteen. But that's still not 20. :)
17:08
There are 57 pending items in the LQP review queue.
Interesting.
I wonder why I'm not getting more. Does it hold off from time to time, to help prevent careless reviewing ("robo-reviewing")?
Is this anonymous edit by the OP? If not, it should be rejected as attempt to reply.
@EliahKagan Yes
not a question (it can be closed as a bug report)
OT "EOL", posted a month after 14.04 LTS reached End of Standard Support
not no repro (fixed link) - every question is specific to not knowing the answer to it, that's not what we mean by no repro
17:22
@EliahKagan It might require a grammar check.
apostrophes are tricky
@EliahKagan no longer in queue, yours was the last one.
Is POP OS a recent thing? Why am I seeing it everywhere in the site these days? Assume I was living under a rock since 2013.
consults search engine.
I can't tell if this question fits the dupe target or not. Is this something that can be determined by discerning the model of the laptop from its appearance? This is the review item.
That looks like Dell
I'm going to replace my comment with one that also mentions that posting the same answer in two places is usually not good (since the post does have that problem, though it does not have the problem the reviewer said it has, or, rather, that is not actually a problem).
17:33
@jokerdino On closer look, my eyes are going blurry.
@JacobVlijm I am not sure I understand you, but if you are ever in search of people who care about content on AU, you will probably find some in here :)
dinner time
who wants poori?
:)
@jokerdino I hope it's the photo, otherwise I need new glasses
@EliahKagan I've replaced my comment on that answer.
17:57
thanks for that comment
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
@Zanna No problem.
18:07
yes
that answer is right
but, I would close the question as unclear
we have many like that
the message has nothing to do with the problem if there is one
if there isn't one, it's a dupe
18:18
@Natty fp
I'm not sure the question qualifies as unclear. I wish the OP said more, but they seem to just think that's an error message. I don't think they've said the system doesn't boot.
18:37
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Link at beginning of answer (0): Please help me install my Brother DCP-7040 laser on Ubuntu 14.04 ✏️ by a deleted user on askubuntu.com
[ Natty | Sentinel ] Link to Post Low Length; Low Rep; 0.5;
@EliahKagan "when I try to boot my system" to me slightly suggests that it does not boot, but I think this is the target for your interpretation
Thanks. I've voted to dupe it and edited the dupe comment.
(I'm not asking you to add your vote. I know you don't agree with that interpretation.)
18:58
[ Natty | Sentinel ] Link to Post Contains ?; Low Length; No Code Block; One Line only; Low Rep; 2.5;
not off-topic, since there is no reason to disbelieve the edit
not off-topic - I don't think this is effectively an attempt to report a bug or that the OP's next step should be to report a bug. Closing it as unclear might be more reasonable, but I'd be reluctant to do that without actual relevant information being requested. The current comment requests information that is not especially relevant to the problem.
This question is in no way off-topic.
I'm inclined to think this question is on-topic.
@EliahKagan I don't disagree with it as there is not enough evidence against it. I'm fine with it being closed as a dupe. OP can let us know if we're wrong
19:17
@EliahKagan I was thinking about that question while sweeping the floor, and I decided it is definitely on topic enough, and I thought it might be too broad, but probably not
dupe, maybe unclear
not no repro, unless I'm missing something, the answer explains perfectly well why it was slow
dupe, probably not unclear
unclear, not a question, and not quite obvious how--or if it would be appropriate--to convert it into a self-answered question
@EliahKagan I've improved my comment on that question and also edited the post. They just need to run apt-get as root (with sudo). It's a more straightforward duplicate than I'd originally noticed.
OT bug, maybe no repro
not unclear - the answer in the comment can be posted as an answer, and there's no reason to close a question as unclear merely because the OP didn't give feedback on a comment that should've been posted as an answer
I'm inclined to think this question is not quite POB, though it's a borderline case and I can see how one might consider it POB. See answer.
unclear per comment
seems OT hardware ("not about Ubuntu", not no repro)
Can this question be edited so it's just about the Ubuntu system talked about in the second half? (This is the review item.)
seems not dupe (see comments)
[ Natty | Sentinel ] Link to Post Low Length; No Code Block; Low Rep; 2.5;
[ Natty | Sentinel ] Link to Post Low Length; No Code Block; One Line only; Low Rep; 2.5;
22:32
@Natty tp
@Natty tp
23:51
@Natty tp

« first day (2908 days earlier)      last day (1718 days later) »