@SreeCharan yes you both are right... @TheDestroyer is right as the mantra is taken from Sri Rudram of Veda Samhita.. and as it's Devata is Rudra so it's primarily addressed to Rudra.. and also for Devi it should have been "Shivayai Namaha"...

शुभोदयं !!!!! @Tezz

@SreeCharan Yes, upvote for every answer certainly decreases quality of site... but what I want to say is most of the answer answered here deserve upvote if they do not deserve deletion... but anyway this is my own personal analysis... sometimes I leave answers without upvoting if I feel it is misinterpreting scriptures... and soon...

@SreeCharan शुभप्रभात् ।।

@Tezz You might know Kanakadhara stotram by Adi Shankaracharya. In that stotram, every word is feminine as it is addressed to Mahalakshmi.

@SreeCharan yes, I know it... Adi Shankara composed that stotra in a small age... I think before Sanyasa..

@Tezz When he was a brahmachari. That house of old woman now became a tourist place.

@SreeCharan Oh I didn't know that house is still there...

@Tezz Yeah it is still there. There it will be written in malayalam "Place where golden emblics showered".

@SreeCharan Is home of Adi Shankara also still surviving... ?..

Yes.

@Tezz A temple is also constructed in the premises. Chinmaya foundation bought the house to restore the cultural importance the house had.

@SreeCharan Oh Thank you! For information... I thought his house was already destroyed...

@Tezz @TheDestroyer @Rickross @AnkitSharma @KeshavSrinivasan Delete.

@SreeCharan Ok... I just cited delete vote..

@SreeCharan Namaskaram

@SreeCharan ^^ so, Do you think the banner is fine or need to change?

@Tezz Namaste!

@Pandya Namaskaram!....

@SreeCharan done

@Tezz I need English translation for Mahabharata verse 13.96.48:

> धर्मः श्रुतिसमुत्कर्षो धर्मसेतुरनामयः | आर्षो वै शाश्वतो नित्यमव्ययोऽयं मया श्रुतः ||४८||

And 13.19.2

@Pandya isn't it in KMG translation.. ?

@Tezz what's KMG?

Gangulis translation...

@Pandya can you give the context for the above verse... ?...

sanskritdocuments.org/mirrors/mahabharata/unic/mbh13_sa.html

@Pandya I think BORIs Critical edition?

I've some work, will be back in evening. (Ignore currently)

@Tezz Isha Upanishad is present in which samhita of Shukla Yajurveda?

Is this the only Upanishad present is Samhita portion of Vedas?

@TheDestroyer Isha Upanishad in both Samhitas of Shukla Yajurveda...( Madhyandiya and Vajasaneyi)...

@TheDestroyer No, NilaRudra Upanishad is also from Paipplada Samhita of Atharvaveda...

@Tezz ok.

I'm updating this answer.

it says yajurveda 40.9

What Yajurveda and which samhita?

Also, verse 33.2?

@TheDestroyer it's Vajasaneyi Samhita chapter 40... sacred-texts.com/hin/wyv/wyvbk40.htm

@TheDestroyer what is in 33.2 sacred-texts.com/hin/wyv/wyvbk33.htm

@Tezz Thank you so much.

@TheDestroyer Oh you mean 32.3... It's here........ sacred-texts.com/hin/wyv/wyvbk32.htm

@Tezz i think i should edit Sanskrit part. Sanskrit grammar varies right without changing Vocabulary?

over time.

@TheDestroyer I do not understand...

@Tezz Sanskrit doesn't evolve.

Ok. I think grammar has nothing to do with evolution.

Is Grammar of Vedas different from grammar of Puranas or Mahabharata?

@TheDestroyer Yes, Sanskrit doesn't evolve.. but we can find some difference between Grammar of Vedas and that of Puranas... minor evolutions... haha...

@Tezz Do Puranas and Bharata follow Panini Grammar?

@Tezz Above 40.9 which has words "Sambhuti" and "Asambhuti" is which recension of Vajasaneyi Samhita?

"Madhyandina" or "Kanva"

'@Tezz Wiki says Isha Upanishad with 18 verses belongs to "kanva", so above verse must be "Madhyandina"

Isha Upanishad mentions Vidya and Avidya in 40.9

@TheDestroyer I think it is present in both recension...

@TheDestroyer yes, both Bharata and Puranas follow Panini grammar...

@TheDestroyer I had discussed this issue with @KeshavSrinivasan before... he tells that western indologists are wrong in dating Panini.. and date of Panini is actually long time before Puranic period...

@Tezz Yes. isha is present in both recensions.

One with 18 is Kanva and other one is Madhyandina

"Sambhuti" occurs n Madhyandina recension of VS

@Tezz Verse 32.3 also belongs to VS right?

@TheDestroyer yes I just checked Sambhuti-Asambhuti occurs in Madhandiya recension.. and Vidya-Avidya is in Kanva...

@TheDestroyer Yes, Vajasaneyi...

@Tezz Thanks!

Is these recensions related to Shakhas of VEdas?

@TheDestroyer and in the 12th verse Kamva use Sambhuti Asambhuti and Madhandiya use Vidya-Avidya... so it's basically same... just change in order of Verses...

@Tezz ok.

@TheDestroyer yes, they are related to Shakha...

@Pandya It looks fine.

@TheDestroyer % of answers is 74 again. :(

@SreeCharan yes

@Tezz Do you know this famous story?

shiva.la/2007/07/miracle-story-lord-shiva.html

Hinduism Today says it is true.

hinduismtoday.com/blogs-news/hindu-press-international/…

@TheDestroyer You deleted the comment?

@SreeCharan Which comment? Ramayana?

Yes.

@SreeCharan As you updated the answer.

@TheDestroyer What are your views on authenticity of Parasara samhita?

@SreeCharan i don't know.

@SreeCharan i think Ramayana concentrates more on Rama than Sita.

@TheDestroyer Yes. It looks like that. The main reason of Ravana vadha is Vedavati's revenge.

@TheDestroyer Watch this video.

@SreeCharan ok.

@TheDestroyer Choosava bro?

@TheDestroyer Do you know Annadanam chidambaram shastri from Dharmasandehalu?He is a hanuman upasaka. He is the one who revived Parasara samhita. His guru gave some verses of Parasara samhiita. chidambaram Sastry is spending his life for making Parasara samita popular.

@SreeCharan yeah. i heard about him.

@SreeCharan how is this savarna dheerga sandhi?

He makes it Raamaa..+ aayana

@TheDestroyer Who kathi padma rao(atheist)?

@SreeCharan swamiji

@SreeCharan ohh..other person is atheist? who is he?

@SreeCharan Ok got it. He is dalit. So, obvious.

That guy is scholar in Sanskrit. I doubt that. He must have known difference between Varna and Jati.

@TheDestroyer అచ్చులకు సవర్ణములు పరమైతే దీర్ఘాలు ఏకాదశమవుతాయి.

@SreeCharan ha. kani a + aa = aa avochu kada.

@TheDestroyer There are many atheists/dalits who read scriptures and misinterpret the verses. I get angry when they talk bad about Rama and praise Ravana, Narakaasura.

@SreeCharan exactly. They still believe crappy theories that Rakshasas are dalits.

@TheDestroyer So swamiji quoted seethayaah charitam mahat saying that raamaa is feminine and quote panini sutra.

@SreeCharan i'm am not actually clear with that. I think we can post question here. Surya may help.

@TheDestroyer Yes.

@SreeCharan Will you post it?

@SreeCharan Ravana's soul was great but not when that soul was in Maya. Ravana was definitely a bad person. His devotion to Shiva has nothing to do with morality.

@TheDestroyer One of them is funny and crazy; You know that Hanuman sees Ravana on bed and watches Ravana drinking alcohol. Hanuma also sees different types of instruments in the palace of Ravana. So one of the dalits concluded that Ravana is not a brahmin. How will a brahmin drink alcohol and use instruments. So he is a low caste person(dappu kotte vadu) and Jain. He believes jataka tales of Buddhism but doesn't believe our hindu scriptures.

@SreeCharan deluded by Maya. I think he should remove his title Sanskrit scholar. It's disgrace to divine Bhasha Sanskrit if such "scholars" misinterpret slokas.

@SreeCharan Do you know anything about Swaroopanandendra Saraswati from Visaka Sarada Peetam?

@TheDestroyer You post it. You will be able to express the doubt properly in the question than me.

@SreeCharan ok. I will post today or tomorrow. I know Ramaa being used for Lakshmi but never heard Raamaa.

@TheDestroyer Not much. He shows up only at the times of Pushkaras, some religious gatherings etc., Is that peetham nearby you?

@SreeCharan Jagan is moving with him for Hindu votes.

And he is supporting Jagan.

I think Jagan gave donations.

@SreeCharan I know this rule but doesn't know Sutra.

Swamiji says that.

@TheDestroyer Who knows?

@SreeCharan yeah. Vijayamma lost to BJP when she did campaigns holding Bible in her hand.

Also, Swaroopanandendra swamy is from Visakapatnam. YSRcp party won in rural side but Vizag city votes for BJP and TDP.

@TheDestroyer Is this an answer or you have written whole chapter ^^

@KrishnShweta haha. yeah. Even i faced difficulty while editing it.

@KrishnShweta But read Q&A if you haven't read them. People of other religions are misinterpreting Vedic Verses to uphold their faith and to convert Hindus.

Yeah I've favorited it so that I could read later :)

@KrishnShweta ok. but read it as soon aspossible.

Sure...

@TheDestroyer If we convert any file to pdf online then will it gets uploaded to web (publicly) or it will get deleted?

@KrishnShweta depends on site. Most of them delete those files.

Hash!!

OK.. so I've to go through site's terms and conditions before doing such things ^^

I guess no need of thanks that's why deleted :P

@KrishnShweta ok.

Hmm.

@TheDestroyer 1 more help needed if you are not busy.

@KrishnShweta tell me.

recently I downloaded C++. In the pic you can see under C++ "Launch" and something something ^^

So if I delete those, will that software runs correctly or not?

OK....

I can keep them but it is looking dirty :P