« first day (4625 days earlier)      last day (13 days later) » 

05:54
20
Q: What is the motivation of the Kullback-Leibler Divergence?

RobertThe Kullback-Leibler Divergence is defined as $$K(f:g) = \int \left(\log \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} \right) \ dF(x)$$ It measures the distance between two distributions $f$ and $g$. Why would this be better than the Euclidean distance in some situations?

In mathematical statistics, the Kullback–Leibler (KL) divergence (also called relative entropy and I-divergence), denoted D KL ( P ∥ Q ) {\displaystyle D_{\text{KL}}(P\parallel Q)} , is a type of statistical distance: a measure of how much a model probability distribution Q is different from a true probability distribution P. Mathematically, it is defined as D KL ( P...
 
5 hours later…
10:38
1
Q: Understanding of KL divergence

Dmitry_IT_03I am learning machine learning and encountered KL divergence: $$ \int p(x) \log\left(\frac{p(x)}{q(x)}\right) \, \text{d}x $$ I understand that this measure calculates the difference between two probability distributions. I have written down the formula as follows (where $p(x)$ is the true distri...

7
Q: Kullback-Leibler divergence when the $Q$ distribution has zero values

Snurka BillFor discrete probability distributions $P,Q$, the Kullback-Leibler divergence of $Q$ from $P$ is defined to be $$D_{\mathrm{KL}} ( P \mathop{\|} Q ) = \sum_i P(i) \ln \left( \frac{P(i)}{Q(i)} \right).$$ Wikipedia's article on Kullback–Leibler divergence states The Kullback–Leibler divergence...

0
Q: Analysis of Kullback-Leibler divergence

dato datuashviliLet us consider the following two probability distributions P Q 0.01 0.002 0.02 0.004 0.03 0.006 0.04 0.008 0.05 0.01 0.06 0.012 0.07 0.014 0.08 0.016 0.64 0.928 I have have calculated the Kullback-Leibler divergence which is equal $0.492820258$, I want to know...

9
Q: Proving that a Kullback-Leibler divergence based kernel is positive definite

TheBugI'm looking at the NIPS 2003 paper A Kullback-Leibler divergence based kernel for SVM classification in multimedia applications. The authors suggest using the following kernel function for two distributions $p$ and $q$: $$ k(p,q)= \exp (-a (D_{KL}(p,q) + D_{KL}(q,p))) $$ where $a>0$ and $D_{KL}$ ...

8
Q: How to use the Kullback-Leibler divergence if the two probability distributions have different supports?

OllieI have two discrete random variables $X$ and $Y$ and their distributions have different support. Assume $X$ and $Y$ can both take on the same number of values. Let's say $X \in \{10,13,15,17,19\}$ and $Y \in \{12,14,16,18,20\}$. I would like to use the Kullback-Leibler divergence but it requires ...

2
Q: Proving that $\operatorname{tr} (P) - \log\det(P) \geq n$ for positive definite $P$ using the Kullback-Leibler divergence

Frank wieneSo, I was looking at the paper by Andrzej CICHOCKI and in the preliminary and notation part where they define some identities, the following identity is also given: $$\mathrm {tr}(P)-\log \det(P) \geq n$$ where $P$ may be any positive definite matrix. I was wondering how one would prove the a...

 
9 hours later…
@MartinSleziak I just removed that tag from all of the questions on which it has been applied. :/
Yes, I've seen that it has been removed. We'll see what happens next.
I'm really not sure what the tag adds to any of the questions so tagged, as they all contain the text "Kullback-Leibler", anyway.
2
Q: Seeking clarification for the domain of Gamma Function

Yunxuan ZhangBackground Information For the Gamma Function in the real plane, we have the following definition Definition. $\displaystyle \Gamma(x) := \int_0^{\infty} e^{-t} t^{x-1} dt \quad (x>0)$ and from this definition we can derive the functional identity Functional Identity. $\Gamma(x+1) = x \Gamma(x...

19:59
I have added - that tag is probably the closest to the topics such as domain and conomain of functions.
3
Q: Seeking clarification for the domain of Gamma Function

Yunxuan ZhangBackground Information For the Gamma Function in the real plane, we have the following definition Definition. $\displaystyle \Gamma(x) := \int_0^{\infty} e^{-t} t^{x-1} dt \quad (x>0)$ and from this definition we can derive the functional identity Functional Identity. $\Gamma(x+1) = x \Gamma(x...

@MartinSleziak Good call.
 
1 hour later…
21:25
The queries should return more questions after the next update of the database.

« first day (4625 days earlier)      last day (13 days later) »