« first day (3011 days earlier)      last day (1330 days later) » 

1:33 AM
@ArcticChar Thanks
 
 
4 hours later…
5:06 AM
A new tag was created by user149418. The tag-info is empty. There are now 24 questions with the tag.
0
Q: Does there exist a complete metric space which is Menger but not Hurewicz?

Nur AlamA topological space $X$ is said to be a Menger space if for each sequence $(\mathcal{U}_n)$ of open covers of $X$ there is a sequence $(\mathcal{V}_n)$ such that for each $n$ $\mathcal{V}_n$ is a finite subset of $\mathcal{U}_n$ and $\cup_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\mathcal{V}_n$ is an open cover of $X$. H...

0
Q: Is $\mathbb{R}^\omega$ (Tychonoff product topology of Euclidean $\mathbb{R}$) a Menger or a Hurewicz space?

Nur AlamA topological space $X$ is said to be a Menger space if for each sequence $(\mathcal{U}_n)$ of open covers of $X$ there is a sequence $(\mathcal{V}_n)$ such that for each $n$ $\mathcal{V}_n$ is a finite subset of $\mathcal{U}_n$ and $\cup_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\mathcal{V}_n$ is an open cover of $X$. H...

1
Q: Does there exist a complete metric space which is Rothberger but not Hurewicz?

Nur AlamA topological space $X$ is said to be a Hurewicz space if for each sequence $(\mathcal{U}_n)$ of open covers of $X$ there is a sequence $(\mathcal{V}_n)$ such that for each $n$ $\mathcal{V}_n$ is a finite subset of $\mathcal{U}_n$ and each $x\in X$ belongs to $\cup\mathcal{V}_n$ for all but fini...

3
Q: How to show that $\mathbb R$ is not Rothberger, and how to show that it is not Menger?

topsiWe say that topological space $X$ is Rothberger $S_1(\mathcal O,\mathcal O)$, if: For any sequence of open covers of $X$, $\{ \mathcal U_n | n \in \omega \}$, one can always find a sequence $\{ U_n | n \in \omega \}$, such that for each $n \in \omega$ $\{ U_n \in \mathcal U_n \}$ and $...

2
Q: Does parR imply Souslin?

topsiI have encountered the following property in this article: We say that a space $X$ parR (partition-Rothberger), if, for every sequence $(\mathcal P_n : n \in \omega)$, of partition of $X$ into clopen sets, one can pick $V_n \in \mathcal P_n$, so that $\{ V_n : n \in \omega \}$ covers $X$. a...

5
Q: Does $X=[0,\omega_1]$ satisfy $S_1(\Omega,\Omega)$?

topsiDefinition: An $\omega$-cover of a topological space $X$, is an open cover $\mathcal U$, such that, for any finite set $C \subset X$, there exists an open set $U \in \mathcal U$, such that, $C \subset U$. Let $X=[0,\omega_1]$, where $\omega_1$ is the first uncountable ordinal. Let $\langle \mat...

 
 
6 hours later…
10:52 AM
In mathematics, a selection principle is a rule asserting the possibility of obtaining mathematically significant objects by selecting elements from given sequences of sets. The theory of selection principles studies these principles and their relations to other mathematical properties. Selection principles mainly describe covering properties, measure- and category-theoretic properties, and local properties in topological spaces, especially function spaces. Often, the characterization of a mathematical property using a selection principle is a nontrivial task leading to new insights on the...
 
 
4 hours later…
3:19 PM
2
A: Tag management 2020

Arctic CharEither make riemannian-metric a synonym of riemannian-geometry, or un-tag all questions with this tag. The Riemannian metric is the defining object of a Riemannian manifold. I can't think of one question in Riemannian geometry which does not involve the metric. Almost no one is using it: it has...

 
3:35 PM
It seems that was created in December 2016: chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/3740/2016/12/8
Dec 8 '16 at 13:24, by Martin Sleziak
- I do not know enough about the topic to be able to judge this. But we already have .
 

« first day (3011 days earlier)      last day (1330 days later) »