« first day (2935 days earlier)      last day (1406 days later) » 

2:37 AM
A new tag was created. I remember seeing the tag in the list of new tags already with zero questions - so most likely it was created and removed elsewhere and then used in this post.
1
Q: The intuition of the round value of $e^{i \pi}$

datdinhquocI can see the value of $e^{i\pi}$ is -1, this value is round without decimals. The $e$ value can be defined as the value (v) that the derivative function of $v^{x}$ is still $v^{x}$. And the $\pi$ value is defined as the value of circumference over diameter of whichever circle. And $i$ is $\sqrt{...

@MartinSleziak The back and forth wit continues, it was removed and then added back by the OP again: math.stackexchange.com/posts/3730974/revisions
 
 
5 hours later…
7:29 AM
The tag got another question.
1
Q: Explain and Apply Euler's Generalisation of Fermat's Theorem

GillAs I understand Euler's Generalization of Fermat's little theorem in Modulo Arithmetic, it is: $a^{\phi(n)} \equiv 1 \pmod{n}$ However, I have also seen a version of the theorem which seems more understandable and goes: "If b and n have a highest common factor of 1, then $b^x \equiv 1 \pmod{n}$, ...

As far as I can tell, tags such as , , , are not good tag names. (Maybe there was even some discussion about such tags.)
One of those question was also using while actually being about .
We still have two separate tags and - the latter is a synonym of .

Tag for Euler's constant

Feb 4 at 6:23, 1 day 1 hour total – 68 messages, 5 users, 0 stars

Bookmarked Feb 5 at 9:11 by Martin Sleziak

Feb 5 at 8:06, by quid
I think it's a good idea to clean this up. I'll come back to it at a later point in time.
@quid Some time ago you mentioned that you plan to look at the situation around the tags for Euler's number and Euler's constant.
Here is the bookmarked situation which we had at the time: chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/3740/conversation/…
It is definitely not urgent - the tags were this way for long time, so it does not matter whether something is done now or later (in 6 to 8 weeks).
Still, I wanted to remind you that old conversation. (And I also wanted to find out whether you are willing to have a look at those tags at some point.)
There is also a related post on meta: Should there be a separate tag for Euler's number $e$?
7
Q: Should there be a separate tag for Euler's number $e$?

Martin SleziakAt the moment, there are two tags which are related to the number $e$. The e has been synonym of exponential function for a long time.1 A newer tag called eulers-number was created in January 2019. Question. Should there be a separate tag for Euler's number $e$? Or is it better to have both e a...

 
 
1 hour later…
8:52 AM
Here is what SEDE returns for the tags mentioned above:
Posts where the tag was added removed (including the editors): data.stackexchange.com/math/query/1105163/… data.stackexchange.com/math/query/1038474/…
 
 
7 hours later…
3:35 PM
@MartinSleziak thanks. I'll try to remember and look into it next week or the weekend. (Do not heistate to remind me. )
 

« first day (2935 days earlier)      last day (1406 days later) »