@quid @quid, can you elaborate on the objection? My point with the bourbaki tag is that it corresponds to a certain style of mathematics and also a certain philosophy of mathematics. Sometimes this is helpful. Sometimes it is not, as argued by Adrian Mathias. A number of questions at SME deal with this by now.
@user72694 the question tagged with the bourbaki tag were, or so my perception, in large part questions where the fact that the author was Bourbaki seemed purely coincidental. As said, if the tag was at least only used for questions that are about Bourbaki specifically I might see the point better.
In Bourbaki, Algebra I, chapter I, ยง5 "Groups operating on a set" paragraph 1, Bourbaki defines the operation of a group $G$ on a set $E$ as a morphism $\alpha \in G\mapsto f_\alpha \in S(E)$ ($S(E)$ is the group of permutations of $E$). Then he defines a faithfull operation asking the morphisme ...
Resolved: manually removed from all questions.
The tag bourbaki is entirely useless. It gives nothing that searching "Bourbaki" doesn't already do.
