I've suggested tag-wiki for connectedness which includes both topological and graph-theoretical meaning.

(The tag is few days old and it has 3 questions now - if someone had objections against this tag, he would probably have mentioned them by now.)

I wonder if I see riesz-spaces among new tags soon. No-one said anything about t.b.'s suggestion so far, see here.

How about a baire-category tag?

@MartinSleziak looks good. Thanks for all these efforts with the tagging-system!

@MartinSleziak I think I'll give it a bit more time.

I have to go now. See you!

@t.b. I'd say I am far behind J.M. and Willie Wong in tag-related activity; here's a query showing the most prolific tag-wiki editors.

@t.b. I'd guess we have 50+ questions which could have this tag.

I like that tag - but I am perhaps not the right person to make a call, since I am an inclusionist.

@t.b. I don't see why not. We're way past having ten questions dealing with it, no?

Okay thanks, that's what I thought :) I went ahead and added the tag baire-category to a few questions and created a short tag wiki summary. Feel free to re-write it if you don't like it.

@J.M. ping

@MartinSleziak ping

Awesome. :)

I have a comment to the tag-exceprt.

what's up?

I'd expect that this tag was also about set of first/second category, and the way it looks now it seems as a tag intended only for questions about Baire category theorem.

Another question: Do you plan to add tag-wiki later? Or did you leave this to other users, who are struggling to earn research assistant badge?

Go ahead, submit any sorts of improvements, I'll accept (agreed with the first/second category point). I didn't intend to write the tag-wiki. I'm always taking an inordinate amount of time with that. Submit any sorts of improvements, I'm going to accept.

@t.b. I'll wait whether you do some more edits to it, but I'd expect having in tag-excerpt only what the tag is for (BCT, meager sets, ...) and the text you wrote could go (with some expansion) into tag wiki.

In the tag-wiki we also have possibility to use markdown.

okay, I'm not very familiar with the system. I only wrote the excerpt in order to signal that the tag is intended to stay, nothing more.

ok

I'll do what I suggested and ping you then.

Great, thank you!

I've noticed that limsup tag-wiki has comparable number of editors and views, so this one might end up with similar numbers.

I agree with Martin; compact summary in the excerpt, and the elaboration in the wiki itself...

That sounds very reasonable to me, no objections at all :)

From the average lengths of my answers you can see that I'm not very talented when it comes to concision. I'm no GEdgar!

@t.b. Since tag-excerpt is the thing the users see when they hover over the tag or when they are adding tags to a question, I think tag-excerpt should be short and it should clarify what the tag is intended for. (Especially in the cases when there might be confusion.)

I've made some changes, but you probably noticed - I've seen that you approved changes to the tag-wiki excerpt.

@MartinSleziak I understood. Thanks. I rephrased a bit of the tag-wiki. Can you have a look, please?

It goes without saying that there is plenty of space for further improvements (or a complete rewrite).

And that was what you were doing :-)

@t.b. Thanks for the corrections and improvements. (I had the restatement of BCT wrong, how could I not see that.)

It seems fine to me.

Okay, very good, then. It's time for lunch now. See you later!

Bye!

@t.b. See you!