« first day (413 days earlier)      last day (813 days later) » 

00:03
oh - also the appetites of astronauts on the ISS decrease, even with intense exercise programs they have to follow
with the low gravity on the Moon, that phenomenon would likely be less, but it would also likely continue to be true.
00:38
"the 15 m2 was an estimate, as i didn't want to go find the figures myself right now either." - I did, and you will not find good numbers, but 15 is reasonable estimation. BIOS-3 had 45m^2 per 3 humans with 80% food covering (the rest were meat supplements outside of the system)
Chinese had worms they consumed, but there is no data about surface for plants used.
I prefer 20-25 because I prefer to have meat(fish) and do not like to eat bugs myself.
But really I'm more interested in energy system discussion(because biology is a big topic), but 1 million people they also should have same diet and export favorite food?
some bugs are really quite tasty. you just have to get used to it.
in fact, lots of them are.
the city uses the entire crater as farmland and parkland. other than a few plazas and large buildings for popular use, nothing is built on the ground
be consistent ) they export favorite food or they eat delicious bugs )
it also has gardens elevated high above the ground, and high-intensity specialized greenhouses outside the city, for a few crops like grains and legumes
by that time, sure, they may well export a few delicacies
the people live in the towers that extend between the ground and the dome, and in the crater walls up near the rim
00:55
ok, 0.75×60000 = 45MW
what do robots do?
or better what is the goal of the colony
what was the goal of colonizing the new world?
i know everyone is all in knots about the business model in the early days, but this project is intended to look at the big picture.
finding better live.
yes, i suppose that was the motivation for most early settlers in the new world
for the moon, i expect it will have more to do with seeking new experiences, and a new way of living.
and later, and even today people immigrate to US for a better life
yes, the moon might indeed count as a better life in a lot of ways
but also, people will definitely have to give things up to go
no oceans, barely even a lake, a very limited set of animals and plants
01:02
"to give things up to go" - completely disagree on that. - just as page checking note.
ok then, what robots do, which industry is present
the big thing is construction - satellites, spaceships, space stations.
eventually it would probably even make sense to build solar power satellite installations - not in the near term though
at 60'000 city level - their industry
60,000 people can most definitely build lots of such things for profitable sale
but the early days of the colony are funded by the Residency Program
the timeline has a lot of stuff in it, but if you read just that section, it is a lot easier than me trying to summarize it here
Will read it, a bit later (preparing food right now)
I would define myself as energoanarchist, it's like capitalism but even worse.
Energy balance should add up, if not, everyone dies. money, gold all that crap worth nothing, only energy makes sense.
Say me the number, energy consumption )
btw. 1GW is about 1600t of aluminum production per day with energy efficient methods.
we can get a lot more stuff done by using basalt, glass, and iron
i am about to label the sketchfab model of the current rough draft of the tank
but i should probably make dinner first too
it isn't annotated and the materials haven't been set up, but it is there to look at, at least.
01:50
@kimholder nice model )
 
12 hours later…
13:26
1
Q: If there is actual ice on the moon, why hasn't it sublimated?

uhohThe Ars Technica article NASA seeks industry help with lunar landings, potentially sample return discusses the potential value of ice on the moon as a source for fuel in future space missions. Ice sublimates. Even if it is very cold hiding in permanent shadows in craters near the Moon's poles, I...

 
4 hours later…
17:55
bricks from regolith with 3d and solar
.....
holy cow. vindication.
that is the first time i've seen a current paper using a technique closely analogous to what i propose for construction.
)) U'll probably like then youtube.com/watch?v=Tsk-24UYFs0
i am curious why they sinter (it seems) rather than liquify the material completely. Maybe it makes it easier to make forms.
btw, usually when people use the )) to indicate a smile, they add eyes using a colon - :)
i have a hard time getting used to your eyeless smiling faces :P
@MolbOrg oh yeah, that video i know well. I have used it to sell the idea several times.
heheheh. well that i didn't know.
why are people so focused on making little bricks that have perfect shapes? it makes building so much harder.
i really like my laminated approach with panels and boards better
i'm going to the plaza to buy vegetables. back in a while.
18:09
as about video did you saw the version I linked? or other because I also know about it for a long time but I do not remember such good closeup shots of melting process. Pay attention how liquefying and tensile strength draws nearby particles which aren't molten but stuck to the liquid
So sintering is the way to increase accuracy. But I'm also a bit curious, other factors aren't excluded
18:34
@MolbOrg yes, that's the one i know. a member showed it to me in the main chat room about a year and a half ago. brian lynch. he is really sharp, but he doesn't have time to spend here any more.
i haven't heard such a technical description before though of why the liquid pulls in nearby particles. interesting.
s/tensile strength/surface tension/fix
yeah, i sort of figured out that is what you meant.
18:55
a bit boooring ted talk video, but a healthy idea and nice to see someone makes something about it - self-assembly at macro level youtube.com/watch?v=0gMCZFHv9v8
19:41
now the model has notes skfb.ly/6q6SV
 
2 hours later…
21:52
btw, i darkened the text of the website a little. i think it does make it a little easier to read, now that it has less contrast.
and i made the background a bit less transparent

« first day (413 days earlier)      last day (813 days later) »