« first day (938 days earlier)      last day (4380 days later) » 

21:00
@TobiasKildetoft ah, I am being silly. at any rate, applying $\varphi^{-1}$ to $\varphi(H)\subseteq H$ gives $H\subseteq\varphi^{-1}(H)$; how does that get us anywhere?
@anon now $H\subseteq \varphi^{-1}(H)$ for all automorphisms $\varphi$
ah, so $H\subseteq \alpha(H)$ for all $\alpha$, duh
I have this group H of order 660=11*10*6 generated by <x,A_5>, how could I say that a regular normal subgroup must be a 11-Sylow subgroup?
@user58512 acting on what set?
it's kind of hard to explain what set it acts on
it's not just 5 symbols
21:04
@user58512 the order of a group acting regularly and transitively on a set is uniquely determined
it's 10 unordered pairs plus one new symbol
hmm
do you require your regular actions to be transitive?
that's perfect for what I need, ill try to prove it
yes, must be transitive
so the order of the group must be the size of the set acted upon
thanks!
I don't see why it's an 11-Sylow group though. I mean is every group of order 11 an 11-Sylow group?
(in a group whose order is a multiple of 11 once)
I don't think I even need it to be 11-Sylow here..
21:09
@user58512 yes, any subgroup of order 11 in a group whose order is divisible by 11 just once, is an 11-Sylow subgroup
just look at how p-Sylow is defined
oh... this makes the Sylow theorem even more amazing
I wasn't fully understanding it before
ahh
it is indeed a very beautiful theorem(s)
I think I can say that this 11-Sylow subgroup is cyclic too, by Cauchys theorem
21:12
The Hall theorems have a similar beauty
@user58512 it is a group of prime order, so it is cyclic by lagrange
the proof of Hall's theorem is very involved!
oh that's even better
yes, Hall's theorems take a lot of work (especially one of the directions)
and the "weak" version of Hall's theorem is even nicer, though I am still not sure if all the details work out
7
Q: Is there a counterexample to this weakened converse of Hall's theorem?

Alexander GruberSuppose that a finite group $G$ contains a Hall $\{p,q\}$-subgroup for every pair of prime divisors $p,q$ of $|G|$. Does it follow that $G$ is solvable?

@TobiasKildetoft, I'm should have taken representation theory
woah
hi
Hilow
21:43
what is the automorphism group of a code?
is there anything to knot theory other than knot invariants?
knots seem so beautiful but I don't care about the invariants....
I didn't realize noam elkies supervised john conway
does that even make sense
he is 30 years younger..
I got the name wrong, it was jeremy martin
22:01
What does age have to do with it?
22:20
I feel like this now, thank you all on MSE !
"Perhaps I can best describe my experience of doing mathematics in terms of a journey through a dark unexplored mansion. You enter the first room of the mansion and it’s completely dark. You stumble around bumping into the furniture, but gradually you learn where each piece of furniture is. Finally after six months or so, you find the light switch, you turn it on, and suddenly it’s all illuminated."
Andrew Wiles
2
@robjohn Are you around?
@Argon yes
I was struggling with this integral: $$
\int_{0}^\infty \frac{\sin x}{e^{2 \pi x}-1}\, dx
$$
It was hinted that I use a rectangle contour that has vertices at $0, R, R+i$ and $i$ and let $R\to\infty$
@Argon Can you compute $\int_0^\infty\sin(x)e^{-\alpha x}\,\mathrm{d}x$?
@robjohn Laplace transform, ya
22:28
@Argon Contour integration is definitely one way to go. I wasn't sure if you could use that... if not, you can use the integral I mentioned and a geometric series.
@robjohn Oh, I was trying it with contour integration (it's a complex analysis book)
@Argon Then that is the way they want.
Yes. My major problem is from $i$ to $0$
Oh, they also hinted to turn $\sin$ to $\exp(ix)$
So along the real axis part, the integral is the one we want. Along $i$, it is the integral times $e^{-1}$
@Argon that is usually what you do for complex integration, $\sin(x)=\dfrac{e^{ix}-e^{-ix}}{2i}$
As $R \to \infty$ the small jump from $0$ to $i$ seems to go
22:31
@Argon yes, it will
But what is done with the contour on return to 0 from $i$?
This probably isn't the right place to ask this, but simple question: What syntax is used is everyone using for their math equations? Like "$e^{-1}$", what language is that?
@Argon I get that it is $$\frac12\int_0^1\frac{\sin((1-\pi)t)}{\sin(\pi t)}\,\mathrm{d}t$$
@Supericy You mean LaTeX?
Is that little bit from $i$ to $0$ $$\int_0^1 \frac{e^{i(ix)}i}{e^{2 \pi i}-1} \, dx$$ ?
@Argon yes, but mine is in the opposite direction so it should be the negative
22:41
@robjohn Yeah, I think thats it. Thanks.
@robjohn Yes, yes. But this goes over a pole, no?
@Argon Note that this blows up at $i$
Exactly. Should I loop around it?
@Argon yes. and include the quarter circle, which is $\frac\pi2i$ times the residue at $i$
@robjohn Hmmm, the book didn't tell me that in the hint!
Will the integral not blow up then? How do I change this integral, it just now goes to $i-\epsilon$
22:44
@Argon Do You know the Cauchy Integral Theorem?
Yep
Ok
But what do I do with the integral? I cannot find it's value, nor can I seem to be able to make it in terms of the integral that I am trying to find.
@Argon Hang on for a bit
Thanks. I will get that residue
When multiplied by $i\frac{\pi}{2}$, it is $\frac{i}{4e}$
23:02
@robjohn Hi.
@Sanchez Around?
@BenjaLim Hey there
@robjohn They're still at topology though not yet at the measure theory
Punishment will ensue ;-)
@robjohn They don't take attendance
@robjohn But the differential geometry class is better
I have been to every lecture
@BenjaLim I wouldn't miss either
23:15
@robjohn So sad Jonas is not coming here. He was supposed to but due to some private reasons could not.
@robjohn I understand you met him/ @Ilya?
@BenjaLim Today, or ever?
@robjohn I mean he was supposed to come to visit someone here. But that was cancelled.
@BenjaLim Yes. Ilya had a stopover on the way to Hawaii
@robjohn You and Ilya met on the internet yea? That was the first time you met him in person?
@BenjaLim Ah. Good. I was afraid we had lost another
@BenjaLim Yes. We had only known each other from MSE
23:17
@robjohn Two people I have met on math.se in real life. We are now close friends :)
@robjohn Out of curiousity, do you find a lot of people named Liam in where you are (san francisco)?
Hi @GitGud
@zero Hello.
@GitGud I heard you and Charlie had an argument?
@zero She might have had one with me. I didn't notice, to be honest. Not until it was too late, I mean.
@GitGud Wasn't there a suspension involved?
23:23
@BenjaLim I am not in SF and I know noone named Liam
@zero What? She was suspensed because of that little thing? I didn't even know. I guess I can see why she'd be suspended because of that, zero tolerance. But it was up to me she wouldn't have been suspended.
2
@GitGud That is why I'm here zero tolerance :)
So I guess people here hate me now. Should be fun.
Come on don't be that way... I don't hate you
@Argon: I made an error, that the real part of that integral from $i$ to $0$ comes to $\frac12\left(\frac1e-1\right)$. The imaginary part might blow up, but not the real part
23:29
@GitGud I just wanted to get your side of the story pal
@zero Can't you access the chat history?
@GitGud Yes, but some added context would help, no?
POV
Everything is in there, there's not much else to it. It was the first time I ever spoke to her.
I like POV, great revolution.
Oh... I didn't know about it being your first time?
...so just getting off on the wrong foot, yeah
@zero Not my first time on the chat, but it was the first time I spoke to her. I've been on the chat a half a dozen times maybe, that episode with Charlie was the only second time I had a conversation here. This is the third time.
23:37
@GitGud Is it now?
@zero Yeah, as far as I remember.
@GitGud Dafuq happened?
@PeterTamaroff Not much. She wanted me to tell her where I was from because I knew she's from Brazil. But I didn't say anything. It was amusing.
3
I'm off now. See you all.
@robjohn But it is the imaginary part we want, isn't it?
@GitGud later
23:40
@Argon the answer is real, so the imaginary part should be $0$
@zero Why don't you mind your own business?
@robjohn But we changed $\sin$ to an exponential so we take the complex part. Bleh, I am missing something here.
@skullpatrol Was I talking to you?
@zero You're a good for nothing divisor ;-)
lol

« first day (938 days earlier)      last day (4380 days later) »