« first day (911 days earlier)      last day (4407 days later) » 

15:00
@WouterZeldenthuis it has been too long since I learned about differentiable manifolds
@skullpatrol no. remember what I said? If you go, I go too :)
@Charlie This suspension was a comedy just like the movie Blazing saddles
Not a blaze of glory at all.
@Argon wazzup?
@skullpatrol Not much! Nice avatar, by the way!
@skullpatrol Haha I love that moive
@Argon Thanks, and the movie was a classic too :-D
@skullpatrol what comments were flagged?
15:14
@robjohn Only 1 Sir.
I didn't see anything deleted, nor anything worth flagging
I must have missed something somewhere
The moderator approved the flag.
@skullpatrol Do you know what was flagged?
is $\gamma(t)=t^3$ a parametrization of $\mathbb{R}$?
@robjohn Yes, I wrote it Sir.
15:21
@robjohn You can check on the chat user profile under "show all flags" if you know the user
3 hours ago, by BenjaLim
@skullpatrol what do you do for a living?
It all started here (removed) is the beginning of the suspension.
user19161
Oh come on we are still talking about this?
user19161
What happened @skull?
@MadScientist Yeah. Looking at what is listed there, I don't see anything worth banning skullpatroll
user19161
@amwhy I did not understand the proof Babak gave. Every line feels wrong.
15:34
ah, the derivative is not 1-1. ok
@JasonBourne I wrote one comment that got flagged and approved by a moderator.
user19161
@skullpatrol What did you write?
@JasonBourne If I write it again it'll be life!
which proof?
@JasonBourne TPTB are watching, no?
user19161
15:36
@skullpatrol Oh well, never mind. A suspension is not a big deal. Even going to jail is not a big deal. That happens to many good people in this world.
user19161
@amWhy The one about the identity of the subgroup being that of the group.
@JasonBourne I'll recheck it...
@JasonBourne: I have an animation for you i.sstatic.net/yx84R.gif
You guys make a storm in a cup of water....
Hi @GarbageCollector wazzup?
15:38
@skullpatrol Nothing. :-)
@GarbageCollector HELLO!!!
user19161
@GarbageCollector Haha, thanks! By the way, was that girl in the photo you?
@Charlie Hi baby!
@JasonBourne It's been deleted...
@JasonBourne oh my ghost!
user19161
15:39
@amWhy Yeah, because we can't assume that the identity of the group is in the subgroup from the start.
user19161
But maybe it is just his English.
user19161
@GarbageCollector So you won't answer that question? Well, that is alright. It is your secret!
@JasonBourne :-)
user19161
@GarbageCollector I think the answer to that question is yes. =)
@JasonBourne: :-)
@JasonBourne: You are interested in?
15:43
I have some very easy questions which are stupid for main.
user19161
@GarbageCollector What do you mean?
@JasonBourne I mean for any element of domain there is only one ... :-)
@JasonBourne: Gong Xi Fa Cai!
user19161
@GarbageCollector I have no idea what you are referring to now...
user19161
@GarbageCollector Haha, not yet...
@Novice Although there is no level requirement for questions on main, some feel that if a question is too elementary, they need to downvote it. However, you can always ask here.
15:47
@robjohn Thank you.
Intermezzo: Today I got a message from my friend in facebook. It is a sad story. facebook.com/…
2
The question is: "Find the last digit in the expansion of $2^{12n} - 6^{4n}$". I tried $n = 0$ and it comes out to be $0$. But for the formalized approach, I know that it boils to showing that $2^{8n} - 3^{4n} \equiv 0 \pmod{10}$. Am I correct?
@GarbageCollector That is not sad, but extremely disturbing...
Wait a sec.
@skullpatrol OK. Thanks for rephrasing.
15:54
In algebraic topology, when attaching a cell to the skeleton, does an attachment map need be continuous?
@GarbageCollector ...why would anyone do that?
@Novice Expand $2^{12}$ and $6^4$ and you shall get your answer.
@Novice: $2^{12}=4096$ and $6^4=1296$ so $\bmod{10}$, both are equal. Raising them to the same power, they will still be equal.
@skullpatrol ooooooh that is .... Disgusting.....Jesus Christ.....
Ah, yes.
15:56
@skullpatrol she might have mental problem.
@Novice The same can be said for the last two digits.
@Charlie I could not watch more than 5 seconds :'(
Thanks both for not pursuing the path "I Will Not Answer Questions If I Don't Get My Rep".
Who marked it with a star?
@skullpatrol neither did I.... Horror....
15:58
@GarbageCollector Not might but $\Huge\text{IS SICK}$
@skullpatrol Thank you for rephrasing again.
I have another question.
Never mind, figured it out.
@GarbageCollector What chance does a child like that have of living?
@skullpatrol that should get flagged...
@Charlie You can flag reality all you want, but it won't change it, no?
16:03
@skullpatrol The baby probably will get disabled mentally and physically.
@skullpatrol no
@GarbageCollector Can you contact your friend who sent that?
Hi everybody, Is it okay to ask a question on general approach to solve a specific type of problems if I can't get a good note on it online? Any ideas or advices?
@skullpatrol No. But I think it is searchable by the public.
@GarbageCollector Please try and help.
16:06
@skullpatrol OK. I am searching...
Thanks...
...for trying.
@Mistu4u you can ask it here if you can't pose a good question on main.
@robjohn, "main"??
@Mistu4u the main Q&A forum
Okkay. Thanks @robjohn.
16:14
Nice formatting Sir :)
user19161
@robjohn Though I always believe that chat should be reserved for 1+1=2 and extended discussion. =)
@Mistu4u If it is a good question for main, people here can help you with the wording for main
user19161
Yeah, once it gets to main, a million people will edit it.
Not if the people in chat help word it correctly :)
@JasonBourne yes, I am not saying that we take the place of main, but we can help with the simpler or longer discussions here. We can also help in figuring out how to ask a question on main
16:17
Well said Sir.
user19161
Strictly speaking, we don't know the number of good oranges. There could be 150 bad oranges in the box. We can only give the estimated number of good oranges. — akkkk 10 mins ago
user19161
What does this mean? Can someone explain?
@skullpatrol: I cannot locate the persecutor.
@GarbageCollector I feel better now that you tried, thanks again.
@JasonBourne Why don't you ask akkkk?
@GarbageCollector you mean the person flagging comments?
16:22
@robjohn No. But the woman tortured the baby in the given video link above.
Prepare yourself Sir $\Huge\text{:'''(}$
>8(
@skullpatrol Prepare for what?
@GarbageCollector I didn't watch it yet
I am very stupid. How to factor $4a^2 + 9b^2 - 8a - 12b + 12ab$?
@robjohn Confirmed.
user19161
16:29
@Novice Regroup the terms first.
I see. $4a^2 - 8a + 12ab - 12b + 9b^2$
user19161
Not this way.
user19161
$4a^2+12ab+9b^2-8a-12b$
$4a^2 - 8a + 9ab + 3ab - 12b + 9b^2$
user19161
$(2a+3b)^2-4(2a+3b)$
16:31
Ah, got it
$(2a + 3b - 4)(2a + 3b)$
Thanks.
user19161
QED.
@JasonBourne Quantum Electro Dynamic.
user19161
Hello @reg why are you here?
Is this a new meme?
Then this new meme sucks.
I can tell you.
user19161
I see you are here to see the video.
16:36
I am here to bash physicists. Or was it physicians?
Wevs. They are our rivals.
@Charlie are you OK?
@GarbageCollector : D
@skullpatrol why you ask? I'm finee...
@Charlie I'm still a bit shaky...
...that video caught me off guard :'(
@skullpatrol that ... No one does anything... As a woman it bothers me a lot....
$\Huge\text{Never let your guard down}$
16:41
@skullpatrol what? I was buttering my toast... thwap
@Charlie As a human being it bothers me a lot...
...what chance does the kid have of living?
Physicists think pure math is unreal, therefore irrelevant. Mathematicians think physics is real, therefore, irrelevant.
What do you think is what counts!
Engineers don't give a fuck either way. Linearize all the things!
i try very hard not to think. i may need those brain cells later.
16:45
@DavidWheeler That's not the problem, the problem is the device physics engineers performing numerical simulations squeezed in the middle. :P
just do everything to O(n)
....according to my calculations that thing will hit the earth...plus or minus 3 AU....
2
here is how i factor polynomials: linear polynomials-ask a high-school kid to do it. quadratic polynomials: quadratic fromula (just add water). cubic polynomials: rational root test, then give up. all others: wolfram|alpha.
4
what does "fixing the proof of Rudin 2.43" mean? (it is not related to fixing the error)
i was reading about perturbation theory yesterday...the gist i got from it was: well, if it's more than first-order, we just draw pictures.
context?
16:53
Show that the Cantor set is uncountable – either by fixing the proof of Rudin 2.43, or by using another (e.g. diagonal) argument.
user19161
Ladies and gentlemen I have 300 answers now...
perhaps "adapting"?
`Hmm, yes that seems to be the thing. I thought may be it was some idiom I was not familiar with.
Today is David Wheeler's free star day.
@JasonBourne Congrats
@JasonBourne good, now you can retire. :P
user19161
16:56
@OrangeHarvester Yes!
user19161
Sometimes, the way to carry on is to give up.
what do the green check-marks mean?
user19161
Acceptance.
user19161
Gives asker 2 points and answer 15 points.
oh. so that's why my rep is going up. must. make. more. mistakes.
i know how to get banned on this site...just ask a question about infinite sets, and bash everyone who answers. i could so do that.
especially asaf. he's so easy to upset.
i should call this posting technique "forcing". oh, the irony.
user19161
17:01
I think different people are upset by different things.
user19161
It's determined a lot by our life experiences.
i kno rite? for example, you could call me ugly and i wouldn't care. but call me unkewl, them fightin wurds.
David Wheeler is totally uncuil. He only uses google.
zomg! untroo! i use bing too.
Oh, and that makes you cool, how?
17:04
@RegDwighт Duckduckgo makes you cool?
the ad promised it would.
@OrangeHarvester Duckduckgo makes you exactly nothing except a Duckduckgo user.
@skullpatrol what? Bing? Sure thing I saw it.
@RegDwighт seems correct.
zomg! reg haz a tau in his handle. 10-4 big buddy.
That is not a tau. You're becoming uncooler by the minute.
17:06
upside-down perp sign? even more rad.
That is a Т.
why so srs?
You can copy it into a Wikipedia search box.
Sorry, I meant the Bing search box.
Except the former will actually work.
@RegDwighт Are you Canadian, is that why you chose a beaver for a gravatar?
@DavidWheeler I am getting paid several bundles of sponduli per very few units of time to be just that, serious.
@skullpatrol first of all, that's an American Beaver.
No really, he is.
Second of all, I used to be an owl. And a viscacha.
17:09
wikipedia (which is, after all surely as reputable and reliable as the OED, or brittanica) says its cyrillic or some such
See, Wikipedia is always right.
QED
quasi-erudition done!
@RegDwighт that's a nice beaver
now excuse me while i google sponduli
17:10
Good luck with that.
@Charlie Don't you like my viscasha?
apparently a reference to Conker's Bad Fur Day
@skullpatrol yes!
Meanwhile Jasper right there will tell you that I used to be RegDwight, RegDwight Ѭſ道, RegDwight βßВ8, RegDwight ΒВB, RegDwight АΑA, and ЯegDwight, but people kept complaining they couldn't ping me.
sounds like something out of the sopranos tho, tbh
17:14
@Charlie I really need to see something cute right now.
@DavidWheeler you know what, Conker does use the word exactly once, after fighting Sloprano.
Hi @BrianM.Scott how are you?
@skullpatrol awn behind this skull beats a warm heart
@skullpatrol Frustrated. I despise what’s been done to the main Question page.
17:16
Only when I let my guard down :P @Charlie
@BrianM.Scott What are they doing?
oh noes! what terrible things have come to pass?
El Pas, New Mexico?
Good day, @BrianM.Scott. It's been a while.
@skullpatrol Posting to it every time someone posts or edits an answer (or possibly even a comment $-$ I’m not sure about that).
Um. It's not always been that way on Maths?
17:17
@BrianM.Scott That is a lot of change.
It's always been that way on every other SE site ever.
@RegDwighт No. A question has always appeared on the main Questions page once, when it was first posted.
@BrianM.Scott and never bumped to it again? You sure?
That would require a change to the engine just for this one site.
@RegDwighт I don’t know about never, but certainly not every time someone posts an answer.
How did you get to know that someone did post an answer, then?
17:19
@BrianM.Scott That has never been the case since Stack Overflow launched as a standalone site in 2009
@RegDwighт Update the Question page and check the number of posted answers.
Maybe you're thinking of Math Overflow or other SE-alike engines?
Yeah I'm scratching my head in disbelief as well.
although I'm fairly certain MO bumps as well
@badp It has been the case as long as I’ve been answering questions on MSE, which is over a year and a half.
17:20
At any rate @BrianM.Scott if you just want a list of questions as they're asked without bumping, you can consider using RSS
@BrianM.Scott how did you know that the number had changed? You kept tabs on every question ever?
@BrianM.Scott I am fairly certain you are either mistaken or you weren't using the default sort order
@RegDwighт I can tell whether it’s $0$ or not, which is usually the most I care about.
@badp Yeah, was just going to point out that. He's probably looking at some other tab.
17:21
@BrianM.Scott Have you heard this?
I recall myself learning how to multiply two three-digit numbers in the fifth grade. Who in the world does diophantine equations with five variables when one doesn't know how numbers work?!
That cookie that remembers your preference sure is a source of a helluvalot of confusion.
Brian wouldn't be the first.
@badp Thank you: your comment about default sort order made me check, and sure enough, I must inadvertently have set it to active instead of newest. Sanity is now restored.
(and never click on the "new questions" autoupdating thing)
Well, another day saved by badp!
I must be off for a Spieleabend anyway.
17:22
Days saved by badp: 0,001
Days ruined ?
Days badp has been hated to death by ЯegDwight: 1.
Ouvert et haut !
@skullpatrol 0,002×10³
Days I have been ignored on this chat: ∞
Congrats.
17:23
although we moderators usually use the milliHitler as the unit of reference for this kind of query ;)
@Novice don't cry,, Parth
@Novice Sorry about that: I got involved in the other business and forgot to respond.
@Charlie OK, ∞ - 1. But that's still ∞.
Ugh -- I do not cry for attention.
@Novice That's a number theory I wasn't previously aware of :P
@badp Works fine with surreal numbers.
17:25
@Novice Come on palio, show us what you got.
Hello there. Is it true, that for $c\in mathbb{C}$ and its minimal polynomial $f\in \mathbb{Q}[x]$, all the roots of $f$ have the same module? It seems that my lecturer used it in his proof, but I don't think it's true...
@badp It doesn't matter if you remove a star from the Universe.
@Novice It creates quite a lot of turmoil actually in that portion of Universe, actually
actually?
actually
17:27
i've never been able to actually remove any stars, i wouldn't know
@badp Yes, it gets the mathematicians crazy after that idea.
For example, at some point in the next few thousand years, Betelgeuse should remove itself from the list of stars (afaik) and shine almost-sun-level light for a week straight
@savick01 what do you mean by "the same module"?
@Novice: You should change your last name to Galen. :-)
If live on this planet will still be a thing, that'll bring distress to quite a lot of chickens, who will be driven mad by the lack of sleep and cross the street. Bringing finally the definitive answer to this ages-old question:
Why did the chicken cross the street? Betelgeuse exploded.
17:28
@DavidWheeler for $a+bi$ the module is $\sqrt{a^2+b^2}$, where $a,b$ are real
@BrianM.Scott Wow. You remember names!
oh modulus!
Oh, sorry:D
@Novice Sometimes. But yes, I did remember yours.
Hi @Argon welcome back!
17:30
@skullpatrol 'ello!
user19161
The trick to answering ambiguous questions is to take care of all possibilities in a self-contained answer.
"Hi, what xy do?"
The trick to answering ambiguous questions is to answer the question you think should have been asked QED
user19161
That might get you downvoted very quickly.
@JasonBourne I sure hope it does!
17:33
@skullpatrol I hadn’t; I’ve almost never looked at the blog.
I say ambiguous questions should be commented upon until they're no longer ambiguous
@BrianM.Scott I can't believe how fast they talk!
@skullpatrol I didn’t actually listen: I just read the transcript.
@badp I think that's much better than writing a useless answer or writing a few times more than necessary
@skullpatrol true
17:35
@Charlie Thanks :)
@badp I’m willing to close them eventually if the OP doesn’t respond at all to comments.
@BrianM.Scott Sounds healthy :)
@skullpatrol ;)
@Charlie ;-D
Guys, any idea about my question about roots of a minimal polynomial?
user19161
17:38
I think I know why someone wasn't happy with my proof yesterday that $a!b!$ divides $(a+b)!$.
user19161
I used A implies B to prove B from A. But they thought that I needed B to prove A so that it was circular.
user19161
I thought about it and it is not truly circular. However, there is some pseudocircularity there.
pseudocircularity :D
user19161
That is because when I used A although B wasn't needed to prove it, B is an intermediate result that arose naturally in the canonical proof of A.
user19161
So I have edited my answer accordingly to remove that pseudocircularity.
17:41
Is an ellipse "pseudocircular?"
user19161
You know the above meta-analysis is even more complicated than the proof itself.
user19161
That is why logicians can go nuts, like Godel.
Unable to find math.stackexchange.com?
loads for me
17:43
@skullpatrol Nah, it’s circular: you just have to look at it from the right angle.
true dat^
@BrianM.Scott A circle is not psuedoelliptical if you look at it from the right angle?
I just noticed: we’re almost in sight of $10000$ problems tagged (homework)! (We’re at $9800$.)
pseudocircle
@skullpatrol No, it’s elliptical. Clearly, then, elliptical = circular!
@badp Potato.
@BrianM.Scott Pseudosphere.
17:47
@BrianM.Scott That's a lot of homework though.
@badp it's a true potato!
@Novice ’Tis indeed. Especially since I’m sure that we’ve seen quite a bit of homework that wasn’t tagged as such.
@Charlie Define "true?"
It's certainly not photoshopped
Would that make it "psuedo?"
17:49
@skullpatrol Not false. Not, for instance, the false-potato that grew on Hades in David Weber’s Honor Harrington novels.
@skullpatrol that approximates what many can observe, real,
hmmm...
@Charlie Maybe it’s a faithful potato.
faith?
sounds...soo belief based, no?
@skullpatrol One meaning of true is faithful, loyal.
user19161
17:53
I shall repeat my favourite words on faith, from myself.
@BrianM.Scott or so you would like to believe...
user19161
Faith is not truth. Evidence is not proof. Evidence leads to faith. Proof leads to truth.
What is truth without faith?
...proper justification leads to a properly justified true belief. QED.
user19161
Religion is about evidence and faith. Mathematics is about proof and truth.
17:56
@skullpatrol That’s actually the oldest meaning of the word, which is from Proto-Germanic $^*\text{trewwj-}$ 'having or characterized by good faith'.
user19161
The existence of deities may not be provable, but neither is it disprovable. One then chooses to believe in them or not based on selecting evidence for or against.
user19161
Therefore, religion is not rubbish, contrary to the flawed logic of pseudo-intellectuals.

« first day (911 days earlier)      last day (4407 days later) »