@N3buchadnezzar, seems to be just a curious definition of $\sinh x$, geometric series formula, and something involving . . . integration by parts? Not sure on the last two lines.
@N3buchadnezzar, want to help me out and show me how to apply that in the last two pieces? That is, $$2\sum \int_0^{\infty}x^{\alpha-1}e^{-(2k+1)x}dx=2\sum\frac{\Gamma(\alpha)}{(2k+1)^{\alpha}}=2\Gamma(\alpha)\lambda( \alpha)?$$
@Argon, was $\Gamma(n)$ originally defined $(n-1)!$ for $\{n: n\in \mathbb{Z}\wedge n >1\}$ and then extended to all $\mathbb{R}$ via the integral representation? Or was it the other way around?
with the quotient mapping being the mediating morphism of the characteristic mappings of these disks
so i wondered maybe if i can describe the equivalence relation directly i can prove that the two topologies coincide by simply noting that the equivalence relation for the subcomplex is simply birestriction of the relation for the whole complex
@Argon, go to piratebay.se, download a torrent for everything gorillaz ever did, and then host said torrent on a powerful server with lots of bandwidth