« first day (5224 days earlier)      last day (91 days later) » 

01:23
every knot complement on S^3 is homologous to trivial knot complement is because a knot is a codimension more than one object in S^3?
01:42
what do you mean by "homologous"
that all knot complements have isomorphic homology groups is a consequence of alexander duality and has nothing to do with codimension
02:33
isomorphic homology groups >> in homology level, knot is same as unknot
I want to know why this happens in a more or less geometrical sense. To me, Alexander duality argument does not give me this kind of interpretation.
and also: Can a boundary map (connecting homomorphism?) on a long exact sequence of homology on manifold be interpreted as an actual topological boundary (of manifold representing the homology class) in some sense? I remember some interpretation like this before using triangulation but I don't remember where.
I lived well without really knowing this boundary map but at some point, I want to know.
02:49
@onepotatotwopotato Alexander duality is geometric, its about intersection numbers. But I believe you can also see it via a Mayer-Vietoris calculation.
Also I like interpreting H_1 by abelianizing a Wirtinger presentation
@onepotatotwopotato if the class is representable by a manifold with boundary, sure
03:03
@Thorgott why is that true?
does that also mean if a representing manifold is closed then the boundary map is zero?
@Thorgott Hmm
 
4 hours later…
06:37
I am reading a section entitled "Differentiation on Euclidean space". Let $f$ be the Radon-Nikodym derivative of $\nu$ with respect to Lebesgue measure $m$, i.e. $d\nu=f\,dm$. Then $\nu(B(r,x))/m(B(r,x))$ is claimed to be the average value of $f$ on $B(r,x)$. I have a hard time understanding why this is so?
06:51
I don't see its immediate uses, but OK.
 
2 hours later…
09:09
My exams are finally over, phew
Can finally study now
X4J
X4J
10:07
@nickbros123 we've just proved at class the correspondence theorem
it's beautiful tho
10:18
It's a v useful theorem
Whenever u want to lookat normal subgroups of G that contain N, it's useful to look at all normal subgroups of G/N
Group theory is very interesting, I should study it more. Though I'm more of an analysis kind of guy
@onepotatotwopotato if $M$ is a compact $n$-manifold with boundary, it has a fundamental class $[M]\in H_n(M,\partial M)$ (coefficients being whatever as long as you're orientable w.r.t. them) and its image under the connecting homomorphism of the pair $(M,\partial M)$ is the fundamental class $[\partial M]\in H_{n-1}(\partial M)$ of the closed $(n-1)$-manifold $\partial M$ with the induced orientation
so if $f\colon(M,\partial M)\rightarrow(X,A)$ is some map of pairs, naturality of the pair sequence yields $\partial(f_{\ast}[M,\partial M])=f_{\ast}[\partial M]$
and if $M$ is closed, this is zero, but that's not surprising cause the element then factors through $H_n(X)$ and the composite $H_n(X)\rightarrow H_n(X,A)\rightarrow H_{n-1}(A)$ is zero
 
3 hours later…
X4J
X4J
13:43
@nickbros123 yeah and I start getting the point with inner-automorphisms
those automorphisms "pass" to other structure under morphisms
"pass" to other structure?
Essentially, every automorphism is an inner automorphism in some larger group
they are inner because they happen inside the group
1
A: Why are "inner" automorphisms named this way?

AnonymousLike the other answerers, I can only conjecture, but I would say this. Given a group $G$, there is always some larger group $G'$ containing $G$ as a normal subgroup and having the property that every automorphism of $G$ is induced by conjugation by a suitable element of $a \in G'$. In that case...

X4J
X4J
@Jakobian That's my first abstract algebra course, I said that in a loosely manner lol
oh, but what it means to happen inside the group
@X4J well it doesn't matter since it still doesn't make sense
X4J
X4J
I can be more precise
but that's chatting nere
here
@X4J every automorphism is a conjugation by some element, but possibly outside of your group. Those where conjugation is by element inside the group are called inner automorphisms
X4J
X4J
13:52
ohh
I see
thanks
So the inner-automorphism of G is in particular the conjugations for which the element that characterizes each one is in G?
I can't write zeta☠️
14:31
@SoumikMukherjee why?
14:42
@X4J "for which the element that characterizes each one is in G?"?
You need to be more precise. This is important for mathematics
14:56
@SineoftheTime Soumik probably means that they can't write zeta on paper
I used to struggle with aleph myself, but I got used to it
I've never tried to write aleph
15:22
@Jakobian Yes, I struggle with Xi also
X4J
X4J
15:40
@Jakobian Sorry. Anyways, I've read the post you've mentioned above regarding the topic. Thanks
Found an easter egg: Try typing “teapot” in Desmos 3D
And here’s a modified version: desmos.com/3d/mflzdc5lhh
@SoumikMukherjee xi is the most satisfying letter to write
@BenSteffan
No group theory in Algebra I at Bonn?
Or am I not seeing something
Also for some reason there is no single webpage for an Algebra II course
15:55
@SohamSaha wow this is cool
can I just look at the proof for "Axiom of Choice if and only if Zorn's Lemma"?
@SohamSaha I assume this will cause it to render the Utah teapot?
but @XanderHenderson your avatar already has glasses :^)
yesterday, by Xander Henderson
Ugh... I need reading glasses... :(
16:11
Oh, it's in Einführung in die Algebra
16:24
@think_meaning_buildß My day-to-day glasses are for myopia. But they don't work that well for reading. I am going ot need to get reading glasses soonish, I think.
Jan 17 at 20:30, by leslie townes
time to update that avatar image.
17:00
I'm working an exercise called Lusin's theorem (see above). What troubles me is that I'm unsure what kind of measure $\mu$ is supposed to be? Is it a Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure? In Theorem 2.26 (not shown), it says if a function $g$ is in $L^1(\mu)$ and $\mu$ is a Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure, we can find a continuous function that approximates $g$ in the $L^1$ metric. I feel like I need $\mu$ to be a Lebesgue-Stieltjes measure.
17:35
Happy Friday!
I think $\mu$ has to simply be Lebesgue measure on the Lebesgue $\sigma$-algebra, since $f$ is Lebesgue measurable.
@SineoftheTime thanks for that link
17:50
@psie it is certainly true for the Lebesgue measure, i looked at some books and they all have different takes on Lusin's (Luzin's) theorem. Rudin has the vague $\mu$ is a measure on a locally compact Hausdorff space which has the properties stated in Theorem 2.14 (seems to be inner & outer regular, finite on a compact set, complete).
Durrett is even more vague, and it is a exercise. Kantorovich & Akilov requires the function to be ae. finite on a compact Hausdorff space (with no mention of regularity, strangely, but it is possible that they have some additional assumptions embedded earlier on).
@think_meaning_buildß is there a particular time that you think is interesting? that is almost 60m long.
40 min was interesting for me
i'm not a real fan of ai, much overhyped by folks who do not understand what it is.
this guy appears to know what he's talking about
17:58
statistics on steroids.
what are some good accessible books
math books
the problem is that you get wealthy successful people talking about things that they may or may not understand at a fundamental level. clearly these are folks that got something right in life, but that does not mean that their perspectives off piste are meaningful.
@XanderHenderson yep
I've learned basics when it comes to Wallman-Frink compactifications and realcompactifications
now onto another chapter and I will hopefully get to construction of continuous pseudometrics, which is what interests me
people send me pdfs from time to time, i just accumulate them.
18:03
the book is really bad but I think I can benefit from it
yeah, he's quite the successful business man
@copper.hat Ha, here are some pdfs I ‘accumulated’: drive.google.com/drive/folders/…
@SohamSaha i'm slightly uneasy with the provenance of some of my pdfs, so i don't make them public.
No prob
copper is an undercover CIA agent
18:10
@copper.hat Admit it: they're from Trump's bathroom, aren't they?
indeed. if i was in the intelligence community, i would in j2, not cia
@think_meaning_buildß Musk has started spouting on all sort of stuff, but has a fairly loose grasp of history & economics. i'm not saying that one needs to be an expert to have an opinion, but he certainly brings the sycophants & gullilble out.
lower than you Erdos number
if i was in the intelligence community, it would be j2, not the cia.
that statement, of course, means i am in neither.
my Obama number is 2.
How do you determine an "Obama number" or "Trump number"?
My copper number is 1
18:14
i know someone who knows Obama, that makes 2.
@SineoftheTime do i know you?
No, but I know you :)
@XanderHenderson if you stormed the Capitol your number is zero
its transitive :-)
18:15
Six degrees of separation is the idea that all people are six or fewer social connections away from each other. As a result, a chain of "friend of a friend" statements can be made to connect any two people in a maximum of six steps. It is also known as the six handshakes rule. Mathematically it means that a person shaking hands with 30 people, and then those 30 shaking hands with 30 other people, would after repeating this 6 times allow every person in a population as large as the United States to have shaken hands (7 times for the whole world). The concept was originally set out in a 1929 short...
@SineoftheTime Yes, I am aware. But both Eros and Bacon numbers place restrictions on what it means to be connected to a person.
Do we admit negative numbers
it was a joke some time ago, this whole Trump/Obama number thing
my dad used to do business with Gadaffi
surely storming the Capitol was irrational
i agree, but i'm staying off discussion that directly. only innuendo.
the Italian suppository.
18:18
and dare I say complex
maybe quaternion...
many folks, MTG in particular, were able to do some peculiar logical rotations of position and memory about such events that could only be explained by quaternions.
my steve jobs # is 2
was never a fan of jobs.
i was/am a fan of Woz
woz # is 3
apple used to be much more open and contributing, like in the homebrew days
jobs is one of those people i was rambling about above.
18:23
My cousin is friends with Jobs neice
linkedin used to have a degree of separation thing
now it's a meet market
i worked in silicon valley starting in the late 80's, you meet all sorts of people.
i believe it was Tim Cook nixed the permissions for my company (long time ago) to put the apple logo on our site as a customer (saying Apple was ok, but the logo no).
but it still amazes me that it is hard to find a crisp statement of Lu[sz]in's theorem. one of the few cases that Wikipedia gets it right
my dad used to do the finances for an Apple manufacturing plant in Ireland
the gm was mad at jobs, when jobs came to give a talk, he insisted that the whole operation shutdown because it made a little noise that bothered him. cost 2 weeks to bring the line up again.
after Gaffadi. before he rose to power
they bought Irish beef.
they had to be careful not to mix with some other groups, notably the rabbis from Israel.
the world was a crazy place back then. just not published on ig/twitter every second
18:30
@copper.hat yeah, but I like the way it is stated in Folland's :) makes it more straightforward if the function is Lebesgue measurable. Then we know that we are dealing with Lebesgue measure on the domain, no need to worry about any other measures (for which the theorem might hold)
@psie i would deal with Lebesgue, in practice all you will need, i imagine.
too much generality sometimes makes things useless because it becomes hard to remember.
indeed
i personally find it a bit aggravating (albeit understandable) that every text has mistakes.
it's annoying, but it's human
the bible says that one should not kill, but has many admonishments to do the opposite...
not that it would be my guiding light.
18:34
A better translation would be "don't murder".
my Aramaic is a bit sketchy
Hebrew, n'est-ce pas?
Or did Jeebus have more to say on the matter?
i could generalise and say that I am a bit sketchy
The first time I saw Hebrew, I thought it was something from Startrek
Jesus said to the disciples: "Drink this blood eat this bread of life. One does not survive on mana alone."
my understanding was that most of the Old Testament is Hebrew, with some parts Aramaic. but could easily be wrong.
18:38
writing 300 pages or more in math, boy, that must be "many dots to connect"...as some CEO used to say once :-)
@copper.hat The Torah is Hebrew, and I assumed you were referencing Exodus (which is in the Torah).
I think Musk seems to be the Second Coming
@XanderHenderson i am skating on microscopically thin ice here
personally, i go for Ogham stones
That bullet grazing his ear made him the chosen One.
curious to see how that bromance will evolve
@copper.hat Trusk?
Mump?
What is their couple name?
18:45
Mumps seems more appropriate
The UFC couple.
just to be clear, i am no fan of their political opponents who would not recognise an oncoming train if they were standing looking at it
as i have pointed out multiple times over the past few years to relevant folks
Have you tried the Trump Musk ? It smells patriotic
seems like a marketing opportunity
along with the Trump Bible
My prediction is that bromance doesn't last more than 6 months. Two big egos in the same room? No way.
18:48
i think you are being generous with 6mo
i gotta say, Gaetz lifted my spirits yesterday
@copper.hat I said it wouldn't even last that long.
It is still 2 months from inauguration. They won't break up until after then.
@ILikeMathematics no group theory in algebra 1
algebra 1 is commutative algebra
i used to commute
basic group theory is taught as part of the Einführung lecture
otherwise there is nobody really doing group theory here so the chances for learning advanced group theory here are small
although there's somebody here doing geometric group theory, which is at the intersection of group theory and topology
not sure why nobody seems to ever make web page for algebra 2, but it really doesn't matter
what algebra 2 is about is pretty much entirely up to who teaches it
often it's something along the lines of algebraic number theory
but it's not a very popular course and not that many people take it
the standard route is to take algebraic geometry 1 after algebra 1
19:17
I have a question
Let $X=[0,1]^n$. For all $n>2$ does $X$ admit a unique (up to permutation) codimension one surface of revolution, $L$, with a complete metric (away from the cone points) and an embedding $e :L\hookrightarrow X$, which maximizes volume while retaining constant positive sectional curvature?
Addendum: sup dist_n (p,q) = sqrt{n}
where p,q are cone points in $L$.
20:15
Wait... The Onion bought InfoWars!? Ha!
20:28
It's been a long week. Let $B(r,x)$ be an open ball of radius $r$ and center $x$ in $\mathbb R^n$. It is claimed that $$\chi_{B(r,x)}\to\chi_{B(r_0,x_0)},$$pointwise as $r\to r_0$ and $x\to x_0$ in $\mathbb R^n\setminus S(r_0,x_0)$, where $S(r_0,x_0)$ is the sphere $\{y:|y-x_0|=r_0\}$. How does one show this?
Here's my attempt. Case 1: $|x - x_0| < r_0$, i.e. $\chi_{B(r_0,x_0)}(x) =1$. How do I proceed to show that for large enough $n$, $\chi_{B(r_n, x_n)}(x) = 1$?
Case 2 is; $|x - x_0| > r_0$, i.e. $\chi_{B(x_0, r_0)}(x)= 0$. But I'm having the same issue here. I don't see how to conclude for large enough $n$, $\chi_{B(r_n, x_n)}(x) = 0$.
20:48
In my previous message ^, I meant to put $x_0$ after $r_0$ in the arguments for $B(\cdot,\cdot)$. That's silly.
@psie it is not true. $B_n=(0+{1 \over n}, 1+{1 \over n})$, $B=(0,1)$, but $1_B(1) =0$ whereas $1_{B_n}(1) = 1$ for all $n$.
it is true for points in the exterior or interior of $B(x_0,r_0)$.
if $\|y-x_0\| < r_0$ and $x \to x_0, r \to r_0$ then the inequality $\|y-x\| < r$ will hold close by.
@copper.hat yeah, that is what I was sniffing
but why will it hold close by?
I did the midterm exam today and I must say it did go pretty good, at least I think so, those exercise sheets really paid off :p (and I wanna thank the chat in general for the help I got as well :P)
If a professor doesn't answer any of your emails, does that mean they think you are a crank
@psie that was stupid of me, see how I misused $x$ here. Jeez...
20:58
@Claudio hope it works out for you!
@copper.hat Thanks :) I'm forcing myself to stay positive today ahahah
@copper.hat I don't understand what you mean by close by. Do you think you could elaborate?
suppose $x_n \to x_0, r_n \to r_0$. if $\|y-x_0\| < r_0$ then there is some $N$ such that if $n\ge N$ then $\|y-x_n\| < r_n$. So, if $y$ is in the open ball, then $y$ will be in the 'moving' ball for $n$ large enough. Same if you replace $<$ by $>$. Its just continuity.
@Jakobian honestly, i would assume something got stuck in a spam filter before that
also, not everybody responds immediately
21:08
@copper.hat ok 👍thanks
@copper.hat yes they do
i'll have to think about that
trying to decide if i want to go legal on UCSC
my son is waiting for a class to finish which they told him would be next quarter, now they are vacillating
i may have an aneurism before then
pie
pie
Are there any books you recommend that are used for preparing for an integration contest?
copper good luck with that, i am sure that the fine print of any contract says that the UC owes you nothing, and they probably have sovereign immunity even if it didn't
pie
pie
I hope I won't be ignored this time:)
21:13
pie just so that you feel that people aren't ignoring you (which may have been your impression), i had never heard of such things until being on this chat
so i do not have books to recommend
@leslietownes i suspect so. then it will have to be social media...
my best friend has been trying to finish an undergrad degree for, it feels like 20 years? and a different UC just canceled the program she was hoping to graduate from
so yes, let's name and shame on social media
wow, unbelievable
makes oxford look like a bargain
pie
pie
@leslietownes How do people prepare for college-integral contest? like MIT integration bee for example? If it doesn't exist then my worst fear is true, one enters with all of tricks he accumulated before, there isn't books for training like how there is book for IMO.
maybe a better a question is "do this type of books exist?"
Have you searched YouTube
21:19
@copper.hat how many months do I need to wait then
pie
pie
@think_meaning_buildß no, I have not, can you recommend YT channels ?
@Jakobian :-).
Just a general search will get you there :-)
@pie i honestly don't think these things existed when i was in college but for something like that i'd start with the higher numbered homework exercises in a standard issue calculus book
and maybe haunt web forums for the rest
@pie Are you interested in this book?
pie
pie
21:28
@leslietownes Maybe it would be a good idea to make such a book, If I became a mathematician I will try.
lists of past problems for X are a good way of preparing for X
pie
pie
@SineoftheTime Interesting...
I have a pdf copy, if you don't find it I can email it to you
pie
pie
@leslietownes I don't think this would work for IMO
@SineoftheTime I appreciate that, If I couldn't find it I would email you.
21:30
Contest math is a race against time.
yeah, take anything i say with the qualifier that i don't really understand contest math at all and basically didn't know that world existed until i had a degree in it
No human can come close to the speed of chatGPT
RIP contests
pie
pie
WOAH
chat gpt can solve Olympiad level problems!!!???
It can't even solve integrals(not the super elementary one).
And the Putnam.
pie
pie
WOAH
HOW? WHEN? I don't believe it.
21:42
Oct 17 at 8:56, by think_meaning_builds
https://www.youtube.com/live/2xYosqVjROc?si=dPoaxgIry_-Tc8Xk
pie
pie
AT this rate 2030 AI can solve Riemann hypothesis
Maybe mathematician would be something from the past?
pie
pie
@SineoftheTime I hope so, but why are you sure?
the name AI is an oxymoron
21:48
Intelligence is not well understood.
22:07
@copper.hat UCSC.... So he's waiting on his advanced hacky sack class?
Hi
22:13
Full stop.
but is there a way to understand if a seemingly indeterminate function limit is possible to solve without using Hopital or Taylor expansions?
@Binky that's too broad
22:28
@Binky "solve" is not the right word here.
You are talking about evaluating limits.
22:44
@XanderHenderson I would be soooo happy if that was the case.
He took this quarter off because the class was not offered. Supposedly it was to be offered in the upcoming quarter, but apparently he is getting mixed messages now.

« first day (5224 days earlier)      last day (91 days later) »