« first day (4918 days earlier)      last day (400 days later) » 
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

20:00
yes but its too early to list all solutions
Next, how would you factor $y^2+2y+2$?
isn't that complex roots
Yeah. Thats why you need to modify it by some factor of $10$ to make it factor into integers
not sure I follow
$y^3+y^2-2 \equiv (y-1)(y^2+2y+2+10k)\pmod{10}$ where $k$ is any integer
while the polynomial doesn't factor as a real polynomial, you can modify it so that it does
so I just choose a k that makes it factorable
20:05
One way of doing this is finding a root of $y^2+2y+2\equiv 0\pmod{10}$, which is simple because you only have $10$ possibilities to check
$y = 0, 1, ..., 9$
and indeed, $2^2+2\cdot 2+2 = 10$
can't $y=12$ work as well?
Thats a big number and you want to avoid big numbers
either way, $y = 2$ already covers this case
so the solutions are $x=1,x=2$?
no
we're not claiming anything yet we're still factorizing
its too early to solve this
$y^3+y^2-2\equiv (y-1)(y^2+2y-8) = (y-1)(y-2)(y+4)\pmod{10}$
wait but $(y-1)(y^2+2y+2) \equiv 0 \pmod{10}$ works for $y = 1,y=2$, no?
20:10
yes but there'll be more solutions
there's no need to list them right now
it will get complicated enough at the end
in fact, trying to list them right now is just going to potentially confuse you
so please don't
Oh i didn't try $k = -1$ I was doing positives :\
$2^2+2\cdot 2+2 = 10$ so $2$ is a root of $y^2+2y+2 - 10 = y^2+2y-8$
alright, now you have $(y-1)(y-2)(y+4) \equiv 0 \pmod{10}$
and the real problem is that you can't say that $y \equiv 1, 2$ or $-4 \pmod{10}$
ok so there are some tricks to factoring polynomials in modular arithmetic i see
@Jakobian hmm?
Because $xy\equiv 0\pmod{10}$ doesn't mean $x\equiv 0$ or $y\equiv 0\pmod{10}$
because $10$ isn't a prime number
so what can we do? We can reduce it to prime numbers
$(y-1)(y-2)(y+4)\equiv 0 \pmod{2}$ and $(y-1)(y-2)(y+4)\equiv 0 \pmod{5}$
and then you have six different cases
well technically less
it will boil down to four different cases
First equation is $(y-1)y^2\equiv 0\pmod{2}$ and second $(y-1)^2(y-1)\equiv 0\pmod{5}$
I don't understand why $(y-1)(y-2)(y+4) \equiv 0 \pmod{10}$ doesn't mean $y = 1,y=2,y=-4$ are solutions. Doesn't $[0]\odot x \equiv 0 \pmod{10}$
20:17
@Obliv they are solutions but not necessarily the only solutions
you want to solve for every $x$ not just the ones you know that are solutions
ah ok
@Jakobian that second equation looks off
yeah so we have $y\equiv 1\pmod{2}$ or $y \equiv 0 \pmod{2}$ and $y\equiv 1\pmod{5}$ or $y\equiv 2\pmod{5}$
@Obliv yes it should be $2$ and not $1$
Technically, first two equations don't mean anything, we always have it either congruent to $0$ or $1$
our equation becomes $y\equiv 1\pmod{5}$ or $y\equiv 2 \pmod{5}$
now to list every solution, you just have to check which numbers among $y = 0, 1, 2, ..., 9$ are congruent to $1$ or $2$ modulo $5$
i did not expect this problem to be so involved
yeah, so you would miss one solution if you would end at $1, 2, -4$
because $y = -3$ fits as well
(or what amounts to the same solution, $y = 7$)
so to break it down, you want to factor and then break the modulus into primes, then find solutions to the equations
20:24
kind of, it will be harder if you have powers of primes in your modulus
because for $4$ for example, you can't do this approach. You need to be more careful about it
can I just brute force $x^3 + x^2 = [2]$ by plugging in $x = 0,1,2,...,9$ ?
yep
or $x = [0], ..., [9]$ I guess
right, i guess your way is more strategic and important for large $n$.
that will be less involved but equally as valid
wait but do I do this for $Z_{10}$ or $Z_{5}$ and $Z_{2}$ separately? (the brute force method as well)
I'm assuming I also have to break apart into primes
20:38
No you don't have to
You can help yourself checking if $y^3+y^2\equiv 2\pmod{10}$ for a particular $y\in \{0, 1, 2, ..., 9\}$ by checking if it equals to $2$ modulo $2$ and $5$, but its not necessary
ok, thank you.
its not necessary, but its convenient
since checking something modulo a smaller number means less calculations
Does anyone know a formula for the content of the $n$-th Faulhaber polynomial , in other words the positive integer with which we have to multiply the $n$-th Faulhaber polynomial to get a primitive polynomial ? Example : For $n=2$ , we have $\frac{x(x+1)(2x+1)}{6}$ , hence the result should be $6$.
$6$ is also the denominator of second Bernoulli number. It might be related
Mathworld gives a formula where actually Bernoulli-numbers occur. But I cannot derive the content from this formula.
20:50
One can say that the content divides $(n+1)!$, but maybe thats too rough for your purposes
from what I found, the content $c_n$ is always divisible by $n+1$ and the sequence $c_n/(n+1)$ is given by A195441
Hope that helps @peter
you might also want to look in this article jstor.org/stable/10.4169/amer.math.monthly.124.8.695
@Thorgott I had this funny idea that may be worth pondering about. Let $S$ be a semigroup, and say that $A\subseteq S$ is dense if $S/A$ is the trivial semigroup. Could we give $S$ some natural topology which makes those dense subsets precisely the subsets that are dense in the topological sense?
21:12
@Jakobian Those donate-appeals over and over again are really annoying !
22:10
@Peter donate-appeals?
if you mean that the article is not public, you can find it in other places
I placed a bounty on my tetration question.
+50
Mutiny on the Bounty!
22:32
First time I see a video about the interpretation of the trace: youtu.be/B2PJh2K-jdU?si=GporhDGw2H6PMIH0
I don't see any natural topology on a semigroup
23:04
somebody just proved in 1 line that $$J(x)= \lim_{r \to \infty} \frac{\int_2^{rx} \pi(k) \, dk }{\int_2^r \pi(k) \, dk}=x^2$$ 😅
so it's real analytic after all
$x>0$.
23:16
@JohnZimmerman from l'Hospital rule and prime number theorem, yeah
$\pi(k)$ is not continuous so using l'Hospital rule sounds a bit sketchy but it should be fine
sorry it not occurred to me before now
that's okay @Jakobian. I suppose $J(x)$ is not related to $\pi(k)$ very much because it's simply a parabola for $x>0$?
In the sense that there's not much information about $\pi(k)$ put into $J(x)$, yeah
What essentially was used is that $\pi(rx)/\pi(r)\sim x$
it should give less information about $\pi$ than prime number theorem as well, since it boils down to taking quotient
23:49
@Jakobian There are two distinct topologies on a $3$-element set with the same dense sets so there's surely lack of uniqueness
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

« first day (4918 days earlier)      last day (400 days later) »