« first day (4587 days earlier)      last day (728 days later) » 

01:31
Dead as a morgue
We should charge money from people from other SE sites visiting Mathematics chat
And then throw a pizza party
@冥王Hades seems a good idea
02:29
@SineoftheTime "authentic" Italian Pizza
03:07
@robjohn chat room sir
Romm where I used to ask question shall I share the link of the room?
03:39
just had a nice deep dish pizza
 
4 hours later…
08:04
Aha, n-multisubsets of x is the answer.
 
8 hours later…
15:47
@JackRod that was already unfrozen.
@冥王Hades ?
16:48
when i see a solar eclipse, i think, is the moon eating the sun? i don't know. i'm just a caveman. but there's one thing i do know...
17:08
@robjohn what's up?
17:25
@leslietownes NOT GUILTY!
(Man, Phil Hartman was so very good... I miss him.)
17:44
@JackRod this was the most recently used inactive room. It was reactivated over a day ago.
@leslietownes Wait... it's not a dragon? That's what I was told.
17:56
An example of an algebraic extension that is not a finite extension
the field of all algebraic numbers would be one example.
Consider $\mathbb Q$ and its extension $\mathbb C$. Let $K$ be subfield of $\mathbb C$ consisting of all algebraic nos. over $\mathbb Q$.
can probably find smaller stuff with, i dunno, adjoin every nth root of 2 to Q.
@leslietownes ohh, same example :-).
or all square roots of primes. proving those things are at least linearly, if not algebraically independent, is a common exercise.
but yeah, A:Q is the example i think most people would think of first.
18:02
Then, $[K:Q]$ is not finite: suppose on the contrary that it is n. Consider f(x)= x^{n+1}-3 in Q[x], which is irreducible by Eisenstein's criterion. Let a be a root of f(x) in C, then a is algebraic. [Q(a): Q] =n+1. Moreover, [K:Q]=[K:Q(a)] (n+1), whence we get [K:Q(a)]= n/(n+1), which is disaster.
@leslietownes Ohh
I was wondering if the following is true? Suppose that K is a finite extension of F. Then there exists a in K such that K=F(a).
If it were true, then Q(√2,√3)= Q(p) for some p in Q(√2,√3).
Consequence would be that we'll be then able to speak of 'minimal polynomial of p' over Q.
In field theory, the primitive element theorem is a result characterizing the finite degree field extensions that can be generated by a single element. Such a generating element is called a primitive element of the field extension, and the extension is called a simple extension in this case. The theorem states that a finite extension is simple if and only if there are only finitely many intermediate fields. An older result, also often called "primitive element theorem", states that every finite separable extension is simple; it can be seen as a consequence of the former theorem. These theorems...
the wikipedia page even discusses the example of Q(sqrt(2), sqrt(3)) :)
ahh, so these are called simple extensions.
yeah, so buried within that wiki entry is the fact that a finite extension of a field of characteristic 0 (e.g. Q or R) is simple
@leslietownes so, complex is simple
18:17
hi, can someone help me with a hint: consider a point P in a triangle ABC. Let the feet of perpendiculars from P on AB, BC, CA be M, N, Q. If PM^2-AM.MB=PN^2-BN.NC=PQ^2-CQ.QA then prove/disprove that P is the orthocenter of ABC.
I actually need it as a lemma for solving a math.se problem
I have a homogeneous DE of the form $\dot v^2 \dddot v - 2\ddot v\dot v + A\dot v^5 - B\ddot v^2 = 0$...does anyone know of a technique for solving something like this?
robjohn: galaxy brain
lots of black holes...
and theoretic white holes
spewing out unformed ideas?
18:21
yeah, weird stuff happening
Be glad I didn't mention the civilized element theorem ;-)
Would that've been an element of western civilization.
footfall in chat has reduced over last few days.
18:39
As in, talk about soccer? ⚽
🙊🙉🙈
🏈🏈🏈
🙏
March madness will soon be upon us, grasshopper.
Keith Conrad's articles are so amazing :-).
Hi @TedShifrin! :-)
They are excellent for basing tutorials around, @Koro
ted, short time no see but hi.
18:43
👋👋👋
Hi Koro, anak
Howdy.
Hi Ted.
@anak I was having so much difficulty in understanding why topological sine curve is not path connected until I saw Keith Conrad's
How can a path leap? 🤷‍♂️
With a bridge.
18:45
Not stilts?
I've never tried jumping with stilts, but it might be difficult.
Just put one stilt where you need to end up?
From this point forward, all functions will be outfitted with a pair of stilts.
Might be a convenient fad.
Actually, it’s the oscillation with non-shrinking amplitude that’s the killer. Stilts could help there, too.
I tried speaking Latin and accidentally summoned an ancient demon instead
19:00
You summoned me?
I thought that was Demonark
Demonark has been scarce.
Hope he is well.
Perhaps he changed his username again.
speaking of people who should change their _user_name.
stares @ user 726941.
19:13
:(
It's okay. We love you anyway.
I can’t tell one user from another.
This one makes emotive use of emojis, so they are highly approved.
heyo Ted, just wanted to share that I passed my diffgeo exam <xD
19:17
Congrats!
thanks:D
🎇🎇🎇
^celebration fireworks 🎆
Congratulations, Sha. I’m far from surprised.
@user726941 so kind, thanks:D
differential geometry is the wrong path. it leads to becoming ted shifrin.
there's still a chance to turn away. it's never too late to change your ways.
19:22
Come back to algebra?
@TedShifrin let's say it wasn't my first try :') we had lectures notes that weren't always very complete/detailed/clear, so I had to dive into alternative literature because I was unable to connect the dots based on these notes, which made the whole process a whole less efficient - but hey, in the end I got there
and it also didn't help that I had never grasped basic smooth manifold theory during my undergraduate years, so it was a looong journey x)
You’re ahead of most of the denizens of chat.
i am?! thanks, ted!
Typical lawyer. Takes after Rudy.
19:40
algebraic top. teacher here is like: how much time is left for the class to end? '5 mins', say students. Then he says: ok, we can do 1 more theorem. Then he writes the theorem and proof, then leaves.
'But how does that step follow?', ask students. He says, 'I have left some steps here and there, complete them on your own.'
i'm split between being annoyed by that, and wanting a job at your university
so people skip his classes.
he did it
he found the loophole
👑👑👑
we have midsem and the syllabus for alg. top. is -Chain complexes, CW complex, fundamental group, homotopy, s -delta sets etc.
Quotient topology was removed from the midsem because then people would score marks.
I shared one image the other day here, wherein he had cut my marks in a test. He was telling me that mine had a mistake. I told him that he was wrong and that my answer was correct. He realized his mistake and said-oh marks don't matter, understanding matters etc.
😅
19:48
Did you get the marks back?
no
Then he needs to understand his mistake.
probably because then he would have to have the trouble of changing the marks in his databse.
(too much task to power on laptop and do it, ughh leave it)
or maybe office politics
but that sucks
why wouldn't he give you your marks back
because 'marks don't matter, understanding matters'
😅
19:52
probably just lazy.
yeah, or full of ....
that too
key his car
i didn't mean that
I don't understand how one becomes like that: don't they introspect what we did today?
nah, just live and learn
19:54
Did my teaching help anyone?
I guess they don't ask these questions to themself.
don't you have a rate my professor site?
unfortunately, no.
and there is no feedback system also here.
start one
yeah, i need to get a job at this place
be the change you want to see
19:59
The college where I did my UG from had a feedback form system: at the end of a semester, feedback forms will be distributed among students who will then fill it up and give to the teacher. It's anonymous. Then the teacher submits it to the administration.
@user2236 -lenin
last semester, one of the teachers who taught us is said be 'one of the best teachers' in the country. Is it strange that I politely disagree with that?
I feel that if I just listened to what he said in the class, I won't be able to even touch an exercise problem in the book.
@leslietownes come here Leslie. You will be a great help here. :-)
@Koro I strongly disbelieve in the notion of "the" best teacher, or any objective measure of "best".
What works for some people will fail utterly for others.
And the people that I, personally, feel are the best instructors are also often the most polarizing.
indeed. But I think it's like -'best actor award, best song award', not really welldefined.
@Koro Well, the awards are, in fact, very well defined (in general).
You get a bunch of nominations, and there is a vote of some sort.
But whether or not that relates to any "objective" measure of talent, skill, or ability is anyone's guess.
21:01
I just did a first pass on reading on Jordan Canonical Forms......seems OK, but I need clarification on a concept. Anybody available?
We have this matrix and after doing all the necessary work we get to a basis of the solution space for $K_{\lambda_2}$. In the book they chose the vector $(-1,2,0)$ to begin their cycle. I tried using the vector $(1,-3,-1)$ initially. I was expecting to be able to get the vector $(-1,2,0)$ after I multiplied by the correct matrix, but I didn't.
Isn't it the case that I should be able to get every vector in that solution space by cycling through it?
When I did it the other way and started with $(-1,2,0)$ I got the second vector, but it didn't work the other way around
21:54
One thing to notice is that solutions to $(A-2I)v$ are solutions to $(A-2I)^2v$
i.e. you have $E_{\lambda_2}\subset K_{\lambda_2}$
If you have a basis of the former you can complete it into a basis of the latter
Since $\dim E_{\lambda_2} =1$, it is sufficient to find one nonzero vector in this space to get a basis
To do this, one thing you may do is pick a vector of $K_{\lambda_2}$ and apply $A-2I$ to it – if you're lucky you will find a nonzero vector, which has to be in $E_{\lambda_2}$
So even though they didn't show the computation, then $(-1,2,0)$ was an eigenvector?
and that is what allowed for the creation of the "cycle" per se?
If you do this with $(1,-3,-1)$ it works. If you do it with $(0,-1,-1)$ it works. If you do it with $(-1,2,0)$ it does not work.
Here you can take any vector in $K_{\lambda_2}$ that is not colinear to $(-1, 2, 0)$ and it will work (can you prove that?)
Right, they did not actually do the computation, they just claimed it works (and it does)
Yea. As I finished the section they said the next section will show the ways to compute these things because I one o fthe things I was wracking my head about was how they were getting some of these results
So when they solved for the basis of the solution space and got the vectors $(1,-3,-1), (-1,2,0)$, they "found" the acceptable vector to be $(-1,2,0)$. I take it won't always be the case that a basis of such a homogenous system will provide me with a cycle of generalized eigenvectors?
22:18
It depends what you mean
if your generalized eigenspaces staired well, you will always be able to find such a thing
more precisely, here $\dim E_{\lambda_2} = \dim K_{\lambda_2} - \dim E_{\lambda_2} = 1$
if there were three independent vectors in K and only one in E, then you should be able to convince yourself that there is never a cycle which yields a basis
however if it is straired (I don't know the actual word) nicely, then you alway will be, by taking one in the upmost space that is not in the one below it
Yea, they showed that idea so it makes sense to me.
Hmmm. I'll pause the rest of my inquiries until a little later when I've read the next section but I do have a bit of better understanding. Thanks for the help
Glad to help

« first day (4587 days earlier)      last day (728 days later) »