« first day (4365 days earlier)      last day (951 days later) » 

00:09
i'm still somewhere in there
i'll have about a week free to do a bit more until january heh
i absolutely need to finish the book before the 2023 semester starts
 
1 hour later…
01:27
@BalarkaSen That's a lot
(^that's an edited version of what I actually meant to say, which was just a string of profanity)
@leslietownes lol
01:54
@TedShifrin not allowed. It doesn’t have a finite non zero limit point.
 
2 hours later…
03:32
thanks. But still, I'm stuck. I'll explain where: Suppose that Q+ is enumerated as $q_1,q_2,...,q_k,...$. Q+ has a non zero limit point (take $\pi$ for example). Let q be a non zero limit point of Q+. Then, there is a k>1 in N such that 1/k< q<k. Since q is a limit point, there is a $q_i$ in (1/k,k).
Take the q_i with minimum subscript that lies in (1/k,k) and call it $r_1$. Note that $(1/k, k)\subset (1/k^2, k^2)$. Choose the $a_i$ with min. subscript such that it lies in $(1/k^2, k^2)$ call it $r_2$.
(we are choosing $r_2$ s.t. $r_2\ne r_1$. This is possible as q is a limit point.)
nope. this is still wrong.
03:49
instead of $(1/k^2,k^2)$, I should consider $(\frac 1{k^{\sqrt 2}}, k^{\sqrt 2})$. Then, I construct a sequence $r_n$ such that $\frac {1}{k^{\sqrt n}}<r_n<k^{\sqrt n}$. Then $r_n^{\frac 1n}\to 1$.
But this creates problem when $q=\frac 1{k^{\sqrt j}}$ for some j or when $q=k^{\sqrt l}$ for some l.
:(
Even if this problem is sorted out. There is no reason to believe why the sequence $r_n$ will contain every element of Q+.
(for example: N and 2N have the same cardinality but are not the same sets.)
koro what happens if you toss countably many 1's into ted's example
Leslie, that's also not allowed. :(
i stand by my two-starred remark
2
we are given a countable infinite set of positive numbers and I think that a set by definition has no repetition allowed.
@leslietownes : )
ok, interleave 1 - 1/1000000^n with ted's example?
04:02
looks like a counterexample.
But the source of the problem is P. Orno, Math. Magazine, Problem 1021
by some search online, I found math.stackexchange.com/questions/2669206/…
but I don't understand the answer.
in particular the (unique) order isomorphism part
f sends n in N to the nth element of N \ f(N)
i haven't digested the proof but that is that part of it
leslie, why is the above not a counterexample?
dunno, i don't work on this stuff
facultymembers.sbu.ac.ir/shahrokhi/ProBookMathAnal2.pdf has a solution although you will be making a request to iran
i'm probably on 20,000 US watch lists now
I dropped a comment on the post.
@leslietownes that's the book. :)
I have the following problem with the solution in the book:
27 mins ago, by Koro
But this creates problem when $q=\frac 1{k^{\sqrt j}}$ for some j or when $q=k^{\sqrt l}$ for some l.
 
3 hours later…
dtn
dtn
07:21
0
Q: Differential Equations with Special Functions: Are analytical solutions possible?

dtnI want to ask a question to specialists, I am very interested in getting their advice and opinion. Let's take elliptic integrals and hypergeometric functions and write down any differential equations in which they enter. For example, these: $x'=-EllipticF(x(t)+1|-1)-EllipticF(\sin (x)|1)$ $x'=_{1...

 
1 hour later…
08:32
Given $|x_{i}|<1,|y_{i}|<1$. If $\Pi_{1=1}^{n} x_{i} (1+y_{i}) < 0$, then $\Pi_{1=1}^{n} y_{i} (1+x_{i})$ cannot be less than zero.
I am thinking if this si true?
As $|x_{i}|<1, |y_{i}|<1 \forall i=1,\ldots,n$
so $\Pi_{i=1}^{n} |x_{i}|<1$
doesnot look correct
@BalarkaSen Oh I've heard that fibrant/cofibrant replacement term. I was about to ask any motivation or application of that replacement in topology at that time.
09:16
@Koro if you have at least one limit point say L, then you have infinitely many terms which are in the interval (L-1, L+1). Enumerate these as b_n, and the rest of the points in the sequence as c_n. So for your rearrangement, you use N-1 terms from the b sequence, where N is chosen so that $1-1/2<c_1^{1/}<1+1/2$. Then for the Nth term, you put. c_1. Now you continue using M-N-1 bs where M is chosen so that $1-1/3< c_2^{1/M} <1+1/3 $. Then for the Mth term you put c_2.
Any graph come to mind which covers all the quadrants except the third quadrant
say in the x-y plane
And so on; in this way you obviously use all the bs, and we slowly pick off the cs one by one, so they're all used
@leslietownes oh no, this comment is self-referential
Hi, can you please explain why the countable set $\{e^{n^2}: n\in \mathbb N\}\cup \{1+1/n: n\in \mathbb N\}$ is not a counterexample to the statement in OP? — Koro 5 hours ago
$\{ e^{n^2} : n\ge 1\} = \{ e, e^4, e^9, e^{16},\dots \}$ Observe $e^{1/3}\in (1-1/2, 1+1/2)$. So choose the first few terms of the sequence is $1+1/1, 1+1/2, e$. The next term from the bad sequence we need to add is $e^4$. Well, $e^{4/15} \in (1-1/3, 1+1/3)$. So our sequence is now $$1+1/1, 1+1/2, e, 1+1/3, 1+1/4, \dots, 1+1/13, e^4.$$ Then we need to add $e^9$...etc.
10:14
@onepotatotwopotato Yes, there are applications. Once you've taken a fibrant replacement, the topology of the fiber measures how far your map is from being a homotopy equivalence.
 
2 hours later…
12:08
@ShaVuklia I think up to a basis change this choice does not matter (because again $\sigma$ is an $L$-homomorphism, so it preserves the Lie bracket)
I haven't studied Lie algebras in forever though, so take this with a grain of salt
 
1 hour later…
13:17
@robjohn well, not in the math.se question version. i didnt scroll too much nor did I check the book that koro was reading
13:37
@LeakyNun This comment is a reply to itself.
 
1 hour later…
14:55
@CalvinKhor Thanks a lot. I understand this :).
@CalvinKhor but I still don't understand this one.
@Koro can you say what you don't understand?
Suppose that I have a sequence $(x_n)$ of distinct elements. Suppose that $x_{2n}$ and $x_{2n-1}$ converge to a,b respectively. Then the set of all limit points of $x_n$ is {a,b}.
@Koro basically you can delay the $e^{k^2}$ as much as possible so that the $1/n$ has more power
@Koro every term of the form 1+1/n appears, and so does every term of the form e^{n^2}. but the terms of the form e^{n^2} appear at an index N, which depends on n, so far away, i.e. a_N = e^{n^2}, so that $e^{n^2/N}$ is basically 1
@CalvinKhor considering the set $\{e^{n^2}:n\in \mathbb N\}\cup \{1+1/n:n\in \mathbb N\}$, we'll always have the set of limit points as $\{\infty\}\cup \{1\}$.
15:09
lets not consider infinity as a limit point
yeah but if you for example make $e^{n^2}$ appear in the $n^2$-th position then the limit points would just be $1$ and $e$
@CalvinKhor ok.
@CalvinKhor you mean $\lim_{N\to \infty} e^{n^2/N}=1$?
@CalvinKhor ok so the construction of 'rearranged' sequence of the sequence involving e^{n^2} above is as suggested here.
not putting $e^{n^2}$ at nth place but putting it 10000 indices ahead for example.
15:30
Yes exactly
Sorry need to run!
 
2 hours later…
17:01
@Koro exactly
the thing about infinity is that
even if you put away finitely many things
you still have exactly as many :D
17:35
One last thing, about another side project of yours with a sizable impact: LaTeX. I’d like to finally clear something up with the creator. Is it pronounced LAH-tekh or LAY-tekh?
Any way you want. I don’t advise spending very much time thinking about it.
17:51
Hi everyone!
In geometry it is defined that a line is made up of points. But a point has no dimension and the lines we draw on papers actually are not one dimensional because they have a width. If we draw a line segment it is a rectangle. Am I right?
Then, a line which matches with the definition "a line is made up of points" can't be seen right? Can we say that a line is a really existing thing? Or it is just a mathematical definition?
uh, you may want to be clearer about how you axiomatize stuff. a lot of common ways of axiomatizing 2d geometry do not have notions of 'dimension' or 'width' and it is not necessary to talk about those things.
your world being a set, in which points are elements, and lines are subsets - this is a common setting.
Hmmm okay
@leslietownes Can you please advise me further how to get a clearer idea about this?
What should I refer?
robin hartshorne's book "geometry: euclid and beyond" is very good.
i don't recommend directly reading euclid, axiomatically it is semi incoherent.
Thank you very very much @leslietownes anything to read prior to that too?
The lines we draw on paper are not the actual lines, but they are rectangles?
i don't know what i'd call them. it's definitely useful to distinguish between the physical representation of the thing and the axiomatic object.
graphite smeared on plant fibers is definitely not included in the axiomatics, although it is often what we use to think about axiomatics.
17:59
Okay, not clear to me yet, but I'll check the book you mentioned and see. Thanks a lot again! :)
Another small thing: if someone ask me whether the lines exist or not in real world, what should I say?
I mean they are axiomatic definitions in mathematics..?
"although they make use of the visible forms and reason about them, they are thinking not of these, but of the ideals which they resemble; not of the figures which they draw, but of the absolute square and the absolute diameter, and so on --the forms which they draw or make, and which have shadows and reflections in water of their own, are converted by them into images, but they are really seeking to behold the things themselves, which can only be seen with the eye of the mind"
plato, writing a century before euclid
A line we draw on paper has 2 dimensions, a square draw on paper also has 2 dimensions right?
it's up to you. i don't personally think of lines from geometry as existing in the real world
i don't know if space is quantized, my understanding is that matter is. when you draw anything on paper, you do have depths and widths and three dimensional everything even if that is not what you are trying to draw
Okay @leslietownes Thank you very much!! :) :)
Many many thanks!
Have a nice day! :)
18:11
@leslietownes i say LAY-tekh
@leslietownes A drawing is a 3 dimensional representation of a 1 or 2 dimensional object
in my way of thinking about it
balarka: i try to avoid saying it but if you push me i would also say it that way
That is how I say it
I say /ˈleɪ.tɛk/ and complain about the lack of IPA knowledge of the common people
which has caused people to have to resort to crazy phonetic representations
18:14
imagine having to spell "anomaly" as "uh-NAW-muh-lee"
what sort of craziness is this
@leslietownes Hmm I don't understand that why a drawing is going to be a 3D representation?
@robjohn It is with reference to the above question I posted right?
@BuddhiniAngelika the paper has thickness
buy or obtain the use of a microscope
@BuddhiniAngelika this is getting too philosophical for your own good
(in case nobody has pointed that out before)
Ohh, okay @LeakyNun and @leslietownes :)
18:17
i was quoting plato a little earlier than i expected to be on a sunday morning, but here we are
@LeakyNun Yeah :)
@BuddhiniAngelika a drawing is made of ink on paper. To be visible, a line has to have width, as well as the length we wish to represent. The ink will have some thickness to be visible.
@BuddhiniAngelika reality exists, and then we create objects in our mind; a table is an object in our mind, the real table is just a bunch of atoms
so a table as we know it doesn't really exist in the real world
This is what is referred to as "saṅkhāra" in Buddhism, at least under my interpretation of it
2
to blend this with the other thing above, if you read knuth about developing tex, one thing he noted very early on is that you do not need to work to infinite precision when designing a typesetting system because when materials are printed on paper, the physical limitations involved in placing pigment on a surface quickly overwhelm whatever you may have worked out to the 1000th decimal place
Hmm okay @robjohn , @LeakyNun and @leslietownes
@leslietownes Okay
Thank you very much again @robjohn , @LeakyNun and @leslietownes :)
 
2 hours later…
20:20
Given a multivariate p.d.f. $f(x,y)$ with marginal p.d.f.'s $f(x)$ and $f(y)$ s.t. $f(0)=1$ and $f(1)=0$ does there exist a copula making $f(x,y)$ genus $0?$
20:48
Good morning professor
20:59
@LeakyNun There is no real table, the table only exists in relation to an observer. Therefore, the table is a relation that relates itself to others. It is not the relation, but the idea that the relation relates itself. In fact, there is no observer except me either, because my idea of an observer is simply an observation of me observing others. Thus, an observer is simply that which observes itself observing others while observing itself observing others.
What I'm trying to say is, you need a Christian God to exist.
he has to be christian, otherwise you're cheating
-the west
I think what I wrote is an accurate summary of Bishop Berkeley's idealism
balarka what are you doing reading kierkegaard and berkeley
what you need in your life is hegel and co.
hegel is too hardcore for me man
that's anglophone academic reception of hegel during the cold war talking
21:08
lolol
purging philosophy departments of subversive thought
im a simple man, i read critical theory and shit on obscurantist continental philosophers
You’re only semisimple.
My base field is indeed characteristic 0
So yes
21:16
is this about effects on academic philosophy
yes, it's about why there is even an analytic/continental divide
gotcha
and why analytic philosophy took over american departments
22:18
@TedShifrin I think I have found a small typo on page 261: "we introduced k-dimensional manifolds in \mathbb{R}^n as being locally the graph of \mathcal{C}^1 function..." I think should be either "we introduced k-dimensional manifolds in \mathbb{R}^n as being locally the graph of A \mathcal{C}^1 function..." or "we introduced k-dimensional manifolds in \mathbb{R}^n as being locally the graph of \mathcal{C}^1 functionS...". I am not a native English speaker so I might be wrong. Hope this helps
In any case it would be such a small typo that it's hardly worth the time to correct it, but still...
Yeah, this one I win’t bother with. Wiley should have hired you instead of the proofreader they hired.
Your corrections aren’t good, but the s is missing on graohs.
And functions.
I hope you’re mastering the math with the same care and attention.
@BalarkaSen so is there any philosophy/-er that you agree with
@Ted Shifrin I see, I had the feeling that something was amiss in that sentence but I am not too much surprised my corrections aren't good since English is not my mother tongue (I have learned it mostly by myself by watching American TV and reading books). The reason I am catching these typos is in fact that I am reading each page very carefully multiple times and trying to work through as many exercises as I can.
Yeah, you're right that the sentence had faulty parallelism. Easiest would be to say a manifold ... :)
Your English seems pretty good.
your english is great, lorenzo.
better than my daughter's, anyway. and she is a native speaker.
22:34
@TedShifrin Dr. Shifrin, in the homework site you for example have #4 (2). Does the (2) indicate some kind of point system for the class?
e.g. #4∗ (2), 5 (2), 10 (3), 11 (3).
Yes, those were points toward the (written) homework grade each week.
smacks @leslie and Munchkin
@Ted Shifrin @leslietownes I'm glad to hear it, thanks!
Lorenzo, are you an Italian speaker or a Spanish speaker (or is your name designed to fool us entirely)?
Italian
ted: we can't expect much of my daughter, she is being raised by a circus clown
22:47
I have hopes Olivia will see to it that Munchkin learns to communicate effectively.
4
Q: Is there only one way to divide an equilateral triangle into congruent fourths?

Akiva WeinbergerSuppose we wish to divide an equilateral triangle into fourths, such that each piece is congruent. (Let's also require connectedness.) One way to do this is to connect the medians, forming one inverted triangle in the center and three at the corners. Is this the only way? Are there any other ways...

Bump
This feels like it should be easy to answer
but I don't see how
@AkivaWeinberger you'll be surprised how many geometric questions are open

« first day (4365 days earlier)      last day (951 days later) »