« first day (3883 days earlier)      last day (1434 days later) » 

00:00
Clarinet, can you explain the error in my thinking? If the sum of independent Poisson RV is again Poisson with the sum of the means, why is the average of $3$ with the same mean different from a single Poisson RV with that mean?
I grant I haven't thought about this stuff in 6 years, but ...
I wrote everything about this above
You know what.........I didn't get that because my thinking is out of whack. I've been working on it conciously, but this is a vivid display of actually having to apply the concepts in ways that are not exactly like in the textbook......alluding to the discussion you guuys were having a few days ago about poor fundamentals and expecting to copy examples from the text to get an answer
What you wrote above (not counting the f***ing) made no sense to me, since I'm not a probabilist. What does yield fractional values mean?
@dc3rd: My book is going to be like that throughout. With analysis it gets far trickier.
hi all
😭😭...I need the mind blown emoji right now......this is precisely what I signed up for when taking my time off from my university studies, so I'm all for it...
00:03
0
Q: Nonassociative algebra's closed under $\sqrt{}$?

mickConsider a non-associative commutative unital algebra of finite dimension where the product is defined by a cayley table such that elements are generated with real number coefficients $(a_0, \dots, a_n) $ for a basis $\{1, i_1, \dots, i_n \}$ and we have a basis so that $ i_k^2 \in \{ -1, +1 \}$....

@TedShifrin poisson has integers as values. The sum of three poissons divided by three can have values such as 1/3 + 2/3 + 1/3 = 4/3 which is not an integer
this is REAL analysis....actually using the techniques......this is going to be ardourous, but rewarding....fortunately I'm a masochist for this stuff
@TedShifrin A Poisson random variable takes on values in $\mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}$. The sum of three values in $\mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}$ is also in $\mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}$. Divide by three, and you end up with fractional values, outside of $\mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}$.
I see. Thank you both.
well that expenditure of brain power merits me eating the leftover caccio e pepe I have
00:05
So the average of identical Poisson is not Poisson, even though their sum is. I understand now.
I will never again attempt to answer probability/statistics. Never.
@dc3rd 🤯🤯🤯
Enjoy it, @dc3rd.
My phone has $\unicode{x1f92f}$ but my computer doesn't.
need to update my OS
🤯
🤬🤬🤬
I don't get all the emojis in here that I get in iMessage.
00:08
@ChairmanMeow Challenge question: can you find an unbiased estimator for $e^\theta$?
(I think I know how you would do this... it's been a very long time)
Speaking of Meow, I wonder what's become of MeowMix!!
anyone willing to look at my question ? pretty please
@mick Just ask it
Oh
Sorry, I missed it
I haven't thought about abstract algebra since 2014
@Clarinetist thats ok. upvote and answer and i forgive you :)
I'll give you an upvote, unfortunately don't know enough to give an answer
00:10
@Clarinetist cool :)
shouldn't you capitalize Cayley?
@Clarinetist That is indeed a challenge question. Would you need to find a constant to do that?
@geocalc33 maybe
Let me see if I can do it... it's been a very long time.
i capitalized for you my friend :)
now upvote :p
@Clarinetist thanks
00:15
I'll give you a bookmark
Now what I originally wanted to write: Physicist's math is marvellous. Assume we have random variables which can be propagated forwards in time (by a Hamiltonian), so in formulas $\partial_t A = i\mathcal L A$. We simply formally solve this as $A_t = e^{i\mathcal L t} A_0$, and do the same for some $B_t = e^{i\mathcal L t} B_0$.

Now we want to compute a laplace transform of the autocorrelation function and continue to treat the operators like usual numbers to get $$C_{AB}(t) = \Bbb E[A_t^\ast B_0] = \Bbb E[(e^{i\mathcal L t} A_0)^\ast B_0] = \Bbb E[A_0 e^{-i\mathcal L t} B_0]$$
@ChairmanMeow Old question I asked:
2
Q: For what values of $k \in \mathbb{Z}\setminus\{0\}$ does there exist an unbiased estimator of $e^{k \lambda}$?

ClarinetistThis is inspired by Finding an unbiased estimator of $e^{-2\lambda}$ for Poisson distribution, reminding me of a qualifying exam question that I was frustrated with. Suppose $X_1, \dots, X_n \overset{\text{iid}}{\sim}\text{Poisson}(\lambda)$. For some subset of size $k \leq n$, it can be seen t...

@Clarinetist cool!
I forgot I asked that question until a minute or two ago
There was a question on one of my master's qualifying exams where a similar question came up
@leslietownes is this how semigroup theorists do operator calculus
00:19
@Clarinetist Wait 'til you're my age!
just act as if literally everything works out and in the end it does?
That is really interesting and motivating!
I resigned from my faculty position on Thursday... leaving at the end of Spring. Can't sufficiently express how relieved I am.
if a rational function has horizontal asymptode y=-2. the the numerator and denominator must have the same degrree of polynomials.right?
00:22
Mazltov, Clarinet!
I have one last question about my question and then I am done torturing all of you nice people and myself. So since I have found the mgf of $$e^{\frac{\sum^3_{i=1}X_i}3}$$, then this should agree with the left hand side of my invocation of Jensen's inequality, which happens to be $$E\left(e^{\frac{\sum^3_{i=1}X_i}3}\right)$$, right?
Yes @Unknownx
@Ted shifrin. Thank you very much :)
@ChairmanMeow Set $t = 1$ and you're good.
00:24
@Clarinetist thank you so so much!
@ChairmanMeow can you specify what you intend to do? What function are you applying Jensen's to?
Clarinet, was the discussion amicable?
Yes, the department chair wasn't surprised. I can tell it's going to be difficult for them logistically, but I could tell he understood why I couldn't continue doing that position.
I'm hoping they get their new full-time hire in on this. Adjunct pay just wasn't worth it for me to keep going.
when you change coordinates you can change how a partial differential equation looks and the solutions change
Plus I would really like to see some commitment from their full-timers on this class if they really are serious about continuing the program.
00:27
@user2103480 I am trying to show that $$^{\frac{\sum^3_{i=1}X_i}{3}}$$ is not an unbiased estimator of $$e^{\theta}$$ two ways. Using Jesnen's inequality and mgfs, just to see how they compare.
I'm glad it was a fair discussion, Clarinet.
I am too.

I know they're going to have bigger fish to fry than my class, though. The dev-ed/remedial math conversation is going on nationally.
That is a conversation that I'm glad I've not had to be a part of.
I have been a part of it at the university level over the years.
So $x-u = s(v-u) + t(w-v)$ is a "shifting" of my whole object, whereas $x - u = s(v-u) + t(w-v) - u$ is traveling on a vector in the shifted object
I think the movement is slowly moving toward eliminating it entirely
00:33
Eliminating what, Clarinet?
Dev-ed/remedial math
Not that I agree with it, but I'm observing.
At a national level.
It really doesn't make good sense, @dc3rd. It then defines something dependent on where the origin is.
in the second case no?
Well, secondary schools will have to actually give students the skills in a provable way, Clarinet.
Yes, the second.
My guess is what will happen is that post-secondary institutions will eventually get rid of dev-ed/remedial classes in favor of just placing students directly into college-level math classes, because the benefits (higher graduation rates, higher retention) outweigh the risks (people not being ready for college-level math).
00:36
Ok. I'll remember that.
Enjoying the headers I've been making. Trying to make a proper dark mode version of it...
It is a consequence of a metric-driven environment. I don't agree with it.
metric?
@ChairmanMeow I think you meant to write $e^{\frac{\sum^3_{i=1}X_i}{3}}$. Okay, I see. In one case, Jensen yield's strict inequality since the exponential is not affine, in the other case you calculate an explicit formula for the expected value and I guess it's left to show that this is not equal to $e^\theta$
Well, I'm all in favor of doing a better job in primary and secondary schools across the board. Parents need to demand that and society needs to respect teachers so that better folks go into teaching.
00:40
I agree. K-12 has a whole host of issues right now distinct from higher ed. I don't miss that world.
Community college and a lot of university curriculum is largely remedial to cover that defect.
@user2103480 yes that is completely correct. Now I am just making sure both agree.
And then there are the high schools determined to teach multivariable calc and linear algebra. The hell with that. AP calc is bad enough.
One of the biggest problems in K-12 IMO is that standardized testing is tied to funding mechanisms, and then indirectly where people live for real estate
0
Q: Is $\zeta$ a solution to the Einstein field equations?

geocalc33Consider a Lorentzian manifold $(\zeta,g)$ with metric $g=\frac{dudv}{uv}-\frac{dr^2}{r^2}-\frac{dw^2}{w^2}.$ Clearly $\zeta$ is diffeomorphic to Minkowski space, $\Bbb R^{3,1}.$ $\zeta$ also has zero curvature like Minkowski space. Is $\zeta$ a solution to the Einstein field equations? I know ...

00:43
Yup, racially and economically super-biased.
$ 0^0^0^0 $
If the federal legislators do to higher ed what they did to K-12 - which is extremely plausible, but was delayed due to COVID - we may see the same thing happen in the undergrad years.
@MarkGiraffe what ??
I want legislators gone and buried.
I'm honestly surprised how few people I've met in higher ed who have heard of the Higher Education Act.
00:46
@mick Trying to make an exponent exponented by another exponented exponent.
Have not or have?
have*, thanks
Pell grants, etc.?
Yep. Drives higher ed funding. One massive bill that has to go through a long renewal process every so often.
$ 1^2^3^4^5^6^7^8^9^10 = 1 = $ damn, what a waste, remove $1$ please to make it more interesting.
Okay.
00:48
Interesting?
$2^3^4^5^6^7^8^9^10 = ?$
K-12 has an analogous bill called the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). No Child Left Behind was a specific renewal of the ESEA, and that's what primarily drove standardized testing as a requirement.
Pre-COVID, the process began to renew the Higher Education Act (HEA). The process was completely derailed by COVID, but the priorities were clear from both major parties: more accountability in higher ed.
2^2=4
Yes, legislators love the idea of outcome-based budgeting and post-tenure review, ultimately killing tenure.
$2^3 = 8$
$8^4 = 4,096$
$4,096^5 = 1,152,921,504,606,846,976$

At this point, it is going to be a Stack Overflow.
00:51
at this point it's going to be more than the galaxies in the universe
I actually support getting rid of some university faculty who are total deadwood.
@geocalc33 Indeed.
Yeah, I don't know enough about promotion & tenure to be able to comment how that would be done
My hardest task as associate head was assigning teaching to people who hardly did research at all and were completely incompetent at teaching.
$1,152,921,504,606,846,976^6 = 2.3485425827738332278894805967893e+108$

Yeah, very beeg.
00:53
fun fact: galaxies come in different shapes and sizes
@MarkGiraffe You're doing it backwards. $a^b^c=a^(b^c)$.
Is 4D on-topic on Math SE?
Ohh.
what's 4D
That's because if you want $(a^b)^c$ you'd write $a^{bc}$
$9^10 = 3486784401$
$8^3486784401 = StackOverflow$
Why is MathJax still wrong??
00:58
If I have a family of maps $\{f_n\}$ such that $f_n = h\circ g_n\circ h^{-1}$ for a biholomorphism $h$ and the family $\{g_n\}$ is normal, is $\{f_n\}$ then necessarily normal?
(complex maps, normal being the complex term for "precompact")
@geocalc33 The four spatial dimensions. We have 3: $x$ (length), $y$ (width), $z$ (height).
I am not going to think hard, but I would guess yes without thinking, anakhro.
That was my thought without thinking, too. :P
four dimensional mathematics is the essence of mathematical thought
But you are paid to think !
01:00
I can't imagine it not being on topic
I kept of thinking that the $4th$ might be depth, thanks to the construction of the tesseract that some would think of.
Where the cube could be inside the cube based on illustration on a flat plane.
I actually tried making a tesseract in Minecraft.
what does precompact mean for a map
@MarkGiraffe You need braces on the exponent: 8^{3486784401}. BTW, that number has 3,148,880,080 digits (in decimal).
@Thorgott precompact set of maps.
it's a family of maps, not a single map.
So you give it (the set of all maps you are concerned with) a topology and precompact makes sense.
wow that's interresant
01:05
ok, which topology is it in this case
Compact-open topology.
@MarkGiraffe See physics.stackexchange.com/q/621590/123208 & the comment by DJohnM which links to a PDF of Heinlein's "And He Built a Crooked House".
01:17
Here's a rotating tesseract projection built with three.js that you can interact with: mikelortega.github.io/tesseract
Are your eyes hurting yet?
In an arbitrary vector space $V$ (in particular vector space can be infinite dimensional), for given point $v\in V$, can we always form a basis $B$ containing $v$?
Nonzero?
any linearly independent subset can be extended to form a basis (basis extension theorem)
proof: use Zorn's lemma to pick a maximal linearly independent subset containing the given set. if there is something outside the span, then adding it to the collection would produce a larger linearly independent subset, contradiction.
01:43
but false without choice
thanks
really needed that
Thorgott strikes again
02:02
@Thorgott important fact
the importance of this fact is directly proportional to how much of a logician you are
always surprised that not AC => vector space without basis exists was proved in 1984
@TedShifrin yes
@LeakyNun Nice
02:55
@MarkGiraffe that kind of reminds me of this book: mitpress.mit.edu/books/…
03:22
a vector space is an imaginary construct. i believe in R^n and some L^2 spaces.
03:40
also C^n.
04:13
Q^n?
no, i don't acknowledge that. it feels like a scam to me.
what are they hiding? i think we should all ask ourselves that.
I did mean quaternions, but why not rationals?
@leslietownes same thing as R^n
for different n, admittedly
that's where they get you.
04:17
different n, indeed.
doesn't get any simpler than that
from hamilton to boole
my alma mater was boole's college
my wife just had her second shot. i'm in the same house as someone who has been implanted with a bill gates microchip.
boole had a number of very good ideas.
there are 10 types of people in the world
how come your wife gets a shot?
health professional?
presumably <65
she is an educator. they're trying to get teachers back into classrooms. that's not happening in 2021. but that's how she got it. she isn't even 40.
nancy pelosi's hairdresser?
sabine schmitz died a few days ago. sad day.
04:22
pretty much. my best friend lives in beverly hills and goes to the same hairdresser as people we all have heard of.
i saw that. that sucked.
awesome topgear episode with her
my brother tested positive after his second pfizer shot
admittedly 37 pcr amplifications later
my wife and i both had horrible symptoms in november. i couldn't taste anything for about a month.
PCR is a funny reaction.
covid or a bad can of spam?
i try to eat vegetarian as much as possible, so the food is mostly flavorless.
india vegetarian is far from flavourless...
04:25
yeah, i wish we lived in india.
one of my favourite dishes is palak paneer
then again, a good lamb biryani does the trick too. not quite vegetarian though...
i used to cook for us. it was OK. but for about a month it was, absolutely no sensation. probably covid? i don't know.
i had some great vegetarian food in china
and indonesia
dang, time for dinner #3.
met some friends for dinner & drinks at the biergarten in berkeley
chinese cuisine is great. it is hard to get those places locally. everything is adapted to an american taste.
got home and had some ribs with wife & son
chinese food in china is a lot different than chinese food in america
i am sure brendan behan has a saying about that
04:30
my grandfather, who loved quoting him, was about the same vintage.
a brilliant man.
behan too :-).
pithy is how my mother described him. that meant he said things she did not approve of.
i imagine he was a fun drinking companion, much like shane mcgowan
my wife doesn't understand when i say "your man" in reference to somebody inextricably tied to the story but not named. it's your man. i don't need to give more references.
'yer man
culture is a hard boundary to cross
i got it from my grandfather. he was a gambler and completely unreliable.
sounds like a fun companion :-)
i am in desperate need of drinking companions. usually easy to find, but covid has ruined things
04:34
covid is a piece of shit.
it has screwed my 17 yos son's life
i can't imagine being at the threshold of life and then all of this garbage.
my daughter is two years old. she has no idea how weird all of this is.
@leslietownes :(
attending college at home sucks.
yep. plus many of last year's cohort are applying this year too
i would be out of my mind right now.
04:44
Please tell me how to solve this
why don't you ask your question on mse?
On main site you mean?
Why are they taking ratios here @copper.hat
It is a small query
@copper.hat It would be extremely kind of you if you suggest me a different chat room in case you do not find it good.
But it doesn't qualify to the standards of a main question
05:05
I did it.
is this for the j e e @RajorshiKoyal?
Slightly adjusted.
@user85795 For IBPS PO
Ok, try here @RajorshiKoyal
That is for physics na
05:27
Sorry
05:56
@user85795 Tq for suggesting
 
4 hours later…
10:22
Is there a query on Data Explorer that gives the number of views on a particular question by days?
 
2 hours later…
jay
jay
12:41
Hi guys in search of some tech help here! I want to download my beamer slides and view them on an application that allows me to draw on them and preferably has an option of a laser pointer for the mouse. ( for giving a presentation). Can someone recommend a application? Im on PC
windows
13:37
apparently $H_n(S^n) \equiv H_n(S^n , S^n \setminus \{pt \})$ for all $n > 0$, and one can see this using the long exact sequence of a pair, but I don't see how the LES of a pair method applied for $n=1$, namely we get $0 = H_{n}(S^n \setminus \{pt \}) \rightarrow H_n(S^n) \rightarrow H_n(S^n , S^n \setminus \{ pt \}) \rightarrow H_{n-1}(S^n \setminus \{ pt \})$, which is of the form $0 \rightarrow A \rightarrow B \rightarrow 0$ for $n > 1$
but for $n=1$ its of the form $0 \rightarrow A \rightarrow B \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}$ , what am I missing?
the justification my lecturer states is that $S^n \setminus \{pt \}$ is contractible, so its homology is zero, surely its zeroth homology is still equal to the number of its path components though, which is equal to one regardless of what $n$ is?
Usually you want reduced homology to make statements for all $n$ with no weirdness when $n=0$, maybe this is one of those cases
oh you're totally right, we want the following LES : $...\rightarrow H_1(S^n \setminus \{pt \}) \rightarrow H_1(S^n) \rightarrow H_1(S^n, S^n \setminus \{pt \}) \rightarrow \tilde{H_0}(S^n \setminus \{pt \})$ which is of the form $0 \rightarrow H_1(S^n) \rightarrow H_1(S^n, S^n \setminus \{pt \}) \rightarrow 0$, although this is really coming from the LES of the triple $(\{x \}, A , X)$ where $x \in A \subset X$
14:06
if $S = \sum_j a_j^nb_j$ and $T = \sum_ja_j^{n-1}b_j$ and $S$ converges, then can we show convergence of $T$ like this: let $m = \max(\frac{1}{|a_j|})$ then $|T| \le m|S|$ ?
@jay I use PDF Annotator, but I recall it has a fee. It is worth it, though, if this is what you do often.

For mouse laser pointers, I have no idea.
14:22
i just did a pinch harmonic by accident and it sounded badass. i felt like i was in zz top.
this is going to be a good week.
nice
what kind of music do you like, Leslie?
lately, jazz guitar. i have a couple of pat martino records on constant loop. i also go through phases where i only want to hear electronic music that came out when i was a teenager.
Do you play anything funky?
not lately but historically yes. i lived in oakland for ten years. it is in my veins.
i just queued up mahavishnu orchestra's "can't stand your funk." it holds up.
Armstrong on the basssss
14:32
the most weed i have ever seen at a show was a herbie hancock concert. i must have been the youngest person in there by 25 years. old people really like weed.
now i'm listening to tony williams' "life time."
Listen to some Jamiroquai.
jay
jay
I watched the Amy Winehouse documentary "Amy" yesterday, so tragic :(
entertainment is a toxic industry. people go to your shows hoping to see how f-ed up you are. anything for a spectacle.
Similar for lectures by famous mathematicians. ;)
I go to shows to show people how fucked up they can get
big hobby
14:43
i was a fan of the comedian mitch hedberg. the last show i went to, he was obviously out of his mind on opiates. almost everyone in the audience found it funny. it wasn't that funny.
i do remember people going to lectures from famous mathematicians just to, like, check them off a list. "why are you going to that? you won't understand anything." "it's sir michael atiyah." or whatever.
i went to a talk once and i was like "wow, this guy is really good." i didn't know who it was. it was VI Arnold.
jay
jay
yeah I saw that pretty sad.
i remember thinking "they should get this guy to come back next week."
lol @ Arnold
he was an amazing lecturer. a high schooler could have understood it. it went from well known theory to open questions. i hope his brain is in a jar somewhere so we can reanimate it and get more out of him.
He did do a popular series of lectures for high school students.
jay
jay
14:51
How are Humans going to cope in say 50 years when every discipline has become so in depth ? will take 30years to get up to date and will take another 30 to change fields...
@jay that won't happen for a long time. Right now math is a very shallow set of roots, with many, many roots.
things go in depth as a consequence of simplification. we realize that many things that previous generations struggled with are not necessary. we truly do stand on the shoulders of giants. and it's completely free. there's no limit to simplification.
imagine all the wasted ink about, like, the propriety of non-euclidean geometry. or people notating calculus in different ways. very smart people completely preoccupied with the wrong things.
almost everything will one day seem like a nightmare from which we have awakened.
Except for the intermediate value theorem, that one seems important.
we can keep the IVT.
my wife had her second covid vaccine yesterday. i've been monitoring her to see if bill gates is controlling her mind. so far it looks like she retains some independent agency. but that could be part of the program.
jay
jay
in the uk people going mad against vaccines (throughout Europe actually)
15:02
Not that mad. The UK has one of the highest vaccine rates.
It's a vocal minority, sure.
we have some of that in the united states as well. it helps that the orange man is no longer able to tweet.
orange man was always good for some fun
at the expense of others
i saw an unpleasant scene at a store the other day. someone was trying to get in without a mask. the people who worked at the store are not paid enough to patrol that boundary.
i wanted to kick the guy. i didn't.
it would have felt really good, though. just a solid kick. just one. no stomping, although he probably deserved that too.
anyway i'm still thinking about it.
hard to know where people are coming from these days
Though most of the people who should not have to wear a mask will have proper documentation with them and won't put up a fight.
15:09
i just can't imagine what's going on in your head where you're like, i'm going to make some minimum-wage workers have the worst hour of their life. because of something i saw on television.
@leslietownes Yeah, they lull you into a false sense of security, and then wham! You find that she has every device in the house controlled by Cortana.
i have a toothbrush that wants to access my wireless network. i'm not joking. i bought a toothbrush and it came with all of this networked shit.
the trojan toothbrush
that could be dangerous if you hold anti-MS views. You think you're brushing your teeth and the toothbrush explodes.
adds new meaning to you have a bit stuck between your teeth
15:16
it sometimes blinks in the middle of the night because it's trying to connect. i'm never giving you the password.
it will figure it out eventually, how long will it take to get to 123456
This is why we have IPv6, so that every toothbrush can have its own IP address.
oralb.com/en-us/why-switch is not my brand but the same idea. why would you let a toothbrush get that far into your life.
i knew a guy once who said he chose passwords starting with z because they would take longer to crack than passwords with letters from closer to the beginning of the alphabet.
lush3
taking about getting far into your life
@copper.hat Ack! Squirming uncontrollably because someone has hacked your device!
15:19
how did you know my password? what sorcery is this
perhaps connect the lush3 and the toothbrush for some oral fun
@copper.hat They did something like that with a remote tongue on Big Bang Theory
They kept it above the belt though, probably due to censors.
Not that the writers didn't have a huge laugh about the other possibilities...
Just imagine seeing "Lucy's Lush3" on the wifi network. Find Lucy by trying to connect.
the people in our new neighborhood don't have any sense of fun, for naming networked devices. it's all Spectrum345734589 or whatever. no wordplay.
I'd scream "nsfw!!!!" but i work at home now. :(((((((
in our old neighborhood, one of our neighbors, i never know who, had This Charming LAN as the wifi spot.
admittedly that's setting a very high bar, but i'm still very disappointed with my neighbors.
15:44
I have a thing that confuses me, chat is better for it: i have the real function f , with property f'(x)\leq 0 , c>0. I just proved with the mean value theorem that for all x>0: f(x)\geq f(0)+cx.
i used to commute on amtrak to the south bay so you get to see everyone's hot spot. one was (.)(.)
i mean instead of f'(x)\leq 0 \geq 0 **
use mathjax with dollar signs so it can be read easily
i'm still figuring out the role of c in all of this.
i don't c what c has to do
15:46
can you say more about c?
I think they mean to say that f is increasing
c c j'suis un rock star
copper.hat is a magician with words. i am simpler and more fundamental.
Ok i'll formulate again coz i had typos
excuse me
irish people have what is known as 'the gift of the gab.'
15:47
i do not have it, unfortunately
my powers of narration are non existent
which means they can run their mouths more than i can. when i run my mouth, eventually someone comes up to me and says 'excuse me, sir,' and that's the quote they'll put on my tombstone.
and my musical/linguistic skills equally non existent
if i do get going, my accent comes out and most cannot understand what i am saying
backing away slowly, 'that's nice joe'
The function $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ is differentiable and has the property that: $f'(x)\geq c$ for all $x\in\mathbb{R}$.
oh doesn't tex language work
i like what i'm learning about c.
you need to start chatjax
15:49
i'm already thinking mean value theorem, it's not even 9 oclock. this is a good day.
but it looks good to me
i prefer the nice value theorem
copper hat has a wonderful ethnic jig dance he's going to do later. there's lots of thumping on the floor. it's peculiar to his ethnicity.
need some caffeine before by 9am sleep session mtg
Now, i want to prove that $f(x)\leq f(0)+cx$ for all $x\leq 0$. But that confuses me, because when i do it with the mean value theorem, it gives me $f(x)\geq f(0)+cx$ and not the desired one.
a friend has a 7yo son who believes in leprechauns. i record some messages for him every now and then with my best accent
15:51
it's because of the $x
so the MVT would say (f(x)-f(0))/(x-0) is something.
x<0 that i'm confused
either it's wrong, which we can establish from linear functions, or it's right, which means we use the MVT. which is it?
Well i proved that $f(x)\geq f(0)+cx$ for all $x\geq 0$, but i get the same inequality for $x\leq 0$.
so i'm messing up but am confused:P
we're all confused. it's the mental state of humanity.
15:54
yeah true but i don't like it
wanna know all the dark secrets
i'm drawn back to that alan partridge sketch. "dere's more to ireland dan dis." unrelated.
just tossing it out there
it's not just people in bell bottoms bombing stuff. there's other things too.
so what happens if x is negative? i'm missing something here.
ok, the sign of x fucks up the inequality. hrm.
the chat definitely has smarter people than me on it. figure this out. please
no it's all good!
thanks
jay
jay
why does $\gamma$ on latex look so different to hand drawn gamma?
16:09
what do you mean? my hand drawn gammas look exactly like that.
jay
jay
same
but people complain
i recommend starting fights with these people. push them. then use one hand to put their chin where you want it and hit them with the other hand.
anyway, that's what i do. it's worked so far.
i'm not in jail.
jay
jay
i went to jail, i dont want to go back
They made me cough
jail is where the cool people at
i actually don't recommend using violence against anybody. yes, there are a lot of cool people in jail. but you can also be cool without being incarcerated.
16:14
i am non violent unless a member of family is threatened. in which case my perspective changes.
@Wouter do you know anything about the sign of $c$?
a guy on my block shot me with a bb gun when i was something like 10 years old. on my father's instructions, i beat him up, bad, and after that he didn't shoot me with a bb gun anymore. i hope that i don't have to give my daughter this toxic legacy.
i'm still curious about c. is c positive?
16:43
I do not know where I went wrong.
16:58
Where did I go wrong?Tried a coupe of times but all in vain.Please check if possible.

« first day (3883 days earlier)      last day (1434 days later) »