Hey guys. Kinda' dumb question that might not make sense. If we have two matrices A and B, and we have the expression A^T B. Is it equivalent to BA in any way?
I am a little stuck. I am trying to solve the functional equation $f(z+1) = zf(z)$ without resorting to the Gamma function. This exercise has led me to a $g$ such that $g(z+1) = ze^ag(z)$, so I think it wants me to use $g$, but I can't think of a way of using the same trick that is often used for the Gamma function because that one builds it from a $g$ such that $g(z-1) = ze^ag(z)$.
I have a question. There is a post that askes an interesting question about using 1/0. normally dividing be 0 is not allowed but in the post's Comments $[here]math.stackexchange.com/questions/4047738/… $ someone mentions Wheel theory. I have never herd of such a thing and it allows for division to always be defined. Why would we down vote this instead of show off it relates to a different mathematics?
The BBC wrote an article on some computer scientist who had "solved the problem of dividing by zero by introducing a new number off the real line called 'nullity'"
@OneColdRuben it gets downvoted because they assert their 1=2 proof holds in what seems to be a context other than wheels. While wheels are a thing, their proof doesn't hold in a wheel.
I am new to this and knew nothing about that site either. Heck I am looking at dishing out money to a tutor in a Masters level Math Logic course on another new site. I never knew that all these things existed (the sites). I guess you never know until you do, is a true statement.
Yes. It is sad, frustrating, blah blah blah. Oh good point, I never thought about just doing it myself.
Researching online, reading my books, talking to strangers on math websites I have never known about, it just didn't hit me that everything I need to know I already knew.
Come on.
It hit me that I cant do it alone and I better ask for help before I am crushed.
sorry, yes, I don't know how to directly reply, The sarcasm was directed at the comment by Anakhro. Edward thank you. Everyone thank you, I understand that this is not the place for sarcasm, and I should have just pointed it out as a comment I disagreed with.
Yes the times we have available do not line up. Even outside office hours, I work full time and have a family with 2 kids. My son is only 1.5 years old. just this semester and the summer to be done.
Governments knew that nobody listens to cattle decapitation so they drafted them to write songs about the return of the plague so they could claim they informed the public
I am a little stuck. I am trying to solve the functional equation $f(z+1) = zf(z)$ without resorting to the Gamma function. This exercise has led me to a $g$ such that $g(z+1) = ze^ag(z)$, so I think it wants me to use $g$, but I can't think of a way of using the same trick that is often used for the Gamma function because that one builds it from a $g$ such that $g(z-1) = ze^ag(z)$.