« first day (3780 days earlier)      last day (1536 days later) » 
00:00 - 15:0015:00 - 00:00

00:00
yeah I should sleep. Maybe
Is anyone familiar with DFAs? I have a small question about one of their characteristics
Suppose $f : X \to M$ is a smooth map, together with $F : TX \oplus \varepsilon^k \to TM \oplus \varepsilon^k$, an isomorphism, such that $F$ restricts to $f$ on the zero section. Consider $f \times \text{id} : X \times \Bbb R^k \to M \times \Bbb R^k$; then $F$ gives an isomorphism on the tangent bundle of these manifolds which restricts to $f \times \text{id}^k$ on the zero section. By Smale-Hirsch theorem, this means $f \times \text{id}$ can be homotoped a little bit to a diffeo
So we have a general diffeomorphism $G : X \times \Bbb R^k \to M \times \Bbb R^k$. Restricting to $X \times \{0\}$ and projecting to $M \times \{0\}$ I expect will give me a map $g : X \to M$ which is almost a covering map... except at various places where $G(X \times \{0\}) \subset M \times \Bbb R^k$ is vertical. Maybe at worst a fold singularity.
One can probable surgery this "bad locus" out by hand and produce a bordant map $X' \to M'$ which is an actual covering map
I don't think people have written down such a proof by hand, but maybe it's known to Eliashberg.
Anyway gotta sleep
00:52
I love this
"Where in the first step we have used the second isomorphism theorem"
this looks like global CFT and maybe Iwasawa theory? not sure about the latter
It's in Sharifi's notes on Iwasawa theory
I see
Sharifi generally has good notes
Yeah I'm enjoying them atm
we used his CFT partially in our ANT lectures and his group cohomology notes for the group cohomology seminar
00:55
I just skimmed over this and the sentence made me laugh though
nice
I'm gonna write to Venjakob tomorrow and see if he can suggest me some stuff to read about Iwasawa cohomology
01:09
howdy @Lukas @Edward
Hi @Ted
Grüß dich, @Ted
Vielen Dank, @Edward
01:24
:-)
01:38
Is anyone familiar with DFAs? I have a small question about one of their characteristics
Askaway
I was just wondering if when we have a DFA that accepts any language L1L2 and another DFA that accepts only L2 then could we make a new DFA using those two to accept L1 only?
also just to clarify, by a DFA that accepts L1L2 I mean a DFA that accepts the concatenation of the languages L1 and L2
is this what you mean by DFA?
01:54
Yes exactly
Are you familiar with that?
02:31
Under what conditions are zero divisors always nilpotent?
@Edward it's true for a local Artinian ring
if you assume that the ring is commutative, then this is true iff there is a unique minimal prime ideal
My first thought was that the nilradical is then the set of all zero divisors
e.g. $\mathcal{O}$ of a local field
I suppose that the first step to getting to "unique minimal prime ideal"
02:41
that doen't have any zero divisors, does it?
Oops, I mean an $\mathcal{O}$-algebra
not every $\mathcal O$-algebra will have this property. For example $\mathcal O\times \mathcal O$ doesn't
@Rithaniel if $ab$ is a zero-divisor, then $a$ and $b$ are zero divsiors. This shows that the nilradical is actually a prime ideal under this assumption. But as the nilradical is the intersection of all prime ideals, it must be the unique minimal prime ideal
Yep, pretty straight forward
If everything else is a unit, then you have a pretty interesting situation
durr I'm being dumb
I was wrong, I think, I can't show that having a unique minimal prime ideal implies that all zero-divisors are nilpotent
at least one implication holds
02:55
Is it possible to apply divergence theorem here?
$\nabla \times \vec{G}$ is continuoius. since $\vec{G}$ is smooth.
Is it possible to guarenteed the existance of continuous first partial derivatives of $\nabla \times \vec{G}$?
$k[x,y]/(xy,y^2)$ is a counterexample, the unique minimal prime ideal is $(y)$, but $x$ is a zero divisor that is not nilpotent
If it could be possible, then I could have apply divergence theorem.
@Unknownx clearly if $\vec{G}$ is smooth, the components of $\nabla \times \vec{G}$ will be smooth functions and have in particular continuous partial derivatives
@Lukas thanks for your efforts. I was just being dumb, but I guess I know something new now lol
@LukasHeger smooth means only first derivative continuous. right?
03:03
smooth means $C^\infty$, infinitely differentiable
is that the definition
?
okay.
thanks
03:56
@Unknownx Yes, you can use either Divergence or Stokes.
If only $C^1$, need Stokes. If $C^2$, then Divergence. Smooth means either.
123
123
Hi All..
 
1 hour later…
05:18
@robjohn thank you very much for citing your answer
@robjohn woah you gave three answers to that question!
Yes I am sometimes impatient but nowadays I am rarely getting answers here so I thought to ask somewhere else.
Seems like only a few people like analytic NT
Algebra questions get more answers here
@EdwardEvans elementary number theory is not necessary, and I don't see why it is useful. For example, apostol's book requires no elementary NT, and even says that it doesn't require that
05:35
Because it's the basis of literally all of number theory
you wouldn't start studying ANT if you didn't know what modular arithmetic is
Ah yes
But still
What I mean is: you don't need to study elementary number theory in depth to start studying more advanced number theory, but it's helpful and motivational
Yes
I think algebraic NT gets a but hard than analytic NT
(For me)
So it has more prerequisites
I have some books on advanced analytic and advanced algebraic NT. They're probably the hardest books ever written
that's
a bold sweeping statement to make
Opening their first page is the most demotivational thing. EVER
The advanced analytic NT book says that its "elementary" prerequisites are abstract harmonic analysis and other eredristkxtitdd subjects
Don't know about the "advanced" prerequisites
There is no use of humans if they can't solve RH after reading it
This is not hypocrisy. I am serious
05:45
you can't claim to be serious if you don't know what you're talking about
Please believe me. I know what I am talking about
You literally said you don't know about the advanced prerequisites. It wasn't meant disrespectfully.
I mean I didn't read them because I was frustrated after reading the elementary prerequisites. There were three pages of prerequisites
Haha finally convinced them that I am serious :p
Hey I recently found out that
$$\pi(x)\sim\frac{x}{\psi(x)}$$
06:21
You're making ridiculous statements, Euler. You have no clue.
Study all aspects of math and a lot of advanced books before you offer statements like that.
Ok
But what is ridiculous in that?
Wait for a year. I would have learned many aspects of math. You are right, @TedShifrin
Lol*2
Most of the people here are a lot smarter than me
They can surely understand that book
Or just older
Yes
In the case of age, most can be replaced by all
06:33
which is precisely why I "lolled" a second ago. One year is not a long time at all.
unless you're like Scholze or smth
One year goes very fast
Like 2020
You can't learn "many aspects of math" in one year
Man learning many aspects can take five years for me
Or ten
But I have much time
e x a c t l y
yo @user2103480
yo
Do you ever sleep
06:35
That's an advantage. I won't end up learning topology at the forties
wtf you can't repeat words
Why not
try typing Why not again
06:37
Why not again
weyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Sheeeeessssh
Ohhhh @EdwardEvans is teaching spamming
Just joking
good one
I think no one needs to teach me how to spam
06:38
So you are already a spammer?
I started early, just as you
If you heat up spam it almost tastes like Leberkäse
oh man I could go for a Leberkäse rn
I never spam. I make people think that I myself am a spam
06:39
People eat spam
People eat food
Unpleasant fact of the day
Leberkäse can be nicer than I'd like to admit though
my austrian ex-gf who now lives in the UK made it known to me that warm spam almost tastes like shitty Leberkäse from Rewe
06:40
@ed
Still swake or already awake again?
Käsleberkäs from Spar is amazing. Even better is Käsleberkäs from Sutterlüty. That's top qual Leberkäse
@EdwardEvans ........
I'm still awake
06:41
Edward Evans never sleeps. Just like math 55 students
I only know a german phrase to reflect my sentiment when I reas that she eats Rewe leberkäse
Die ist kein mensch
Math 55 is a two-semester long first-year undergraduate mathematics course at Harvard University, founded by Lynn Loomis and Shlomo Sternberg. The official titles of the course are Honors Abstract Algebra (Math 55a) and Honors Real and Complex Analysis (Math 55b). Previously, the official title was Honors Advanced Calculus and Linear Algebra. == Description == The Harvard University Department of Mathematics describes Math 55 as "probably the most difficult undergraduate math class in the country." Formerly, students would begin the year in Math 25 (which was created in 1983 as a lower-level Math...
Ein unmenschliches Wesen scheußlichster Art
@EdwardEvans but do you mean like "frischetheke" leberkäse or shelf leberkäse? And why am I starting to make supermarket leberkäse distinctions?
Frischetheke
06:43
Oh thats fine
There's a supermarket in Vorarlberg called Sutterlüty that genuinely serves the best Leberkäse in the universe
bold
Thought it was genuine shitty shelf leberkäse
Nah we bought some of that and cooked it and it tasted like fehlgeburt
not that I know what that tastes like
lmao understandable
@EdwardEvans a man's gotta try
Especially when something's done in a south park episode
5 messages moved to Trashcan
Just a sec, it's still early. Continue :)
06:55
Haha no worries and thanks
Finally, messages that really belonged to the trashcan
@NoName dismissed the mod flag, you can use standard r/a one for that...
You really should: They stack and if there's a bunch of em no mod is needed to handle them :)
Oh I see. Thanks.
@EdwardEvans "banter > morals" is the principle that makes it impossible for me to ever have a career in politics, at least for the spectrum of people that care about past remarls of politicians
My whole career could easily be derailed already on a communal level lmao
07:12
@user2103480 same tho
also, got leberkäse
@EdwardEvans proof that britons really lack taste
Or proof that you're drunk at 8am, choose
us
moment
I'd try to contribute something to the chat here but we really have 0 math to talk about
07:18
yeah I belong to an interesting area of mathematics
I belong to a funded area of mathematics
fair one
Yeah, would be more useful if I was good at a funded area
Still better than being no good in an unfunded area, eh?? lmao gottem
$\text{funded} \cap \text{interesting} =\emptyset ? $
@NoName I'mma go tell lurie his work is shite
07:26
I take it back.
07:53
Hey, please forgive me
I was just going to delete that
I have a good tongue twister
Song the ievan polka correctly
*sing
08:34
Hi, I read an article that said in the first paragraph the following:

Randomness is powerful. Think about a presidential poll: A random sample of just 400 people in the United States can accurately estimate Clinton’s and Trump’s support to within 5 percent (with 95 percent certainty), despite the U.S. population exceeding 300 million. That’s just one of many uses.

My question is: how did he know that from sample of 400 persons, then we can know with 95% certainty that 5% of the U.S. populations are supporting the ones who have the majority in the sample?
I have noticed that math has produced more prodigies than any subject. Why is it so?
@user777 oh to hell I accidentally flagged that I think
Sorry
I'm on my phone and it doesn't do what I want
I think it's inaccurate to take polling as an example
As we have seen two elections in a row
@user2103480 It is Okay!
You should be careful @user2103480
@user2103480 Lol I did that to Ted once, now I am dead to him
08:41
I think this assumes that our samples are actually distributed in the right fashion
If you say that the probability that someone votes trump is p, and the probability that someone votes clinton is 1-p
And you assume that you ask people in a way such that the probabilities of their respective answers have the same distribution
Becoming a mathematician takes ~7 years
Lol that means I can learn most branches at the age of about 20 if I follow that pace
@user2103480 So they made a mistake in their article
And at the age of 30...
Then, and this is a bit tricky if you haven"t seen it yet, you know that the normalized, shifted sum of the amount of people should be approximately normally distributed with variance equal to the variance of a bernoulli R.V. with parameter p (by the central limit theorem), and so you can estimate the parameter p from the answers of people pretty accurately, if our assumptions are right
@user777 they made the mistake of choosing a bad example. The mathematical principle is correct. If the assumption are right.
You can also go a less sophisticated way and say that the sum of bernoulli random variables is binomially distributed and then do some calculations with stirling's approximation
09:13
"Studying is fun and learning will be fast, if there were no exams and tests, and also rude teachers"
This is why can learn math very fast
there is no pressure on me so math is fun for me
a website says calculus 1 takes ~180 hours in college man I completed in 90 hours
I could have done faster
*not boasting, anyone can do that
weird sierpinski
09:55
@LeonhardEuler Are you 13?
lol yeah
gonna turn 14
nothing special in that
ok
@skullpatrol your edit is the best edit in the history of edits
moderators should be as kind as you
5
10:14
thnx, pal
 
2 hours later…
11:54
@Dubias nope, sorry
12:42
hey chat
Hello @LucasHenrique
say $C$ is any closed path in the complex plane and $f$ a continuous function. is it true that $\oint\limits_C f(z)\, \mathrm{d}z = 0 \implies \oint\limits_C f(z)^2\, \mathrm{d}z = 0$?
if $f$ is analytic it's clear. but I'm having trouble if that's not the case
What about something like $re^{i\theta} \mapsto r\cos \theta$ ?
And C the unit circle
does not satisfy the hypotheses. :(
Why not?
12:48
The closed integral is $i \pi$
the first one, I mean
huh?
@Astyx this function, restricted to the unit circle, is simply $\cos \theta$, isn't it?
Yes
So you're integrating cos over $[-\pi, \pi]$
and $\oint\limits_C f(z)\, \mathrm{d}z = \int\limits_0^{2\pi} i \cos \theta e^{i \theta}\, d \theta$
13:07
Ah yes you're right, I was thinking of |dz|
Sorry
yeah, my professor made up the question in a wrong way
he wanted a fixed function $f$ s.t. the closed integral is 0 for every path
thus analytic
in this case, the implication is obviously true
I need a counterexample, otherwise I won't get a full mark
(Even though... yeah, I didn't know any counterexample when I wrote that this implication is false lol)
Are you certain it's false? I'm very hazy but doesn't Morera imply it is true that f is analytic?
Oh I misunderstood your assumption.
if Morera hold, yes, $f$ is analytic. But in the original way he wrote the question, you simply fix a $C$, closed path. So the closed integral being 0 needs not to hold for all closed paths
Right exactly you fix C
I misread
that's my problem and sincerely, this teacher is an asshole. we're having this complex analysis course with the physics people and the best people from pure math have already gave up from it
it's not supposed to be a course that hard, the professor is just a beetlehead and doesn't care about the ridiculous results we're having
13:24
If a regular surface is diffeomorphic to S^2 then is it possible for the region on which $K\leq 0$ to have greater area than the region on which $K\geq 0$? $K$ is a Gaussian curvature
14:03
@love_sodam do you know Gauss-Bonnet?
Why does that help, @anakhro?
I don't think it does.
Take a standard pseudosphere. This has area $4\pi$. The base is a circle of radius $1$, let it go upwards for a long time until the waist is $\varepsilon > 0$, a very small number.
my intuition tells me it should be possible, no?
Cap it off at the base by a disk and at the top by a disk. You have a surface (with singularities) which has negative curvature area very close to $4\pi$ and zero curvature area very close to $\pi + \pi \varepsilon^2$
Then round off near the corners
You get some positive curvature but mostly negative curvature dominating
Yeah, @Thorgott, I think my example works
you just need small negative curvature in a lot of places and large positive curvature in a few places
14:08
Hello I am back again
Sorry for so many errors
@Thorgott <-- it helps get intuition for this, Balarka
This website is mainly saying that every branch of math is hard
@anakhro Yes. From that, I know that $\int\int_S K dA = 4\pi$
I came up with my example without thinking about Gauss-Bonnet.
One of the things I have learned about teaching is that students learn in more ways than I know how to teach.
14:11
you just internalized GB already
What works for one of us might not work for every student.
I also said what I said without GB in mind explicitly, but that's just cause GB has very intuitive content to an extent
OK, I found it more interesting to just try to come up with an answer to the question than making @love_sodam suffer :)
It's a cool question, wasn't clear how to build an explicit example.
the intuitive content is that if curvature goes down somewhere, it has to go up somewhere else
the unintuitive part is why on earth the total is the euler characteristic
I don't think helping someone figure out the question for themselves rather than giving them the answer is "making them suffer".
14:13
That was facetious. I didn't know the answer so I didn't feel qualified to guide them through the answer.
@BalarkaSen hey man, aren't you active on the h bar anymore?
@Thorgott Well the first thing I thought was GB but immediately discarded it because it didn't say anything explicit (though I like your high +ve curvature low area summary). Then I was thinking about capping off ends of a hyperboloid by spherical caps
Cuz if you are hyperbolic you expect area to grow very fast
And then you stop the thing after some time and cap it off.
But who knows what area of a hyperboloid of one sheet (truncated) is? Pseudosphere was obviously the right choice.
I was thinking of like denting in the pole of the sphere and then denting more and more in, but I don't think I can actually get a majority negative curvature that way
Yeah
Maybe you can if you wiggle around with those inward-tendrils
Get it to almost space fill
I thought it's impossible but suddenly people try to find counterexample
14:18
@love_sodam are you sort of following the ideas being mentioned?
Not really.
I gave an explicit example, maybe understanding that will help.
@love_sodam Thorgott mentioned "you just need small negative curvature in a lot of places and large positive curvature in a few places". Do you see how this idea sort of makes sense when you consider either Gauss-Bonnet or "diffeomorphic to the sphere"?
@NiharKarve Nope, I go there occasionally though
(Sorry, lost your message in the discussion above)
14:22
@love_sodam So how one can start is by trying to force this to be the case. That is, you want a large region with only slight negative curvature, then you want to add areas of harsh positive curvature.
That's kind of the intuition that's being worked out in the example Balarka gave. He starts with a portion of the pseudosphere, and then completes it to a surface that is diffeomorphic to the sphere with small enough positively curved caps.
It probably helps to look at a picture of a pseudosphere if you do not know what that is.
I know that
Do you know the area of the pseudosphere?
because the smaller the positive caps are, the more curved they are.
14:25
Also, what is the set it intersects the $xy$-plane in?
Well I know the Gaussian curvature of it
Yeah, that's a good summary @anakhro. Surprising I didn't think of it this way though
Most things are easier to reason in hindsight.
@love_sodam That's a good start. Find the area.
Now I should get back to my homework I suppose.
14:32
@BalarkaSen It's $2\pi$
$\gamma(t)=(sin(t),0,cos(t)+log(tan(t/2)))$ for $t\in(\pi/2,\pi)$
the generating curve of pseudosphere I have
Oh, my bad then. But still OK.
I was thinking of the doubled pseudosphere, which is $4\pi$. Thanks.
What's the base of the pseudosphere? Circle of radius $1$, am I correct?
What do you mean base
The pseudosphere abruptly stops in the $xy$-plane, right? It intersects the $xy$-plane on some subset -- what is that subset?
Does it intersect?
$sin(t)\neq 0$ on $t\in(\pi/2,\pi)$
Correct, but you can take a half-open interval.
It certainly "limits" to the $xy$-plane. What is in that limit?
14:41
unit circle you mean
Right.
When people draw the pseudosphere they draw a symmetrized version. The equator is what I am speaking of, along which the symmetrized surface has singularities. It's the unit circle.
In your version you just took the open upper half, the "upper hemisphere of the pseudosphere"
Yea my diff. geo. text is strange
It's ok, this convention varies text to text anyway.
So here is my plan. The surface above has curvature $-1$ everywhere, except the equator where it is singular. Area of the whole thing is $4\pi$
Sandwich this symmetric pseudosphere between the hyperplanes $z = -N$ and $z = N$ for some large $N \gg 0$
Chop off everything outside these hyperplanes. Add appropriate caps to the top and bottom so that you have a smooth surface there anyway
Finally, smoothen the equator. You can of course remove a very tiny cusp-like neighborhood of the equator and replace it by a spherical annulus.
This new surface is diffeomorphic to $S^2$. Agree?
The positive curvature pieces are the two spherical caps top and bottom and the spherical annulus at the equator. All of them have extremely small radius so they contribute nothing to the area.
But note that these pieces all have HIGH curvature. Because radius is small, they have curvature which is like $1/\varepsilon$. Massive!
Low area high positive curvature regions, high area low negative curvature region, as @Thorgott and @anakhro promised.
14:54
Yes I got it. Thanks :)
00:00 - 15:0015:00 - 00:00

« first day (3780 days earlier)      last day (1536 days later) »