« first day (3716 days earlier)      last day (1600 days later) » 
00:00 - 22:0022:00 - 00:00

22:07
Roughly in what area of mathematics would one usually encounter Clifford algebras first?
In a reasonably standard mathematical education
Mathematical particle physics ?
Or advanced quantum theory
I think that's where I heard of them
But of course it was a physics pov, not sure about a mathematical approach
Well that's where I've encountered them in physics, I was wondering from a pure mathemathical progression
yeah
Something like group representation theory
(maybe)
I'm wondering more pre-representation theory. That being said I don't really know enough to ask the question meaningfully perhaps
I am trying to determine what $Hom_{\Bbb{Z}}(\Bbb{Q},\Bbb{Z})$ is. I believe consists only of the trivial homomorphism. First note that any homomorphism is uniquely determined by its action on $1$. If $f(1) \neq 0$, then I believe you could show that $\Bbb{Q}$ is a cyclic group, which is absurd.
Does this sound right? Here's a sketch. Let $f : \Bbb{Q} \to \Bbb{Z}$ be a $\Bbb{Z}$-module homomorphism, and suppose that $f(1) \neq 0$. Then $f(x) = xf(1)$, and $\Bbb{Q}/ \ker f \cong \Bbb{Z}$, so $\Bbb{Q}/ \ker f$ is cyclic with generator $\overline{q_0}$. Let $x \in \Bbb{Q}$ be arbitrary. Then there exists $n_x \in \Bbb{Z}$ such that $x = n_x \overline{q_0}$ which holds if and only if $x - n_0 q_0 \in \ker f$ if and only if $0 = f(x- n_0 q_0) = (x - n_0 q_0) f(1)$.
Since $f(1) \neq 0$, it follows that $x = n_0 q_0$, which means $\Bbb{Q}$ is cyclic. This is a contradiction, so $f(1) = 0$.
22:19
Or Atiyah-Singer index theory/geometry ...
Look at Lawson/Michelson's beautiful book on spin geometry.
$f(1) = n$ implies $2f(1/2n) = 1$ which is absurd if $n\ne 0$
Oh, that's easier...Is what I wrote correct though?
You mean $\bar x$ at some point, but yes
22:38
Oh, yeah...whoops. Thanks!
There are two different formulas for the MGF of a Negative Binomial Distribution on Wikipedia, one on the Negative Binomial Distribution page, the other on the MGF page. They don't seem to be algebraically identical. Is one of them wrong?
what are the two formulas?
22:56
The two right hand sides here: i.imgur.com/uiREOUE.png The graph demonstrates that they aren't algebraically equivalent.
$$y'' + y' -xy = 0$$
I tried the power series approach (limited by the question to use this approach)
but it has a too complicated 3 term recurrence relation
However, the author has also provided this information: $y_1(0) = 1, y_1'(0) = 0 ; y_2(0) = 0, y_2'(0) = 1$. How do I utilize it?
@Charlie What's the real question here? Just why mathematicians would care? Most don't
00:00 - 22:0022:00 - 00:00

« first day (3716 days earlier)      last day (1600 days later) »