« first day (3408 days earlier)      last day (1907 days later) » 

00:30
Hello people
The lying over theorem says that A is a subring of B, with B integral over A, then every prime ideal of A is contraction of some prime ideal in B.
Is a more general statement true? If $f : A \to B$ is an integral homomorphism, then, is every prime ideal of $A$ contraction (under $f$) of some prime ideal of $B$?
$f$ being integral homomorphism means that $B$ is integral over $f(A)$.
More precisely, if $\mathfrak{p}$ is a prime ideal of $A$, then is $\mathfrak{p} = \mathfrak{q}^c = f^{-1}(\mathfrak{q})$, where $\mathfrak{q}$ is some prime ideal of $B$?
00:57
well $f^{-1}(\mathfrak{q})$ is always a prime ideal of $A$ at least
lol
This Materials Modeling stack exchange is currently ranked number 1 in Area51 in terms of its progress: area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/122958/materials-modeling…. Let's support our neighbours that are using mathematics to model materials!
01:12
@ÍgjøgnumMeg yeah. But we're asking about the converse. Is every prime ideal of $A$ is of that form.
The lying over theorem (See Theorem 5.10 in A&M) states that this is true for the special case when $f$ is the inclusion map, $A \hookrightarrow B$.
@ÍgjøgnumMeg bist du hier?
@ÍgjøgnumMeg ich habe mein Prof gefraget
uber $x^p - px^{p-1} + (np+1)p$
Was hat er gesagt? :D
he found a paper that linked to another paper
and that's the end of the story
01:21
np^2 + 1 oder?
it's (np+1)p, I messed up
Ah nice :)
not that it makes any difference :P
so it's a mystery now
and maybe you can publish a paper if you figure out why it's galois :P
weird
steals
Howdy, @ÍgjøgnumMeg and @Leaky
01:23
Hiya @Ted :)
@TedShifrin bonsoir
@ÍgjøgnumMeg have you learnt Dirichlet's theorem of prime?
Going through some elementary observations on the $\Gamma$ function
primes in arithmetic progression?
I saw a proof on it in the course on $L$-functions that I thought was very cool
what's it?
I can't quite remember the full proof but it essentially boiled down to showing that a certain divergent sum would converge if only finitely primes of the relevant form existed
which I thought was very nice lol
(as in, the sum was known to be divergent but could be shown to be convergent under the assumption that only finitely many primes of the form $a + kd$ existed, or something equally handwavy)
@AkivaWeinberger But you should listen to God's talk
"What is Manifolds?"
01:32
Whose?
Gromov :3
@BalarkaSen wow you're here also
I am always here
Greetings, a @Balarka
@BalarkaSen wanna play?
01:36
Hi @Ted!
@LeakyNun Alright. Not in a great shape, but I can try
Send me a link
Hey there, old man DogAteMy!
@BalarkaSen there must be a bug
01:37
because some other anonymous player also can't start with white
Some connection problem
so I must be white
Maybe I'll sign in and send you a friend req
ok sure
What was your username again lol
01:42
@BalarkaSen ChEsSn0oBz
Of course :P
Makes perfect sense.
Shouldn't have started with Scandinavian, I don't know the first thing about it lmao
Scandinavian is a language?
I thought Scandinavia was a region ....
An opening rather
01:44
@TedShifrin how far do you usually get in G&P in a semester (4 months)?
LOL, oh.
I did pretty much the whole book, but I did certain things differently, like the Poincaré-Hopf Theorem. I also covered Mayer-Vietoris for deRham cohomology and did examples.
I was writing out notes for this class on it and I realized most of the substance occurs in the exercises and explanations. The actual number of theorems isn't actually as many as I have seen in other courses.
I thought 200 pages warranted 2 semesters, but writing out just statements, it definitely seems like 1 semester as you teach it.
I wrote a number of extra problems, too (some more advanced for grad students), because I felt that Guillemin gave away too many hints. The one problem he needed to give hints was the one constructing path lifting of maps $S^1\to S^1$.
I also did the explicit example of the Hopf map $S^3\to S^2$ every time and showed them that fibers linked.
$\pi_1(S^1)$ is surprisingly hard to calculate.
Well, it was ridiculous that on that one he didn't give any hints.
Did I send you my G&P homeworks, a @Balarka?
Years ago, of course.
01:49
Yup
I remember the problem on parallelizability of products of spheres.
@BalarkaSen did you read G&P?
Thought so. Just haven't made you do all the complex geometry exercises yet :P
Could someone please help me figure out this one
0
Q: Estimating number of people who selected a specific shape

DemCodeLinesLet's say we have 4 shapes (triangle, square, rectangle and circle) and 50 people are each asked to pick 1 of the four shapes. Based on statistics, it is said that half of the people (25) will select a triangle and the number of people who select a rectangle is twice the number who choose square....

@anakhro Yeah
@BalarkaSen I guess I am late to the game then. :P
01:51
@DemCodeLines: Is this really statistics, or is it a basic algebra problem? I can't tell.
Never late to read a good book
I also gave you the exercise that a $C^k$ retract is always a $C^k$ submanifold when $k\ge 1$. That is still a cool exercise.
@TedShifrin It's from a Data Science problem set, which is why I labeled it as Stats
I know absolutely no statistics, @DemCodeLines.
@TedShifrin Yeah, constant rank theorem is an A+ theorem
01:52
I originally solved it without using that theorem. Just from the submersion theorem.
I like that he doesn't opt for the modern notation and so you actually get to prove things rather than just learn a bunch of notation.
$SO(2)$ everyone here
Shout out to everyone here
@DemCodeLines: So there are approximations, obviously. If we chase through the facts, we have 25 triangles, 15 rectangles, 5 circles, 5 squares, adding up to 50. But we don't have 15=2(5).
So you're supposed to do some sort of data analysis. I dunno what.
@anakhro: I'm a big believer that one should learn diff top (including transversality) and just do submanifolds of $\Bbb R^n$, not worrying about all the abstract chart/diff structure stuff until later.
I tried using simple algebra, but lost it on 2(7.5) = 15, which makes no sense
Bob
Bob
Are questions related to the Black-Scholes model on topic for math stack exchange?
01:56
Right, @DemCodeLines. Leave that one for last and you get what I got. But you're presumably supposed to do some statistical stuff to make a meaningful answer. That's beyond me.
@Bob: For the main site, sure. Mathematical finance is becoming reasonably common. It's just that we (most of us?) don't know any of it.
@Bob I think Economics S.E. would be better don't you think?
@TedShifrin do you have any hidden gems of books that do things with the modern notation (that you'd suggest after G&P)?
I never really liked either of the Lees' books, and Tu is okay, but kind of slow. I think I will probably pick up Bott & Tu next semester for fun.
No, @anakhro. I like Boothby, Spivak, and the world loves Lee (his books seem too wordy to me, but I don't know them well).
Bob
Bob
I tired quantitative finance a while back but I did not get a good answer
I taught my own graduate courses doing an amalgamation of my own thing (more with differential forms and vector bundles, because of my complex geometry bias), but certainly followed Boothby and Spivak in places.
02:00
I like Spivak, but I am surprised you find Lee wordy but like Spivak.
I suppose Spivak tries to use his words to convey something, whereas Lee is variable.
Bob
Bob
thanks and good night
Guten nacht Bob
Yeah, certainly, over 5 volumes, Spivak is very wordy.
Is there a particular volume you liked?
I have used 1, 2, 3, and 5 the most.
02:03
Matsumura was fun, but Federer was like playing tennis on a sunny day
For things like Gauss Bonnet, I prefer to teach characteristic classes the way Chern developed them, and do stuff with Schubert cycles in Grassmannians ... rather than the "modern" approach.
Is 4 the Riemannian one?
3 is definitely Riemannian. 4 does lots of PDE stuff.
Oh I see.
Does he ever do symplectic structures in any volume? I know his physics book does.
Arnold's PDE book is very good and even does the relevant contact stuff.
No, he discusses that (along with complex geometry, etc.) at the end of Volume 5 where he talks about various avenues of future exploration.
02:11
For complex geometry do you have suggestions for favourite literature? Or do you prefer your own notes for that?
@Leaky what's the link for the paper you were talking about?
@anakhro: Chern's little book, Ronnie Wells's complex manifolds book, and, of course, Griffiths/Harris. People nowadays like Huybrechts and deMailly.
Did you ever consider writing a textbook on complex geometry, or were you satisfied with the notes for your classes?
I should look into Arnold's PDE once
02:28
@Leaky doesn't that theorem show that $K^g/\Bbb Q_p$ is Galois? lol
Oh sorry
that's the Galois closure
rofl
#beingabletoread
Can somebody help me how to solve frobenius method
Frobenius might be able to help.
turns to the grave of Frobenius.
0
Q: Solving using Frobenius method

Aladdin $2x^2y''-xy'+(x-5)y=0$ I know how to solve using power series but I am not able to understand the Frobenius method. Can somebody do the solution in a basic manner so that I can understand how to solve this.

02:42
@BalarkaSen wow SF says Qc3 instead of Rf7
Oh fuck
Nice
Didn't see that at all
@BalarkaSen I still don't see why
But see, it was winning for you because you had more queen side pawns
@LeakyNun I think queen checks, you move your king, then Rf7
then what
you have to take the rook with the queen otherwise it's mate
02:46
it isn't
24. Qc3+ Kh6 25. Re3 g4 26. Rf7 Qg5 27. h3 Qh4 28. Qd4 Rh8 29. Kg2 c5 30. Qg7+
Re3? You mean Qe3?
I just copied the line
oh wait you wanted Rf7
ah ok then it's R v Q
02:50
cool
This stuff is too hard
chess is hard
How do people even play man
I would love to play again, but I have assignments
I have to sleep!
02:50
you should
Also I think I'm done for today lmao
Good games, both
You play really well
03:04
My phone is charging but somehow the batter life is going down
It was like at 10% and now that I put it to charge it shows it's at 1%???
turn the cable around
or hang the phone under the laptop so the electricity flows down under gravity
#PhySiCs
Lmao my phone is charging the charging point
you're putting energy into the grid man
Altruist
so that's how they steal electricity
when you think you're charging your device, no, it's a government conspiracy
your device is charging the electricity supply
03:08
There's a big vat of electricity sitting underground in the capital
just filling up with electricity
stolen from people using their charge cable the wrong way
this is how electricity works right
its capitalism bro
we're powering the computers in wallstreet
Hmm so I'm thinking about why $\Gamma(z)$ is holomorphic on the open right half plane
by defining $f_n(z) := \int_{\frac{1}{n}}^n t^{z-1}e^{-t}dt$
showing these guys converge on the closures of open balls in the right half plane I guess
$f_n \to f$ obviously
yeah, uniform limit of hol. functions on compact domains is hol.
and the $f_n$ are holomorphic obviously
so I just need to show that $f_n \to f$ uniformly on those closed balls
sounds right
03:12
$f - f_n$ is just a tail of the Gamma function which I've just shown converges absolutely on all of the right half plane
I think?
actually its $\int_0^{\frac{1}{n}} +$ tail of the Gamma function
but that guy on the left is gonna go to 0 as $n\to \infty$
how barbaric
to use $z$
rofl
you'd prefer $s = \sigma + i\tau$
no!
it's $s = \sigma + it$
I think Riemann used $\sigma + i\tau$ and Riemann is bae
$\Gamma(k)$ with $k = \Sigma + j\Xi$
$\displaystyle \left| \int_0^\infty t^{s-1} e^{-t} \ \mathrm dt \right| \le \int_0^\infty t^{\sigma-1} e^{-t} \ \mathrm dt \le \int_0^\infty t^{N-1} e^{-t} \ \mathrm dt = (N-1)!$ for $1 \le \sigma < N$
this achieves nothing wait
03:18
@ÍgjøgnumMeg Yeah it's just Weierstrass' M-test. If each term of a sum or integral is bounded then the sum or integral converges uniformly.
Nise one
oh this achieves something
this should tell you that the tails are uniformly vanishing lol
maybe not
but the idea is that you can bound it by one integral
one integral to rule them all
Yeah, your inequality, but just applied to the tail integrals instead
$\int \infty$
yeah
the fact that $\int_0^\infty t^{N-1} e^{-t} \ \mathrm dt$ is finite means that the tails go to 0
so yeah that's how you prove it @ÍgjøgnumMeg
03:20
The holomorphy?
the Morphy
The hol got-damn morphy
I got a fun exercise to do tomorrow
03:22
Prove that the Poincaré series of fixed weight form a basis for the cusp forms of that weight
@Leaky what was Morphy's defense again
just Ruy Lopez?
@BalarkaSen according to wiki it's 3... a6 in Ruy Lopez
but I don't play the Ruy Lopez lol
most people just take the knight after that lol
messy pawn structure
03:24
> In the Exchange Variation, 4.Bxc6, (ECO C68–C69) White damages Black's pawn structure, giving him a ready-made long-term plan of playing d4 ...exd4 Qxd4, followed by exchanging all the pieces and winning the pure pawn ending. Max Euwe gives the pure pawn ending in this position (with all pieces except kings removed) as a win for White.[8] Black gains good compensation, however, in the form of the bishop pair, and the variation is not considered White's most ambitious, though former world champions Emanuel Lasker and Bobby Fischer employed it with success
yeah
I should read some book or something once in a while
I wanted to read Nimzowitsch's "My System"
but my blind chess playing friend said its trash lol
I tried to read it but maybe it wasn't very suitable for me
"Nigel Short has claimed that 'My System' should be banned."
lol
03:28
lmao
talking about Short have you watched his famous game
the 7 games against "Bobby"?
the king march
yeah crazy
the opponent was like "what are you doing with your king"
and when he found out, it was too late
lmao
that had to be some engine dude tho
03:30
what's more interesting is that engines have a hard time recognizing this
I tried once, it took some time before announcing Kh2 as the best move with eval +5
and then once Kh2 is played, the eval goes up to +15
04:00
I really enjoyed that Elder album you suggested, thanks @BalarkaSen
I really enjoyed that Elder album you suggested, thanks @BalarkaSen
Any other recommendations?
@TedE Like Elder specifically, or something else?
They have a new EP which I also like
"Gold and Silver Sessions"
Very different, stylistically
Anything else, what are your favourite bands (of that style, or any other)?
Hmm
I am into a lot of loud stuff so I am not sure how you'll like them since you're more into soft/progressive stuff
What is your favorite Opeth album? :P
I can lead you somewhere from there maybe
HeRiTaGe
04:15
yaaas
Remarkable album I don't know why people don't like it as much
Not a clue, I love it
Heritage, Watershed, Blackwater Par
k
I can't tell you what I like the best but if I were to list down what I listen to most frequently then
Damnation, Blackwater Park and Still Life
Ah Ending credits is one of my favourite songs to play
rofl
It's great
I also like In My Time Of Need
I haven't actually listened to Heritage :O. I like 'My arms, your hearse', and blackwater park most probably
wow 134 weeks ago
@TedE Ok so you actually do like heavier stuff
Cool @ÍgjøgnumMeg
Some of it for sure yeah
I can reco you some atmospheric black metal
04:22
Sounds good :D
Eldamar's cover of Land of the Dead by Summoning
Ulver "Bergtatt", Agollach "The Mantle", Drudkh "Autumn Aurora"
My top 3 albums
Bergtatt is a masterpiece
Eldamar is great
Do you know Winterfylleth?
04:24
I'll check all these out, thanks :D. I've actually heard Agalloch's Marrow of the Spirit and enjoyed it
Nope, checking it out
wait
Check out
Led Astray in the Forest Dark
by Winterfylleth
You will know this song hehe
@ÍgjøgnumMeg Isn't that like the title of Chapter I in Bergtatt
it is indeed lol
Oh ok it is a cover
04:27
the song is an English translation tribute by Winterfylleth lol
04:39
@ÍgjøgnumMeg This is pretty good!
@Balarka yeah, Green Cathedral is a great song, very long tho :P I saw these guys live in the UK and they were great
You guys listen to scary music lol
Yeah we're followers of anti-Christ
TrveKvlt
We go about our day riding a bike at 120 km/h through mountain passes, burning Churches and listening to heavy metal
04:41
Hahahaha
Translation: Valfar gets caught in a snow storm on the way home from seeing his mum and fucking dies
lmao
black metal ist krieg bro
Nargaroth all the way
its no joke
I actually haven't listened to Nargaroth in ages
youtube.com/watch?v=vOLtRdSg6eE Trve German Black Metuhhhllll
04:44
Seven Tears are Flowing To The River is my favorite song from that album itself
A fine song
Oh btw, I saw Mayhem live the other day
Oh damn
I gotta say
it was kinda lame
Gaahl's wyrd were much better
I haven't actually listened to too much Mayhem
I like the lore
some of their old songs are cool but most of it is boring music
04:45
you know Necrobutcher said he wanted to kill Euronymous lol
rofl
I was on my way to kill Euronymous too
Did you watch Lords of Chaos?
Nope
Is it any good
it's quite good
the actor who plays Varg is lame
04:46
I shall check it out
but the film itself is great
nobody can play Varg I mean come on
Louisss Cacheeet
yeah he's a character lol
Oh man I have become very fast at computing class groups for quadratic fields
at least for small square free integers
rofl
what's the class group of Q(sqrt(147))
04:50
heh its not trivial according to
lol lemme just check that all the primes of $\Bbb Z[\sqrt{147}]$ lying over primes less than 13
ha nice
2 ramifies, 3 ramifies, 7 ramifies
How do you actually compute the class number in practice?
5 is inert
minkowski bound or something
oo 11 splits
fuck
04:53
damn
@Ted you compute the Minkowski bound, and then you only need to check the orders of ideal classes of prime ideals lying over primes less than the Minkowski bound
this is kinda mechanical and easy for quadratic fields but often relies on finding solutions to Pell-like equations
which can be a pain in the ass
I tricked you actually
although there are algorithms to solve those so
147 is 3 * 7^2
04:56
sry
okay so actually I'm computing the ideal class group of $\Bbb Z[\sqrt{21}]$
nah wait, 21 is 1 mod 4
damn boi u hurt me
lol rip
actually that makes it easier
cuz.. the minkowski bound is like.. less than 3
just need to check that $a^2 - 21b^2 = 2$ has a solution
I guess
which it does not
04:58
how so? since its 1 mod 4 the norm is not that right
I actually think you can still take that

« first day (3408 days earlier)      last day (1907 days later) »