Is it just finitely generated as an algebra? If so presumably the point is that you can just list a generating set, some are transcendental and others are algebraic
And if you have an algebraic element, it'll generate a finite extension, so if you have finitely many such elements, still gonna generate a finite extension
Lmao Adeek people are interested in different things, some folk just like subjects more than they do geometry
So basically you have an algorithm for doing that. You have a generating set. Let $\alpha_1$ be some transcendental guy over $\mathbb{Q}$, let $\alpha_2$ be transcendental over $\mathbb{Q}(\alpha_1)$, keep going
Since it's finitely generated that terminates at some $\alpha_T$
@ÍgjøgnumMeg algebra, number theory and logic are in the same area so the more courses I take in one of the three the less credits I have left for the others, but I can probably do one or two courses in algebraic geometry or something
@Daminark well you have a mandatory minimum number of credits in each of the three areas you pick, plus 30 credits for the thesis, so this is also an upper bound unless you want to do 12000 courses and graduate with more than 120 credits
That makes sense, yeah, probably helps to have both down to a degree. On the other side I should probably learn some geometry. At least AG, not knowing it made dealing with elliptic curves mildly tricky
(Basically I wonder whether the theorem is important in the way that Sard is important or not, extremely useful statement that gets applied everywhere the proof is a one-shot)
@Rudi_Birnbaum no but yesterday we heard some so as I was getting surrounded by thunderstorms I had to turn back even though I was 5 minutes away from the goal and then for the next 2 hours we ran / slipped aaaall the way down and once there it turned out the bridge had been destroyed and we had to be rescued by the firefighters, it was a rough day
there was an article in the local news too but it's behind a paywall
imagine climbing 1100 meters up and down and then being told "oh now you have to climb this hill and someone will be waiting for you on the other side"
@G.Ünther yeah. I suspect the fuzziness is due to numerical errors piling up in the initial condition, even when I set it to 0.5. The code is the same code you use to plot me the sine map system
I am not sure if that can be plotted without going fuzzy. If that can be done, it will definitely show the structure within the chaotic region more clearly