« first day (2800 days earlier)      last day (2518 days later) » 

19:27
@TedShifrin Ohhh… I forgot to multiply the residue by $2\pi i$.
(@GFauxPas)
That'll do it
What's the repeated idea of quotients of the for $I/I^2$ from
e.g. like the cotangent space definition
I just saw another construction that used the ideal of nilpotent functions for I and again another thing pops out as this quotient.
I dunno
What have you been up to @MikeMiller ?
Still in the writing process?
19:42
I will never finish
Writing a talk for Friday now
Graduate time dilation: It doesn't take forever, but it sure as hell feels like it.
Heh.
@MikeMiller I was wondering if you think Ko Honda would receptive to emails about his notes on contact topology.
I am always wary about emailing professors from different universities about what they write. I don't want to be a pest.
He's on a sabbatical anyways, I hear.
Whats the correct way of saying that: 2/3 is twice more favorable outcomes that 1/2? As 1/2 = 1 or 0 and 2/3 is 1 or 1 or 0. My english failed to formulate this tricky sentence
@anakhronizein Maybe, I don't know. My money is he would be slow to respond.
19:57
Most professors are.
Hi Daminark, how are you?
I'm doing alright, how about you?
20:04
is the underlined trivial?
I need to know quick:p
If it is not obvious to you that it is trivial, then it is not trivial.
I have to hand in questions about the text
but I don't know if this is trivial
I don't see it now
I don't want to hand in a stupid question:p
Lol this reminds of one time in office hours last year for analysis, someone asked why we were allowed to use Besicovitch in a proof from class, and at the time we couldn't figure it out. 2 hours later I was walking down the hall, passed my professor, and she was like "Wait turns out it was trivial!"
In this case it legitimately was, we just had to do it on bounded sets
@TedShifrin Only because I have left the chat
I shall return soon
Like Jesus did
Sorry too much Eurocentrism on my part I guess
I take that back
dat balarka
20:22
@Balarka the cure to eurocentrism is characterizing the "big pieces of Lipschitz graph" property using projections
@Dami so you don't see it right away either?
then I'll just include this question:p
Well I'm not sure of the notation even
lol bro
that is standard notation I believe
But the neighborhood around that sentence doesn't quite imply the underlined bit to me
I'm not sure what $\chi'$ and $\Delta(G)$ are
chi ia colour number, prime means line graph, delta means maximum degree
is*
20:29
Never heard of line graph
So gimme a sec
well edge colouring
but you've reassured me:p
oh my project partner just explained it
alright so nvm
But the thing is you'd need a lower bound of some kind
Oh huh
haha yea I have to go now, I'm changing trains
Zee
Zee
21:02
Can you take a Cartesian product of a set X and an empty set? What’s the result
Just X ?
The elements of a Cartesian product are pairs (x,y) where x is an element of X and y is an element of Y
If Y is empty there are no such pairs
So the product is the empty set
Zee
Zee
It’s seems more like a convention than a logical conclusion but ok
Thanks
Dunno what there strikes you as convention
It's perfectly logical
Zee
Zee
I mean the empty set is also an Elena of y
21:14
In mathematics and logic, a vacuous truth is a statement that asserts that all members of the empty set have a certain property. For example, the statement "all cell phones in the room are turned off" will be true whenever there are no cell phones in the room. In this case, the statement "all cell phones in the room are turned on" would also be vacuously true, as would the conjunction of the two: "all cell phones in the room are turned on and turned off". More formally, a relatively well-defined usage refers to a conditional statement with a false antecedent. One example of such a statement is...
Zee
Zee
So you get (x,empty ) = x
The empty set is not an element of the empty set. It's a subset of the empty set (the only subset)
The empty set by definition has no elements
The empty set is by definition the only set with no elements.
Zee
Zee
The empty set is an element of any set
21:15
No. Is a subset of any set.
Zee
Zee
Fine
Am just annoyed empty X set = empty
I think empty X set = set
Are you also annoyed that zero times any number is zero?
Zee
Zee
No
That's what you get when you measure the cardinalities, so you should not be annoyed by this either
Zee
Zee
Alright
Although zero times number is about measures not cardinals
21:43
TACO
How is everyone?
Zee
Zee
21:58
Good , How are you
Gtg though
22:51
Tacocat @Faust
I like that "cat attack" is a palindrome phonetically (even if not orthographically)
Phonemically
rehi DogAteMy ... hi, @Faust
@Ted how's it going
rehi Eric.
Hi everyone!
23:06
hi @Shaun, whoever you be.
I'm studying for a PhD in Combinatorial Group Theory and, lately, I'm finding it difficult to stay motivated :/
All Ph.D. students go through waves of frustration, lack of motivation, and excitement and progress.
3
It's a beautiful area to work on though.
See? That sounds positive :)
Our resident more algebraic people aren't around at the moment.
what is combinatorial group theory
23:08
i like algebra its just that i know nothing
You like most things, @Faust ... well, maybe you hate analysis.
Combinatorial group theory studies groups via their presentations.
@TedShifrin lol you know me so well =)
o i thought that was like the historical term for geometric group theory
I think geometric group theory is more interaction with topology.
23:10
@TedShifrin you have any second course in linear algebra exercises or old tests?
@TedShifrin hence the historical
I've never taught that course, literally, @Faust. I taught a lot of the material in the Artin algebra course, but that was way before LaTeX and I don't have old materials.
there was a time before LaTeX?
Alegedly
allegedly?
word
I typed everything on old fashioned typewriters, yup.
23:12
O.o
yeah i come from the generation that doesnt really understand how to use the mail or cheques
I still remember typing my thesis on a Hermes 3000. I loved that typewriter, but NO math symbols.
Indeed, @Faust, or much else :P
i know how to use both those things and im p sure im younger than you Faust
LOL, Eric.
i dont know how to use eithier
not important why learn
I still use both, rarely, but occasionally.
23:14
it's not so much a thing you learn as when you do it once it's so simple that it's hard to forget how to do it
With dementia, one forgets most things, Eric.
you'll find a need to use checks soon enough
i tried to mail a letter once, mailed it to myself
as soon as you start cursing out your landlord
23:15
Heya @Antonios :)
hows it going
i have a question which perhaps you might be able to help with?
i concede that it's not really a thing that matters if you have the power of google on your side
yeah i moved out of my grandparents and bought my first place when i was 18 now i have 5 properties dont think its likely ima ever gunna have a landlord. also i accept email transfers cause its not the the 1800's
lol ok
my landlord's dog is really cute
23:17
congrats on your 5 properties mate the rest of us will be coping with the world around us
@Faust will be our next slumlord.
I haven't met my new landlord.
@TedShifrin no way i may buy destroyed places but i always renovate them myself to like new condition. if you make a place nice its easier to keep good tenants
Here's what I'm stuck on: I'm reading a proof and the author claims that to construct an isomorphism of locally constant sheaves on $X$ its sufficient to work on an open covering $\{U_i\}$ of $X$ and show the isomorphism on each open.
Sure thing. I think my new landlord is happy to have me, even though I'm making him pay for a new microwave after only a week. :)
Once I have this, the proof is fairly simple.
23:19
@Antonios-AlexandrosRobotis sheaf axioms?
its not true for general sheaves
or at least not as far as I can tell
Um ...
sheaves can be locally isomorphic but not globally
Have I made an obvious error ? :P
@TedShifrin its all a write off, you shouldnt cook too much food with a microwave though
Trust me, @Faust. I know what I'm doing with cooking.
23:21
you've never invited me over for dinner so i wouldn't know :P
Hello nerds
Hi Demonark
You're better off asking that on the main site, @Antonios-AlexandrosRobotis
morning polarbear
yeah probly @Shaun
23:23
@Daminark yo what did marianna do today my brain hurt so i didnt listen super hard
1
Q: Find an inner product.

FaustSuppose V is a vector space over $\Bbb C$ (without an inner product), and that $T \in \mathcal L (V )$ is diagonalizable. Prove that there exists an inner product $\langle ·, · \rangle $ on V such that, with respect to this inner product, T is normal. My original thought is well we have $T= U D...

No, @Shaun, we have people who can handle it here.
But I'm trying to do six things at once.
@TedShifrin does my argument make sense?
im trying to avoid doing any work...
uniqueness of inverses is ftw
Anyway, as I was saying, I'm struggling with my motivation; a couple of supervisor meetings ago my supervisor said I should be studying at least 5 hours a day but I'm only doing about one if I'm lucky :/
@EricSilva Damn, sorry. So, we talked about cross ratio, reflections, and classified automorphisms of the unit disk
23:25
also can someone explain what the difference between and unitary matrix and an isometry is?
Specifically, they're all of the form $c\frac{z-z_0}{z\overline{z_0} - 1}$ for some $z_0 \in B(0,1)$ and $|c| = 1$
ok so i missed good stuff but nothing i havent seen before cool
Yeah, one hour a day won't cut it. I probably averaged 8-10 in grad school.
@Shaun sounds like the motivation problem im having right now dont want to do anything cause im sick
@Faust: Still sick? Ugh. An isometry of $\Bbb C^n$ that fixes the origin is unitary. But you can have a translation.
23:27
There was a homework problem. Show that two points are symmetric about a circle/line iff any other circle/line going through them is orthogonal to the first
how can i tell when an isometry is a unitary then? @TedShifrin
i didnt know i was working with translations
Does it fix the origin? ... This is a rather important theorem — that any isometry that fixes the origin must be linear.
What's your definition of isometry?
but if $T\in \mathcal L (V) $ its always fixes the origin
So it's a linear map that's an isometry.
Then it must be unitary, yes. That's a real theorem.
Well, no, it's easy.
its easy
just me being silly thanks
23:28
Usually, the hard part is deducing linearity.
@Antonios: The crucial thing is why locally-defined things glue to make something global in the first place. So the question needs a bit more precision.
@Daminark hmmmmmmm
Diagonalizable is OP
I know, @TedShifrin. It's particularly odd because I've been wanting to do a PhD for many years now. The main problem, I guess, is that, a few months ago, my results were superseded by the work of some American mathematician, so I had to change topics (within CGT). This new topic is much more difficult than the last.
it just gives you everything you want almost always
@TedShifrin actually I may have answered my own question. I'll let you know.
23:30
OK, @Antonios. Happy to chat when it's calmer :)
okay! I'll be tabbed out working on this but ping me if need be.
@Shaun: That's never fun. If you actually had a definitive result, it might still have been publishable even if someone else did it simultaneously.
I'm sorry to hear that you're sick, @Faust :/
I been sick since the end of February nothing new sadly was told to drop all my classes but im still taking a couple feeling really half assed and unmotivated despite loving mathematics :(
@TedShifrin Nah, I'd only worked on it for a fee of months - I got a few preliminary lemmas but nothing publishable.
23:34
Anyway i hope you find your motivation @Shaun
Thank you, @Faust.
*few
Damn predictive text . . .
Gotcha Shaun. Well, maybe you can understand that person's work and delve into it a bit tangentially.
Is it often that people get sniped in publishing?
In hot fields, it happens, Demonark. One reason I never worked on the most trendy stuff :P
@TedShifrin Depression is 6x higher in PhD students than the general public, too.
23:37
Ouch, that's definitely no fun. Not working on trendy stuff is probably a good idea
@MikeMiller thats not surprising lots of studies suggest that theirs a correlation between high intelligence and mental illness.
i think it has more to do with academia being trash than people being smart
2
@EricSilva life just sucks being a student is wonderful compared to my old job
@MikeM: Is that across all fields?
I'll certainly look into it, @TedShifrin; I don't know if I could allude to it in my current topic as it's completely different. (I'm now trying to establish the Tits Alternative for a certain class of cyclically presented groups.)
23:39
@Faust grad students arent just students
@Faust Life sucks, says guy with 5 properties
I'm just suggesting that because you already had gotten into that sort of question, @Shaun. But your supervisor would obviously know better than I. When I did research, it was in complex differential geometry and some classical projective algebraic geometry.
@MikeM: No need for that language.
Thank you.
@TedShifrin I left a comment on the GMT question you linked that's a little more helpful than the guy who linked Federer's Amazon page.
@MikeMiller i grew up in a family thats was as dysfunctional as possible whole family has substance abuse and abuse problems, my mother had severe drug problems mental illness she used to beat the living crap outta me just for fun, i have 6 different learning disability including autism and no one gave me anything in my life i had to work for everything i have.
yes life sucks and yes i was lucky enough that my grandparents took me away from my mother but i can defiantly say that it is true that life sucks but its better than not existing so you might as well make the best of the time you have here cause its all you get.
I've got to go. (It's late here.) Thank you for listening :)
23:45
good night and good luck

« first day (2800 days earlier)      last day (2518 days later) »