« first day (2598 days earlier)      last day (2720 days later) » 

04:00
@Dodsy 1. the square root of -1 is not > 0; 2. the square root of 0 is not > 0
what's the square root of zero?
what's the square root of -1?
the square root of zero is zero
the square root of -1 is undefined in the reals
so, what's your point?
I was talking about the reals.
as you can see above.
you said the square root of any real number must be > 0
i'm just pointing out that the square root of any real number doesn't have to be define; and even if it's defined, it can be = 0
if I forgot a line under my > sign, then you are being quite pedantic to suggest that my entire statement was wrong
and no, you aren't just saying
04:04
you don't have to interpret every statement maliciously
04:23
@Semiclassical best place to sketch a graph
if you can't use desmos/wolfram alpha/etc
then by hand is pretty much what's left to you
G={5,15,25,35} is a group under multiplication modulo 40 :O
@Semiclassical geogebra!!
finally
I found leaky nun
meh. divide everything by five and you get {1,3,5,7} mod 8 i.e. (Z/8)*
04:26
@KasmirKhaan my timezone is UTC+8.
let me see what is that in my time ><
@Semiclassical but 5 isn't the identity; it's 25
7 HOURS difference ><
@Semiclassical 25*25=25; 5*5=25
04:27
sure, I see it
i'm just a bit puzzled
@KasmirKhaan I sleep quite late, so the difference may not be that huge
Anyway leaky if you are free ,i kinna need some help putting things on texstudio
@KasmirKhaan ok
[Chemistry]
To be submitted:
file=025 stage=1 bash masterscript
file=026 stage=1 bash masterscript
file=027 stage=1 bash masterscript
file=028 stage=1 bash masterscript
file=029 stage=1 bash masterscript
file=030 stage=1 bash masterscript
file=031 stage=1 bash masterscript
file=032 stage=1 bash masterscript
file=033 stage=1 bash masterscript
file=034 stage=1 bash masterscript
file=035 stage=1 bash masterscript
file=036 stage=1 bash masterscript
file=037 stage=1 bash masterscript
file=038 stage=1 bash masterscript
and this is why I spent 4 weeks to wrote that python bash stuff previously
@LeakyNun Ill send you the examples one by one =p they are a mess btw, gave up at the end on using corect latex , but just let me send it :D
04:28
Youtube: Stop trying to get me to play League of Legends. So tired of these ads that go into breathless detail about it
@KasmirKhaan ok
@Semiclassical so what's your explanation?
@LeakyNun Sent =P Ill walk you thru what I did so you can correct me =p
well, the elements of G are 5m where m=1,3,5,7
so if 5m is the identity in G then it acts as (5m)(5n)=40a+(5n) -> 5mn=8a+n
@KasmirKhaan what is the question? still the isomorphism between S3 and GL(2,Z/2)?
Yes
I found a good way on how to solve it =p
using generators
04:32
so the identity in (Z/8)* will be 5m
and since the identity in (Z/8)* is 1, we need 5m=1 mod 8 and that's m=5
I see
so the identity in U(10) is 1 = 9x9 = 3x7
I think I should've gone the opposite direction, mind
if we consider 3U(10) = {3,9,21,27}
start from (Z/8)* and go to G
under multiplication mod 30
then m=7 is the identity, i.e. 21?
04:34
@LeakyNun matrix X = (1 0 ) first row and second row is (1 1 )
lemme see. the identity in U(10) acts as (1)(m)=10a+m
3 x 3 = 9
9 x 9 = 1
21 x 21 = 21
27 x 27 = 9
wait what
@LeakyNun matrix Y is : (0 1 ) first row (1 0 ) second row
I guess a=0 is sorta superfluous there.
@Semiclassical what are you guys trying to solve? =p
04:35
(1)(m)=m, (1)(3m)=(3m)
why doesn't 3U(10) form a group ;_;
10 mins ago, by Leaky Nun
G={5,15,25,35} is a group under multiplication modulo 40 :O
so one needs 3n=1 mod 30
@KasmirKhaan we're trying to understand and generalize that result
...which is not going to happen :/
@Semiclassical interesting
04:36
lemme go back to the original example in this approach
but 5n=1 mod 40 also doesn't happen
But there is no formula for Z/n *
the identity in U(7) acts as (1)(m)=m
as far as I know
@KasmirKhaan so what
04:37
so (1)(5m)=5m...hrm. this doesn't work, no
@Semiclassical I don't understand what you mean by "act as"
I mean that the defining feature of the identity in a group is that eg=g
@Semiclassical oh, you can instead use e^2=e
that group is isomorphic to Z/8*
what else you want to do
04:39
We know.
But the identity element in {5,15,25,35} isn't 5. it's 25.
@KasmirKhaan we want to know why you can form another group by multiplying each element in U(8) by 5
@LeakyNun I think what we really want to say is that while x->5x is a bijection with G, it's not an isomorphism because it doesn't map the identity to the identity
@Semiclassical I suspect it isn't multiplying by 5 so much as multiplying by 25, amirite?
so the actual isomorphism between (Z/8)* and G is different.
I think so, yeah.
04:41
back to U(10) x 3
mod 30, but multiply each element by 9
{1,3,5,7}->{25,35,5,15}
{1,3,7,9} -> {9,27,3,21} wtf am I doing here
we do have a group
this is very interesting
yeah. 3^2, 5^2
(1)(n)=10a+n -> (25m)(5n)=5(40a)+5n
that don't look right
$$\begin{array}{r|r}
\cdot&9&27&3&21\\\hline
9&21&3&27&9\\\hline
27&3&9&21&27\\\hline
3&27&21&9&3\\\hline
21&9&27&3&21
\end{array}$$
You're right, the identity is 3m=1 -> m=7 -> 3x7=21
@KasmirKhaan are you sending me an email?
@LeakyNun I did , just did not tell you becauseyou were busy
04:48
i feel like there's a better description than this, but eh
@KasmirKhaan just because I'm talking to Semi doesn't mean I'm busy
@Semiclassical Semi I got a deadline on 18th and another on 21th , let leaky help me :D
@LeakyNun oh okay =p its a mess btw , warned you again :D
@Kasmir, I can respond to two people at the same time
04:49
this teacher want things in pdf form
I used to do them handwritten
But at some point I need to learn how to use tex so =P
@LeakyNun that is nice, sometimes I got trouble responding to 1 person =p
@Semiclassical conjectures:
1. let a be an element of U(n). Then, a^2U(n)/(an) forms a group.
2. a^2U(n)/(an) = aU(n)/(an) as sets
@Kasmir, cut the opening
{1,3,5,7}->5{1,3,5,7}={5,7,1,3}
@LeakyNun what do you mean ?
What you guys are doing is cosets btw
What am I doing, just combine 1 and 2 to get aU(n)/(an) forms a group @Semi
@KasmirKhaan it isn't coset
it's poor notation on my part
Okay then I dont know=p
@LeakyNun Did you get the email ?
04:52
@Semiclassical refined conjecture: let $a$ be an element of $U(n)$ and let $ab=1$ under $U(n)$. Then, $x \mapsto abx \pmod {an}$ gives you a group under multiplication mod $an$.
so b=a^{-1} in U(n)
@KasmirKhaan I got it but you sent it to the wrong address
@LeakyNun what do you mean ? you only gave me that one :D
@KasmirKhaan email me the address you sent to
(I know it sounds paradoxical and stupid; just do it)
Okay ><
Done @LeakyNun
04:56
interesting, I received it under the proper address now
am I supposed to fill in the blank where it says "X = ..."?
zhk
zhk
https://i.sstatic.net/Pxje6.png

wha type of function is E here?'
latex rule 1: never use \\ outside math context :p
zhk
zhk
wha type of function is E here?
@LeakyNun haha could not type matrices there
matrix Y is : (0 1 ) first row (1 0 ) second row
Evidently it's part of what you get when you take the inverse Laplace transform of $\dfrac{1}{s^\alpha+\nu k^2}$
which...ew
04:59
@LeakyNun matrix X = (1 0 ) first row and second row is (1 1 )
@LeakyNun matrix Y is : (0 1 ) first row (1 0 ) second row
I mean, the case of $\alpha=2$ isn't too bad.
But for the general case I dunno what function would produce that
@KasmirKhaan do you want $\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\1&1\end{pmatrix}$ or $\begin{bmatrix}1&0\\1&1\end{bmatrix}$?
Finding a good table of Laplace transforms is surprisingly annoying, alas. The usual ones are pretty short and spare.
zhk
zhk
@Semiclassical I agree. But here I am unable to identify the function E_alpha,alpha.
@LeakyNun first one is correct
@LeakyNun zero only on the row1, colum2 postion
05:05
@KasmirKhaan they're the same
the difference being () vs []
@LeakyNun well the second could not read it thats y >< ehm does not matter really =p parenteses are better
they look better just that
the matrix Y is like the identity matrix with 0's and 1's swtiched
Analysis or Model Theory?
In mathematics, a matrix of ones or all-ones matrix is a matrix over the real numbers where every element is equal to one. Examples of standard notation are given below: J 2 = ( 1 1 1 1 ...
lol, this guy has standard notation
05:09
@KasmirKhaan you can't write S3 = <a,b|a^3=b^2=1,ab=ba^-1> on one line and S3 = <a,b> on the other
although I know what you mean
In mathematics, especially linear algebra, the exchange matrix (also called the reversal matrix, backward identity, or standard involutory permutation) is a special case of a permutation matrix, where the 1 elements reside on the counterdiagonal and all other elements are zero. In other words, it is a 'row-reversed' or 'column-reversed' version of the identity matrix. J 2 = ( 0 ...
uh, what?
Both are J
@LeakyNun Oh thanks, can you please correct it? =p am really bad at this tex thing :D
@zhk Source?
@KasmirKhaan this isn't about tex.
@LeakyNun yes this is why I need someone good to help me write clean proofs =p
zhk
zhk
05:12
@Semiclassical Linear Partial Differential Equations for Scientists and Engineers by Tyn Myint-U Lokenath Debnath
Page 516
@KasmirKhaan I won't do your work for you
@LeakyNun I know I know :D just the latex thing =p
Then presumably they define it somewhere in there...though I know from experience how hard it can be to find something like that in a big book @zhk
@LeakyNun I copied the codes you gave me, but this time its alot more new things, such as matrices and stuff thats y I was stuck
zhk
zhk
@Semiclassical thats what I thought and searched but I am unable to find.
05:14
Alternatively, a very extensive table of integral transforms can be found here: authors.library.caltech.edu/43489/1/Volume%201.pdf
And by extensive I mean 400 pages long, with a good chunk of that being Laplace/ inverse Laplace transforms
zhk
zhk
@Semiclassical The only other place I found function was in the Laplace table
that's just unkind.
zhk
zhk
Apart from this there are quite a few typos in this book but I still like this book
05:19
hmm.
zhk
zhk
@Semiclassical I got it. Its there
Sorry
oh? What was it?
zhk
zhk
Mittag-Leffler function
...yep, I have no earthly idea what that is
zhk
zhk
Oh GOD! Sorry to bother you.
me too, I have no heavenly idea about this
05:21
though Wikipedia evidently does:
In mathematics, the Mittag-Leffler function Eα,β is a special function, a complex function which depends on two complex parameters α and β. It may be defined by the following series when the real part of α is strictly positive: E α , β ( z ) = ∑ k = 0 ∞ z k ...
heh, no worries.
It is a scary time when even Wikipedia is just like "uw0tm8?"
@KasmirKhaan skickades
though, dang, the DLMF does have it: dlmf.nist.gov/10.46
05:22
@LeakyNun Haha tack :D
Though it doesn't mention the Laplace transform.
@LeakyNun I sent you the next one =p ( btw I solved them all ) what did you think about the solution of the first? regor enuf?
@LeakyNun thanks alot man !you are the best :D
Mathworld also has it, and does mention the Laplace transform.
@KasmirKhaan I'm surprised that the second one compiles in your TeXstudio
coz it doesn't for mine
zhk
zhk
@Semiclassical Thank you for time. Sorry to bother you with relevant stuff. I will now search more about it
05:24
@LeakyNun it did not open ?
@KasmirKhaan it did open
but it does not compile
no problem. I'm just amazed to see a new special function
Interestingly, it seems dlmf does not have an entry for harmonic numbers and its generalisations
What is the Laplace transform anyway?
zhk
zhk
unrelevant*. me too
05:25
@Daminark $F(s)=\int_0^\infty e^{-s x}f(x)\,dx$ is the Laplace transform of $f(x)$.
zhk
zhk
@Semiclassical I know that
though the integral representation of harmonic numbers does kinda resembles that of the Mittag-Leffler function in that there's a x-stuff denominator and a stuff-more stuff numerator
well, of course you do :P
@LeakyNun oh yeah now I also noticed some errors, did not compile it really just wrote stuff
zhk
zhk
@Semiclassical here is a new one i proposed sometime ago and then stopped working on it
In mathematics, the Natural transform is an integral transform similar to the Laplace transform and Sumudu transform, introduced by Zafar Hayat Khan in 2008. It converges to both Laplace and Sumudu transform just by changing variables. Given the convergence to the Laplace and Sumudu transforms, the N-transform inherits all the applied aspects of the both transforms. Most recently, F. B. M. Belgacem has renamed it the natural transform and has proposed a detail theory and applications. == Formal definition == The natural transform of a function f(t), defined for all real numbers t ≥ 0, is ...
05:27
@LeakyNun that question is about the map that f : x --> x'
full question Kasmir
yes sir
So is it slightly more tan cousin of Fourier?
ill send you the pdf file
@LeakyNun done, sent you both of the assigments for future work =p , its the first question on assigment II
05:32
ok
@Daminark It's handy for some stuff, though damned if I remember what
Semi remembers and is subsequently damned. Rip
@KasmirKhaan correct your errors so that it compiles and then send it to me.
@LeakyNun okay fixing it now =p
@LeakyNun \documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
\text{First implication , we assume homomorphism to get abelian}
\\\(\phi(xy) =(xy^{-1})=y^{-1}x^{-1}=ba\) \text{let \(a=x^{-1} and b=y^{-1}\)}
\\\(\phi(xy)=\phi(x)\)\(phi(y)=x^{-1}y^{-1}=ab\)
\\\(ab=ba)\) for all a,b in G
\\\text{the second implication , we assume G is abelian to get homomorphism}
\\\(xy=yx\) , also \(phi(xy)\) = \(phi(yx)\) since G is abelian
@KasmirKhaan press Ctrl+K
05:41
i did that
nothing happned
af
press it when you edit the message
better?
Have you compiled it?
@LeakyNun am not making these errors on purpose , I hope you know that =p
yes
it shows fine for me
@KasmirKhaan does it produce the result you want?
no, I am not accepting it. Go fix your errors.
05:45
@LeakyNun its gonna ruined now :/
@KasmirKhaan ?
@LeakyNun it was just phi that did not go right
now its all red
then fix them
I typed something wrong i guess that ruined it all
:(
@LeakyNun is there a "back" function on texstudio ?
@KasmirKhaan Ctrl+Z
05:50
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
	\text{First implication , we assume homomorphism to get abelian}
	\\\(\phi(xy) =(xy^{-1})=y^{-1}x^{-1}=ba\) \text{let \(a=x^{-1} and b=y^{-1}\)}
	\\\(\phi(xy)=\phi(x)\)\(phi(y)=x^{-1}y^{-1}=ab\)
	\\\(ab=ba)\) for all a,b in G
	\\\text{the second implication , we assume G is abelian to get homomorphism}
	\\\(xy=yx\) , \text {also \(\phi(xy) = \(\phi(yx)\) since G is abelian}
:D
that was very handy =p
@LeakyNun .
1. \text is for writing in math mode; don't use it in normal mode
2. use two newlines, not \\
what is newlines?
what you get when you press enter
Just goes down 1 line @LeakyNun
@KasmirKhaan yes, it's called a newline
it's a character just like every other character
05:55
if I hit enter twice that will be new line ?
oh neat :D
thanks :)
now fix what i told you to
and send it to me
@LeakyNun dont get it man, it does not compile now
@KasmirKhaan what have you got?
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
	First implication , we assume homomorphism to get abelian


	\(\phi(xy) =(xy^{-1})=y^{-1}x^{-1}=ba\) \text{let \(a=x^{-1} and b=y^{-1}\)}
	\(\phi(xy)=\phi(x)\)\(phi(y)=x^{-1}y^{-1}=ab\)

    \(ab=ba)\) for all a,b in G
    the second implication , we assume G is abelian to get homomorphism
    \(xy=yx\) \(\phi(xy) = \(\phi(yx)\) since G is abelian
line16
shows error
that what it sais
do you think \(\phi(xy) = \(\phi(yx)\) would compile?
06:06
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
	First implication , we assume homomorphism to get abelian


	\(\phi(xy) =(xy^{-1})=y^{-1}x^{-1}=ba\) \text{let \(a=x^{-1} and b=y^{-1}\)}
	\(\phi(xy)=\phi(x)\)\(phi(y)=x^{-1}y^{-1}=ab\)

    \(ab=ba)\) for all a,b in G
    the second implication , we assume G is abelian to get homomorphism
    \(xy=yx\) \(\phi(xy) = (\phi(yx)\) since G is abelian
@LeakyNun grrrr this is really madness for me , each time i use tex
@LeakyNun how did you learn it?
You need to press enter twice if you want to get a new line
@LeakyNun Ill do that in future, because now when i try to do it , it gives error for some reasom
do you really think that $\phi(xy) =(xy^{-1})$?
yes by definition
06:09
f(xy) = (xy)^-1
or what do you mean ?
@KasmirKhaan this is right
what I quoted isn't right.
oh parenteses
but where do they appear
in what i sent
and check your output again.
@KasmirKhaan second line
oh damn it
fixed =p
fix everything and send it to me
06:14
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
	First implication , we assume homomorphism to get abelian


	\(\phi(xy) =(xy)^{-1}=y^{-1}x^{-1}=ba\) \text{let \(a=x^{-1} and b=y^{-1}\)}


	\(\phi(xy)=\phi(x)\)\(phi(y)=x^{-1}y^{-1}=ab\)

    \(ab=ba)\) for all a,b in G


    the second implication , we assume G is abelian to get homomorphism


    \(xy=yx\) \(\phi(xy) = (\phi(yx)\)
@LeakyNun done =p
press enter two times, not three times
have you seen the file I sent you for the previous assignment?
Yes it was perfect =p
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
	First implication , we assume homomorphism to get abelian


	\(\phi(xy) =(xy)^{-1}=y^{-1}x^{-1}=ba\) \text{let \(a=x^{-1} and b=y^{-1}\)}


	\(\phi(xy)=\phi(x)\)\(phi(y)=x^{-1}y^{-1}=ab\)

    \(ab=ba)\) for all a,b in G


    the second implication , we assume G is abelian to get homomorphism


    \(xy=yx\) \(\phi(xy) = (\phi(yx)\)
@KasmirKhaan it will be worthless if you don't learn from it
I know you are right
but this is my second time using tex
need to work more on this, ill save those you did ofc, and wont ask you for same stuff again
Check your output.
Fix it until it is exactly what you want.
ask me if you don't know how to fix something
not just give me the whole thing
06:19
@LeakyNun \documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
	First implication , we assume homomorphism to get abelian


	\(\phi(xy) =(xy)^{-1}=y^{-1}x^{-1}=ba\) \text{let \(a=x^{-1} and b=y^{-1}\)}


	\(\phi(xy)=\phi(x)\)\(\phi(y)=x^{-1}y^{-1}=ab\)

    \(ab=ba\) for all a,b \(\in G\)


    The second implication , we assume G is abelian to get homomorphism


    \(xy=yx\)

    \(\phi(xy) = \phi(yx)\)
@LeakyNun it is fixed now =p
@LeakyNun Ill be more specific with my problems in the future, thanks for taking time with me :)
Look at the second line in your output
did you intend the "and" to be in italics?
28 mins ago, by Leaky Nun
1. \text is for writing in math mode; don't use it in normal mode
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
	First implication , we assume homomorphism to get abelian


	\(\phi(xy) =(xy)^{-1}=y^{-1}x^{-1}=ba\) \text{let \(a=x^{-1} ; b=y^{-1}\)}


	\(\phi(xy)=\phi(x)\)\(\phi(y)=x^{-1}y^{-1}=ab\)

    \(ab=ba\) for all a,b \(\in G\)


    The second implication , we assume G is abelian to get homomorphism


    \(xy=yx\)

    \(\phi(xy) = \phi(yx)\)
@LeakyNun what do I use for normal text?
@KasmirKhaan nothing. It's already a text
Okay =p
8 mins ago, by Leaky Nun
press enter two times, not three times
06:24
@LeakyNun okay
am working on part b) that direct product
this what I did so far
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
	The first implication we assume abelian and show homomorphism


	\(\phi(x,y),(x_{1},y_{1}) =\phi(xx_{1},yy_{1})=xx_{1}yy_{1}=xyx_{1}y_{1}=\phi(x,y)\phi(x_{1},y_{1})\)

	The second implication we assume homomorphism and show that \(G\) is abelian
\end{document}
alright
@KasmirKhaan you see, you can get things done when I'm not doing everything for you
@LeakyNun I know you want to teach me to do this alone, and I want that, but need some help sometimes =p
really lost courage when could not put those matrices
=p
anyway am finishing in a min
the seocnd implication
@LeakyNun here?
06:41
@KasmirKhaan ?
I have an error
missing dollar sign
inserted
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
	The first implication we assume abelian and show homomorphism


	\(\phi(x,y),(x_{1},y_{1}) =\phi(xx_{1},yy_{1})=xx_{1}yy_{1}=xyx_{1}y_{1}=\phi(x,y)\phi(x_{1},y_{1})\)

	The second implication we assume homomorphism and show that \(G\) is abelian

	\(\phi(x,y),(x_{1}y_{1})=\phi(x,y)\phi(x_{1}y_{1})=xyx_{1}y_{1}\)

	\(\phi(x,y),(x_{1}y_{1})=\phi(xx_{1},yy_{1}) = xx_{1}yy_{1}
the line before that has missing \)
still cant spot it
( xx_{1}yy_{1})
\( xx_{1}yy_{1}\)
that line ?
GOT IT
:)
...
does it compile?
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
	The first implication we assume abelian and show homomorphism


	\(\phi(x,y),(x_{1},y_{1}) =\phi(xx_{1},yy_{1})=xx_{1}yy_{1}=xyx_{1}y_{1}=\phi(x,y)\phi(x_{1},y_{1})\)

	The second implication we assume homomorphism and show that \(G\) is abelian

	\(\phi(x,y),(x_{1}y_{1})=\phi(x,y)\phi(x_{1}y_{1})=xyx_{1}y_{1}\)

	\(\phi(x,y),(x_{1}y_{1})=\phi(xx_{1},yy_{1}\) =\( xx_{1}yy_{1}\)
Yes it does :D
06:49
why do you put the = in normal mode?
did not know that should be done in math mode too
ill fix it :D
well you did put the first = in math mode
okay ill fix those in all what I wrote
can you please tell me how to put the question on same file
\documentclass[10pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
	First implication , we assume homomorphism to get abelian


	\(\phi(xy) =(xy)^{-1}=y^{-1}x^{-1}=ba\) \text{let \(a=x^{-1} ; b=y^{-1}\)}


	\(\phi(xy)=\phi(x)\)\(\phi(y)=x^{-1}y^{-1}=ab\)

    \(ab=ba\) for all a,b \(\in G\)


    The second implication , we assume G is abelian to get homomorphism


    \(xy=yx\)

    \(\phi(xy) = \phi(yx)\)
@LeakyNun I tried this but there are no newlines showing up
I mean I wanted more space between them so it can be read eays
@KasmirKhaan just put them in the same file?
All righty =p
07:00
@KasmirKhaan \vspace{5mm}
@LeakyNun thanks! that was what I wanted :D
@LeakyNun Ill continue on the rest later, my eyes hurt
@KasmirKhaan ok
@LeakyNun thanks for all your help again ! :D ill email you once am done :)
07:42
$G_1={(1234),(2134),(1243),(2143)}, the orbits of 1 and 2 are {1,2} and the orbits of 3 and 4 are {3,4}.$ i know the definition of orbits, but i dont see how the orbits are calculated, help please
@NV-US full question?
07:57
@NV-US did you mean (12)(34)?
08:34
@LeakyNun i copied this from mathworld.wolfram.com/GroupOrbit.html paragraph 2
@LeakyNun I think it uses one-line notation rather than cycle notation (which is a terrible idea, but then again, so is much of Mathworld)
@NV-US You just start from one element and see where you can make it go using the group elements
@TobiasKildetoft oh, ok
At least, that is consistent with the orbits found
(and with those permutations forming a group in the first place)
but then, i get, 1 can go to 2,3,2,4, wwhich is not the orbit
no, $1$ can only go to $1$ or $2$
As I said, they use one-line notation rather than cycle notation
08:46
what is 1-line notation
it means that the first item is what $1$ gets sent to, then what $2$ is sent to and so on
e.g. $(2143)$ is the permutation $\sigma: \begin{cases} 1 &\mapsto& 2 \\ 2 &\mapsto& 1 \\ 3 &\mapsto& 4 \\ 4 &\mapsto& 3 \end{cases}$
I don't actually think I have ever been in a situation where that notation was the best choice
got it. ty @TobiasKildetoft @LeakyNun
09:11
back home finally
@BalarkaSen welcome back
 
3 hours later…
11:59
Hey guys, I have a question that is probably I a question because I cannot give enough attention but have to ask. I don't even know how did I notice this but on the internet there are two different sin tables. Most places like Wolfram Alpha etc. gives sin1=0.8414 but some places gives sin1=0.0174 I know the second one is calculated as sin(x*pi/180) for x=1 but I don't now what it is.
As I said this is probably something that is so simple but I can not see it and I'm about the go crazy.
Hello!!
Let $p$ be a prime for which it exists a $n\in \mathbb{Z}$ with $p\mid n^2+3$ and $p\mid (n+1)^2+3$. I want to show that it must hold that $p=13$ and that there are infinitely many integers $n$ so that the above relations hold.

We have that $p\mid n^2+3$ and $p\mid (n+1)^2+3 \Rightarrow p\mid n^2+2n+1+3$, so we get $p\mid (n^2+2n+1+3)-(n^2+3) \Rightarrow p\mid 2n+1$, right?

How could we continue?
Alright, I just realized one of them is degree one of them is radian, my brain can be so slow sometimes.
12:32
imgur.com/a/OqGqc For part (c) of this problem, I tried to generalize part (a) by letting E be the event that trial i comes before trial j. However, unlike part (a) where P(R intersect B intersect G)= empty_set, these trials might not be disjoint, so I couldn't just do P(E)=P(E intersect T1)+P(E intersect T2)+...+P(E intersect Tn).
Do you know any other strategies to tackle this problem?

« first day (2598 days earlier)      last day (2720 days later) »