« first day (2540 days earlier)      last day (2776 days later) » 

17:00
integer coefficients as in the ordinary integers
1,2,3,4...
@PVAL-inactive I know that word, but it is not helpful here
i mean it is though
...
I'm not working with the set of algebraic integers.
not all of them
ok so $-\sqrt[3]{2}$ satisfies the polynomial $X^3+2$. Does it satisfy a second degree one?
@AlessandroCodenotti exactly
if you knew more stuff about algebraic integers you would know the answer to your question
17:02
@EricSilva ok, but I'm only asking if it is true. I don't want a proof.
@AlessandroCodenotti yes.
but wait...
depending on what you know about field extensions and minimal polynomials the question I asked you above can be either very easy or not easy at all so think about it
sqrt[3]/2 isn't a solution to a second order polynomial...
The main point is the fact that the minpoly always divides any polynomial a root satisfies.
@AlessandroCodenotti no! That's not an example.
ugh
@Alessandro adjoining that doesn't give you a quadratic extension
17:03
A quadratic field is any field Q[x] such that x^2 + ax + b = 0, where $a$ and $b$ are integers. The elements of any quadratic field are quadratic rationals.
@AlessandroCodenotti the cube root of 2 isn't a quadratic integer or a quadratic rational....
@Typhon the thing you just defined isn't a field
oh i guess it is
@EricSilva yeah it is. Do you need a proof?
yeah never mind
:-)
Oh, right, give me a moment to come up with a better one
17:05
@EricSilva and I didn't just define it. That's a quote from 10 minutes ago.
@AlessandroCodenotti alright
brb
I am sleepy
Let's make lots of noise
I watched shitvideos for so long yesterday that I ended up messing up my sleep schedule.
@Mike Did you not sleep too well? Or is it like, general fatigue?
Actually I think the answer to your question might be affirmative @Typhon
@Typhon You "just" defined it again, don't be rude.
@Typhon Whatever the monic polynomial is, factor it
@Balarka Washington
And gg
Note that, up to factors of $-1$, the product of non-monic polynomials cannot be monic in $\Bbb Z[x]$
@Daminark Washington is a pretty damn good place
17:14
(I say "up to factors of $-1$" 'cause you could do it if they things in the product are both negatives of a monic thing)
And every time I try to type "monic", my phone thinks I either meant Monica or mimic.
Monica polynomials could be a real thing tbh
In particular, Washington... DC
Forgot capital letters, how rude
Anyhow
@Daminark dc sucks man
Named after someone with the last name Monica? @EricSilva
@EricSilva dc is the greatest place on earth
17:16
lol wut
@Akiva sure, or first name, they sound cool so someone should make them a thing
Also I'm curious what a mimic polynomial would be
Hm, probably the image of a bijection of some sort
or a fun-named knot invariant
@AkivaWeinberger um what?
@AkivaWeinberger It looks like a polynomial, but when you try to factor it you're thrown into a turn-based combat sequence.
@AkivaWeinberger monic with integer coefficients.
@Balarka i have a bias against swamp towns
17:18
okay, this is funny. google "mimic polynomial" with quotation marks
and take a look at the fifth entry :P
@Typhon Yes, I know.
(assuming it works the same for everyone else, I guess)
Is it really a swamp town? I hadn't realized that
17:19
The leading coefficient of the product is the product of the leading coefficients, no?
KEK @Balarka
(Swamp here being a metaphor and also because the climate suuucks)
Leading coefficient meaning the coefficient of the term with the highest power
@Daminark it's not actually a swamp town
or it might be, but im fairly certain it's not in reality
Metaphors are too meta for me
17:20
the swamp thing was a politics joke
Venice: the ultimate swamp town
but because it has an awful climate people actually believe it sometimes
i'd make a joke about metanyms but I never remember what they actually are.
snaps at self joke
I give up
I'm leaving
17:21
Oh @Eric I also legit thought it was a physical swamp and was like kek, figures since you're from Florida
this conversation is too weird
@Daminark i also hate actual swamp towns
Similes are like a wind blowing freshly cut grass.
@AkivaWeinberger Isn't that circular reasoning since factoring implies that I can factor which implies where is some factor(s) which are unneeded?
17:22
@Daminark a funny thing is that people have talked about draining the swamp and it's gotten even MORE swampy
Lol I immediately defaulted to the Shrek joke when I heard that phrase
A lot of modern politics would be hilarious if it wasn't actually happening.
honestly actual politics have gotten much more ridiculous than past parodies of politics
uuuh
no politics
that's not allowed here
let's talk math
17:27
@BalarkaSen I hope that a**hole was perma-banned.
tbf this is like pretty much the way the current administration represents itself to media
If Trump alienates 10,000 of his voters daily how long before he alienates all 62,979,879?
and IP banned
@Typhon How about this. You know Euclid's algorithm for finding GCDs of pairs of polynomials?
@PVAL-inactive Never, because one of the 10,000 will end up murdering him.
17:28
I've linked this before, but it still describes how I feel at this time of the day: youtube.com/watch?v=CahNAauFgys
@AkivaWeinberger nope.
(The division algorithm applied to polynomials, essentially)
O.O
I think it's really weird that Munkres' proof of the Urysohn metrization theorem uses normality of a regular space with countable basis just to use the Urysohn lemma and then only uses regularity.
wait...
polynomials are themselves a euclidean domain?
17:28
@PVAL-inactive I don't deal with numbers larger than 7 a la extremely strong Goldbach
@PVAL like the length of four terms
@Typhon Yup!
dies
$P(x)=Q(x)(x-a)+R(x)$.
Using their degree as a measure of size
17:29
oh f***
@AkivaWeinberger What's the $\sigma$-algebra tho?
several of my proofs relied upon them being integrally unclosed
weelp
im done
literally dies
If someone accrues a trillion dollar deficit a year and the interest on the loans given are 5% compounded continuously how long before the deficit out weighs the total amount of currency in existence?
Hint: We are already way past that.
that sounds like a wolfram-alpha theorem pval
i mean i feel like there being more debt than money isn't even weird
17:33
Economics is weird.
Well it is when the debt is entirely the governments.
i mean debt is a book keeping system and not like an actual thing
If I actually understood heterodox economics I'd probably want to say something re: MMT.
But I don't and I won't.
money is numbers
@Araske so there is only 7 money
17:35
That's essentially the idea behind Bitcoin @Araske
at least 7, @Daminark.
there isn't a reason for it to have phisical form
or ledger systems, I guess
@Balarka goldbach
@akiva this is the essentially the idea behind ALL money lol
17:36
@EricSilva Yeah but you can hold a dollar in your hand
its the idea behind fiat currency
a dollar is a piece of cloth and paper
You can't hold anything in your hand if some ledger somewhere has a "7" next to your name
@Araske is there really a difference between fiat currency and currency backed by something
@Araske Hm, fair point
like is the difference more than superficial i mean
17:37
fiat currency is backed by something
like laws, and government power
but it's backed by something that a lot of people see as somehow less legitimate than e.g. gold
Can you replace damaged currency if it's backed by something?
If it's fiat there's nothing wrong with the mint throwing away a ripped $100 bill and printing a new one
right
thats p much what happens
17:38
All they lose is the cost of printing one bill, which is pennies probably
less than that certainly
much less than that
Ledger systems are interesting 'cause they're just a billboard somewhere with people's names and numbers next to them
it costs like 5 cents
like you can send damaged currency to the mint and they'll send you back a fresh bill
17:39
@EricSilva The difference is that the faith-based nature of fiat currency means that it is not backed by a finite resource, and as such isn't subject to massive inflation as that finite resource becomes scarce.
That seems so insanely high.
and you exchange services for the opportunity to add some value to your number and subtract the same amount from someone else
Hi ! :)
@Fargle sure
@Fargle i mean it still gets tied to commodities but less directly
17:40
All the complicated stuff with Bitcoin is making sure no one can tamper with the ledger (the billboard)
@Araske what if you send it to the coffee beens instead?
I want comoney
I guess it's technically lots of little boards everyone has that are kept in sync rather than one central billboard
Eh. The element that seems missing in that 'abstract' picture of a ledger system is the extent to which the legitimacy of such a system depends on external power structures.
Outside of that, backing by a finite resource is still backing based on faith: one's faith that that resource will remain perceived as valued.
17:41
Even as an individual it is so easy to print relatively nice looking documents at less than 1 ct a page.
@Semiclassical Bitcoin isn't backed by any bank
It's just backed by the fact that it's hard to tamper with the ledger ('cause of crypto stuffs)
@PVAL-inactive Bills need to be hard to be counterfeited, so they'd cost more, right?
What with the watermarks and stuff
my point was moreso that perception of things as having value isn't different from the idea behind fiat currency in a meaningful way @Fargle, but the actual currencies "work differently" still, hence your point.
No, it's not just backed by that. It's also backed by people's acceptance of it as such.
and some currencies have clear sections in some of the bills
Maybe 'external power structure' isn't the right way to put it, though.
17:44
it kinda is?
You always need people to decide your ledger scribbles are worth more than zero dollars I guess
like I don't believe anyone is required to accept Bitcoin as valid payment for debts
Yeah, that's true.
@Akiva I agree but I thought that the fact it's done by much more efficient methods would be more significant.
It's legitimate in some instances, but not all.
17:45
its as legit as people agree it is i guess
tbh wealth is a big spook
idk, im neither an economist nor an expert on bitcoin tho
@PVAL-inactive Looking at the attached pdf, I think that the 5 cent mark isn't just the printing costs.
For instance, the following sentence occurs in there: "Variable [printing] costs, by denomination, remained relatively stable between 2016 and 2017 and range from \$ 22.06 per thousand notes for \$1 notes to \$71.37 per thousand notes for \$100 notes. "
Most of the bitcoin community seems to be just speculators.
So the printing costs would seem to indeed be a fraction of a penny.
17:48
@Semi sounds like economies of scale
People buying a commodity with no inherent value but with the hope the perceived value increases so they can sell it at a later point.
I think it's more that it factors in stuff like shipping.
How do credit cards work?
Not credit
Debit
I feel like it'd also be some sort of ledger-like thing
Good morning everyone
Good morning
17:50
@Akiva do you mean the actual cryptographic operations they do or just where money is coming from?
Kinda both, they both sound interesting
but the second part seems more relevant
" The printing budget includes \$418.7 million (62 percent) in fixed costs and
\$255.1 million (38 percent) in variable costs. Fixed costs, which include capital, prepress and engraving, fixed manufacturing overhead and support, research and development, and general and administrative staff, are budgeted to increase nearly \$21.5 million, or 5.4 percent, from 2016 estimated expenses, because the BEP included an additional \$9.3 million for staffing and overtime expenses to support the acceleration of the next design family of notes. "
@Semi maybe? it seems weird to me that they wouldn't say outright that it included shipping cost
do we have some kind of upper bound on what the furthest distance between to primes could conceivably be?
I think the way the chips work is really modern cryptography so reasonably complicated but somehow depends on factorization.
17:52
but i guess they might
Looks like I read it a little quick.
The printing budget includes the actual printing costs, but also stuff that's more structural
@Faust7 Do you mean consecutive primes?
@Faust7 You can have arbitrarily long gaps
well yes what the furthest apart two consecutive primes could be
There standard example is $n!+2$ through $n!+n$
or $n\#+2$ to $n\#+n$ I guess
where, assuming I didn't mess up the notation, $n\#$ is the product of all primes less than $n$
17:53
Get those filthy primorials outta my chat
@AkivaWeinberger I wonder if it is known whether all even integers occur as the distance between consecutive primes though
Is there a known estimate of how large in $n$ you'd have to go to achieve a specific prime gap length?
Things like the prime number theorem imply that as you get larger the expected gap between two primes must become arbitrarily large.
@TobiasKildetoft Hm. Seems kinda Goldbachy?
I imagine it could be extracted from PNT, yeah.
17:54
hmm
intresting
18
Q: Can every even integer be expressed as the difference of two primes?

user8520Can every even integer be expressed as the difference of two primes? If so, is there any elementary proof?

you guys are much more knowledgeable then my googling skills
There's a lot of number-theoretic content that just comes from the fact that $\binom{2n}n$ is an integer, by the way
Like, you wouldn't expect $2n!$ to always be a multiple of $n!n!$, but it is
and I think a proof of Bertrand's postulate uses that
17:56
Counting is weird.
@Semiclassical Ahh, so what I asked about is open and even open if one weakens it a lot
Right.
"Plausible but not known" as is typical of these problems.
@AkivaWeinberger If you mean $(2n)!$ then that is just an artifact of suitable subgroups of symmetric groups of course
yeah that stupid thing with the dots
in a grid
Well it's also an artifact of $\binom{p}{q}$ is always an integer :P
17:58
whats it called
@Semiclassical But at least they got fairly close to the twin prime conjecture with their big project (though I think there was some kind of obstruction that prevented it from even having a chance of getting all the way)
ya, that polymath project.
Ferrers graph
I suppose the simplest proof of $\binom{p}{q}$ (beyond a counting proof) would be to use ...oh, what's the name. Pascal's formula, I think?
Hm, would you interpret $pq!$ to mean $(pq)!$ or $p(q!)$
What about $p\cdot q!$
18:00
Right, they got it down to gaps of 246 according to arxiv.org/abs/1409.8361
The one that makes the Pascal's triangle work.
Probably is called Pascal's formula, yeah
i never understood pascals triangle very well despite the fact that ive used in several classes
It's like Fibonacci but 2D and goes down instead of sideways
lolk
18:02
$\binom{p}{q}=\binom{p-1}{q-1}+\binom{p-1}{q}$
Really if you look at it as an induction argument it makes sense.
Fibonacci's line
strong induction, I think
If you tried to make a 1D version of Pascal's triangle that's probably what you'd end up with, tbh
is Fibonacci related to e in some way?
18:04
I don't think so.
I'm sure somehow
Contradiction
cause i know when u do pop models e shows up alot in DE's
I guess it comes down to how natural a relationship one asks for
but i rember the fibonacci numbers having something to do with the growth of a bunny population
18:05
I mean you just need to squeeze $(\frac{n+1}n)^n$ in there somewhere
@Semi I just mean if you look at (x+y)^{n-1}(x+y) it comes down to adding together adjacent coeffs. of (x+y)^{n-1}
In any case $1\cdot2\dotsb n$ is a factor of $(n+1)\cdot(n+2)\dotsb2n$
so you can do careful counting of the prime factors of each of those
and then, I dunno, Erdős magic happens
lol
thats a very big way of doing things
18:20
@Hippalectryon o/
18:33
What is meant by a 'real normed vector space'? It seems that $\mathbb{R}$ with the absolute value function fits the description..but are there other spaces that are also called real normed vector spaces? Could $\mathbb{R}^3$ or $C^1([0,1])$ also be called real normed vector spaces?
@eurocoder I'd need to check for $C^1([0,1])$, but $\Bbb R^3$ is definitely a real normed vector space--it is over the field $\Bbb R$, and it has as a norm the usual Euclidean distance from the origin.
@eurocoder Any real vector space with a norm fits the bill
Okay, yeah, $C^1([0,1])$ works, with the norm being $\sup |f(x)| + \sup |f'(x)|$.
And it is also over $\Bbb R$, as is more or less clear.
@Fargle Why add sup of the derivative?
@TobiasKildetoft I guess you don't have to, but adding the sup of the derivative makes it a Banach space.
18:45
I thought it already was one
uniform limits of $C^{1}$ things can be differentiable nowhere
Ahh
Hmm, so we need to work over the complex numbers to make this a $C^*$-algebra, right?
(and take all continuous functions rather than the $C^1$ ones)
isn't being over the complex numbers part of the definition of being a $C^{*}$-algebra
@EricSilva Yeah
18:50
mmk
gtg give a lecture
bye chat
Whenever I get an upvote on a question or answer and I have not asked or answered anything in a while, I know it will be one of a fairly small set of such that got it.
Ok thanks guys!
So it seems that just about everything is a 'real normed vector space', and in the case of real normed vector spaces, boundedness is equivalent to continuity and hence the strong and weak topologies coincide. So when do they not coincide?! It seems like it would be really unusual for them not to coincide?
@eurocoder What about the vectorspace of all maps from the reals to themselves?
Or probably just the space of continuous maps on an open interval
Does Little Fermat imply that in $\Bbb Z/p[x] $ one has $x^p=x$ if $p $ is prime?
@TobiasKildetoft Hmmm..well I asked about $C^1([0,1])$ above and it was confirmed this is a real normed vector space, so I assume $C^0((a,b))$ is also a real normed vector space, and hence boundedness = continuity, and the topologies coincide?
19:04
@eurocoder Note that the norm defined used the fact that the domain was compact.
for the open interval, just consider something like $1/x$
@TobiasKildetoft I really don't see how that fact changes anything..it seems $C^1((a,b))$ fits all the requirements of a real normed vector space? And being such a space is the sole requirement for boundedness to equal continuity.
@eurocoder What norm would you put on it? And my example clearly shows that there are non-bounded continuous functions on an open interval
Ohh, I misunderstood what you meant with bounded iff continuous. Anyway, you can certainly put a norm on it, since it is isomorphic to the previous example as a vectorspace. It is just not obvious what that isomorphism would look like
@TobiasKildetoft I would not put any explicit norm on it, it holds for all norms as far as I know. I don't think your example of f(x) = 1/x holds as it not linear?
@eurocoder Yeah, I was thinking of the functions in the space itself, rather than functions on the space
@TobiasKildetoft I really am just trying to understand what sets are 'left out' if we use the weak topology instead of the strong topology. I just can't see how they contain different sets!
19:16
But it is not clear to me that a norm always exists if the dimension becomes large enough (though it might do so by some argument I am missing)
@eurocoder I am not even sure which ones those are. Choosing a topology is of course much weaker than choosing a norm
@TobiasKildetoft Well my situation is, I am taking X to be a real normed vector space. And then I consider the norm (also called strong) topoolgy, and the weak topology. And supposedly the weak topology may by smaller than the norm topology, so I was wondering what sets can be discarded. I think I'll just move on and maybe I'l have better idea as I cover more material!
@eurocoder Not sure what you mean by discarding sets. You mean which are open in one but not in the other?
@eurocoder I imagine this is related to the question you made about continuity with respect to one topology but not the other, right?
So, if you're in a finite dimensional space, I think weak and strong topologies are the same
In an infinite dimensional space, you tend to lose quite a lot. No bounded sets are open, I think (and the topology ceases to be metrizable)
19:44
A real normed vector space has two pieces of data. A vector space $V$ and a norm $n: V \to \Bbb R$. It doesn't make any sense to ask whether a particular vector space is a normed vector space.
You could ask that it admit the structure of a normed vector space but that is a different question.
Whoa @PVAL your picture changed
My ip changed
Does that mean you're active now too?
Ah, iseewhatyoumean.jpg
I actually see a different picture next to my name than the one next to the chat box.
19:55
A few years ago all the system generated gravatars changed for some reason
PVAL's this avatar is the changed one
for some reason he's got two avatars now
I always thought it was based on ip.
Me too
@PVAL-inactive Right, but IP when you sign up
If I get on a different machine I don't get the avatar change
well mine's changed multiple times.
19:56
It is not meant to change based on where you access from
So it seems like they have wears sunglasses an IP system
@Daminark ayy
Mine was originally some color, and when I moved it changed to burnt orange (which made sense).
What if you use a VPN?
@skullpatrol then gg no re

« first day (2540 days earlier)      last day (2776 days later) »