« first day (2429 days earlier)      last day (2888 days later) » 

20:00
Bring one of them halfway around one of the loops that the arc is made of.
Can someone point out to me why: $- \frac{e^{-\frac{\pi}{2}} \cdot e^{14 \pi * i * t}}{2} == \frac{e^{-\frac{\pi}{2}} \cdot e^{14 \pi * i * t}}{2}$
I'd probably need to draw this to explain it better, but you end up with two loops on the same vertical plane that are each looped around different sections of the arc
(In fact $\epsilon$-nbhd of that is easily seen to be a manifold because it's itself a manifold with two isolated non-tame point; so obv boundary is also a manifold.)
You then combine them into one loop
and then bring that big loop around one of the ends of the arc.
I see it.
20:02
Arright
Why does that say if each of those loops are individually boundaries?
I don't get it
You're just giving a boundary for $a + (-a)$
I talked with my TA, who talked with a couple of professors, about $\Bbb R^2\setminus \Bbb Q^2$ with or without the origin and they all agree that they should be homeomorphic, but we didn't come up with a proof
I think I'll ask about it on MSE
@BalarkaSen I'm starting with $0=a+(-a)$ and ending up with a nontrivial-looking loop.
dude why do you like to think about weird stuff
Because it's interesting
20:06
So, you can do that backwards, and show that the nontrivial-looking loop does bound.
@Alessandro "You're such a wonderful person / But you've got problems"
Let me guess, is that Bowie?
took me a sec to get the tune
BUT YOU'VE GOT PROBLEMS
what an album
Low is pretty awesome
like it the most out of the Berlin trio
20:13
agreed, though i have a soft spot for lodger
Lodger is my 2nd
got african night flight stuck on my head
can't possibly write out the lyrics even if i can hear them right now
Consider $\begin{align}f(x,y)=\frac{x^3-xy^2}{x^2+y^2}\end{align}$ and $f(0,0)=0$. My book says that $D_1f(\vec 0)=1$, but I would think it it 0? Didn’t they just differentiate $f$ with respect to $x$ only? And then plug in $x=0,y=0$. That can’t give 1?
what does it mean for cardanility to be locally constant ?
Is it is constant on each path component ?
20:27
oh never mind
I forgot I could easily use the definition of the partial derivative
could=should
should = can
no, right? I can't do anything else
because the rules for $f$ are different at 0
so I can't just do $\begin{aligned}\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} \end{aligned}$, in the sense that I differentiate $\begin{aligned}\frac{x^3-xy^2}{x^2+y^2}\end{aligned}$ with respect to $x$, and leave $y$ constant
@Akiva are you familiar with complex logarithm ?
Yeah, what about it?
@ShaVuklia Also, notice that $f(x,0)=x$
20:41
@AkivaWeinberger is it true that $Log(z^n)=nLog(z)$ when $z$ is complex and $n$ an integer ?
$\rm Log$ is the principal branch, right?
I think $z=-1$ gives a counterexample.
${\rm Log}((-1)^n)={\rm Log}(-1)=i\pi$, but $n{\rm Log}(-1)=n\cdot i\pi$.
ok thanks
Is there a way to find roots of $f(x) = x^3 - x^2 + 1$ ?
I can prove that only roots are between $[-1,0]$
and there is only one real root.
@A---B Do you know of Cardano's formula? Aka the cubic formula
It's quite complicated.
@AkivaWeinberger I searched on wikipedia before asking here and there were some formulae but I don't know much.
I need to find a good approximation not exact solution.
20:54
@A---B You can prove that the only roots lie in that interval by seeing there are no other intervals where it changes sign, I suppose
Oh, approximations are easier
@BalarkaSen Yes. I used IVT.
Wolfram Alpha knows the exact form (click on "exact form" where it says "real solution")
@A---B
@AkivaWeinberger Yes I know wolfram alpha but I want a way that I can do by hand.
Nevermind, your question is to find the roots approximately.
20:56
@A---B So, like, you want the root to a few decimal places?
This was in chemistry book and I am not allowed to use external softwares.
Newton's method might be applicable
@AkivaWeinberger Three will be fine.
@A---B Are you sure you have the right polynomial, by the way?
@AkivaWeinberger Yes I am sure because this was in "Additional Problems" section where we get such type of problems.
And this was a problem to find $K_c$ for a ion in solution. So it was easy to find the polynomial.
20:59
Look up Newton's method (if you know derivatives), then. You'd need a calculator
@AkivaWeinberger please have a look at my question math.stackexchange.com/questions/2209302/…
== English == === Etymology === Named after Isaac Newton. === Proper noun === Newton's method (mathematics) A method for finding successively better approximations to the roots (or zeroes) of a real-valued function. === Synonyms === Newton-Raphson method...
I don't know if I'll have time (I need to leave in like a minute), but maybe later @LeGrandDODOM
@AkivaWeinberger That sounds fair since I have Newton's method in this semester. Do you know any other method that does not require calculators ? Anyway I am fine with Newton's method. Thank you very much.
@A---B I don't think you can do this without a calculator. (Or perhaps a log table, I suppose)
21:02
There are a bunch of other increasingly complicated methods for approximating roots of a polynomial.
@LeGrandDODOM Looks interesting. I'd have to think
@AkivaWeinberger I guess I have to use Log table anyway.
Hey guys some questions about complex analysis:
1.) Wikipedia says: "In mathematics, a Taylor series is a representation of a function as an infinite sum of terms that are calculated from the values of the function's derivatives at a single point." $1/{1-z}$ is not holomorphic right? Still we can find an Taylorexpansion for $\vert z \vert < 1$ with the geometric series. This seems strange to me -.-
2.) Also I don't quite understand the difference between the Laurent and the Taylor series. Or what the Laurent series is used for. Is it true that we use the Laurent series to approximate a func
@skullpetrol How did you do that ?
"define:"
It works in all rooms.
21:07
Pronoun: me (first-person singular pronoun, referring to the speaker)
  1. As the direct object of a verb.
  2. Can you hear me?
  3. (obsolete) Myself; as a reflexive direct object of a verb.
  4. 1819, John Keats, La Belle Dame sans Merci,
  5. And I awoke, and found me here.
(52 more not shown…)
Adjective: me m (feminine mee)
  1. insufficient, scanty, not full
Noun: me
  1. mother
  2. me
  3. male
  4. husband
  5. me
(3 more not shown…)
Conjunction: me
  1. and
  2. me
  3. and
Interjection: me
  1. baa (representing the bleating sound sheep make)
Wow, nice.
No need for the quotation marks.
"me
baa (representing the bleating sound sheep make)"
Sounds like me indeed
Interjection
Noun: interjection (plural interjections)
  1. (grammar) An exclamation or filled pause; a word or phrase with no particular grammatical relation to a sentence, often an expression of emotion.
  2. Some evidence confirming our suspicions that topicalised and dislocated constituents occupy different sentence positions comes from Greenberg (1984). He notes that in colloquial speech the interjection man can occur after dislocated constituents, but not after topicalised constituents: cf.
  3. (21) (a) Bill, man, I really hate him (dislocated NP)(21) (b) ✽Bill, man, I really hate (topicalised NP)
  4. An interruption; something interjected
  5. interjection f (plural interjections)
(3 more not shown…)
sheepish interjections are the worst
Indeed.
21:12
I like sheeps.
Noun: sheeps
  1. (nonstandard or obsolete) plural of sheep
  2. sheeps
  3. (Unquachog) a sheep
define: unquachog
oops lol
Seems like we don't need English SE now.
:-/
Unquachog: the Eastern Algonquian language of the Unquachog.
define : Algonquian
21:24
Is anyone familiar with signal processing here?
There is a SE for it, no ?
I guess, but it doesn't seem very active.
It is a promoted site, so I think you will get your question answered.
Adjective: Algonquian (not comparable)
  1. Relating to a group of North American languages.
Noun: Algonquian (plural Algonquians)
  1. An Algonquin.
Alright, I suppose I'll post it there as a question then.
21:35
You put a space between define and : @A---B
21:51
Lo
Med?
Find the points on the parabola $y=x^2$ that are closest to the point ​(0,44​)
Lo dHi - Hi dLo
what is the distance btwn 2 points in the plane $(x,y)$ and $(0,44)$?
$\sqrt{x^2 +(y-44)^2}$ right?
$\sqrt{ x^2-(x^2-44)^2}$
21:55
yup
now minimize that
First draw a sketch.
$\frac{1}{2\sqrt{x^2+(x^2-44)^2}} \cdot (2x+2(x^2-44)(2x))$
$x+2x^3-88x=0$
$x(2x^2-87)=0$
3 solutions
Hello
I have a question
ok so how do i determine which values takes the place $x2, x1, y2, y1$?
22:09
somehow $(0,0)$ cannot work
so I think it's the other two points
$x=\pm\sqrt{87/2}$
i made an error posting the original question: it shoudl have been (0, 4) not (0, 44)
but thats not really an issue
ok then $x+2x^2-8x=0$
$x(2x^2-8)=0$
$x=0,\pm 2$
so basically how this works is, i use distance formula then the derivative of its result
but again I think 0 cannot work
you will have to decide why
We have that $d_p \equiv d \pmod{p-1}$ and $d_q \equiv d \pmod{q-1}$.

Also $m_p \equiv c^{d_p} \pmod{p}$ and $m_q \equiv c^{d_q} \pmod{q}$.

I found that $d=(d_p+d_q) \pmod{\phi(n)}$.

We have that $m=c^d \pmod{n}$, so $m= c^{d_p} c^{d_q} \pmod{n}$.

But how do we relate the latter to $m_1$ and $m_2$ ?
22:12
hint: I think $(0,0)$ has MAX distance from $(0,4)$
also my calculation above is wrong
i think zero should work because $f(x) = x^2$ when f(0) = 0 is as close as can get to (0, 4)
but you get the idea
check the sign of the derivative and you will see that there is not a minimum there
$x=0$ will be a local max
Hey @BalarkaSen
Do you maybe have an idea?
n=pq, where p,q primes
hmm i see
What does multiplying a polynomial's coefficients by the attached exponents of the term have to do with getting the derivative?
22:22
@MeowMix Say, any progress on the longest sequence you could write problem I gave you?
Hey Neev why are you imitating my profile picture? Trying to impersonate me?
lol
How do you get those images made? I'd like to generate a list of SE starter profile pictures and choose one that I like
alex jones says the government is poisoning me
Ahahahaha @CausingUnderflowsEverywhere mate, I didn't realize I had a profile picture xD
thats what they all say Neev
22:32
*dun dun dun*
any IB math HL people?
@CausingUnderflowsEverywhere You mean, why does $(x^n)'=nx^{n-1}$?
It essentially comes from the first two terms of the binomial formula
(Specifically, $(x+h)^n=x^n+h\cdot nx^{n-1}+\dotsb$)
@AkivaWeinberger What does \dotsb stand for?
More or less the same as \cdots, I think
Dots binary (as in binary operator, like $+$), I think.
Not sure.
And that's why he had to die
22:42
#leavenotrace
xD
@Neev Was
@Daminark How was it?
@Daminark what was your option?
Calc, and meh
Are you in uni now?
23:05
@NeevParikh No, I am not
23:21
Hi
23:35
@Neev Yeah I am
I liked IB at the time but I've realized the math level, in terms of content, is iffy
What's IB?
Hi @Akiva, @Dami
I've?
You've what?
23:46
In what language does adding an a to end of the word make it plural
Don't know
@CausingUnderflowsEverywhere the set of languages that are correct responses to this question
@Akiva I always wanted to make my own constructed language
I know.
I'm just saying

« first day (2429 days earlier)      last day (2888 days later) »