« first day (2420 days earlier)      last day (2898 days later) » 

23:08
@TedShifrin Ah ok!! Thank you!! :-)
Hmmm... Are there any magic tricks for determining whether some crazy function is actually rational?
If we have the vectors $\vec{u}, \vec{v}\in \mathbb{R}^2$. Do we consider them as line segments that start deom origin? Or from an arbitrary point?
23:24
@Mary There are a few ways to look at them, when I noticed them in a physics context, they were more directed line segments, to emphasize that the information they carry in terms of magnitude and direction
Now I'm not really taking physics, I do analysis/linear algebra, and a vector registers more instinctively as a point
I want to describe the set of vectors $\vec{z}=\lambda \vec{u}+(1-\lambda )\vec{v}$.

So, do we consider the vectors $\vecu}$ and $\vec{v}$ as line segments from origin, and $\vec{z}$ are all the points on the line segment that connects the endpoints of the vectors $\vec{u}$ and $\vec{v}$ ? @Daminark
Yup
For $\lambda$ between $0$ and $1$
You can get that by thinking about them as points as well
You let $\lambda$ run between $0$ and $1$, and trace which point you reach each time
Supposing you could do this uncountable process in, say, 23 seconds, you would find that this leads to tracing every point in the line segment between them
Ah ok. What is more convenient in calculus? Do we consider them mostly as points or as line segments?
In single variable calculus you aren't really playing too much with vectors
It's all numerical anyway
(As in, functions $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$)
Yes. What about two-variable calculus?
23:39
In my experience, the primary advantages of looking at vectors as arrows come from either having them represent quantities where there is some sense of a duality of information
You have the length of a vector and its direction, so in subjects like physics, thinking about vectors as such will help
In math, though, you tend to not really be looking at vectors as representing things, they're merely the objects you're working with
The other advantage is visualization, which you lose in multi because you can't visualize more than 3 dimensions well
You often deal with functions mapping $\mathbb{R}^n$ to $\mathbb{R}^m$, sometimes you go even more general than that
At which point you're best off thinking about stuff as points
(You don't even really think of the functions as being of multiple variables, in my experience, more as functions mapping a point in one space to a point in another)
Ah ok!! Thank you!! :-)
Hi @Dami
How's it going @Meow?
I'm hungry.
23:54
Haha, well, hopefully you're gonna get to eat soon
Also hey @Adeek!
I can't.
Hey @Daminark @MeowMix
Hey @Akiva!
I'm trying to lose weight.
23:54
And I mean, it is nearly 8, so wouldn't you have dinner soon?
Oh, I see
Yeah it'll be real tough at first
hi @AkivaWeinberger
how can I write an arrow above it is the map name ?
Right now I'm ~40 kg
that is $\rightarrow$ with a name of the map above it ?
\overset{}{\rightarrow} $\overset{\text{test}}{\rightarrow}$
okay cool
23:57
If you want to TeX commutative diagrams, consider looking into TikzCD
okay I remember I am using something fancy in my blog like TikzCD but I just need something simple for a commutative algebra question I want to ask.
@Dami Target weight is <38kg

« first day (2420 days earlier)      last day (2898 days later) »