« first day (2418 days earlier)      last day (2899 days later) » 

19:00
actually now two equations
for first down cycle
x*(1+a/100) = x-441
for second down cycle
x*(1-a^2/10000) = 1944.81
The change of 441 was after price had been raised/lowered once, wasnt it?
then what are the two equations
Right now you've only included the effect of the increase in price for computing x-441.
change of 441 after the price is lowered
Right. You need to include both the increase and the decrease.
19:04
yes
correct
So the first equation should have a factor of 1-a/100 as well.
x*(1-a^2/10000) = x-441
then another equation
And the second equation is after two such cycles.
So you multiply by both factors twice, not once.
19:06
so much big process
which equals
1944.81
correct
What's the whole equation?
wait
x*(1-a^2/10000)*(1-a^2/10000) = 1944.81
correct
right.
Aka x*(1-a^2/10000)^2=1944.81
Now i have to substitute and find the value of x
i am not able to get it
right
Yeah. In this case, though, you'll want to find a first.
No, that's not right.
19:10
why
That would work if the second equation had x twice not once.
i am not able to get it
lets do one thing to make the algebra less horrid.
no, you are right
Define t=1-a^2/10000.
19:12
sorry
thank you so Much
@Semiclassical
for your patience
Then the first equation is xt=x-441 and the second is xt^2=1944.81
Np.
if possible another question
a short one, perhaps
0
Q: Mixture and Alligation Problems::

Learning user A 10 litre container holds a mixture of water and sugar,the volume of sugar being 15% of total volume.A few litres of the mixture is released and an equal amount of water is added.Then the same amount of the mixture as before is released and replaced with water for a second time.As a r...

try with this one please
That's not short, so I'll have to pass
19:17
ok
my way of doing right
@Semiclassical please upvote my two questions , if you like it
Prove that $$3\zeta(2)\zeta(5)+\frac{3}{4}\zeta(3)\zeta(4)-6 \zeta(7)>0$$
Anybody already done with it?
@Semiclassical, I like your patience and attitude, you deserve it, thank you so much I have learnt lot from you
0
Q: Product of Principal Ideals is Principal Ideal of the Product $(x)(y) = (xy)$ when $R$ is commutative, but not necessarily unital

ALannisterWhen $R$ is a ring (not necessarily commutative, and not necessarily with unity), I have a result that tells me that for $x \in R$, the ideal generated by $x$, $(x) $, is $= I_{x} = \langle RxR \rangle + Rx + xR + \mathbb{Z}x$. If I define $(y)$ in a similar way, namely that $(y) = I_{y} = \lan...

@arctictern we talked about this a little last night, but now I'm using a different definition of principal ideals.
This one works for rngs
I actually had to look up "alligation" in order to find out it has nothing whatsoever to do with alligators, @Learninguser
19:37
is anyone here who has done a PhD or is doing one?
in math?
@ALannister you know to find alligation problem
I have liitle strucked
@SoumyoB I want to do one if that counts... /s
Hi @Dami
Helping with algebra problems: easy
Grading these lab reports: ughhhhhhhh
@Semiclassical so you're in PhD then?
Physics, but yes
19:41
since grading must mean TA-ship
how much of a load is it, academically?
as in, how many hours go into academics-be it studies or grading papers?
the first year or two it's tough.
shit
i need to prove that if $f : R \ ^ n \to R \ ^ n $ is $K \gt 0$ lipshitz function then $f$ maps zero measure sets to zero measure sets.
someone can help with that?
After that you typically are doing research rather than taking classes
I'm moving to the US, into a university that's offering me a fully funded PhD with stipend and from what I've heard it's hell on earth
instead of being happy about it I'm just horrified about it
19:44
The thing you probably want to think in terms of is what you intend to do with a PhD
I just want to discover something new, that's all
If your ambition is academic research, there's really no way around it.
it's.... fun
not really, I eventually want to get into research and development in industry
@SoumyoB I'm doing it right now. Semi's right the first year or two is tough. It's been especially tough for me b/c I also have a disability.
19:47
Can't advise you re: industry. I just dunno
But, make connections with your professors and the important administrators. They can help you out of a bind when you need it.
the thing is, I thoroughly believe I'm highly undeserving of the offer letter I've received
I think it helps to always have in mind what you really intend to do with a PhD.
as in, if I convert my university's GPA into the typical US GPA it's just 2.72-ish
@SourmyoB everybody feels that way. It's called "Imposter Syndrome". And you know, your university is probably way tougher than the ones in the states.
As long as you're not from Greece.
19:49
I just have a good summer project work and made good impressions on my professors-they think I can do good research but they well know academics-taking classes and performing in exams-is not my strong suit
Impostor syndrome (also known as impostor phenomenon or fraud syndrome) is a concept describing high-achieving individuals who are marked by an inability to internalize their accomplishments and a persistent fear of being exposed as a "fraud". The term was coined in 1978 by clinical psychologists Pauline R. Clance and Suzanne A. Imes. Despite external evidence of their competence, those exhibiting the syndrome remain convinced that they are frauds and do not deserve the success they have achieved. Proof of success is dismissed as luck, timing, or as a result of deceiving others into thinking they...
Well, potential as a researcher is the most important thing they look for.
@ALannister but my GPA is quite a good indicator of my performance in academics
Not necessarily. Like I said, your school could be a lot tougher academically than most schools in the US. Some schools give out A's like candy.
2.72
Which is a B?
B+?
19:51
even if you accounted for the toughness in my school, I don't think it can come any close to a respectable US GPA
If you tell me you go to that school in Switzerland, ETF or whatever it's called, you're probably a frigging genius.
well we're marked out of 8, and my GPA is 5.3, which is a C
my university is Indian Institute of Science
What country are you from?
I had a friend from the US who went to University of Madras. She said it kicked her ass.
If you're worried, why don't you find out what courses you are going to be expected to take your first year, get your hands on some books, and spend the summer preparing?
8 is S, <=7 is A, <=6 is B, and so on up to <=4, which is a D, and then F
you're right about that, and I plan on doing that
I think that is a very good strategy.
19:54
but I still don't think it'll be good enough and I'll have to improve my time management capabilities by leaps and bounds
<-- time management not my strong suit either. For me, it's part of my disability. I have a neurological disorder that affects that.
I see
But, as of now I've got a 4.0, which is like an 8 for you guys.
congratulations dude
I've needed to work really hard and hustle a lot ;)
19:56
it's not exactly time management
The hustling is. I'm constantly needing to ask for more time to do things.
you spelled it for me-what I can't do is hard work on end for more than 3 consecutive days
my fuel runs out real fast
So, you need to take a break in between.
And make sure you eat right.
do they give breaks?
Gosh, I sound like such a mom.
No, I mean, just take an hour out of your studying every couple of days to relax.
19:57
an hour of rest for every couple of days?
4
!!
you're kidding me right?
No, you get more than that.
What the heck do you think graduate programs are like, prison?
I imagine so
I just mean make time for yourself every now and then so you don't burn out.
Well, they're not.
I mean they're paying me a salary which is four times that of my dad, obviously they'll expect just as much of an output from me
Not really. You'd be surprised.
19:59
I really hope so
I'll tell you what. In addition to going tuition free, my university pays me about $25,000 a year.
That's barely minimum wage in the US.
I imagine they're probably giving you about the same. I've never known someone who's become a millionaire as a TA.
well I'm an immigrant there so minimum wage laws don't apply to me
of course
Yeah they do!
You have rights as a non-resident alien.
really? NOW that's surprising
But you're not allowed to work other than what your visa is for.
You can look up all this stuff online.
20:01
I see
And some schools have graduate student unions.
thanks for all the optimism and information buddy
I gotta go now, I'll catch you later
Sure. Look at that link though. it's helpful!
Hey @arctictern
i need to prove that if f:R n→R nf:R n→R n is K>0K>0 lipshitz function then ff maps zero measure sets to zero measure sets.
someone can help with that?
20:06
@arctictern I'm looking at your answer right now.
I'm going to try multiplying $(x)$ as you wrote it out with $(y)$ and see if that helps.
If linear map $A: \Bbb R^n \to \Bbb R^n$ has rank $k$, the dimension of the subspace of vectors satisfying $A\mathbf{x} = 0$ will be $n-k$, right?
@ALannister you mean $(x)=Rx+\Bbb Zx$?
@MeowMix yes
Is that what it reduces to if it's commutative?
What is $\langle RxR \rangle$?
$\langle RxR\rangle$ is the additive subgroup generated by the subset $RxR=\{rxs: r,s\in R\}$
I know that, I mean how do I write it out so I can multiply it with stuff?
20:10
Which is comprised of sums of elements of the form $rxs$
oh, is that what the middle sum you wrote in the answer is?
And then what is $r_{0}x + xs_{0}$ there?
About the "is that what it reduces to if it's commutative" - (a) You should be able to determine that yourself in a matter of moments. Not trying to be judgmental, telling you not to fear thinking about it out of fear of wasting mental energy. (b) Read my answer.
@arctictern just did. Found the answer to what I asked.
Going to digest it a bit and work things out. Thanks, man.
@ALannister what do you mean what is $r_0x+xs_0$? it is what it is,
I just meant which terms in what I originally wrote did it come from?
20:12
$Rx+xR$
Thank you. Thought so.
If $(x)$ is an ideal of a non-unital not-necessarily-commutative ring $R$ that contains $x$, then it must contain things that look like $rx$, must contain things that look like $xs$, and must contain things that look like $rxs$, and must contain things that look like $nx$ when $n\in\Bbb Z$, and must contain any sum of those things. then you can just check the sums of those things is closed under addition and ambient (left or right) multiplication.
Thanks!
You're a good person. And you get me. Thank you.
You're welcome.
I just realized that scalar multiplication of vectors is a group action
There's more to it ofc but damn this just came to mind now and I'm far more surprised by this than I ought be
20:26
nonzero scalars
and the orbit space is projective space
Is projective space the set of one-dimensional subspaces of a space?
yes (although you can make it a manifold, not just a set)
you can also imbue it with incidence relations (projective geometry) and layer it to include k-subspaces for each k
it also gets an induced action from GL, which factors through PGL
so a point in projective space is a line in affince space, a line in projective space is a plane in affine space, etc.
weird things happen with $k^4$, you get the klein quadric in $\Bbb P(\Lambda^2k^4)\cong\Bbb P(k^6)$
Wow, that's cool
What's the $\Lambda$ here referring to?
exterior power
so like $\Lambda^2V$ is sums of things that look like $v\wedge w$, where $\wedge$ is has the distributive property and is antisymmetric, so $(u+v)\wedge w=u\wedge w+v\wedge w$ and $u\wedge v=-v\wedge u$
Oh is it that construction which differential forms come out of?
20:39
over $\Bbb R$, it's like a linearization of the set of all planes. indeed, the collection of all $u\wedge v$ (with $u,v$ orthonormal) inside of $\Lambda^2\Bbb R^n$ is diffeomorphic to the manifold of all oriented 2D subspaces
@Daminark yes
Huh, we had only ever done wedge things with forms in the plane
Our professor wanted to focus on stuff like homotopy of curves rather than the exterior algebra
not sure how related those two things are
if the boxes $\{P_i \}$ covers a measure zero set ,$A$ , and $\sum m(P_i) < \epsilon $ and $f$ is $k>0$ lipschitz, how can i cover$f(A)$ with boxes that their vol will be less than $\epsilon$ ?
I mean, he said that to do things in $\mathbb{R}^n$, we'd need a full exterior algebra formulation. By keeping things to the plane, he could keep to what was necessary there, and then focus on talking about stuff like homotopy and winding number
Given an infinite list of integers L, from a given position P, add to a finite number of subsequent values by given amounts, e.g the next 5 values {1, 0, 0, 5, -2}, and move the position P alone by some amount, e.g -3.
As in, start with the list L, and transform L by applying the additions, then moving P.
such transformations are not assoceative or commutative, and is not a group
sorry, I missed a point, the transform repeats the process until P = 0, and can transform the positions before and at P as well as after.
programs formed of nested sequences of thease transformations of L are in effect the entirety of an important esoteric programming language goofely named BrainFuck, and in my opinion it's amazing that this process is turing complete, meaning that it can perform any calculation
but, these transformations are not assoceative, commutative or distrubative
21:15
How can I show values of the sides of a right triangle with hyp = 1 without appealing to trigonometry? It seems like you have to learn trig to prove trig.
what does it mean to show a value?
what is it exactly that you're trying to prove?
the known values of sin and cos for the unit circle
What, given an angle?
as in, sin (pi/6), cos (pi/6), sin (pi/4), cos (pi/4)... etc
yes
you can do those with geometry
21:21
You can use simple geometry to get some of those values
Here's pi/6
We reflect the right triangle to get an equilateral triangle
And use simple geometry to find the side lengths of the triangle i.e. sine, cosine
I mean, pi/4 and pi/2 are obvious, I agree
and pi and 2pi
Refer to pi/6
@MeowMix, so you are saying just graphically?
how do you do pi/5
@MeowMix o it is equilateral n/m that is rather cool actually
21:26
@DanielFischer Do you know if unbounded entire functions exist such that $\lim_{R \to \infty} f(Re^{i\theta}) = 0$ for every $\theta$ between $0$ and $2 \pi$ inclusive?
@RandomVariable Funny question.
complex numbers still freak me out. I avoid working with them
complex numbers are the states found from the sucessor function and 0.
successor(0) we tend to call 1.
successor(1) we tend to call 2.
etc...
the sucessor gives us new values from existing values, always the case, always new values from previously unseen values.
those are the natural numbers
yes
your with me so far, with sucessing, meaning new values, that are always the same given the same value, and naming them?
21:38
@BalarkaSen Why is it a funny question?
@RandomV I mean, first guess is no but I don't know a proof.
I'd be very surprised if there exists such a thing
@RandomVariable I Don't know, but I think such beasts exist.
complex number is pair of real numbers
I was going to go to on all the way to complex numbers the explaine why thats the the furtherest you can go.
in topology, what does $\doteq$ stand for
21:39
$\langle a,b\rangle$
i forget the property they have that the reals do not have
a field under multiplication?
no
@ForeverMozart fundamental reason why C has more structure than R^2 is because you're choosing a natural automorphism J : R^2 --> R^2 such that J^2 = -I
C is also a field, yeah.
@ForeverMozart it's an algebraically closed field
usually when I read a paper with complex numbers, they are only being used to describe a rather intuitive topological object
cause I only read topology papers:)
@ForeverMozart sort of, and yes, but your with me so far when it comes to sucessing?
21:45
@alan2here yes
Hi Zach
Is $\pi_1(\Bbb R^2\setminus\Bbb Q^2)$ free? It sure looks like it @Balarka
@RandomVariable such entire functions do exist, I recall this being mentioned in lindelof's book calcul des residus
Can't find a reference atm as I'm on my phone in the airport but I believe that's where I saw it anyway.
@Alessandro That's a good question. I think it should be, but I don't know a proof.
I am worried about stuff like what happens in Hawaiian earring, whose fundamental group is not free
@Eric Thanks.
I think this chap has an earring subgroup
21:51
@BalarkaSen It doesn't have a free group with countably many generators as fundamental group? This earring gets weirder every day
No.
The point is you can compose infinitely-long loops and cancel from infinity
what are open sets in the hawaiian earring
sets that are open in $\Bbb R^2$
@ForeverMozart functions, or more generally, relations, such as the sucessor have inverses
open sets of the earring are exactly open sets of R^2 intersection earring
@MeowMix no subsets of the hawaiian earing are open in R^2 with usual topology
21:53
I think there are earrings in $\Bbb R^2-\Bbb Q^2$, you only need to find a point $(a,b)$ and a sequence of points $(x_i,y_i)$ with $\{x_i,y_i\}$ linearly independent over $\Bbb Q$, such that $(x_i,y_i)\to(a,b)$ right? Because then the circle of center $(x_i,y_i)$ through $(a,b)$ won't have rational points for any $i$
@Eric Is there a version of the textbook translated into English?
@Alessandro Ya
@AliCaglayan what?
but yeah as Balarka says intersect them with open sets of R^2 and you're good
You just pick an accumulating sequence of rational lattice points and take it's complement in R^2
(that deformation retracts to the earring)
21:55
i'm confused, ill just stick with my ted-cercises
Uhh not sure if there is one @RandomVariable I just read the original language
Hmm, interesting, I'm reading that blog post you linked now, thanks for the reference
@ForeverMozart the inverse of the successor, which is in effect +1 is -1. success(0) = 1, success(x) = 0, we tend to call 'x' -1
The hawaiian earring $H$ does not contain an open subset of $\mathbb R ^2$. it is a subspace of $\mathbb R ^2$, which means you intersect open sets in $\mathbb R ^2$ with $H$ to get the open sets in $H$.
you intersect a disc with $H$ and you get some intervals
or some hawaiian earring if you intersect stuff near the bad point :P
21:57
@ForeverMozart now, if you repeat addition X times you get multiplication
But, the hawaiian earring contains a bunch of points in $\Bbb R^2$?
It does.
OH, wait.
Nevermind...
I realized some open path in $\Bbb R^2$ isn't open...
@ForeverMozart and it's inverse division yeild some new values, which we must name and gery naturally become the ratonal numbers
the topology on $H$ must be a collection of subsets of $H$

« first day (2418 days earlier)      last day (2899 days later) »