« first day (2305 days earlier)      last day (3014 days later) » 

15:00
hello what is the norm on the dual space ? please @BalarkaSen
I thought I understood what they are doing, but nevermind, that doesn't seem right
yeah me too
what book are you using, out of curiosity? @MartianCactus
how old r u heather?
8th grade
15:01
oh nice
im in 10th
nice
so maybe i will have to wait for another guy
i will brb
okay
Hello!!! We have that $u(t,x)=v{\left( \frac{x^2}{t}\right)}$, $z=\frac{x^2}{t}, t>0$.

I want to calculate $v'(z)$.

We have that $v'(z)=\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{t}}\frac{dt}{dz}+\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{x}} \frac{dx}{dz}$

We have that $t=\frac{x^2}{z}$ so $\frac{dt}{dz}=-\frac{x^2}{z^2}$.

Also we have $x^2=tz$. How can we compute $\frac{dx}{dz}$ ?
ww.meritnation.com/cbse/class10/textbook-solutions/math/rs_aggarwal_(2015)/1_10_‌​1_1176 here it is
15:03
w missing
isnt that vectors or something
is what vectors?
Hello @Astyx
Do you maybe have an idea?
Huh ?
We have that $u(t,x)=v{\left( \frac{x^2}{t}\right)}$, $z=\frac{x^2}{t}, t>0$.

I want to calculate $v'(z)$.

We have that $v'(z)=\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{t}}\frac{dt}{dz}+\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{x}} \frac{dx}{dz}$

We have that $t=\frac{x^2}{z}$ so $\frac{dt}{dz}=-\frac{x^2}{z^2}$.

Also we have $x^2=tz$. How can we compute $\frac{dx}{dz}$ ? @Astyx
15:08
What is $z$ ?
$z=\frac{x^2}{t}, t>0$ @Astyx
But is $x$ a real ?
is it weird to use typewriter font \texttt to denote sets?
Yes, it is @Astyx
i wanna distinguish between sets and structures. i could use \mathfrak or \mathcal but \mathfrak is somewhat difficult to read and i use \mathcal for different purpose.
15:12
This seems weird
to me
Why? @Astyx
Because you can't go from $v({x^2\over t})$ to $u(x,t)$
But I might be wrong
I'm not an expert
@Astyx Let $n=1$ and $u(t,x)=v\left( \frac{x^2}{t}\right)$. I ahve to show that $u_t=u_{xx}$ iff $4zv''(z)+(2+z)v'(z)=0, z=\frac{x^2}{t}, t>0$.

I have shown that if $u_t=u_{xx}$ then $4zv''(z)+(2+z)v'(z)=0$.

It remains to show the other direction.
Have you tried anything ?
I thought to find $v'(z)$ and $v''(z)$ , but I didn't know how to calculate $\frac{dx}{dz}$
15:18
What are $u_t$ and $u_{xx}$ ?
$u_t=v'\left( \frac{x^2}{t}\right)\left( -\frac{x^2}{t^2}\right) $

and $u_{xx}=v''\left( \frac{x^2}{t}\right) \left( \frac{2x}{t}\right)^2+v'\left( \frac{x^2}{t}\right) \frac{2}{t}$ @Astyx
can someone check out my question a couple of messages above?
$\sin\cdot -\sin(x) + \cos(x)\cdot\cos(x) = -\sin^2(x)+\cos^2(x)$, right?
trigno in 8th?
thats pretty cool
@MartianCactus, I'm not actually taking trig, I'm just learning about it on my own =) but thanks
15:29
same
i learnt trig in 9th before it was taught in 10th :P
khan academt?
yeah and youtube where I didn't understand things
i cant help u with the question tho..i have not studied that yet
oh nice
and you do pogramming too?
which languages?
python mainly
oh nice
i know JS and am still learning Java
but I also know a bit of JavaScript and HTML/CSS (I first learned on Khan Academy)
oh, nice!
15:32
i learned JS from KA and a little bit of HTML too :)
but didnt take the full course
of HTML
and was on 'advanced JS' midway
have you tried codecademy?
has a lot more languages, though not as in-depth as KA
Could someone of you take a look at the edit part of my question: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2029913/… ?
15:48
@heather thats why i left it
its not indepth
@MartianCactus, makes sense. Where are you learning Java then?
treehouse
its a subscription based thing
but they have REALLY indepth guides
i learned object oriented programming from there which i couldnt understand at KA
nice
but they do get a little vague after sometime tho
I'll have to look at it
15:52
but u have to pay
depends on how much it costs, I suppose
25$ for basic sub
100$ for pr sub
and 1000$ for real pro
i have the basic
its good
yeah, that's probably too much
btw where do u live?
don't have a consistent job yet
Iowa, USA
you?
15:53
wait u in 8th
job?
india
i mean I don't have one, so I can't make money consistently
ur in 8th grade
yeah, so?
isnt your dad supposed to do the money makin stuff?
yeah...but he wants me to pay for stuff like this
15:55
its good stuff
ur not buying games off steam
ur doing something productive
also u can do a 1 week trial and see if u like it
but they do get vague in advanced lessons
i'm sure its good, and I know i'll be doing something productive (i might do the one week trial) but i still doubt i'll be able to persuade my dad to pay for it =)
so u might need some help frm external sources and java docs too
oh
so then its up to me to pay for it
no just go up to him and tell him that programming has a bright future, tell him that you will make a great game/whatever you wanna make and give him $50 back, that might do it
making $50 from the game that is..
=P i wish but there's no way i'd be able to make a game/app that would make 5, let alone 50
15:58
u just need to BELIEVE it
u watch naruto?
no, what's naruto?
nvm then
but just believing aside, i have to be realistic
i don't think i could make something that would earn me any money whatsoever
no u can
like, once u get a sufficient amount of training, and if u are ambitious enough, u CAN
thats wat im trying
well, maybe i'll try making an app/something without treehouse and see how that goes
16:01
yeah go for it!!
once u succeed , then maybe u can get enoug for the subscription :)
and if u fail
keep on trying!
it all comes down to how bad u want it
ur in 8th grade so studies are probably heavy too
and its difficult to manage between thos
both
but i can always find a way
ok now i gtg, brb o/
see you o/
Hi people, I've just been introduced to systems of differential equations which isn't making much sense right now for me. Here's my question:

Let $M$ be an arbitrary real $2\times2$ matrix.

Show that if $x(t)$ $\land$ $y(t)$ $\in$ $C^1(\mathbb{R})$ and that if $a(t)$ $\land$ $b(t)$ $\in$ $C^0(\mathbb{R})$, then the following system of differential equations is linear:

$$\begin{bmatrix}
x\,'(t)\\
y\,'(t)\\
\end{bmatrix}=\mathbf{M}\begin{bmatrix}
x(t)\\
y(t)\\
\end{bmatrix}+\begin{bmatrix}
a(t)\\
16:17
what is $\int \cos^2(x) \, dx$?
would it be $\sin^2(x) + c$?
I'm not sure.
No
Differentiate $\sin^2$ to see this is not true
And to integrate it linearise it
@heather you're doing calculus in 8th grade? That's impressive. Keep it up
@Astyx, not sure what it means to "linearise" it, sorry
Use trigonometric identities to get something without any product between trigonometric functions
For instance in your case $\cos^2x ={1+\cos 2x\over2}$
Which is easier to integrate
oh...good to know
thanks
so then you take out 1/2, get int of 1+cos 2x and then you get x + -sin2x times 1/2
16:26
Exactly
more generally, a product of trig functions with frequencies $\omega_1,\omega_2$ is equivalent (by the product-to-sum formula) to a superposition of trig functions with frequencies $\omega_1+\omega_2,\omega_1-\omega_2$.
You should learn trigonometric identites (the earlier the better)
(In french, but mostly formulae)
@Astyx, okay, thank you
@Semiclassical Hi how are you :) can you help me with my problem? described above
My pleasure @heather
16:28
Not interested, sorry.
Alright
Does $x(t),y(t) \in C^1(\mathbb{R})$ denote that the elements in the functions are real? What does the power to 1 indicate?
You should write $x,y \in C^1(\Bbb R)$
And it means that the functions $x$ and $y$ are functions whose domain/codomain is/are $\Bbb R$ (not sure, I find this notation abiguous)
And that they are differentiable once, and that their derivative is continuous
$C^2(\Bbb R)$ would mean they are differentiable twice, and their second derivative is continuous, etc.
16:44
Let $\rho=\sqrt[3]{\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}}$.

We have that $\rho$ is a root of $f(x)=x^6-x^3-1\in \mathbb{Q}[x]$, that is irreducible over $\mathbb{Q}$.

How can we find all the roots of $f$ ?
Solve $x^2 -x -1 =0$
This gives you two roots @MaryStar
Each of which you can take the cubic root
$x=\phi$ and $x=-\frac1\phi$
And multiply the result by $\omega$ a cubic root of the unit
Which gives you a total of 6 distinct roots
$e^{\pm2\pi i/3}$
Now $f$ is polynomial in $x$ of degree 6, thus it has at most 6 roots
So these are all the roots of $f$
16:47
Cheers. @Astyx
My pleasure
Just noticed that there's a hint to my problem.

Hint: Show that the vector space transformation $f: C^1(\mathbb{R})\times C^1(\mathbb{R}) \rightarrow C^0(\mathbb{R})\times C^0(\mathbb{R})$ is given by $f(x) = x' - Ax$
So I should just isolate $(a(t),b(t))$?
What is $f$ ?
So, do we find the y that satisfy the polynomial y^2+y+1 by the driscriminant?
We get $y_{1,2}=\frac{1\pm \sqrt{5}}{2}$. Then by setting $y=x^3$, we get the following roots:
$\sqrt[3]{\frac{1+ \sqrt{5}}{2}}=\rho, \sqrt[3]{\frac{1- \sqrt{5}}{2}}$, or not?
Why do we have to multiply each of them by $\omega$ ?
These are two roots
You need 6
If $a$ is a root, then $a\omega$ and $a\omega^2$ also are
So you can get 6 roots from the 2 you have
(I'll let you figure out why this is true)
17:00
And looks everyone is facing difficulties when DHMO is not there now
@MartianCactus did you got that now?
Haha
@heather did you got that?
no is till need explanation @Ramanujan
17:18
please if $u_n\rightarrow u$ and $\phi$ is continuous can we conclude that $\phi(u_n)u_n\rightarrow \phi(u) u$ ?
what does $u_\rightarrow u$ mean?
(u_n) converge to u
Ah ok, thank you!! :-) @Astyx @robjohn

I have also an other question... We have that $f(x)=x^6-x^3-1\in \mathbb{Q}[x]$ is irreducible over $\mathbb{Q}$. Is it also irreducible over $\mathbb{Q}[\omega]$ ?
that's true then
look up sequential continuity for more info
@MartianCactus k^2 <( 8/5)^2
17:22
good morning, everyone
So…k<±8/5
hi @meow
k<8/5 and also k<-8/5
17:22
@Alessandro Anything fresh today?
So k lies between?
k is smaller that -8/5 and it is also smaller that 8/5
if k is less than -8/5 and 8/5, we can state that k < -8/5
17:24
yes
so whats the problem
We starting talking about paths in my topology class today, we should start talking about fundamental groups and homotopy sometimes soon @Balarka
the book says that -8/5 < k < 8/5
whats the problem
like, what does it ask you
@Alessandro Very cool.
17:25
also I had this abstract algebra exam I mentioned, writing down all the elements of a $16$ elements field and their minimal polynomial was painfully tedious, but the rest was fine
@meow-mix, hello
@Ramanujan, that's what I got as the answer to the problem, yes
Glad to hear.
@MartianCactus take x=k and a=8/5
yeah
either x < -a
or x > a
where did you guys mess up
Hi everyone !
17:27
hi @astyx
I too don't know the third step,long ago I I round that
yeah, i dont understand how THAT happens
well
if (x-a)(x+a) is greater than 0
How are you ?
then neither (x-a) or (x+a) may be 0
correct?
17:29
By "greater than" you mean $\gt$ ? If so, you're right
yes lol
@MartianCactus correct?
Oh that wasn't a question, right ^^'
ok, so if (x-a) and (x+a) can't be 0
that is
well, theres two cases
x + a > 0
they have to be negative or positive
17:30
and x - a > 0
Are you still studying for exams or did you find enough time for some interesting mathematics @Balarka?
if both of them are negative , then negative * negative = postivie which is greather that 0
$\Vert$
@MartianCactus when we take (-) common,lessthan changes to greater than and vice versa
17:32
hey, @Astyx im having trouble with a problem in my book, and i feel really stupid
Tell me, I'll see if I can help
i dont understand
wait i will send a pic of the problem
@MartianCactus $a^2 \lt b^2 \iff |a|\lt |b| \iff a\in ]-|b|, +|b|[$
Does this help ?
Prove that $|\mathrm{Aut}(C_n)| = \phi(n)$
where $C_n$ is the cyclic group of order $n$
and $\phi(n)$ is Euler's totient function
17:34
Do you know the typical representant of $C_n$ ?
what do you mean by that
If I define $\operatorname{Arg} z$ to map to $[0,2 \pi)$, then $\operatorname{Log} 1=0$. I is then the series for $\operatorname{Log}$ simply the standard logarithmic Taylor's series $\log(1+x) = \sum^\infty_{n=1} (-1)^{n+1}\frac{x^n}n$?
Well what groups do you know that are cyclic of order $n$ ?
$\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}$?
17:36
Yep
Let's say I have a morphism $\psi :C_n\to C_n$, you can ask me the value of $\psi (n)$ for some $n$ in $C_n$, how many do you need to ask me before you can uniquely determine what's $\psi$ @meow?
why cant (a+x) and (a-x) be negative?
must it be a homomorphism?
Now there's a property of generators of $\Bbb Z / n\Bbb Z$ in modular arithmetics
17:37
@MartianCactus can I know which step you not got?
@MartianCactus because in fourth step we took that as positive
Sorry, I'm tired, I misread your question @meow-mix
it's ok
I think what you were saying is still relevant to this problem @Astyx , but @meow should be able to work it out by himself!
17:40
Anyway Alessandro is leading you on the right track
@Alessandro well there are $n!$ possible morphisms
Sure @Alessandro
$(n-1)!$ morphisms that mapp the identity to the identity
@meow-mix Try and find a sufficient condition on $\psi(n)$ for a certain $n$ for $\psi$ to be an isomorphism
That's not true @meow-mix
You're confusing permutations and morphisms
oh wait
im thinking of automorphisms
17:43
Hello fellow kitty.
This chat's going to the cats.
wait no... isomorphisms map $n$ elements uniquely to $n$ elements
They do
Any of you lovely people want to help a cat out with a Fourier Series/Sturm-Liouville problem? math.stackexchange.com/questions/2030456/…
so why arent there $n!$ possible bijective morphisms?
Can you answer that by yourself ? :)
17:46
because not all permutations are morphisms, they need to be bijections and be compatible with the group structure
@meow what's your definition of a cyclic group by the way? That's going to be useful here
my book defines it as a group isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}$
Meh.
user227867
@meow-mix Do you like cats?
17:48
I mean it's true, but that's definitely not a great definition to work with
Hm, let's see, what do you know about generators?
well i know about them, but this book hasn't discussed them yet
(im reading a new algebra book)
What book is this ?
aluffi's
17:50
That's interesting, I wonder how you're supposed to solve this exercise without talking about generators
yeah i probably could solve it w/ generators but i don't want to
that is
i dont want to go against the book
Well you can solve it with generators without being explicit about them
Especially with that definition of cyclic group
yeah I think that's pretty much the only approach
and one can notice it even without knowing explicitly what a generator is
user227867
Interesting that kids these days say the author of a book without saying the title. =P
Discussing cardinality of the image of the morphisms in function of the image of a generator (without saying it's one) should be an alternative
17:54
example 15
is the one i cant understand
the last step of example 15
Did you see my answer @MartianCactus ?
@Astyx i'd imagine isomorphisms map generators of order $k$ to generators of order $k$
Prove it !
sry for the inactivity i was doing something else
@Astyx
17:55
@Steve
@Astyx well i could prove that a homomorphism $\phi$ satisfies $\phi(a^n) = \phi(a)^n$
$f$ is the underived system of differential equations I think
so if $\phi(a^n) = 1$, and $\phi(a)^n = 1$, and $n$ is the minimum, then, its true?
Yes, but that's not sufficient
I think your book wants you to prove it for $\Bbb Z/n\Bbb Z$ (and it's better to do so if you don't have generators yet)
Actually, with your definition, we're just discussing automorphisms of $\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}$. If you know $\phi(a)$ and $\phi(b)$ you also know $\phi(a+b)$ right?
17:57
yes
wait
And therefore my first answer was not as off-topic as I thought it was :p
@Steve what was the question again ?
so if i know a generator $g$, and i know it maps to $\phi(g)$, then i can find out the homomorphism?
prove it
well
Try to rely on you intuition to prove such things, that's how you'll progress.
Don't rely on us to tell you wether you're on the right track
17:59
what CAS can open the product $(x+a+bw+cw^2+dw^3+ew^4)(x+a+bw^2+cw^4+dw+ew^3)(x+a+bw^3+cw+dw^4+ew^2)(x+a+bw^4+‌​cw^3+dw^2+ew)(x+a+b+c+d+e)$ for me and collect the $x^k$ terms? I for obvious reasons don't want to open the 625 term beast
(not that I don't want to help you)

« first day (2305 days earlier)      last day (3014 days later) »