« first day (2299 days earlier)      last day (3020 days later) » 

02:00
How's it go on your side?
refreshes e-mail inbox
no new e-mails
I've been battling old TeX documents for the past few hours. It's all meow's fault.
smacks @meow anew
my fault?! i have been playing chess this whole time!
I won't ask
you should learn LaTeX @meow-mix, then you can help @TedShifrin in his struggle against evil =)
02:01
i know LaTeX
you should see my typesetting :D
test: $\Latex$
OK, sent, finally.
darn
test "chapter"
a picture of rene descartes in the top for, well
i dont know
02:02
nice
@meow-mix, because rene descartes and cartesian coordinates and analytic geometry =)
@meow-mix The text body is certainly pretty.
@Brody: Have you done the cool exercise on the three different points associated to a triangle and how they're collinear?
@TedShifrin Not yet. Is that first chapter?
End of section 2.
oh you guys want to see my visualization of the circle group?
02:05
You mean a circle? Deep.
Snideness begets snideness. :D
displays what multiplication "means" in the circle group
@TedShifrin I speed-read through the chapter material just to get to the cross product and have Balarka tell me something cool.
and why its closed (specifically due to Euler's formula)
Balarka likes to show off, @Brody :P
What did you get to?
@TedShifrin I had the test today
02:06
Did you survive, @Maks?
takes pulse
@TedShifrin If that's true, he layers it with well-intended pedagogical fervor.
@TedShifrin wow, you like large margins dont you?
@Brody ... I think Balarka is great. He's matured a great deal. He's learned a smidgeon from Mike and me, too.
@TedShifrin Maybe, I dont know
i'd even call them
larg-ins
02:07
@meow: That was for the publishers for the actual book. I didn't reset all the margins.
@TedShifrin There were 5 exercises, I could only do 4
I actually typeset the book as it appeared in print. They just did the binding.
was that not a good pun?
hilarious (::groans::)
02:08
@meow-mix No pun is good.
@meow-mix "$e^{i\theta}$ forms group under multiplication"?
@heather: You're allowed to smack him too.
That's what makes them good.
eh, it was actually kind of funny, for about a picosecond
02:08
Well, @Maks, in my world, if you did 4 well, you did superbly.
@TedShifrin He has a good "sense of things" imo. I enjoy not only his knowledge and mathematical maturity, but his intellectual and social maturity as well
@DHMO that's called the circle group; the group consisting of all $z \in \mathbb{Z}$ such that $|z| = 1$
@TedShifrin The problem is, I dont know If I did those 4 in the right way, (the picture is the test)
@meow-mix nice
Yup, @Brody. As I say he's a different person now from the one I got to know 2 years ago.
02:08
Its in spanish tho
so basically, $e^{i\theta}$ for all $\theta \in \mathbb{R}$
He's good people, I like Balarka.
@meow-mix also known as $\Bbb R /\Bbb Z$
I can read it, @Maks ... and I'm trying to learn Spanish fast, too :)
Maks, the test is quite fair, I think. I am meaner :)
@DHMO the factor group of $\mathbb{R}$ and $\mathbb{Z}$?
02:10
@TedShifrin Can you help me redo the exercises in a fast way ? Like telling what I did and the answer I got ?
@Maks como puedo ayudarte?
@meow-mix yes
@DHMO good thing im wearing my DHMO-resistant gloves
what
@Maks, sure ... but I'll be leaving in a half hour or so. Ask whatever you want.
@DHMO Quiero rehacer el parcial, no escribirlo sino revisar que lo que hice esta bien
doesn't a factor group have to be with a subgroup?
02:11
@meow-mix nice, ban all DHMO!
Yes, with a normal subgroup.
@Maks entonces solo numero 4?
I hadn't realized how confusing math would be in Spanish with "and" being $y$. :D
@TedShifrin English with "one" being $a$ it's the same thing
well we have "I" being, well "I"
02:12
Yes, in English "a" and $a$ cause difficulties :P
no, because, other than in Mathematica, $i$ isn't "I". :D
good thing we have cute math fonts to make them
differentiable
3
but you can resolve it by context, and so can we
ba dum tss
@TedShifrin Really? Good to hear he's grown so much. It's funny seeing you abusively playfully smack him around, definitely an interesting dynamic lol
I wasn't criticizing Spanish, @DHMO. Don't worry.
02:13
never thought so
ok, maybe that one was a bit too far
@meow-mix, you know, $\sum$ people like math puns, and $\sum$ people don't
@Brody: You'll get your turn.
D:
I miss my office hours with 10 students in them all the time.
(or more)
@Maks: So which question(s) do you want to discuss?
02:14
h
G'night @MikeM
@meow-mix What's the contour integral around western Europe?
ummm is this some residue theorem joke
It's zero--all the Poles are in eastern Europe.
Dogs' residues?
02:15
@TedShifrin @DHMO first exercise, taylor series of $ xe^{-x} $ is $ \dfrac {(-1)^{n+1} x^n} {(n-1)!} $
i knew it
Hehehehehehehehe.
OK, @Maks.
@Maks I struggle enough with conversational Spanish, but with math involved too? Mmm
puts @Fargle on ignore
02:16
I've always wanted to be a math professor. I'm told it's one of the Cauchiest jobs in America.
:c
Not when Trump's done with America, @Fargle. Actually, we had lots of problems even before him.
now puts Fargle on ignore
That's cold.
@Maks and with the constant term being $0$
@TedShifrin not complaining, but your references are bugging out
like it'll say Lemma ?? instead of Lemma 1.1 or something
Huh? @meow
Oh crap.
02:17
...he could have just smacked me...oh well. goes back to Rudin
all i do to fix that is just compile it again
Yes, I know that. But I recompiled it several times, I thought. Let me look.
My high school math team had a shirt that said $$\text{Cow }\pi\text{'s are }\int e^{x}y$$
Then that one is ok ?
@Brody Classy.
02:18
where's his infinitesimal
Sure. Keep going, @Maks.
guys, when do you pronounce "integral" as inTEGral and when as INtegral?
Now, it asks for which values of x does the series equals the function
(in normal English context)
@Maks el serie es la foncion
Is that right DHMO ?
02:19
@DHMO When it's inTEGral to the discussion, not an indefinite INtegral.
@DHMO inTEGral i use when stressing it
So, I just take the interval of x in which the series converges ??
@Fargle dictionaries list INtegral as a valid pronunciation also in normal English context
@Maks pienso que si
@DHMO es lo que unico que se me ocurrio jajaj
@DHMO Either way's fine for the former context, but only one is fine for the latter, at least in my opinion.
02:20
@DHMO yo soy zach y me gustaria estudiar mas de matematicas
excuse the missing accents
Well, to do that rigorously, you need to look at the remainder formula for the Taylor polynomials for $e^x$. Or you can just know from class that it converges for all $x$.
I'd never say "an indefinite inTEGral", but I could say either "INtegral..." or "inTEGral to the discussion"
@meow-mix do i look like i used accents?
@DHMO, I say INTEGRAL when I'm telling my friend(s) overly enthusiastically that calculus is wonderful, and INtegral in all other occasions
@TedShifrin do i have to read the chapter about induction
section*
02:20
the exercise b, says which order of taylor you have to use to calculate $ f(x) = \sqrt{(36+x)} $
@meow-mix nice to meet you
When a = 0 , x = -1
@meow: You should read what you don't know, and go back to stuff if you don't know it.
The result was 3
i know induction :P
02:21
@Maks que es a?
@Maks: So you wrote down the remainder formula and estimated it?
@heather but people do use inTEGral instead
@DHMO the point $ (x-a)^n $
In the taylor function
@Fargle ok
@TedShifrin I used lagrange
02:22
@Maks right
@DHMO, I use inTEGral when I say that something is integral to, say, a conversation
Yes, that's fine. I haven't checked your answer. Do you want me to?
@meow: New version sent.
@Maks y que hiciste?
@heather I see
@TedShifrin thank you
@DHMO integral like integrity, integral like integer :D
02:24
@Brody: Do you know the English word GHOTI?
@Brody so integral = pertaining to integers
how did integral come to mean $\int$?
Sanity check: The set $\{\frac{1}{n} : n \in \Bbb Z \setminus \{0\}\} \cup \{\frac{n-1}{n}: n \in \Bbb N\} \cup \{\frac{1-n}{n} : n \in \Bbb N\}$ has only three limit points--$0$ and $\pm 1$, right?
@DHMO You're asking the wrong person. The earlier remark was just a handy association
Not that I'm vouching that you're sane.
02:25
I'm also curious though
@Brody ok
@TedShifrin Huh?
Integrate means to put together.
@TedShifrin I don't have to be sane, the result has to be though. ;)
@TedShifrin fair enough
02:26
That's a famous one on the irrationalities of English pronunciation, @Brody. George Bernard Shaw came up with it.
It's pronounced FISH. Now figure out why.
GHOTI looks like the rapper Yo Gotti's name to me
No ... Think about grouping letters and English idiotic pronunciation.
I'm thinking... @Ted
cough
mmm...
OK ...
Had my first meeting in a while today in which I had to say i've got nothing new at all
02:28
@MikeM: meeting with your adviser, you mean?
I had zillions of those.
@MikeMiller "yeah man, math's pretty hard, turns out"
I'd never keep an adviser.
"So..." "So..." "..." "..." "...How about that election?"
@Fargle: You're not yet ready for prime time.
@TedShifrin You must know how much of my being it's taking not to make a primality pun.
You can maybe argue lemon @Ted
02:30
@Semiclassical hi
Not the right vowel, @Brody.
hi @DHMO
@Brody There's an even more egregious example.
Well, right vowel, but wrong sound.
I swear some people say it like that though @Ted, but yeah there's certainly a better one out there
02:30
@Fargle: I'm glad you've composed yourself.
@Brody There's no accounting for ...
@TedShifrin All I've ever strived for is self-unity.
ducks
I rather thought you were a zero divisor.
I'm assuming o corresponds to i, and ti to sh
@TedShifrin Not only that, I'm practically nilpotent.
Not to mention impotent ... ducks
02:33
He asked me to explain what I was stuck on. So I did, then asked him to explain something unrelated, then it had been 20 minutes and we were done.
It's OK, @MikeM. Don't beat yourself up.
@DHMO Perdon, estoy con haciendo otras cosas
I have excuses, at least. Some more valid than others.
ti as in tion
@DHMO Aplique lagrange
@Maks no hay problema
02:34
y saque el n
@MikeMiller Yes.
@MikeMiller Right
el 3a no se como hacerlo
I can't do o though
o as in "oh fuck this"
02:34
@MikeM: I showed up in Chern's office at 8 AM on Friday more than a few times saying I hadn't gotten what I wanted done.
@Maks el 3a significando la cuestion "2a"?
@MikeMiller NO.
@Brody Many men and women have struggled with this before.
si 1b es la 2a cuestion
@Brody: Here's a hint. Whom does Trump hate (other than Muslims, gays, foreigners ...)?
02:35
@TedShifrin, women?
Fargle gave a more blatant hint.
@Fargle Their sexuality
but that makes no sense...
Perfect, @heather.
How is the "o" in "women" pronounced?
@TedShifrin, but women isn't pronounced that way
02:36
It is around here
I mean, the o isn't pronounced like an i
@heather "wimmen" is how I pronounce it.
Where are you, @heather?
Iowa @TedShifrin
Hmm, how do you pronounce it, then?
02:36
fish and women
"woman" and "women" are distinctly different
@DHMO Nono me refiero el apartado a del 3)
English is just a ridiculous language.
No pude hacer ninguno del 3
I almost pronounce it as a u, like wumen, or woomen, something like that. I pronounce it practically the same as woman.
02:37
@TedShifrin I couldnt do the number 3
@TedShifrin Then Spanish should feel relieving
wuh-men and wih-men
Well, you're totally weird.
Couldnt figure how
02:38
@Maks pronuncialo como "thwee"
@TedShifrin As little as I know about German, I do like the consistency of pronunciation.
@Maks: So you need the partial derivatives of $f$ at $(1,3)$.
@Fargle: I know 4 other languages (not all thoroughly), and English is uniquely ridiculous.
brb, gotta finish an economics assessment
(kill me when I'm gone please)
@TedShifrin cuales 4 idiomas?
@TedShifrin the formula was $<(f_x(1,3),f_y(1,3) , (x,y,z) - (1,3,1) > $ ?
02:39
@TedShifrin Surely the other languages have different elements of ridiculousness--I seem to remember words like "doch" in German. However, English is uniquely bad probably because it's such a mutt of a language.
No, @Maks. The normal vector to the plane is $\langle f_x, f_y, -1\rangle$.
@Fargle: "Doch" is totally consistent with all pronunciation in German.
A German grammatical structure with some, but very few, relics of conjugation and declension, mixed with a vocabulary borrowed from French, Norse languages, and the many languages in places where the British colonized.
@TedShifrin its meaning as the positive response to a negative question is ridiculous to him
@TedShifrin I don't mean pronunciation-wise--I mean it's a strange part of the language itself.
what is the latex command for floor?
02:40
@meow-mix \lfloor and \rfloor
Oh, I was talking about pronunciation alone. I like "doch." In English, a "yes" or "no" answer to an ambiguous question is completely ununderstandable.
@TedShifrin I love the word myself--I just find it an oddity.
@TedShifrin so (x,y,z-1) ??
But that's an oddity relative to my own language, not to the space of languages overall.
seriously guys, should i use a times-like font in my typesetting?
02:42
Similarly: "es gibt" for "there is" is very strange.
@Fargle what is your language?
English.
@Maks: Oh sorry, I put in the brackets wrong. $\langle (f_x,f_y,-1),(x-1,y-3,z-1)\rangle = 0$.
@meow-mix, times new roman is pretty standard in papers in school, at least for me
Mayhaps the oddest language, and yet the lingua franca.
02:42
@Fargle: "it gives"
@TedShifrin ohh, could you explain me why please ?
@heather yeah, but not for math papers
@TedShifrin Yeah--it's just kinda weird that a German speaker might say (in German): "It gives a wheelbarrow over there!"
But, in a very strange way, it makes a sort of conceptual sense.
"It" being the universe, I guess.
@Maks: Well, if you look at the curve in the $x$-direction in the surface, its tangent vector is $(1,0,f_x)$. The curve in the $y$-direction has tangent vector $(0,1,f_y)$. If you take the cross product of those two vectors you get the normal vector. Is that OK?
Ahh right, yes, I forgot about that
02:44
@Fargle: Note that several of our chat denizens say "Does it stand that ..." ... :)
@meow-mix, maybe look at packages written especially for math journals? they have preset everything such that it fits with that journal's requirements.
Now, what we just got is the equation of the plane tangent to the function
heh, i'm not writing for a journal
plane tangent to the graph of the function, yes
What's the equation of the line tangent to the plane on that point ?
02:44
which is what the question asks for ... "tangente al gráfico ..."
that doesn't make sense ... you mean line normal to the plane?
Yes, sorry
the vector $(f_x,f_y,-1)$ is the direction vector of the line.
(evaluated at the point of course)
@TedShifrin I mean strange in a sort of "from an alien perspective" kind of way, haha. Language itself strikes me as a strange phenomenon.
@meow-mix, ah, ignore me. =)
@meow has lots to learn now ...
02:46
got to go, see you guys later
g'night, @heather
Take care @heather!
And what about the level curves ? That's my last question
is my statement correct? "The mapping $f: \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{R}$ which maps every $n \in \mathbb{Z}$ to $[n, n+1)$ is a bijection. Additionally, the inverse $f^{-1}$ is the floor function, $\lfloor x\rfloor$."
@Maks ... so $e^{3x-y}$ is constant precisely when $3x-y$ is constant. So you just have to think about the graph of $3x-y=c$, and for the question you choose $c$ that will fit the point $(1,3)$.
NOOOOOOO @meow
02:48
@meow-mix This isn't a function: to each integer you've mapped an entire set of reals.
You can't have a bijection between $\Bbb Z$ and $\Bbb R$.
Oh, and you can't map a point to an infinite set. :)
@meow: This is why I'm telling you to slow down and learn things well ... Much better than being in a ridiculous hurry.
@meow-mix This is a function from $\Bbb Z$ to the power set of $\Bbb R$, however. Though it is still not a bijection.
@Maks: Are we OK with what I said?
02:49
@TedShifrin so 3(1) - 3 = 0 ?
I dont get the logic of it :(
Right, so the level curve is $3x-y=0$.
i just realized
That's the line $y=3x$.
how stupid i am
[n,n+1) is not an element of $\mathbb{R}$
Well, elements versus subsets is hard for lots of people.
02:50
@meow-mix Don't be so hard on yourself. I might have said the same thing but a few years ago.
He can be somewhat hard on himself if it slows him down and makes him learn thoroughly. I went through this with Balarka, too :P
is balarka really 16?
Yeah, I think so. I can't keep track.
what?
but wait
02:51
@Maks: Is that OK?
Balarka's a young'un, and you know that's true because I'm the one saying it, and by all accounts, I'm a young'un too.
hmm
@Fargle how old are you?
@Fargle: No fair rubbing in how old I am.
21, @meow.
oh, ok
02:52
Tern was right when he said I raised the average by 10 or so ... :D
Balarka's got me beat in mathematical maturity, however. Maybe because he listened to @Ted and I'm still somehow retaining my impetuousness...
i wish more people my age were interested in maths
Lots are, @meow, truly.
You say "maths," so you're in Europe?
no, America
So stop saying "maths." :P
@Maks: OK?
02:56
@TedShifrin I'm sorry I'm trying to learn matlab at the same time
Ohh I get it
OK ... Well, I'm leaving. I'll be back later.
I have to do some examples
Good. Keep up the good work :)
wait @Fargle
Thanks :) appreciate all the help
02:57
Yes?
why can't it be a mapping?
@meow: Enjoy learning algebra and projective geometry.
Mappings send points to points.
@TedShifrin thanks for the resource, have a nice night
@meow-mix For something to be a function, it must map each element in the domain to only one element in the codomain.
Bye @Fargle
02:57
Your example maps a single integer to many reals.
@TedShifrin Bye!
We could define a function $f\colon A\to \mathscr P(B)$, however, @Fargle :P
but can't mappings send an element to more than one element?
Only if the codomain is a set of sets :)
@meow-mix yes, but then it is not surjective
injective, you mean
02:58
@meow-mix Not sure what definition of mapping you're using--if by "mapping" you mean "relation", then sure, but usually "mapping" is taken to mean "function".
right?
leaves in a hurry
@Fargle yeah i meant as in a relation
that is, $f: A \to B$ is a subset of $A \times B$.
@meow-mix isn't it surjective?
it is surjective
not injective
02:59
@meow-mix Then that kind of works, but it fails to have a lot of nice properties.
@Fargle is it not sujective?

« first day (2299 days earlier)      last day (3020 days later) »