« first day (2014 days earlier)      last day (3302 days later) » 
00:00 - 18:0018:00 - 00:00

18:00
Do you have a simple counterexample to help my intuition?
Do you really think the identity map is null-homotopic...?
:D thanks
I mean, in particular, if you think whether maps are null-homotopic is entirely determined by $\pi_1$, then you've just proved every path-connected space with trivial fundamental group is contractible, which is patently absurd.
Yeah, I realize that now
So... can something in this direction be said? Like... if all homotopy groups are trivial?
Huy
Huy
@Danu that's a really wide scale for passing
18:04
@Huy What do you mean by wide scale?
Huy
Huy
@Danu: as you probably know, we have grades from 1 to 6, 1 being worst, 6 being best
over here, 4 is barely pass, everything below is fail
so you have only a freedom of 4 - 6
@Danu No.
@Huy Okay. Consider percentage-based grades. They have a 6-10 passing range
which mirrors Germany's 1-4
It's just that Germany cut off the fails, grouping them all into one number
Huy
Huy
ah
funny how it's different in every country
@MikeMiller Okay.
18:06
The only statement that I know works is "If the induced map is zero on all extraordinary cohomology theories, then it's null-homotopic"... but this is completely worthless
@MikeMiller Extraordinarily worthless? :)
because part of "zero on all extraordinary cohomology theories" is, uh, "the map is null-homotopic"
I see
1) Use the fact above (if a map $X \to Y$ is zero on fundamental groups, it factors through the universal cover $\tilde Y \to Y$) to calculate the homotopy groups of surfaces of positive genus. 2) Find a map between surfaces that's not null-homotopic but zero on all homotopy groups.
And then read Ch1 of Hatcher because that covering space shit is clutch
2
> shit is clutch
Huy
Huy
18:12
@MikeMiller: what are you up to these days
If only I knew the definition of the higher homotopy groups, haha
@Danu You should learn them and answer the question. The definition is in the beginning of Hatcher ch4. It is not hard to read, and you don't need background to read the definition.
@Huy The past few days I've been home sick. I'm going in today because the LA topology meeting is today and I probably shouldn't miss that. But I haven't gotten a lot of thinking done. Otherwise I have a project I should be working on.
Huy
Huy
sounds like you've got a lot of work to do
@MikeMiller Sigh, you guys and your exercises. Exams are still not over, so I won't take you up on it.
18:30
Why ask questions if you're not prepared to do the work to find the answers?
hhh
hhh
18:51
@BalarkaSen why you think it is rotation $2\pi/n$?

z^n=cos(n\theta)+i sin(n\theta) so with \theta=2\pi/n, z^n=cos(2\pi)+i sin(2\pi)=1?
actually of course, correct!
thank you for the point :)
19:37
I have so much fun here!!! Oh, so amazing days I might never forget!
Huy
Huy
19:58
@MikeMiller maybe context helps? just if you have a bit of free time to check it out
Hi, my question was put on hold, could someone help me understand what the problem with it is?
0
Q: Is there an arbitrarily large set of naturals so that the sum of each two has exactly $n$ prime divisors? What about an infinite set?

user336- i actually chose this Is there an arbitrarily large set of naturals so that the sum of each $2$ has exactly $n$ prime divisors where $n$ is fixed? What about an infinite set? For $n=1$ this is clearly false, what about other $n$?

Why can't I equal two derivatives to find the common tangent?
Comparing derivatives would assure you that the tangents have the same slope, but they might just be parrallel
Oh... right!
But... I found that there is only one solution for the equation that I mentioned above (equalizing two derivatives). For example, I equalized the derivatives of x^2 + 3 and -x^2 - 2x - 2 and I get as result that the slope is (-1/2). However, the slope is positive. How can this be possible?
20:30
Hey,
Given function f that is differentiable twice and f(0)=f'(0)=0
i need to prove that for every x>0 exist c x>c>0 so that f(x)/(x^2)=f''(c)/2
i can see how it works for example for x^2 but can't manage to prove the general case
Do you know about Taylor expansions with Lagrange's remainder @aaadddaaa?
nope
it's in the same part of darboux theorem so i guess it has to do something with it
hm, I've never heard that theorem so I'm afraid I can't help you
@Alessandro tnx anyway :)
0
Q: Another way of doing integration

I'm an artistWhat's your option for calculating this integrals? No full solution is necessary, it's optional as usual. Calculate $$\int_0^1 \frac{2 \zeta (3)\log ^3(1-x) \text{Li}_2(1-x) }{x}-\frac{2 \zeta (3) \log ^2(1-x) \text{Li}_3(1-x)}{x}+\frac{ \log (x) \log ^5(1-x)\text{Li}_2(1-x)}{x}+\frac{\log ^4(1...

Upvote
20:50
hello everybody
:)
what is the difference betweem a step function and an impulse response function
?
in system theory
I mean can you model your system with both of these functions?
 
2 hours later…
22:50
qestions like this and i could settle for my first job application in my first meeting
23:19
oh wait a minute, its my first contribution in this new year, thought i wouldnt contribute a dime with this nick, nice i still have the passion and the craving to post
23:55
hey guys, so I am attempting to prove the rotation of axes formula
and I managed to get as far as setting up a system of equations (first I prove the cosine addition formula and then applied that to the rotated axis system)
but for the life of me I cant seem to solve the system of equations I set up. There are two equations and two unknowns. Here is how it looks like: wolframalpha.com/input/…
00:00 - 18:0018:00 - 00:00

« first day (2014 days earlier)      last day (3302 days later) »